A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Establishment and Evaluation of a Sheep Model of Full-thickness Osteochondral Defect

737 views

DOI:

10.3791/68842

April 14th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Here, we present an integrated protocol for generating controlled osteochondral lesions in sheep knees to establish an experimental model suitable for bone and cartilage tissue regeneration studies. The protocol outlines a method for inducing a full-thickness osteochondral defect in the femoral condyle, utilizing techniques that minimize animal welfare impacts and variability in results.

Abstract

Aging, trauma, genetic predisposition, and lifestyle impact the human body´s cartilage degradation. Once injured, continuous insults resulting from daily activities can trigger pathological conditions such as osteoarthritis, the primary cause of disability and socioeconomic loss worldwide. The main goal of all orthopedic surgeons treating joint cartilage injuries has been to reduce the extent of the lesion anatomically, repair the cartilage surface, and reestablish joint stability. Animal models are essential for the development of therapeutic drugs, but current models for cartilage defects are unsatisfactory. Osteochondral lesions in sheep are a valuable model for testing new therapies and biomaterials that can aid in the recovery of cartilage and bone in human joint environments. This study established an efficient protocol for inducing acute osteochondral defects in large animals. A standardized lesion was created in both medial femoral condyles. One knee was randomly assigned to receive gelatin-methacryloyl treatment, while the contralateral knee served as a control. Six months after the surgical procedure, the femoral condyle area was removed, the dissected knee joints were decalcified, embedded in paraffin, and cut into sections, which were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Scores were used to evaluate the lesion. This methodology allows immediate macroscopic observation after injury induction. Additionally, this model effectively replicates clinical cartilage defects, providing a valuable model for studying their pathology and developing innovative therapeutic approaches.

Introduction

Cartilage is essential for preserving the mechanical competence of the skeletal system by providing a frictionless surface between bones in diarthrodial joints, thereby preventing articular surface erosion1. The ability of cartilage to perform these demanding mechanical functions relies heavily on the unique composition and organization of its extracellular matrix-particularly its exceptionally high-water content. Water plays a crucial role in the structure and function of articular cartilage, representing approximately 70-80% of its composition. Water is the primary element responsible for load bearing during compression. The tissue's ability to resist compressive forces depends on how water is structured and restricted within the matrix. This organization is possible through the interaction of water with the main macromolecules of cartilage, such as collagen and proteoglycans, especially hyaluronic acid-bound aggregates1. These act as containment structures that order and limit water movement. This interaction provides the tissue not only with stiffness but also with resilience and the ability to recover after deformation. The interaction between free water, bound water, and the macromolecular matrix constitutes the core of cartilage biomechanical behavior2.

Despite its remarkable ability to support and distribute physical and mechanical loads that reach the joints, once injured, articular cartilage (AC) has limited potential for spontaneous repair due to low chondrocyte mitotic activity and poor tissue vascularization2. Joint damage is usually associated with the progressive loss of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and proteins, which constitute 95% of the tissue, and confer biomechanical features to AC3. An imbalance between synthesis and degradation of ECM components, shifting toward catabolic processes, can result in osteoarthritis (OA), the most prevalent degenerative joint disease worldwide. Osteoarthritis affects approximately 10-12% of the adult population, causing pain, limiting mobility, and markedly reducing patients' autonomy4. Osteoarthritis is more prevalent in aging populations due to cumulative insults on the joint over a lifespan; however, assorted risk factors have been associated with the clinical condition onset, such as gender, genetic predisposition, obesity, and daily habits4. Until now, therapeutic approaches to treat OA have consisted of clinical symptom management and total joint replacement in the most severe cases5. Without a robust, reproducible, and reliable therapeutic strategy to effectively treat OA, innovative approaches to understanding and addressing the problems associated with articular cartilage injury are being studied.

