RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Research Article
Elise Lupon1,2, Sergio A. Segrera2, Tanguy Perraudin1, Anandhini D. Narayanan2, Alexis K. Gursky2, Hailey P. Wyatt2, Eduardo D. Rodriguez2
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institut Universitaire Locomoteur et du Sport, Pasteur 2 Hospital,University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France and Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, LP2M, 2Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery,New York University Langone Health
Erratum Notice
Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice
Retraction Notice
The article Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data (10.3791/61715) has been retracted by the journal upon the authors' request due to a conflict regarding the data and methodology. View Retraction Notice
This protocol details the surgical technique used to harvest and prepare a full-face allograft for transplantation in patients with severe facial disfigurements, focusing primarily on soft tissue procurement with limited bony harvest restricted to the nasal framework.
Full facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) offers a reconstructive option for patients with severe facial disfigurement who cannot be treated with conventional methods. This article details a surgical protocol for donor procurement of a full facial allograft, focusing on soft tissue with limited bony harvest restricted to the nasal framework, and emphasizes key anatomical landmarks and technical considerations for safe and efficient harvest. The procedure involves dissection of the entire facial soft tissues while preserving the external carotid artery, internal jugular veins and subsequent thyro-linguofacial, and branches of the facial and maxillary nerves to maximize pedicle length for later neurorrhaphy. The protocol describes systematic exposure of the vascular pedicles at their origin in the neck, subperiosteal elevation of the scalp, identification and division of the supraorbital and infraorbital nerves, and preparation of the facial nerve at its root to achieve optimal length. Strategies to minimize ischemia time and ensure allograft integrity are highlighted. This article provides a comprehensive visual guide to the procurement phase of a full soft tissue face allograft and aims to standardize the technique for research application and surgical training in advanced vascularized composite allotransplantation.
Nonfatal severe craniofacial defects profoundly affect patients' social interactions and perceptions of their own self-image, often leading to significant psychological distress. Beyond appearance, intact facial anatomy is crucial for essential functions, including respiration, chewing, swallowing, speech, and non-verbal communication1,2.
Facial allotransplantation has emerged as a transformative reconstruction option for patients with severe facial deformities resulting from congenital anomalies, trauma, or oncologic resections. Despite advances in conventional reconstructive surgery, restoration of both function and aesthetics remains especially difficult for centrally located defects3,4.
Since the first partial face transplant in France in 20055, techniques have continued to evolve6,7, culminating most recently in 2023 with the landmark achievement of a combined whole-eye and face transplantation by Ceradini et al.8. Modern surgical planning and technological innovations have improved the reproducibility and predictability of outcomes, enabling better functional and aesthetic results4,9. However, lifelong immunosuppressive therapy introduces risks of infectious, metabolic and neoplastic complications, which raise substantial ethical and medical challengess10,11.
Procurement strategies have progressed from partial lower-face transplants12 to full face allografts8,13,14. Full-face procurement is indicated when extensive tissue loss involves multiple aesthetic and functional units, such as eyelids, nose, lips, cheeks, and when the restoration of vital functions (breathing, speech, mastication, swallowing) requires a three-dimensional reconstruction of the entire facial framework6,15.
Facial vascularization is mainly provided by the external carotid artery system, with the facial artery serving as the principal vessel and the superficial temporal artery as an important supplementary source16,17. Venous drainage occurs mainly via the facial vein into the internal jugular veins18. Preservation of neural structures is equally critical: motor function is restored through coaptation of the facial nerve while19 sensory innervation of the face depends on careful dissection of the trigeminal nerve, branches: V1, V2, and V320.
Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for harvesting a full-face vascularized composite allograft, including the forehead, eyelids, cheeks, nose, and lips from a cadaveric donor. The harvest incorporates only limited bony structures, restricted to the nasal framework, which is included primarily for pedagogical purposes to facilitate training reproducibility and minimize procedural complexity in cadaveric demonstrations.
The Anatomy Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine of Nice, France, generously provided the specimens and materials used in this study. The study was approved by the French National Ethics Committee (IRB approval No. IRB00014528_2025_36) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
1. Positioning and airway preparation

