Cartilage is essential for preserving the mechanical competence of the skeletal system by providing a frictionless surface between bones in diarthrodial joints, thereby preventing articular surface erosion1. The ability of cartilage to perform these demanding mechanical functions relies heavily on the unique composition and organization of its extracellular matrix-particularly its exceptionally high-water content. Water plays a crucial role in the structure and function of articular cartilage, representing approximately 70-80% of its composition. Water is the primary element responsible for load bearing during compression. The tissue's ability to resist compressive forces depends on how water is structured and restricted within the matrix. This organization is possible through the interaction of water with the main macromolecules of cartilage, such as collagen and proteoglycans, especially hyaluronic acid-bound aggregates1. These act as containment structures that order and limit water movement. This interaction provides the tissue not only with stiffness but also with resilience and the ability to recover after deformation. The interaction between free water, bound water, and the macromolecular matrix constitutes the core of cartilage biomechanical behavior2.
Despite its remarkable ability to support and distribute physical and mechanical loads that reach the joints, once injured, articular cartilage (AC) has limited potential for spontaneous repair due to low chondrocyte mitotic activity and poor tissue vascularization2. Joint damage is usually associated with the progressive loss of extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules and proteins, which constitute 95% of the tissue, and confer biomechanical features to AC3. An imbalance between synthesis and degradation of ECM components, shifting toward catabolic processes, can result in osteoarthritis (OA), the most prevalent degenerative joint disease worldwide. Osteoarthritis affects approximately 10-12% of the adult population, causing pain, limiting mobility, and markedly reducing patients' autonomy4. Osteoarthritis is more prevalent in aging populations due to cumulative insults on the joint over a lifespan; however, assorted risk factors have been associated with the clinical condition onset, such as gender, genetic predisposition, obesity, and daily habits4. Until now, therapeutic approaches to treat OA have consisted of clinical symptom management and total joint replacement in the most severe cases5. Without a robust, reproducible, and reliable therapeutic strategy to effectively treat OA, innovative approaches to understanding and addressing the problems associated with articular cartilage injury are being studied.
To repair, regenerate, and enhance joint movement in arthritic joints, progress in regenerative medicine has emerged as a new hope for restoring damaged AC6,7. The use of autologous chondrocytes combined with ECM implantation and intra-articular injection of stem cells represents the current state-of-the-art in this area8,9,10. The main challenge with these approaches is ensuring appropriate differentiation and functional ECM synthesis by implanted cells. Autologous chondrocytes tend to form fibrocartilage or progress to a hypertrophic state, creating new dysfunctional tissue that does not recapitulate the physiological features of AC, leading to incomplete recovery and often late deterioration11. Biomaterials can be used to guide cell behavior during tissue regeneration, providing a temporary scaffold for cells to adhere and synthesize new, natural, and functional extracellular matrix12,13,14. The ideal biomaterial for cartilage engineering must ensure strong integration with surrounding tissues, especially the subchondral bone, as failure at this interface compromises long-term repair. However, weak bonding between the cartilage and bone layers of osteochondral scaffolds and poor integration with host tissue remain major challenges15. Although scaffolds attempt to mimic the native osteochondral architecture, reproducing the complex interface microstructure is still difficult. This reinforces the importance of research and development of scaffolds with biological properties that can simultaneously support cartilage and bone regeneration while maintaining interface stability16. Gelatin, derived from collagen-a key component of cartilage tissue-possesses properties such as cell-binding motifs and biodegradability, suggesting its potential as a supportive biomaterial when combined with regenerative factors for the treatment of osteochondral lesions. When chemically modified with methacrylic anhydride to form gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), it becomes photo-crosslinkable, enabling injection and in situ photopolymerization, which enhances mechanical stability for applications in regenerative medicine17.
Osteochondral lesions have limited regenerative capacity, which represents a clinical challenge. Preclinical investigations that employ large-animal models of knee joint injury are essential for translational research because they allow systematic evaluation of variables affecting disease mechanisms and therapeutic outcomes. Commonly used species include pigs, goats, dogs, horses, and sheep, each presenting specific advantages and limitations that must be considered in experimental design. Moreover, all these species exhibit limited endogenous repair of chondral and osteochondral defects, as observed in humans18. To ensure that these models are predictive of human outcomes, they must reproduce relevant parameters such as anatomy, physiology, and biomechanical properties18. For comparison, the thickness of human articular cartilage in the femoral condyles ranges from 1.8 to 2 mm19, and the diameter of cartilage lesions typically requiring treatment is 10 mm or greater20.