To repair, regenerate, and enhance joint movement in arthritic joints, progress in regenerative medicine has emerged as a new hope for restoring damaged AC6,7. The use of autologous chondrocytes combined with ECM implantation and intra-articular injection of stem cells represents the current state-of-the-art in this area8,9,10. The main challenge with these approaches is ensuring appropriate differentiation and functional ECM synthesis by implanted cells. Autologous chondrocytes tend to form fibrocartilage or progress to a hypertrophic state, creating new dysfunctional tissue that does not recapitulate the physiological features of AC, leading to incomplete recovery and often late deterioration11. Biomaterials can be used to guide cell behavior during tissue regeneration, providing a temporary scaffold for cells to adhere and synthesize new, natural, and functional extracellular matrix12,13,14. The ideal biomaterial for cartilage engineering must ensure strong integration with surrounding tissues, especially the subchondral bone, as failure at this interface compromises long-term repair. However, weak bonding between the cartilage and bone layers of osteochondral scaffolds and poor integration with host tissue remain major challenges15. Although scaffolds attempt to mimic the native osteochondral architecture, reproducing the complex interface microstructure is still difficult. This reinforces the importance of research and development of scaffolds with biological properties that can simultaneously support cartilage and bone regeneration while maintaining interface stability16. Gelatin, derived from collagen-a key component of cartilage tissue-possesses properties such as cell-binding motifs and biodegradability, suggesting its potential as a supportive biomaterial when combined with regenerative factors for the treatment of osteochondral lesions. When chemically modified with methacrylic anhydride to form gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), it becomes photo-crosslinkable, enabling injection and in situ photopolymerization, which enhances mechanical stability for applications in regenerative medicine17.

Osteochondral lesions have limited regenerative capacity, which represents a clinical challenge. Preclinical investigations that employ large-animal models of knee joint injury are essential for translational research because they allow systematic evaluation of variables affecting disease mechanisms and therapeutic outcomes. Commonly used species include pigs, goats, dogs, horses, and sheep, each presenting specific advantages and limitations that must be considered in experimental design. Moreover, all these species exhibit limited endogenous repair of chondral and osteochondral defects, as observed in humans18. To ensure that these models are predictive of human outcomes, they must reproduce relevant parameters such as anatomy, physiology, and biomechanical properties18. For comparison, the thickness of human articular cartilage in the femoral condyles ranges from 1.8 to 2 mm19, and the diameter of cartilage lesions typically requiring treatment is 10 mm or greater20.

The porcine model offers advantages for cartilage and osteochondral regeneration studies, as joint size, cartilage thickness, and weight-bearing requirements closely resemble those observed in humans18. Some miniature pig breeds, such as the Göttingen minipig, are easy to handle and reach skeletal maturity between 18 and 22 months of age21. Their cartilage thickness ranges from 1 to 2 mm, and defects of 6 to 8 mm can be created18. Bone characteristics, including trabecular thickness, bone apposition rate, and collagen fiber organization, are comparable to those of humans22. However, the porcine model also has limitations: even in miniature breeds, the knee (stifle) joint is smaller than in humans, limiting the creation of large experimental defects. Furthermore, most studies use skeletally immature animals due to the associated maintenance costs, which may overestimate the repair potential23.

Goats exhibit joint anatomy, biomechanics, and cartilage thickness like those of humans24. They do not require specialized facilities, are easy to handle, and are relatively inexpensive25. Goat cartilage thickness ranges from 0.8 to 2.0 mm, and the most reported critical defect size is 6 mm26. However, there is significant variation in cartilage thickness across breeds, sizes, and sexes, which can lead to inconsistent results27. The cartilage-to-subchondral bone ratio and trabecular bone structure are also comparable to those of humans28. Skeletal maturity occurs relatively late, between 24 and 36 months of age29. From a biomechanical standpoint, the goat knee experiences joint pressures and cyclic loads like those of humans25, although knee flexion during gait is greater (50°-70° in goats vs. <30° in humans), resulting in distinct contact areas30. This difference, combined with higher peak pressures, may contribute to less efficient cartilage repair30.

Among large animal models, dogs stand out for their ability to tolerate rehabilitation regimens, joint immobilization, and training for treadmill walking, swimming, and controlled load-bearing exercises18. Articular cartilage thickness ranges from 0.9 to 1.3 mm, and the critical defect size is approximately 4 mm, limiting direct comparison to the human model25. Skeletal maturity occurs between 8.5 and 13.7 months of age31. Anatomically, the canine knee differs from the human knee, and variations in biomechanics, loading patterns, and maturity across breeds complicate the extrapolation of results32. Despite these anatomical differences and the small defect size, the canine model remains valuable for studies including rehabilitation protocols or spontaneous cartilage pathologies similar to those in humans. However, its experimental use is restricted by ethical considerations29.

