$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The nanoporous surfaces fabricated via polymerization-induced phase separation exhibited a dominant pore size distribution of 60-100 nm, as shown in Figure 2. This distribution was confirmed by three replicate measurements using high-resolution SEM imaging. The SEM images were processed via pixel-based image analysis in MATLAB to determine pore diameters, assuming a circular cross-section.
The static water contact angle measured on the porous surface was 84.4 ± 1.4°, based on five replicate tests with 5 µL sessile water droplets (Figure 3A). To evaluate the changes in surface wettability, the contact angle was monitored across the surface-modification steps-including nanoporous structure formation, UV-ozone activation, silanization, and light-induced PDMS grafting. After silanization, the surface became hydrophobic; however, a second UV-ozone treatment, performed prior to PDMS grafting, temporarily reduced the contact angle because hydroxyl groups were introduced. This reduction was reversed by the formation of a covalently bonded PDMS brush layer, restoring the hydrophobicity of the surface29. Unlike free silicone oil coatings, which can readily deplete, the tethered PDMS brush provides a stable and flexible molecular layer that retains lubricant and enables long-term slippery behavior11. If the grafting process is not completed, droplets remain pinned on the surface and fail to slide, indicating that the grafting step is essential to achieving slippery behavior.
To validate the slippery behavior of four representative liquids (Figure 3B)-deionized water, octane (low surface tension), honey (high viscosity), and artificial human saliva (a biofluid mimic; commercial synthetic solution)-their contact angle (Figure 3C), sliding angle (Figure 3D), sliding speed (Figure 3E), and contact angle hysteresis (CAH) (Figure 3F) were measured. For each liquid, a 5 µL sessile droplet was used to measure the contact and sliding angles (tilting rate: 0.8°/s), and another 5 µL droplet was placed on a 30° tilted surface to measure the sliding speed over an 8.5 mm distance. CAH was quantified in each case. All slippery behavior tests were performed in quintuplicate. In every experiment, the sliding angles remained below 3°. The sliding speed of honey was markedly lower because its high viscosity causes greater internal viscous dissipation, which strongly resists droplet motion under the same driving force. Additionally, CAH remained below 10° (Figure 3F), indicating a robust, omniphobic slippery interface.
Before implementing the slippery patterning protocol with DLP projection, the printing resolution of the PEG-PUA resin was evaluated using line-and-space test patterns (Figure 4). Given the native pixel resolution of the DMD chip (50 µm x 50 µm), the minimum line width was set at 50 µm, with incremental increases up to 300 µm. Each line width was fabricated and analyzed five times. The 50 µm features exhibited high fidelity to the designed geometry (50.3 ± 6.3 µm). However, dimensional deviations increased slightly with wider features, likely due to light scattering and lateral diffusion during exposure of broader areas, leading to overcuring beyond the intended pattern boundaries. These overcuring effects are commonly observed in photopolymer resins that are not purpose-engineered for additive manufacturing. In this study, the PEG-PUA resin was initially developed for photopatterning and was not optimized for 3D printing, which likely contributed to this behavior. Nonetheless, such limitations may be mitigated by optimizing the resin composition and photopolymerization characteristics.
Patterned nanoporous surfaces featuring letter-shaped (JoVE) and graphical (maze, gear) designs were successfully fabricated with the DLP process (Figure 5A). After completing all surface modification steps-including silanization, UV-ozone activation, PDMS grafting, and silicone oil infusion-the patterns became optically transparent (Figure 5B). This transition results from the refractive index mismatch between air (na = 1.0) and the polymer matrix (np = 1.5), which causes scattering in the unfilled porous structures. After infiltration with silicone oil (ns = 1.4), the refractive index contrast was reduced, yielding a visibly transparent surface with transmittance exceeding 90% (Figure 5C). When water-containing ink was applied, the droplets selectively migrated toward untreated hydrophilic regions (e.g., the PET film), avoiding the slippery domains (Figure 5D), thereby forming well-defined liquid patterns (Figure 5E). These results demonstrate that the protocol enables the effective spatial control of surface wettability.

Figure 1: Schematic of the fabrication process for a digitally patterned slippery surface built on a silane-coated nanoporous structure. (A) Roll-to-plate process for uniformly coating PEG-PUA resin between a PET film and an FEP film, followed by light-induced patterning with a DLP projection system. (B) Fabrication sequence of the slippery surface: (step 1) formation of a nanoporous surface by phase separation; (step 2) UV ozone treatment to generate hydroxyl groups on the nanoporous surface; (step 3) OTS vapor deposition to form a hydrophobic SAM; (step 4) second UV ozone treatment to introduce hydroxyl groups on the SAM surface; (step 5) silicone oil infiltration; (step 6) light-induced surface grafting to form a PDMS brush layer. Abbreviations: PEG-PUA = Polyethylene glycol-Polyurethane acrylate; PET = Polyethylene terephthalate; FEP = Fluorinated ethylene propylene; DLP = Digital light processing; OTS = Octadecyltrichlorosilane; SAM = Self-assembled monolayer; PDMS = Polydimethylsiloxane. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Fabricated nanoporous surface. (A) SEM image and image processing steps for nanopore size analysis: (i) original SEM image; (ii) depth map showing relative pore depth with a pseudocolor scale derived from brightness; (iii) binarized image for pore region segmentation; (iv) pore labeling, where each pore is assigned a distinct color. Scale bar = 500 nm. (B) Size distribution of the nanopores. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Surface wettability analysis. (A) Water contact angle measurements (5 µL) after each fabrication step: porous surface (step 1), UV ozone-treated surface (step 2), OTS-coated surface (step 3), UV-ozone-treated SAM (step 4), silicone oil-coated surface (step 5), and light-grafted surface (step 6). (B) Surface tension of various liquids: octane (28.7 ± 0.5 mN/m), water (70.6 ± 4.4 mN/m), honey (51.0 ± 0.2 mN/m), artificial human saliva (66.7 ± 0.4 mN/m) (C) Static contact angle, (D) Sliding angle (5 µL), (E) Sliding speed (5 µL), and (F) Contact angle hysteresis (CAH) measured for the droplets of these liquids. All experiments were performed at room temperature and a relative humidity of 40 ± 5%. Bars and points represent mean values, and error bars indicate mean ± SD (n = 5 independent experiments). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Microline structures printed for resolution testing of the DLP system, with linewidths measured at the midpoint of each line (five repetitions). Scale bar = 500 µm. Points represent mean values, and error bars indicate mean ± SD (n = 5 independent experiments). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Patterned surfaces fabricated from digitally designed images via DLP projection. (A) Nanoporous surfaces before silicone oil infiltration, showing opacity. Patterns: (i) gear, (ii) maze, (iii) JoVE text. Scale bar: 10 mm. (B) Slippery surfaces after silicone oil infiltration, appearing transparent. Patterns: (i) gear, (ii) maze, (iii) JoVE text. (C) Optical transmittance comparison between the slippery and porous surfaces. (D) Selective removal of water droplets steered to designated hydrophilic regions (PET film) on the slippery surface. (E) Liquid-guided patterning with water droplets on the slippery surface. Patterns: (i) gear, (ii) maze, (iii) JoVE text. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.