Figure 1: Preoperative skin markings of the planned incisions. (A) Anterior view showing a transverse incision at the level of the hyoid bone. (B) Lateral view showing the lateral coronal incision, the preauricular incision and the lateral cervical incision along the sternocleidomastoid muscle contour. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Cervical dissection

Figure 2: Cervical dissection and exposure of the neck structure at their origin. (1) Common carotid artery, (2) External carotid artery, (3) Occipital artery, (4) Posterior auricular artery, (5) Facial artery, (6) Lingual artery, (7) Superior thyroid artery, (8) Internal jugular vein, (9) Facial vein, (10) Vagus nerve, (11) Ansa cervicalis, (12) Hypoglossal nerve. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Facial nerve dissection

Figure 3: Facial nerve dissection. (1) Facial nerve, (2) External carotid artery, (3) Superficial temporal artery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Coronal approach for scalp dissection and periorbital management

Figure 4: Coronal dissection. (1) Supraorbital nerve, (2) Supratrochlear nerve. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
5. Elevation of the facial flap and extension toward the midface
6. Midface osteotomies

Figure 5: Midface dissection. (1) Infraorbital nerve. For demonstration purposes, the infraorbital nerve was preserved and not divided prior to nasal harvest. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
7. Intraoral dissection and flap liberation

Figure 6: Final aspect of the harvested graft. The facial nerve is tagged with a blue suture on each side of the graft. (A) Internal view, soft tissue side. White arrow: orbital septum. Black arrow: superior gingival mucosa. Green arrow: inferior gingival mucosa. (B) External view, epidermal surface. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
8. Packaging of the graft
The donor face dissected for this study was a male measuring 1.72 m in height with a malnourished body morphology. During graft dissection, vessel and nerve dimensions were measured bilaterally at the usual transection levels using a caliper, and mean values were calculated.
Mean vessel and nerve diameters from the donor were compared with averages reported in cadaveric and surgical literature. The harvested facial artery measured 1.5 mm at the mandibular border, closely matching cadaveric means for the diameter at the same level (1.9 ± 0.4 mm)22. The superficial temporal artery measured 1.7 mm, consistent with pooled estimates from a meta-analysis that showed a mean diameter of 1.5 mm23. The facial vein measured 3.3 mm at the mandibular border, slightly larger than CTA-based facial vein averages (2.42 ± 0.58 mm)24. The measured diameter of the internal jugular vein was 8.1 mm, which falls within the range of 2.5-9.0 mm which has been previously reported (mean 6.2 ± 1.81 mm)25. The diameter obtained of the external jugular vein was 6.7 mm, which is smaller than the average diameter reported of 9.3 mm. Neural structures were also slightly smaller than published averages (facial nerve trunk 1.6 mm vs 2.66 ± 0.55 mm; infraorbital nerve 2.4 mm vs 3.31 ± 0.68 mm), although differences likely relate to level and measurement technique26,27,28.
The graph demonstrates the mean lengths of the vascular and nerve structures in our cadaveric dissection in comparison with averages in the literature.