The equine model is the largest available animal model for cartilage repair research and naturally develops age- or trauma-related chondral lesions and osteoarthritis similar to those in humans33. Horses exhibit anatomical and biomechanical features comparable to humans, such as an upright knee joint, large joint size, cartilage thickness between 2 and 3 mm-closer to human cartilage-full knee extension during gait, and comparable bone mineral density34. Skeletal maturity occurs between 24 and 48 months, and defect sizes commonly studied range from 6 to 20 mm32,33. Limitations include the high vertical loading on the equine stifle joint during locomotion, which exposes implants to greater forces than in humans and hinders long-term healing35. Moreover, acquisition and maintenance costs are high, and specialized facilities are required36.

Sheep are widely used as a model in cartilage repair studies due to their availability, docile temperament, good tolerance to joint surgery, and ease of handling37. Skeletal maturity in sheep is typically reached at approximately 2-3 years of age25. In addition, the ovine knee demonstrates anatomical and biomechanical similarities to the human knee joint38. Cartilage thickness in the medial femoral condyle ranges from 0.7 to 1.7 mm, and bone mineral density and contact pressures are also comparable, although bone volume fraction is higher in sheep39. Due to reduced cartilage thickness, induced defects often extend into the subchondral bone, making this model more suitable for osteochondral defect studies32. Lesions of 6 to 8 mm in diameter are typically created in locations such as the femoral condyles and trochlea32. Furthermore, the ovine model offers advantages for bilateral studies, allowing comparison of treated and control sites within the same animal, thereby reducing host-related variability, improving consistency and reproducibility, and minimizing the number of animals required40. Each model presents different degrees of similarity to human physiology and biomechanics. Therefore, model selection should balance biological relevance, practical feasibility, and ethical considerations. In the present study, nulliparous female sheep aged 12 months, evaluated during the seasonal anestrus period, were included.

This study sought to design an effective protocol for generating acute osteochondral defects in large animals. The protocol involves creating a full-thickness osteochondral lesion to establish a model suitable for regenerative medicine studies. Additionally, the application of GelMA hydrogel is explored as a guide for tissue healing and as a prospective method for delivering regenerative molecules and cells. The protocol outlines the surgical procedure for creating osteochondral lesions in the sheep's knee articular cartilage. It is adaptable to various tissue-engineering applications, including the induction of similar injuries in other large-animal models for regenerative medicine.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The study received approval from the Ethics Committee in Research and was certified with a Certificate of Ethical Presentation numbered 6092250823/2023. In the present study, nine White Suffolk female sheep aged 12 months were selected. The defect was created in both medial femoral condyles of each animal. Empty defects were used as controls. Each animal had one knee randomized to treatment with GelMA and the other as a control. This strategy allowed us to assess the natural regenerative capacity and reduce the impact of individual variations, such as genetic factors and skeletal maturity. The animals were followed for 6 months to evaluate hyaline cartilage formation.

1. Anesthetic procedure

  1. Deprive the animals of food and water for approximately 24 h before the surgical procedure.
  2. Premedicate the animals with intramuscular meperidine 4 mg/kg combined with midazolam 0.3 mg/kg.
  3. Fill the anesthetic vaporizer one day before use, with the room empty, and wear protective gloves to minimize the risk of occupational exposure.
  4. Check the anesthetic circuit for leaks before each procedure, and perform all manipulations in a well-ventilated area, following institutional biosafety guidelines.
  5. After 15 min, cannulate the animals with an 18 G catheter and administer Lactated Ringer's solution at a rate of 10 mL∙kg-1∙h-1.
  6. Administer intravenous anesthesia using 1% propofol at a dose of 4 mg/kg.
  7. Intubate the animals with a 7.5-8.0 mm cuffed endotracheal tube and maintain them under spontaneous ventilation using a semi-closed circular breathing system that delivers oxygen at an FiO₂ of 1.0 and a flow rate of 50 mL/kg.
  8. Use the partial intravenous anesthesia (PIVA) technique, maintain propofol as a continuous infusion at 0.1 mg∙kg-1 min-1, and only adjust the isoflurane concentration to achieve an adequate surgical plane of anesthesia. Monitor anesthetic depth throughout the procedure.
  9. Perform perineural blocks of the femoral and sciatic nerves, guided by a neuro localizer. Administer 0.2 mL/kg of 2% lidocaine for each blockade.
    NOTE: The surgery should only begin once the animal is confirmed to be under surgical anesthesia (no response to a firm hoof pinch and no jaw tone).

