$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Tear film is the outermost barrier that protects the ocular surface from pathogens and maintains ocular homeostasis1,2, while the lipid layer in tear film is the key component for preventing tear evaporation and maintaining tear film stability3,4. Dysregulation of the tear lipid composition has been linked to various eye diseases, including dry eye disease (DED), meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and allergic conjunctivitis5,6,7,8. As a result, detailed characterization of tear lipidomics has become a critical and trending research direction for a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular pathologies underlying these ocular conditions9.
While the tear lipidomic approach holds significant clinical importance, a critical challenge in tear lipidomics is establishing a standardized, reproducible collection and analysis workflow. Current tear sampling methods, Schirmer's strips and microcapillary tube, each present distinct limitations. Schirmer's strips have a large contact area with the ocular surface that often causes ocular irritation and reflex tearing9,10. In comparison, microcapillary tube collection is highly dependent on operator technique and can yield inconsistent results when performed by different personnel11. Additionally, improper use of these sampling tools may also carry a risk of ocular surface injury. These limitations could compromise the accuracy and reproducibility of downstream data12,13. Furthermore, tear collection methods that require complex handling procedures may limit their accessibility and standardization across different laboratories and clinical settings. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish a non-invasive, robust, and reproducible tear collection and processing workflow that can preserve the native tear lipid profile.
Recent studies have highlighted the utility of phenol red thread (PRT) for downstream LC-MS/MS workflows analyses in proteomic and metabolomic applications14,15. PRT offers inherent advantages as a tear collection tool. Its thin structure, minimally invasive nature, and straightforward sampling procedure could minimize technical complexity and reduce operator-dependent variability, while being well-tolerated by most subjects14,16. However, a standardized workflow specifically for PRT-based tear lipidomic analysis has not yet been established.
This protocol introduces an integrated workflow for reproducible tear lipidomics: a user-friendly PRT-based tear collection method adapted for lipid analysis, an optimized methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/methanol lipid extraction protocol with defined solvent-to-sample ratios and storage controls17,18, and a modified lipid identification method using high-resolution LC-MS/MS. This standardized approach enables a consistent tear lipidomic profiling for downstream biomarker discovery and disease characterization. Also, it is particularly well-suited for subjects with low tear volume or reduced tolerance for foreign body sensation (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Schematic overview of the Phenol Red Thread (PRT)-based workflow for human tear lipidomics. Tear fluid is collected from subjects utilizing the PRT approach, which enables consistent sample acquisition with minimal discomfort. Sample processing involves sequential MTBE/methanol biphasic extraction, SpeedVac-mediated concentration, and reconstitution of tear lipid extracts for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Lipidomic profiles are subsequently acquired via LC-MS/MS and subjected to annotation and identification using LipidSearch software. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.