This protocol describes the imaging procedure of a microwave imaging device for breast imaging.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This protocol describes the imaging procedure of a microwave imaging device for breast imaging.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, and early detection and treatment are critical for improving clinical outcomes. X-ray mammography remains the standard screening modality; however, it has several limitations, including radiation exposure, patient discomfort, and reduced sensitivity in women with dense breast tissue. Microwave imaging, a non-ionizing technique, has emerged as a promising alternative. We have developed a device that reconstructs breast tissue structures by solving the inverse scattering problem and is currently undergoing clinical trials. This system generates three-dimensional tomographic images without the use of contrast agents and without causing pain during examination. To date, 24 breast cancer patients have been imaged, with an accuracy of 86% for tumors ≥ 1 cm in diameter, and 58% when tumors < 1 cm are included. In this article, we present a detailed protocol for device preparation, clinical imaging, and data processing, along with representative imaging results from selected patients.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women, with approximately 95,000 new cases diagnosed annually in Japan1. Early detection and treatment are essential for improving patient outcomes.
X-ray mammography is currently the standard screening tool. However, its sensitivity is limited in women with dense breast tissue, making small tumor detection difficult2. To address this limitation, ultrasound is often used as an adjunctive diagnostic method. Ultrasound examinations require a high level of operator skill, and the diagnostic accuracy of mammography or ultrasound alone is approximately 60%. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) achieves accuracy exceeding 90%; nevertheless, due to high equipment and examination costs, MRI is not suitable for routine screening and is mainly reserved for surgical decision-making and treatment planning3.
Recently, microwave imaging has attracted increasing attention as a potential alternative capable of overcoming the limitations of mammography and ultrasound4. When microwave radiation interacts with biological tissue, strong reflections occur at dielectric boundaries. Reflectivity is more than an order of magnitude higher than that of X-rays or ultrasound, enabling the detection of small lesions. Research on breast cancer detection using microwave imaging has been ongoing for over 25 years, with several clinical studies reported5.
Microwave imaging can be broadly classified into two categories: confocal imaging, which reconstructs the distribution of scattered power, and scattering tomography, which reconstructs the distribution of complex permittivity (dielectric constant and electrical conductivity)6,7. Confocal imaging is conceptually similar to ultrasound diagnostics; however, due to multiple reflections within tissue, internal structures cannot be accurately reconstructed. In contrast, scattering tomography provides accurate reconstructions even in the presence of multiple reflections but requires precise numerical modeling of electromagnetic scattering. Current computational electromagnetic techniques still face challenges in fully replicating these phenomena. Therefore, calibration that aligns measured data with numerical models is critical for practical implementation8. Moreover, because lesion responses are less than 1/1000 of the skin reflection9, highly sensitive antennas and receivers with excellent signal-to-noise performance are indispensable.
Our system addresses these challenges by introducing innovative approaches to solving the inverse scattering problem using an iterative distorted Born approximation (IDBA)10. Several key technologies have been developed, including a dual-polarized dielectric-loaded horn antenna11, a calibration method using two homogeneous phantoms12, breast fixation to the sensor via suction13, multi-polarized wave excitation14, and exploitation of the linear relationship between tissue permittivity and conductivity15. A prototype device incorporating these technologies was completed in September 2023, and clinical trials commenced in November 2023.
Although microwave imaging has been extensively investigated, there is still no widely accepted clinical protocol that guarantees reproducible data acquisition, robust calibration, and stable image reconstruction across patients. Establishing such a protocol is essential for the translation of microwave imaging from experimental research to practical clinical application. The protocol presented in this study, incorporating suction-based breast fixation, dual-phantom calibration, and multi-polarized wave excitation, addresses these requirements and provides a standardized framework for reliable clinical evaluation of microwave tomography.
Figure 1A illustrates the principle of microwave imaging16. Multiple antennas are arranged around the breast, with one antenna transmitting while the others receive scattered waves. A vector network analyzer (VNA) functions as both transmitter and receiver. If only a single port is available, transmission and reception are alternated sequentially, and scattered signals are acquired for all possible antenna pairs. The collected data are then used to reconstruct tomographic images of the breast.
The hardware configuration of the prototype is summarized in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1B, while the external appearance of the prototype is presented in Figure 2A. The device consists of a ceramic container for the breast, 16 antennas attached to the container, an antenna switch for selecting transmitting and receiving antennas, a VNA for measuring transmission characteristics between antenna pairs, a laptop computer with measurement software, a control unit for coordinating the laptop and antenna switch, and an aspirator for suction-based breast fixation (Figure 2C).