2. Surgical procedure in vivo

  1. Disinfect the shaved knee using topical antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate and place the animal in the dorsal decubitus position in the surgery room.
  2. Locate the articular cavity by touching the animal's knee to determine the precise site of incision. Make a double-curved skin incision (starting distal to the lateral femoral epicondyle and ending medially at the level of the tibial tuberosity).
  3. Identify the patellar tendon, patella, patellar ligament, and the medial portion of the joint capsule. Incise the capsule to expose the medial femoral condyle. Hyperflex the knee to visualize the most distal region of the condyle's articular cartilage.
  4. Make a surgical incision of approximately 3-5 cm in the region of the animal´s condyle. Remove the tissue layers underlying the skin to access the condyle and keep the incision area clean to prevent contamination.
  5. Collect synovial fluid by using a syringe and needle. Transfer part of the sample to an EDTA tube for analysis and use the remaining material to prepare smear slides.
  6. Position the retractors to expose the condylar surface fully. The more exposed the condyle is, the easier it will be to induce injury in the next step.
    NOTE: At this time, be aware of the animal's paw. Flexion or extension of the knee can help expose the condyle.
  7. Drill an 8 mm diameter and 5 mm deep defect in the center of the medial femoral condyle using an orthopedic drill fitted with an 8 mm trephine bit, ensuring proper alignment to avoid unintended dimensions or shapes, and maintain a 0° angle relative to the most distal region of the articular cartilage.
    NOTE: Perform the trepanation at the lowest possible speed, gently operating the drill control and using only enough rotation to cut the cartilage and subchondral bone, also performing local cooling with 0.9% NaCl at room temperature, even at low speed.
  8. Perform the surgical extraction of the osteochondral plug using the orthopedic hammer and osteotome.
  9. Clean the wound extension with sterile gauze, ensuring the inside of the lesion is free of blood and tissue debris.
  10. Apply 200 µL of the liquid 20% (w/v) GelMA formulation, containing 0.25% (w/v) lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP) as the photoinitiator, to the inside of the injury until it reaches the surface.
  11. Photocrosslink the GelMA hydrogel under a 395-405 nm LED (9 W total power) positioned approximately 5 cm from the sample for 180 s. Under these conditions, the estimated irradiance at the surface is ~10 mW/cm², resulting in a total exposure energy of approximately 1.8 J/cm².
    NOTE: Use protective eyewear when using ultraviolet light.
  12. Remove the retractors carefully.
  13. Close the lesion with independent sutures in the different tissue layers to prevent seroma formation. The number of sutures required will depend on the extent of the surgical incision.
  14. Apply a sterile bandage to the sutures to prevent infections.

3. Postoperative care

  1. Monitor the animals during anesthetic recovery, including vital signs such as heart rate (70-90 beats/min), respiratory rate (12-20 breaths/min), body temperature (39 °C to 40.5 °C), and normal mucous membranes with a capillary refill time of 1-2 s. Palpate the facial and femoral arteries regularly to check if the pulse is easily perceptible.
    NOTE: Anesthetic recovery should occur in a quiet, clean, warm, padded environment, with minimal lighting and low noise levels.
  2. Perform surgical site dressings using topical penicillin (benzathine penicillin G: 1,250,000 IU; procaine penicillin G: 1,250,000 IU; dihydrostreptomycin sulfate: 1.25 g; urea: 2.50 g), once a day for 10 days.
  3. Ensure that the animals remain in a quadrupedal position immediately after waking from anesthesia, put weight on the operated limb, and show no signs of discomfort.
  4. Postoperative analgesia consisted of meloxicam (0.4 mg/kg every 24 h) and tramadol (2 mg/kg every 12 h) for 5 days. An additional rescue dose of tramadol was administered when pain-related facial expressions were identified using the Sheep Grimace Scale41, a validated tool based on specific facial action units (including orbital tightening, flehmen response, ear position, and head position) for assessing postoperative pain and distress in sheep.