Figure 7: Comparison of cadaveric vessel and nerve diameters with published averages. Bars represent mean diameters (mm); error bars indicate standard deviation from literature values. Cadaveric measures are shown in blue, literature values in purple. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Face allotransplantation has become a milestone in reconstructive surgery, offering a unique solution for patients with otherwise unsalvageable facial defects4. Our harvested bipedicle graft included the skin, the eyelids, and the nose, together with the facial, supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental nerves. Both external carotid arteries should be isolated at their origins. In terms of neural structures, the main branches of the trigeminal nerve (supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental) should be consistently identified bilaterally, as well as the branches of the facial nerve within the graft. To minimize vascular injury, especially in the inferior portion of the flap, the dissection should be carried out as close as possible to the mandibular border.
Multiple strategies have been described for facial allograft procurement. The current technique enables harvest of the entire facial skin envelope, excluding the scalp, based on various published studies6,12,14. However, variations may exist depending on coverage requirements. For example, the scalp can be harvested, including the posterior auricular and occipital arteries29. Supraorbital and infraorbital neurovascular bundle lengths can be extended by osteotomies of the cranial/orbital bone (require osteotomizing the supraorbital notch, the infraorbital rim and infraorbital groove)30.
The facial trunk can also be reached through different approaches31. While this technique focused on a proximal retroauricular facial nerve dissection, some technique focuses on the neurorrhaphy at the level of distal facial nerve branches. Proximal coaptations of the facial nerve, performed near the main trunk, may result in unpredictable reinnervation and synkinesis. Distal neurorrhaphy, closer to the peripheral branches within the parotid gland, can allow for faster and more selective reinnervation of the facial mimetic muscles, although it carries a higher risk of synkinesis. In contrast, proximal repairs offer more reliable anatomical landmarks and may reduce the risk of incomplete palsy. Clinical outcomes have reflected these trade-offs: distal approaches may lead to earlier recovery of movement but with a higher likelihood of synkinesis, whereas proximal approaches tend to provide more stable, long-term function14,29,31. Thus, nerve harvesting strategy should be individualized, balancing targeted reinnervation against the risk of synkinesis.
A characteristic of this protocol is the absence of bony harvest, except for the nasal framework. Bone support can, however, help maintain the shape of the transplant. Also, the inclusion of bony components via osteotomies can further increase the length of the nerve structure30. This limitation can be countered by the fact that sensory restoration may also be retrieved without the coaptation of these nerves32. Osteotomies of the maxilla, mandible, or zygomatic complex allow for preservation of ligamentous and muscular attachments, providing structural support, maintaining proper anatomical relationships, and optimizing both function and aesthetics33. Across studies and procedures reported in the literature, the inclusion of bony structures has been inconsistent4. The decision to incorporate bone should be guided by the recipient's specific needs, as it can provide critical structural support and help preserve facial contours. This protocol, which involves only a limited bony harvest (restricted to the nasal framework), is particularly suited as a pedagogical article, as it facilitates standardization, reduces procedural complexity, and provides an efficient platform for both surgical training and preclinical research.
Cadaveric rehearsals provide opportunities for surgical refinement through repetition, objective outcome assessment, and high-fidelity simulation6,34,35,36. This protocol illustrates the procurement of a full soft tissue face allograft; however, in clinical practice, each protocol must be tailored to the specific recipient following preparatory sessions in the anatomy laboratory. Moreover, a comprehensive evaluation of the recipient's defect and dedicated training in the selected surgical approach remain essential steps that extend beyond the scope of this protocol.
Clinical experience has demonstrated that full-face reperfusion can be achieved through a single facial artery, with exclusion of the parotid glands and distal coaptation of the facial nerve branches to minimize salivary complications37. In contrast, this cadaveric protocol includes the parotid glands to simplify the dissection and avoid the need for delicate facial nerve isolation, which would be unnecessarily time-consuming and carry a higher risk of nerve damage in a research or training setting. In clinical face transplantation, the parotid glands are routinely excluded from the graft to prevent postoperative salivary complications such as sialocele or salivary fistula. Inclusion of parotid tissue carries a risk of persistent salivary leakage, infection, and delayed healing, particularly if the Stensen duct or gland capsule is violated during inset, and can result in unaesthetic fullness