The porcine model offers advantages for cartilage and osteochondral regeneration studies, as joint size, cartilage thickness, and weight-bearing requirements closely resemble those observed in humans18. Some miniature pig breeds, such as the Göttingen minipig, are easy to handle and reach skeletal maturity between 18 and 22 months of age21. Their cartilage thickness ranges from 1 to 2 mm, and defects of 6 to 8 mm can be created18. Bone characteristics, including trabecular thickness, bone apposition rate, and collagen fiber organization, are comparable to those of humans22. However, the porcine model also has limitations: even in miniature breeds, the knee (stifle) joint is smaller than in humans, limiting the creation of large experimental defects. Furthermore, most studies use skeletally immature animals due to the associated maintenance costs, which may overestimate the repair potential23.
Goats exhibit joint anatomy, biomechanics, and cartilage thickness like those of humans24. They do not require specialized facilities, are easy to handle, and are relatively inexpensive25. Goat cartilage thickness ranges from 0.8 to 2.0 mm, and the most reported critical defect size is 6 mm26. However, there is significant variation in cartilage thickness across breeds, sizes, and sexes, which can lead to inconsistent results27. The cartilage-to-subchondral bone ratio and trabecular bone structure are also comparable to those of humans28. Skeletal maturity occurs relatively late, between 24 and 36 months of age29. From a biomechanical standpoint, the goat knee experiences joint pressures and cyclic loads like those of humans25, although knee flexion during gait is greater (50°-70° in goats vs. <30° in humans), resulting in distinct contact areas30. This difference, combined with higher peak pressures, may contribute to less efficient cartilage repair30.
Among large animal models, dogs stand out for their ability to tolerate rehabilitation regimens, joint immobilization, and training for treadmill walking, swimming, and controlled load-bearing exercises18. Articular cartilage thickness ranges from 0.9 to 1.3 mm, and the critical defect size is approximately 4 mm, limiting direct comparison to the human model25. Skeletal maturity occurs between 8.5 and 13.7 months of age31. Anatomically, the canine knee differs from the human knee, and variations in biomechanics, loading patterns, and maturity across breeds complicate the extrapolation of results32. Despite these anatomical differences and the small defect size, the canine model remains valuable for studies including rehabilitation protocols or spontaneous cartilage pathologies similar to those in humans. However, its experimental use is restricted by ethical considerations29.
The equine model is the largest available animal model for cartilage repair research and naturally develops age- or trauma-related chondral lesions and osteoarthritis similar to those in humans33. Horses exhibit anatomical and biomechanical features comparable to humans, such as an upright knee joint, large joint size, cartilage thickness between 2 and 3 mm-closer to human cartilage-full knee extension during gait, and comparable bone mineral density34. Skeletal maturity occurs between 24 and 48 months, and defect sizes commonly studied range from 6 to 20 mm32,33. Limitations include the high vertical loading on the equine stifle joint during locomotion, which exposes implants to greater forces than in humans and hinders long-term healing35. Moreover, acquisition and maintenance costs are high, and specialized facilities are required36.
Sheep are widely used as a model in cartilage repair studies due to their availability, docile temperament, good tolerance to joint surgery, and ease of handling37. Skeletal maturity in sheep is typically reached at approximately 2-3 years of age25. In addition, the ovine knee demonstrates anatomical and biomechanical similarities to the human knee joint38. Cartilage thickness in the medial femoral condyle ranges from 0.7 to 1.7 mm, and bone mineral density and contact pressures are also comparable, although bone volume fraction is higher in sheep39. Due to reduced cartilage thickness, induced defects often extend into the subchondral bone, making this model more suitable for osteochondral defect studies32. Lesions of 6 to 8 mm in diameter are typically created in locations such as the femoral condyles and trochlea32. Furthermore, the ovine model offers advantages for bilateral studies, allowing comparison of treated and control sites within the same animal, thereby reducing host-related variability, improving consistency and reproducibility, and minimizing the number of animals required40. Each model presents different degrees of similarity to human physiology and biomechanics. Therefore, model selection should balance biological relevance, practical feasibility, and ethical considerations. In the present study, nulliparous female sheep aged 12 months, evaluated during the seasonal anestrus period, were included.
This study sought to design an effective protocol for generating acute osteochondral defects in large animals. The protocol involves creating a full-thickness osteochondral lesion to establish a model suitable for regenerative medicine studies. Additionally, the application of GelMA hydrogel is explored as a guide for tissue healing and as a prospective method for delivering regenerative molecules and cells. The protocol outlines the surgical procedure for creating osteochondral lesions in the sheep's knee articular cartilage. It is adaptable to various tissue-engineering applications, including the induction of similar injuries in other large-animal models for regenerative medicine.