4. Histology analysis

  1. Six months after the surgical procedure, perform euthanasia. To achieve deep sedation before administering the euthanasia agent, premedicate the animals intravenously with ketamine (10 mg/kg) and xylazine (1 mg/kg), using doses intentionally higher than those typically recommended for clinical procedures to ensure rapid onset of profound sedation, as supported by accepted euthanasia protocols. Subsequently, administer propofol to induce an anesthetic coma. Then, administer potassium chloride at 2 mEq/kg IV until respiratory and cardiovascular arrest occur and all protective reflexes are absent.
  2. Section the distal femoral epiphysis to remove the area of the condyles. Fix the dissected knee joints in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and decalcify in 5% EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) at 34 °C, changing the EDTA solution every 3 days.
  3. Embed the material in paraffin and cut into 4 µm sections. Remove paraffin from the slides by soaking them in xylene at 65 °C for 3 x 5 min. Hydrate with 10-20x immersions in ethanol (99%, 95%, 70%) followed by deionized water for 5 min42.
  4. For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, stain the sections with Harris hematoxylin and counterstain with eosin, scan at 20× magnification using an automated slide scanning microscope, and analyze using the linked software.
  5. Evaluate the lesion according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histopathology initiative43: a score of 0 indicates normal cartilage; a score of 1 reflects superficial fibrillation without cartilage loss; a score of 2 corresponds to vertical clefts that reach the layer immediately beneath the superficial zone, accompanied by partial loss of the surface lamina; a score of 3 indicates vertical clefts or erosion that extend into the calcified cartilage and affect less than 25% of the articular surface; scores of 4, 5, and 6 represent vertical clefts or erosion that reach the calcified cartilage and involve 25-50%, 50-75%, and more than 75% of the articular surface, respectively.
    NOTE: For this study, lesions with vertical clefts or erosions extending into the calcified cartilage and involving more than 25% of the articular surface were assigned a score of 4.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Osteochondral defect induction

This study aimed to develop an efficient protocol for inducing acute osteochondral defects in large animals. The injuries were created mechanically during a surgical procedure, resulting in a lesion measuring approximately 8 mm in diameter and 5 mm-deep (Figure 1). Considering the scores established by the International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society, this type of injury represents a grade 4 ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

To overcome challenges in cartilage therapy, such as the inadequacy of chondrogenic differentiation and ECM maturation, non-clinical studies remain essential for evaluating therapeutic strategies. Methods for non-clinical models of injured cartilage tissue have been reported previously using various techniques45. However, the literature still lacks detailed reports and standardized procedures for inducing acute osteochondral injury in the knee of large animals, resulting in considerable variation ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Araucaria Foundation (grant number PDT2020221000005). We thank all the staff of Carlos Chagas Institute and the Program for Technological Development in Tools for Health-RPT-FIOCRUZ for using the microscopy facilities at FIOCRUZ/PR, Core of Cell Technology, and Experimental Farm of Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Programa de Estímulo à Pesquisa do Instituto Carlos Chagas – Fiocruz Paraná. We also thank Wagner Nagib, from the Communication Office of the Carlos Chagas Institute, for his contributions to audiovisual production.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
25 poliglecaprone suture thread, no. 2-0EthiconSuture thread for general soft tissue closure, was used for suturing the joint capsule and subcutaneous cellular tissue.
Antibody anti-β-TubulinInvitrogenPA516863Antibody against β-tubulin, two subunits (α/β) that make up the microtubules of the cytoskeleton
Anesthesia deviceHB hospitalarInhalation anesthesia equipment
Axio Scan Z1Zeiss, Munich, GermanyMicroscope
Benzathine penicillin GOurofinoAntibiotics
Catheter 18 G SolidorIntravenous catheter
CephalexinVirbacAntimicrobial therapy
Chlorhexidine Digluconate Aqueous SolutionRIOQUÍMICAAntiseptic used for skin antisepsis
Cuffed endotracheal tube 7.5–8.0 mmSolidorCuffed endotracheal tube
DAPISigmaD9542Fluorescent dye
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle MediumGibco12100-046
Cell culture medium
Dihydrostreptomycin sulfateOurofinoAntibiotics
EDTA tubeBecton Dickinson362788Collection tube
EosinNeon1795A dye used to visualize cell morphology, staining cytoplasm.
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidSigmaE5134Promotes the gradual demineralization of bone tissue
Fetal Bovine SerumGibco12657-029Supplement for cell culture with growth factors
FormalinSigma-Aldrich47608Preserve tissue morphology
GelMA LyophilizedTissueLabsGLMA-LYO-1Photocrosslinkable hydrogel
Harris hematoxylin Laborclin620503A dye used to visualize cell morphology, staining nuclei.
IsofluranoCristáliaanesthetic maintenance
Ketamine 10%VETNILEuthanasia procedure
Lactated Ringer's solutionFresenius KabiFluid therapy
L-Glutamine 200 mMGibco25030-081Essential amino acid for cell culture
Lidocaine hydrochloride CristáliaLocal anesthesia
LIVE/DEAD viability/citotoxity KitInvitrogenL3224Fluorescent assay kit to evaluate cell viability
MeloxicamOuro finoAnti-inflammatory and analgesic for the postoperative period
Midazolam hydrochlorideCristáliaPreanesthetic medication
Mononylon suture thread, no. 3-0EthiconSuture used for skin closure
NaCl 0.9%CristaliaSaline solution
Neuro localizerNeurolocalizador DL 250 DeltaLifeLocal anesthesia guided by a neurolocalizer and peripheral nerve electrostimulator.
Orthopedic DrillCannulated Mini Orthopedic Drill (Delicate) - Chromed Mandrel - Makita BrandUsed for orthopedic surgeries.
Orthopedic hammer EdloHammer Neufield (10-3155)General characteristics: 20cm in length and 560gr in weight; material: high-quality stainless steel; use: indicated for traumatology and orthopedics procedures requiring controlled impact. Certifications: the products have quality certifications such as ISO ((International Organization for Standardization): 13485:2016, with European compliance and Good Manufacturing Practices standards.
Lambotte osteotomeEdloLambotte osteotome (10-0749)The Lambotte osteotome (6 mm x 17 cm / 6 3/4") is a high-precision surgical instrument used primarily in orthopedic surgeries and neurosurgical procedures involving bone manipulation.