The ceramic container with attached antennas (referred to as the imaging sensor, Figure 2B) and the antenna switch are housed within the main body of the device. Although there are 16 physical antennas, 12 of them are dual-polarized, resulting in an effective antenna count of 28. The device is positioned beside the bed, and the patient lies prone, placing her breast into the imaging sensor (Figure 1C). To minimize imaging artifacts caused by body movement, the breast is suction-fixed to the sensor using the aspirator.
During measurement, a transmitting antenna is selected, and microwaves at 1.9 GHz with an output power of -5 dBm are irradiated into the breast. Scattering parameters (S-parameters) are measured by the VNA while sequentially switching transmitting and receiving antennas, and the data are recorded on the laptop. This process is repeated for all antenna combinations. Acquisition of one breast takes approximately 14 min. The relatively long measurement time is due to the serial acquisition process and additional waiting intervals implemented to prevent communication errors. Measurement duration is consistent across patients.
The recorded measurement files are transferred to a dedicated workstation for image reconstruction. The core control program is implemented in Excel VBA, which coordinates data processing and interfaces with the electromagnetic field simulator FEMTET and the numerical analysis platform MATLAB, as illustrated in Figure 317,18. Reconstruction of a single breast image requires approximately 7 h on a workstation equipped with an Intel Core i7-14700K CPU and 96 GB of RAM. Since the reconstruction algorithm is based on IDBA10, large-scale three-dimensional full-wave electromagnetic simulations must be executed repeatedly. Each forward electromagnetic field analysis requires approximately 10 min, and retrieving the computed field distribution from FEMTET takes an additional 30 min. This cycle is repeated ten times per reconstruction, yielding a cumulative processing time of roughly 400 min.
The software environment is summarized in Table 2. The laptop is configured with the Analyzer Control program to manage communication with the VNA and control unit for the antenna switch. Hardware connectivity requires a digital input/output (DIO) interface and a general-purpose interface bus (GPIB)-USB conversion cable to ensure reliable command transfer. All other reconstruction programs are installed on the workstation, which must support Microsoft Excel, FEMTET, and MATLAB. FEMTET is used to solve Maxwell's equations in the imaging domain via the finite element method, while MATLAB executes numerical routines required for the IDBA inversion.
A rigorous calibration procedure is required to align measured scattering data with the numerical forward model. Calibration is performed using two homogeneous dielectric phantoms (Figure 2D) designed to approximate tissue-mimicking media. At 1.9 GHz, phantom 1 exhibits a relative permittivity of 6.65 and a dielectric loss tangent of 0.438, whereas phantom 2 has a relative permittivity of 4.66 and a loss tangent of 0.289. A calibration file, cal_2314_94_ver2.mat, is pre-generated, containing correction coefficients that compensate for systematic discrepancies between measured and simulated S-parameters. These coefficients are derived from FEMTET-based simulations of the phantoms' transmission characteristics and cross-validated against experimental measurements obtained with the prototype12. This calibration ensures consistency between numerical modeling and experimental data, stabilizing the convergence of the iterative reconstruction process.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All clinical procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Aichi Medical University (Certification Number of Specific Clinical Research: CRB4200004).
1. Device setup
2. Input of initial parameters
3. Calibration of the Vector Network Analyzer (VNA)
4. Imaging procedure
5. Image reconstruction
button in the editor to generate a .mat file for equipment calibration (Figure 8B).
to generate a patient worksheet for use in the main Excel VBA program.
in the editor to start the image reconstruction process (Figure 9B).Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The imaging results of three representative patients are presented below:
Patient 1
A 78-year-old woman with a 34 mm × 21 mm cancer located at the 2 o'clock position of the left breast. The mammary glands are predominantly fatty. Figure 10A and Figure 10B show X-ray mammography images, whereas Figure 10C-F present imaging results obtained with the pro...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Calibration in this context has two distinct meanings. First, it refers to the correction of measured scattering data so that the results can be accurately incorporated into numerical models. Second, it refers to the calibration of the vector network analyzer (VNA) itself.
Prior to any calibration or measurement, the VNA should be powered on at least 15 min in advance, and the READY indicator on the electronic calibration module must be green. All device connections should be ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no commercial or financial relationships with any companies related to this work.
This study was conducted with the support of Science and Technology Research Grant of Japan, 24K10872. This research was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). The authors have filed patent applications related to the technology described in this article.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirator | AS ONE | DAS-01 | |
| digital IO | National Instruments | USB6501 | |
| Elecreonic Calibration Module | Agilent | 85093C | Discontinued. Replace with 85093D. |
| Electromagnetic simulator | Murata Software | FEMTET | |
| Excel VBA | Microsoft | Office | |
| GPIB USB Conversion Cable | National Instruments | GPIB-USB-HS | |
| Numerical Software | Mathworks | Matlab | |
| VNA | Keysight | E5071C |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.