$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Hemostasis is the result of a dynamic balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis. Thrombin and plasmin are the key enzymes driving these processes: Thrombin converts fibrinogen into fibrin, while plasmin degrades fibrin to dissolve clots. Disruption of this balance can lead to bleeding or thrombotic events1,2. However, the laboratory tests used to evaluate hemostasis in clinical practice typically focus on isolated steps of coagulation or fibrinolysis, providing limited insight into the overall hemostatic balance. In patients with a suspected bleeding tendency, routine screening tests such as prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are commonly used to screen for coagulation factor deficiencies. However, these assays measure the time to initial fibrin formation and do not capture thrombin generation beyond clotting onset, where most physiologically relevant thrombin activity occurs1,2,3. Consequently, they may yield normal results in patients with mild coagulation factor deficiencies3,4,5,6,7,8. To identify these specific deficiencies, coagulation factor activity assays are used. While informative for diagnosis, these assays assess individual proteins in isolation and do not reflect the overall hemostatic balance. As a result, in patients with mild deficiencies, factor levels often correlate poorly with the bleeding phenotype9,10. This complicates clinical risk assessment and the optimization of patient management, including the timing and dosing of therapy, as well as interventions in response to thrombotic or severe hemorrhagic events. These limitations highlight the need for assays that offer a more comprehensive view of the hemostatic process over time and may help bridge the gap between laboratory results and clinical presentation.
The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay (NHA) was developed to address these limitations by enabling the simultaneous, time-resolved measurement of thrombin and plasmin generation in platelet-poor plasma8,9. It uses two synthetic fluorogenic substrates with distinct excitation and emission spectra to quantify both enzymes in the same microplate well without cross-reactivity. Enzyme generation curves allow derivation of quantitative parameters that reflect the dynamics of secondary coagulation and fibrinolysis, including lag time, thrombin peak height, fibrin lysis time and plasmin peak height. The NHA provides several advantages over existing thrombin generation assays, such as the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT), Ceveron s100, and ST Genesia, which provide valuable information on thrombin dynamics but do not assess fibrinolytic activity10,11,12,13. Clot lysis assays, in turn, capture aspects of fibrinolysis but lack information on thrombin generation14. This limits their usefulness in evaluating the complex interactions that determine overall hemostatic balance. While some laboratory-developed approaches have combined thrombin and plasmin generation measurements, these typically require separate wells or parallel assays, limiting temporal alignment and throughput15. Global assays such as thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) provide complementary information by capturing primary hemostasis, secondary coagulation, and fibrinolysis16,17. Flow chamber systems represent another emerging yet experimental approach to assess total hemostasis under flow conditions18. While these global assays offer a broader physiological context, they are generally less sensitive to mild bleeding disorders19,20,21. By simultaneously measuring thrombin and plasmin generation in the same reaction well, the NHA combines the sensitivity of conventional TGAs with the integrated view of global assays, enabling direct assessment of secondary hemostasis, fibrinolysis and their interactions.
Thrombin generation assays have already shown considerable promise for translational applications, such as individualized bleeding and thrombotic risk profiling and therapy monitoring22,23,24,25. In clinical research, the NHA has demonstrated reduced thrombin generation in patients with hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and rare coagulation factor deficiencies, as well as elevated plasmin generation in hyperfibrinolytic conditions such as α2-antiplasmin deficiency26,27,28,29. Differences in both pathways have also been observed in patients with hypofibrinogenemia, a disorder associated with both bleeding and an increased risk of thrombosis. In this population, lower fibrinogen levels correlated with reduced plasmin generation, likely due to the lack of plasminogen-binding sites, while patients with a history of thrombosis showed increased thrombin generation30. Additionally, the assay detects the effects of therapeutic agents, including anticoagulants, procoagulants, and antifibrinolytics8. In a previous study, we proposed a standardization and normalization approach to improve reproducibility and enable comparison of results across runs and laboratories, an essential step towards clinical implementation28. This protocol outlines the full procedure and analytical approach of the NHA for implementation in clinical research or translational settings.