With a 6 mm wide tip, it is ideal for delicate cuts, reshaping, and removal of compact cartilage and subchondral bone.
Penicillin StreptomycinGibco15140-122Broad spectrum antibiotic widely used in cell culture
Pethidine hydrochloride CristáliaPreanesthetic medication
Potassium chloride 19.1%SamtecEuthanasia procedure
Procaine penicillin GOurofinoAntibiotics
PropofolCristáliaAnesthetic induction and maintenance
Ringer lactateCristáliaFluid therapy
Semi-closed circular breathing system HB hospitalarRespiratory circuit for anesthesia
Sterile crepe bandageCremerSterile crepe bandage, used to cover the distal ends of the limbs being operated on.
Stimuplex D, 22 Ga. x 2 in. (50 mm) Insulated Needle with Extension Set, 30° Bevel (STIMD2250/30)BBRAUNPerineural local anesthesia
Tramadol hydrochlorideCristáliaPostoperative analgesia
Trephine DrillBone Trephine Drill, mm diameter – model: contra-angle, brand: surgical WFBone Collecting Trephine Drill 8.0 mm; produced in surgical steel; used in bone graft surgeries; serves to remove the bone block for histological analysis or autografting.
Xylazine 10%VETNILEuthanasia procedure

References

  1. Wang, Q., et al. An ultrasound study of altered hydration behaviour of proteoglycan-degraded articular cartilage. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 14, 289(2013).
  2. Cederlund, A. A., Aspden, R. M. Walking on water: revisiting the role of water in articular cartilage biomechanics in relation to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J R Soc Interface. 19 (193), 20220364(2022).
  3. Gahunia, H. K., Pritzker, K. P. H. Effect of exercise on articular cartilage. Orthop Clin North Am. 43 (2), 187-199 (2012).
  4. Hunter, D. J., Schofield, D., Callander, E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 10 (7), 437-441 (2014).
  5. Rahmati, M., Nalesso, G., Mobasheri, A., Mozafari, M. Aging and osteoarthritis: central role of the extracellular matrix. Ageing Res Rev. 40 (1), 20-30 (2017).
  6. Zhang, L., Hu, J., Athanasiou, K. A. The role of tissue engineering in articular cartilage repair and regeneration. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 37, 1-57 (2009).
  7. Coccia, M. Cartilage tissue engineering with chondrogenic cells versus artificial joint replacement: the insurgence of new technological paradigms. Health Technol. 2, 235-247 (2012).
  8. Muhammad, H., et al. Human migratory meniscus progenitor cells are controlled via the TGF-β pathway. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 789-803 (2014).
  9. Shen, W., et al. Intra-articular injection of human meniscus stem/progenitor cells promotes meniscus regeneration and ameliorates osteoarthritis through stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4-mediated homing. Stem Cells Transl Med. 3, 387-394 (2014).
  10. Gille, J., et al. Outcome of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC registry. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 133, 87-93 (2012).
  11. Richardson, S. M., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: focus on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration. Methods. 99, 69-80 (2016).
  12. Kang, H., et al. In vivo cartilage repair using adipose-derived stem cell-loaded decellularized cartilage ECM scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 8, 442-453 (2012).
  13. Taylor, D. A., Sampaio, L. C., Ferdous, Z., Gobin, A. S., Taite, L. J. Decellularized matrices in regenerative medicine. Acta Biomater. 74, 74-89 (2018).
  14. Sun, Y., Yan, L., Chen, S., Pei, M. Functionality of decellularized matrix in cartilage regeneration: a comparison of tissue versus cell sources. Acta Biomater. 74, 56-73 (2018).
  15. Niu, X., Li, N., Du, Z., Li, X. Integrated gradient tissue-engineered osteochondral scaffolds: challenges, current efforts and future perspectives. Bioact Mater. 20, 574-597 (2023).
  16. Deng, C., et al. Bioactive scaffolds for regeneration of cartilage and subchondral bone interface. Theranostics. 8, 1940-1955 (2018).
