The research was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Chengdu Jinxin Mental Diseases Hospital's ethical guidelines and approved by the hospital's ethical committees (Approval No. 2024017).
Study design and participants
This study is a systematic evaluation and integration aimed at comparing the efficacy and effects on glycolipid metabolism of treating BD with lithium carbonate in combination with olanzapine, risperidone, or quetiapine. 210 BD patients admitted to Chengdu Jinxin Mental Diseases Hospital between February 2023 and August 2024 were selected and categorized into three groups by different interventions: the LO group, the LR group, and the LQ group. The flowchart is illustrated in Figure 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: (1) Meets the international classification of diseases (ICD-10) diagnostic criteria for BD18; (2) The treatment regimen was lithium carbonate combined with a single antipsychotic drug (olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine); (3) After 4 weeks of treatment, patients were confirmed to have achieved marked symptomatic improvement by two or more attending physicians, as defined by a ≥50% reduction in the total score of the Bech-Rafaelsen mania rating scale (BRMS); (4) Age 15–55 years old; (5) Patients with good compliance and willingness to cooperate with the treatment plan developed by the study; (6) Patients in basic health, without major physical diseases. They can truthfully express their complaints about the symptoms and answer the relevant questions from the medical staff; (7) They can tolerate the drugs involved in the study; (8) The patients and their family members are informed and agreeable and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Comorbid serious somatic (cardiac, renal, hepatic, etc.) diseases; (2) Comorbid chronic infectious diseases; (3) Dependence or abuse of psychoactive substances; (4) Patients who have been involved in a clinical drug trial or a clinical research study; (5) Taking psychiatric medication 2 weeks prior to the admission, or using long-acting injections; (6) Comorbid metabolic diseases such as hyperlipidemia and diabetes; (7) Pregnant and breastfeeding women; (8) Requesting discontinuation of treatment or automatic discharge for personal reasons; (9) Allergic to the medication used in this study; (10) Other conditions that the study physician believes should not be included; (11) Other conditions that affect the indicators of subsequent observation.
Interventions
Patients in all three groups were treated with lithium carbonate, oral lithium carbonate tablets, with a starting dose of 0.25 g/times, 2 times/day, and then gradually increasing the dose to 1.0–1.5 g/day according to the patient’s condition for 8 consecutive weeks. Regularly monitor serum lithium concentration (at 1, 2, and 4 weeks of treatment, and then every 4 weeks during follow-up), with the target treatment serum lithium level maintained at 0.6–1.0 mmol/L. The LO group added olanzapine treatment. Olanzapine tablets were taken orally at a starting dose of 10 mg/day once, and then the dose was adjusted to 10–20 mg/day depending on the patient's condition, and the drug was used for 8 consecutive weeks. The LR group added risperidone treatment. Risperidone tablets were administered orally at an initial dose of 1 mg once/day, and then the dose was increased by 1–2 mg per week according to the actual condition of the patients, and the maximum dose should not be more than 6 mg, and the drug was administered for 8 weeks consecutively. The LQ group added quetiapine treatment. Quetiapine fumarate tablets were taken orally, the dose on the 1st day was 0.1 g/times, 1 time/day, the dose on the 2nd day was 0.2 g/day, the dose on the 3rd day was 0.3 g/day, the dose on the 4th day was 0.4 g/day, and the dose was maintained at 0.4~0.7 g/day in one week depending on the condition, and was given continuously for 8 weeks.
Observational indicators
Primary indicators
Assessment of illness
The BRMS was utilized to assess the patient's condition19, which included 13 items such as hallucinations, sexual interest, and contact, with a 5-point scale of 0 to 4 corresponding to asymptomatic, mild, moderate, pronounced, and severe symptoms, respectively, for a total of 52 scores. The higher the rating, the more severe the condition.
Clinical efficacy
Post-treatment, patients with a BRMS score <10 showed a clear effect; those with ≥50% decrease in BRMS score were considered effective, and those with <50% decrease in BRMS score were considered ineffective.
Total efficacy rate = obvious effect + effective.
Glycolipid metabolism analysis
Subjects were fasted for at least 8 h. Venous blood was collected early the next morning, and the fully automated biochemical analysis system was applied to measure lipid triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and fasting blood glucose (FBG).
Secondary indicators
BD severity
The clinical general impression-BD disease seriousness (CGI-BP-s) scale was used20. The scores assessed the seriousness of BD before and after treatment of three groups of patients, which consisted of a total of three dimensions, with each dimension scoring 7 points, and the higher the score, the more severe the patient's bipolar disorder was.
Quality of life score
The quality of life of the three groups was assessed using the life qualities integrated assessment questionnaire-74 (GQOLI-74) score21, which includes 4 aspects of somatic functioning, psychological functioning, social functioning, and material life. Each aspect has a score of 1 to 100, and the worse the score, the worse the life quality.
Adverse reaction
Observe adverse reaction occurrences during the treatment process and follow-up period across the three groups, and calculate the total incidence rate of adverse reactions.
Follow-up visits
Follow-up visits at 6 months after treatment were primarily scheduled in this study to assess the durability of the effects and to address any potential adverse reactions or problems.
Sample size calculation
Given the retrospective, observational nature of this study, the sample size was determined by the number of eligible BD patients identified in hospital medical records between February 2023 and August 2024. A total of 210 eligible patients were identified, and based on clinical treatment decisions, they were evenly assigned to the LO, LR, and LQ groups (70 patients per group). This sample size is sufficient to ensure the reliability and generalizability of the research conclusions, as it includes all consecutive eligible cases during the study period and provides sufficient statistical power to compare clinical efficacy and metabolic index differences between the three groups.
Statistical methods
Use SPSS 27.0 software to analyze the data. Continuous data that conforms to a normal distribution is represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical data is represented as counts (percentages). For the comparison between three treatment groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for normally distributed continuous data, and chi-square test (chi-square test) was used for categorical data. When significant main effects were observed (P < 0.05), Bonferroni correction was used for post hoc pairwise comparisons to control for type I error rates associated with multiple comparisons. The superscripts (a, b, c) in Table 2-6 correspond to the post hoc test results after Bonferroni correction, where different superscripts indicate statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05 after correction). The paired t-test is used to compare continuous variables within each group before and after treatment. A bilateral P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.