As one of the most technically demanding surgeries in abdominal surgery, PD or LPD has been predominantly performed at high-volume tertiary centers1. Adhering to the basic principles of anastomosis reconstruction and being able to perform anastomosis surgeries that are safe, reliable, repeatable, and associated with a low incidence of clinically significant POPF remains crucial for achieving excellent surgical outcomes5. Unlike gastrointestinal anastomosis, pancreatic anastomoses are diverse and remain the focus of future research in PD11.
The critical procedures include suturing the entire pancreatic stump, securing the stent, ensuring close attachment of the pancreatic stump to the stomach, and localizing the pancreatic stump. The small branches of the pancreatic duct at the pancreatic remnant can lead to pancreatic leakage7. Thus, it is essential to continuously suture the pancreatic stump to reduce leakage. Given that stent displacement is the most prevalent complication associated with internal stents5, it is of great importance to firmly secure the stent. We employ three steps to fix the stent: ligating the Wirsung duct together with the catheter, suturing the entire pancreatic stump, and performing two interrupted figure-of-eight sutures on the gastric wall incision. When initially dissecting the pancreas and isolating the pancreatic duct, it is recommended to keep it adequately long to facilitate the binding with the catheter. The surgeon needs to be cautious and tie the knot appropriately to avoid obstructing the pancreatic duct. The greater omentum flap and a portion of the preperitoneal fat should be used to localize the anastomotic site. It has been suggested that POPF may lead to more severe complications due to reduced or delayed formation of abdominal adhesions12. Wrapping the residual ends of the hepatic artery and the gastroduodenal artery helps prevent invasive intraabdominal bleeding after pancreatic resection by isolating the exposed arteries from pancreatic fistulas and infections13.
In a multicenter RCT, PG has been proven more effective than PJ in reducing the incidence of POPF14. From a pathophysiological perspective, the increased pressure in the lumen of the jejunal loop, combined with the detrimental effects of activated pancreatic enzymes in the presence of intestinal enterokinase and bile in PJ, may gradually lead to fatal POPF caused by self-digestion15. PG may effectively achieve complete diversion of pancreatic fluid, prevent the accumulation of pancreatic leakage and the subsequent activation of pancreatic enzymes within the jejunum cavity, thus interrupting the pathological physiological cascade reaction16. There is also a hypothesis suggesting that postoperative pancreatic fistula might be caused by accidental damage to the pancreatic duct, akin to acute pancreatitis, or the fragile pancreatic tissue during the process of suturing or knotting17. Thus, the thinner and fewer sutures are recommended8. This recommendation is particularly applicable when dealing with soft, fragile, high-fat-content, and small-duct-diameter pancreatic tissues. Compared with duct-to-mucosa or invaginating end-to-side PG18, the stent-bridging PG reduces tangential tension and shear forces by only catheter placement in the gastric cavity and fewer sutures. Moreover, a smaller posterior gastrotomy is created, allowing the catheter to be inserted without undue tension. The short distance between the pancreatic remnant and the stomach enables the gastric wall to function as a serosal covering for the pancreatic remnant. The thick gastric wall has desirable suture retention strength and rich blood supply. It may also reduce the potential risk of suture cutting caused by a single- or double-layer full-thickness purse string suture of the pancreatic stump.
Surgeons are seeking simpler and safe methods of pancreatic anastomosis to facilitate the surgery and promote adoption from duct-to-mucosa to the bundled method11,18. Existing risk models have shown limited predictive accuracy, potentially leading to unreliable estimations regarding the impact of the anastomosis technique and surgical duration19. The stent-bridging PG can shorten the pancreatic reconstruction time without excessive manipulation of the stomach and the pancreatic remnant9. Due to the complexity of these procedures, debates surrounding surgeon experience have hindered the broader adoption and clinical trial dissemination of such techniques, largely due to steep learning curves and suboptimal early results20,21. A definitive conclusion regarding the number of operations required to overcome the learning curve has not yet been reached22. As this surgery is still in its early stages, many issues remain unclear, such as the long-term side effects of the internal stent. Further evaluation and validation of the above therapeutic effects and safety in a randomized setting are still necessary.