  17. Armiento, A. R., Alini, M., Stoddart, M. J. Articular fibrocartilage: why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 146, (2018).
  18. Chu, C. R., Szczodry, M., Bruno, S. Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 16, 105-115 (2010).
  19. Pane, R. V., Setiyaningsih, R., Widodo, G., Al Hajiri, A. Z. Z., Salsabil, J. R. Femoral cartilage thickness in knee osteoarthritis patients and healthy adults: an ultrasound measurement comparison. Sci World. 2023, e3942802(2023).
  20. Milano, F., Chevrier, A., De Crescenzo, G., Lavertu, M. Injectable lyophilized chitosan-thrombin-platelet-rich plasma implant to promote tissue regeneration: in vitro and ex vivo solidification properties. Polymers. 15 (13), 2919(2023).
  21. Dias, I. R., Viegas, C. A., Carvalho, P. P. Large animal models for osteochondral regeneration. Osteochondral tissue engineering. , 441-501 (2018).
  22. Fernandes, T. L., et al. Development of a novel large animal model to evaluate human dental pulp stem cells for articular cartilage treatment. Stem Cell Rev. 14, 734-743 (2018).
  23. González Vázquez, A. G., et al. Systematic comparison of biomaterials-based strategies for osteochondral and chondral repair in large animal models. Adv Healthc Mater. 10, e2100878(2021).
  24. Brehm, W., et al. Repair of superficial osteochondral defects with an autologous scaffold-free cartilage construct in a caprine model: implantation method and short-term results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 14, 1214-1226 (2006).
  25. Moran, C. J., et al. The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair. J Exp Orthop. 3, (2016).
  26. Getgood, A. M. J., et al. Evaluation of early-stage osteochondral defect repair using a biphasic scaffold based on a collagen-glycosaminoglycan biopolymer in a caprine model. Knee. 19, 422-430 (2012).
  27. Cook, J. L., et al. Animal models of cartilage repair. Bone Joint Res. 3, 89-94 (2014).
  28. Jackson, D. W., Lalor, P., Aberman, H. M., Simon, T. M. Spontaneous repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage in a goat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83, 53-64 (2001).
  29. Meng, X., et al. Animal models of osteochondral defect for testing biomaterials. Biochem Res Int. 2020, 1-12 (2020).
  30. Patil, S., Steklov, N., Song, L., Bae, W. C., D'Lima, D. D. Comparative biomechanical analysis of human and caprine knee articular cartilage. Knee. 21, 119-125 (2014).
  31. Stewart, H. L., et al. A missed opportunity: a scoping review of the effect of sex and age on osteoarthritis using large animal models. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 32, 501-513 (2024).
  32. Proffen, B. L., McElfresh, M., Fleming, B. C., Murray, M. M. A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species. Knee. 19, 493-499 (2012).
  33. McIlwraith, C. W., Frisbie, D. D., Kawcak, C. E. The horse as a model of naturally occurring osteoarthritis. Bone Joint Res. 1, 297-309 (2012).
  34. Liu, T. P., et al. Updates on mesenchymal stem cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration in large animal models. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10, (2022).
  35. Murray, R. C., Vedi, S., Birch, H. L., Lakhani, K. H., Goodship, A. E. Subchondral bone thickness, hardness and remodelling are influenced by short-term exercise in a site-specific manner. J Orthop Res. 19, 1035-1042 (2001).
  36. Malda, J., et al. Comparative study of depth-dependent characteristics of equine and human osteochondral tissue from the medial and lateral femoral condyles. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20, 1147-1151 (2012).
  37. Kon, E., et al. Orderly osteochondral regeneration in a sheep model using a novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial. J Orthop Res. 28, 116-124 (2009).
  38. Allen, M. J., Houlton, J. E. F., Adams, S. B., Rushton, N. The surgical anatomy of the stifle joint in sheep. Vet Surg. 27, 596-605 (1998).
