Heart transplantation is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage heart failure1. Recipients with cardiac allografts require lifelong immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection2. Despite immunosuppression, long-term graft survival remains compromised by acute and chronic rejection, particularly antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)3. In addition, these regimens carry significant side effects, including nephrotoxicity, metabolic syndrome, infections, and malignancies, which reduce both graft and patient survival2,4. These challenges underscore the urgent need for immune tolerance, a state in which the recipient's immune system accepts the donor graft without requiring lifelong immunosuppression5. Achieving tolerance would eliminate drug-related toxicities, reduce infection and malignancy risk, prevent chronic alloimmune injury, and allow steroid withdrawal, thereby improving metabolic control and preserving graft function. While multiple tolerance strategies have shown promise in animal models, including mixed chimerism, costimulatory blockade, regulatory cell infusions, and gene-targeted approaches, clinical translation remains limited6,7,8,9. A significant barrier is the need for reliable in vivo models that rigorously test donor-specific tolerance5.
Murine heterotopic heart transplantation is a powerful and widely used experimental model for studying the mechanisms of allograft rejection and tolerance10,11,12,13,14. The availability of genetically defined mouse strains and transgenic models enables a rigorous dissection of immune pathways involved in graft injury and regulation9,15,16. In tolerance studies, a second heterotopic heart transplant, either donor-matched or third-party, is often required to evaluate the donor specificity of immune regulation13,17,18. The cervical region provides an ideal anatomical site for this second transplant, offering direct surgical access, reliable graft monitoring via palpation or imaging, and efficient retrieval of tissues for downstream immunological and histological analyses8,19. These features make the cervical model particularly valuable for investigating mechanisms of tolerance induction and rejection across a wide range of transplantation settings.
Several cervical heterotopic heart transplantation techniques using sutures have been described over the past three decades. Early work established that the neck is a feasible site for graft implantation and direct functional monitoring using suture-based end-to-end anastomoses between the donor's vessels and the recipient's carotid and jugular system20. Other groups have reported cuff-free sleeve configurations as an alternative means of securing the donor pulmonary artery or aorta to the cervical vasculature21. A novel end-to-side suture-based cervical model has been proposed to preserve native carotid continuity and more closely approximate the geometry of the standard abdominal end-to-side anastomosis22. Together, these approaches highlight the versatility of the cervical site and illustrate necessary trade-offs between technical complexity, hemodynamics, and the amount of foreign material at the anastomotic interface.
One widely applied vascular anastomotic technique in murine cervical heart transplantation is the intraluminal cuff technique23,24,25,26. Cuff-based cervical techniques introduce intraluminal stents to simplify microvascular anastomoses and increase technical success rates, particularly for less experienced microsurgeons24,25,26. While cuff-based approaches simplify the technical challenge of connecting vessels, this technique introduces foreign material into the anastomotic site. The presence of polymers may promote peri-anastomotic inflammation, alter local hemodynamics, and potentially confound immune analyses27,28. Furthermore, narrowing of recipient vessels, whether due to genetically modified mouse strains, immunosuppressive treatment, advanced recipient age, or chronic experimental conditions, can make cuff placement technically challenging in small-caliber vessels29.
To address these limitations, we developed a fully cuff-free, suture-based technique for cervical heterotopic heart transplantation. In this configuration, the recipient carotid artery is anastomosed end-to-end to the donor ascending aorta, and the recipient external jugular vein is anastomosed end-to-end to the donor pulmonary trunk, providing straightforward inflow and outflow for coronary perfusion (Figure 1A). By minimizing the use of intraluminal synthetic material, this approach avoids direct polymer-blood contact at the anastomotic site and is conceptually attractive for studies focused on local immune and inflammatory responses. The method involves meticulous preparation of both the donor and recipient vessels, as well as end-to-end micro-anastomoses of the carotid artery and the external jugular vein. Additionally, intraoperative patency assessment and postoperative monitoring are performed. In practice, this cuff-free cervical model is applied when a secondary cardiac graft is required to test donor-specific tolerance after an abdominal graft with long-term survival, particularly in transgenic or immunosuppressed mice with small-caliber vessels. However, the technique also requires advanced microsurgical expertise and access to an operating microscope; additional limitations related to carotid ligation and recipient selection are discussed below. By providing a reproducible platform, this technique enhances both the reliability of secondary transplantation models and supports mechanistic studies of donor-specific tolerance in murine systems. This protocol employs end-to-end anastomoses by connecting the recipient carotid artery to the donor ascending aorta and the recipient external jugular vein to the donor pulmonary trunk, thereby providing robust coronary perfusion of the graft (Figure 1B). End-to-end anastomoses create a straightforward inflow-outflow pattern that reliably supports coronary perfusion in this model.