of the cheeks 38,39. Moreover, excluding the parotid facilitates distal coaptation of the facial nerve branches and reduces the risk of traction or injury to the main nerve trunk during inset. Similarly, the submandibular glands are systematically excluded to prevent postoperative salivary collections and infection, as inclusion has been associated with a higher risk of sialocele and excessive bulk formation21. This protocol also uses bilateral external carotid artery pedicles to facilitate exposure, improve reproducibility during dissection, and save time when the model is intended for research purposes only. This design improves visualization of both vascular axes and ensures complete harvest of the soft-tissue envelope, which is valuable for anatomical teaching and surgical training. However, this divergence from current clinical practice should be acknowledged, and the decision to train on a dual-pedicle model should be understood as a didactic simplification rather than a clinical recommendation.
Although a mock revascularization or perfusion simulation was not performed in this study, it represents a valuable next step for functional validation of the harvested allograft40. Future studies could incorporate perfusion tests or pulsatile reperfusion models, which allows simulation of near-physiologic arterial pulsation and venous drainage in perfused human cadavers. This approach would provide an opportunity to assess real-time graft perfusion, venous outflow, and the functional patency of vascular pedicles before transplantation. The integration of such dynamic reperfusion models could also enhance surgical training and improve understanding of vascular territories in complex facial allografts41.
Additionally, this protocol has inherent limitations related to its cadaveric nature. Even when latex or contrast perfusion is used to mimic more realistic conditions, it only provides a static visualization of the vascular network and does not reproduce dynamic flow, collateral circulation, or the physiologic responses of living tissue42. Consequently, the number of pedicles required or their perfusion dominance cannot be directly extrapolated to clinical transplantation. Similarly, nerve dissection and coaptation in cadavers do not reproduce synkinesis or functional recovery, and anthropometric discrepancies between specimens limit direct donor-recipient comparison. Therefore, pedicle selection and tissue inclusion should always be guided by intraoperative findings and outcomes in living donors. Additionally, certain steps, such as transection of the external auditory canal or inclusion of the parotid glands, represent cadaveric simplifications intended to facilitate exposure and dissection efficiency. In clinical practice, the auditory canal is preserved, and the parotid glands are excluded from the graft to minimize salivary complications and improve aesthetic outcomes.
Beyond the technical and anatomical aspects, donor face restoration represents a critical ethical component of facial allotransplantation. Proper restoration of the donor's facial appearance is a legal and moral obligation in many countries and plays a key role in maintaining public trust and supporting family consent for donation. Techniques such as rapid alginate molding followed by the production of a resin mask can restore the donor's integrity within 30 min without delaying organ procurement. This approach provides highly satisfactory morphologic outcomes and positive feedback from donor families, reinforcing the importance of respectful donor management43.
This protocol provides a comprehensive and reproducible platform for harvesting the full soft tissue facial allograft suitable for further research, including studies on preservation strategies if applied on a brain-dead donor44,45,46 and tissue engineering approaches, such as decellularization/recellularization techniques40,47.
The authors have no disclosure.
The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the individuals who generously donated their bodies to science, thereby enabling anatomical research.
| 11.5” Medium Premium Surgiclip II Auto Suture vessel clip applier | Covidien | ||
| 2-0 silk suture | |||
| Adson Forceps | MPM | 106-2112A | |
| Bioimpedance drill | Stryker | 5400-50 | High-speed drill with bioimpedance feedback for optic canal and skull base dissection |
| Bipolar Coagulation Forceps | Olsen | 20-1320I | |
| Custodiol HTK Solution for limb perfusion | Essential Pharmaceuticals Inc. | off-label use | |
| Cysto/ Bladder Irrigation Set | Baxter Healthcare Corp. | ||
| Disposable Scalpel #15 | Sklar | ||
| DLP 3 mm vessel cannula blunt tip | Medtronic Inc | ||
| Forceps Dilators | WPI | 15910 | |
| IV stopcock | |||
| Micro scissors | WPI | 504492 | |
| Monopolar Diathermy | Valleylab | ||
| Oscillating saw | Stryker | 5400-31 | Standard oscillating saw for craniofacial osteotomies (also Synthes/DePuy) |
| Saline solution 0,9% | GenDepot | S0600-101 | |
| Strabismus scissors | Surtex | 102-4109 | |
| Surgical marking pen | Cardinal health | 212PR | |
| Sutures Ethilon 4.0 | Ethicon | 1667G | |
| Sutures Ethilon 4.0 and 9.0 | Ethicon | 1667G | |
| Syringue 10 ml | Agilent | 9301-6474 | |
| Three sterile procurement plastic bags, and three sterile zip ties | |||
| Tissue Forceps | MPM | 106-0511 | |
| University of Wisconsin (UW) Solution for organ preservation | Bridge to Life | off-label use | |
| Vessel loop | Deroyal | 30-711 |