  39. Chevrier, A., Kouao, A. S. M., Picard, G., Hurtig, M. B., Buschmann, M. D. Interspecies comparison of subchondral bone properties important for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 33, 63-70 (2015).
  40. Orth, P., et al. Reduction of sample size requirements by bilateral versus unilateral research designs in animal models for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 19, 885-891 (2013).
  41. Häger, C., et al. The sheep grimace scale as an indicator of post-operative distress and pain in laboratory sheep. PLOS ONE. 12, e0175839(2017).
  42. Smart, A., et al. Protocol for tissue processing and paraffin embedding of mouse brains following ex vivo MRI. STAR Protoc. 4, 102681(2023).
  43. Glasson, S. S., Chambers, M. G., van den Berg, W. B., Little, C. B. The OARSI histopathology initiative: recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 18, 17-23 (2010).
  44. Sprecher, D. J., Hostetler, D. E., Kaneene, J. B. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology. 47, 1179-1187 (1997).
  45. Hunziker, E. B. Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 10, 432-463 (2002).
  46. Ahern, B. J., Parvizi, J., Boston, R., Schaer, T. P. Preclinical animal models in single-site cartilage defect testing: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 17, 705-713 (2009).
  47. Maglio, M., Brogini, S., Pagani, S., Giavaresi, G., Tschon, M. Current trends in the evaluation of osteochondral lesion treatments: histology, histomorphometry and biomechanics in preclinical models. Biomed Res Int. 2019, 1-27 (2019).
  48. Bell, A. D., et al. Bone-induced chondroinduction in sheep Jamshidi biopsy defects with and without treatment by subchondral chitosan-blood implant. Cartilage. 4, 131-143 (2012).
  49. Levingstone, T. J., et al. Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 32, 149-160 (2016).
  50. Jia, S., et al. Multilayered scaffold with a compact interfacial layer enhances osteochondral defect repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 10, 20296-20305 (2018).
  51. Schinhan, M., Bijak, M., Unger, E., Nau, T. Electromyographic study of the popliteus muscle in the dynamic stabilization of the posterolateral corner structures of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 39, 173-179 (2011).
  52. Bernstein, A., et al. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics as tissue engineering scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: histological results. Acta Biomater. 9, 7490-7505 (2013).
  53. Crovace, A. M., et al. Evaluation of in vivo response of three biphasic scaffolds for osteochondral tissue regeneration in a sheep model. Vet Sci. 6, 90(2019).
  54. Salerno, M., et al. Biomimetic tri-layered osteochondral scaffold: study of early implant stability in a sheep model. Bone Joint Res. 14, 953-968 (2025).
  55. Lewis, J. A., et al. A bioactive supramolecular and covalent polymer scaffold for cartilage repair in a sheep model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 121, (2024).
  56. Tamaddon, M., et al. In vivo evaluation of additively manufactured multi-layered scaffold for the repair of large osteochondral defects. Bio-Des Manuf. 5, 481-496 (2022).
  57. Petrovova, E., et al. PHB/CHIT scaffold as a promising biopolymer in the treatment of osteochondral defects: an experimental animal study. Polymers. 13, 1232(2021).
  58. Saber, A. S., Bolbol, A. E., Schenk-Saber, B. A. A radiographic study of the development of the sheep carpus from birth to 18 months of age. Vet Radiol. 30, 189-192 (1989).
  59. Cambra-Moo, O., et al. Multidisciplinary characterization of long-bone cortex growth patterns through sheep ontogeny. J Struct Biol. 191, 1-9 (2015).
  60. Arens, D., et al. Seasonal changes in bone metabolism in sheep. Vet J. 174, 585-591 (2007).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Cartilage RegenerationJoint InjuryGelatin MethacryloylLarge Animal ModelHistological EvaluationOsteoarthritis ModelArticular CartilageSurgical Protocol