All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Experimental Animal Welfare of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (SDUTCM20221101001).
Drugs
QFY granule dry cream powder was prepared and tested by Lunan Pharmaceutical Houpu Research and Development Center. Donepezil and Memantine were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Technology. Male 5xFAD mice with an initial body weight range of 19–27 g were used in this study. The QFY dosage was derived from the clinical human dose of 43 g/d, which corresponds to 16.297 g/d after adjusting for the QFY granule dry cream powder. The medium dose for the present experiment was calculated based on the clinical human dose (16.297 g/70 kg x 9.1 = 2.11861 g/kg/d). The high dose was set to twice the medium dose (4.24 g/kg/d), and the low dose to half the medium dose (1.06 g/kg/d). All drug solutions were administered at a volume of 0.1 mL per 10 g of body weight.
For the positive control, combined administration of donepezil and memantine hydrochloride was employed. The dosages were determined with reference to their current clinical application doses (10 mg/d and 20 mg/d, respectively) and previous data from our research group, resulting in a regimen of donepezil at 1.0 mg/kg/d plus memantine at 2.8 mg/kg/d, yielding a total combined dose of 3.8 mg/kg/d. The final concentration of the donepezil–memantine mixture was prepared as 0.38 mg/mL, calculated as 3.8 mg/kg divided by the administration volume of 0.1 mL per 10 g body weight.
QFY solutions at low, medium, and high doses were prepared as follows: 5.3 g, 10.6 g, and 21.2 g of QFY dry powder were each placed into separate 100 mL beakers, mixed with 30 mL of purified water with thorough stirring, transferred to graduated cylinders, and brought to a final volume of 50 mL with purified water, yielding final mass concentrations of 0.106 g/mL, 0.212 g/mL, and 0.424 g/mL, respectively. For the positive control, 5 mg of donepezil and 14 mg of memantine were dissolved in purified water and adjusted to a final volume of 50 mL. Animals in each group were given the corresponding drug solution once daily via oral gavage.
Animals
5xFAD transgenic mice [B6. Cg-Tg (APPSwFlLon, PSEN1* M146L* L286V)6799Vas/Mmjax] were bred in the laboratory. The animals were all maintained in an SPF environment at Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, with a temperature of 22–24 oC, a humidity of 50–60%, and a 12 h light-dark cycle. Food and water were provided to the animals at all times.
At 2.5 months of age, male 5xFAD mice were randomly allocated to five groups: untreated 5xFAD, donepezil plus memantine, low-dose QFY, medium-dose QFY, and high-dose QFY. Age-matched male wild-type (WT) littermates served as the WT control group. Treatments were administered once daily for 220 days. (Figure 1).
Behavioral tests
Grip strength test
The forelimb skeletal muscle strength of the mice was measured using a grip strength meter23. During the experiment, the testing device was positioned horizontally, ensuring the mouse remained parallel to the table surface. After the device was turned on, the mouse was gently placed on the grip plate. When the mouse had securely grasped the plate, its tail was pulled backward with equal force until the mouse released its grip. The maximum grip strength was documented. This measurement was repeated three times, and the average of these values was used to determine the mouse’s grip strength.
Gait test
Mice's gait regularity was measured using CatWalk XT. The experiment was divided into a training period and a test period24. One day earlier, the experimental mice were transferred to the experimental room to allow them to adapt to the new environment. During the training period, the mice were placed at the starting point and ran along the channel to the end point. Each mouse was trained three times a day. After 3 days of training (until each mouse could quickly pass through the channel), the mice were returned to the cage. The test period was the same as the training period, and the computer software would automatically analyze each movement trajectory. Green dots were displayed if the trajectory was qualified, orange dots were unqualified, and at least three green dots were qualified for each mouse, which were analyzed by CatWalkXT 10.0 software.
Shuttle box test
The shuttle box test was used to assess conditional active avoidance ability in mice25. The apparatus consisted of a shuttle box (18 cm x 18 cm) housed within a sound‑attenuating chamber. The experiment comprised a 4‑day learning period followed by a 1‑day test period. On each learning day, mice were allowed a 120‑s adaptation period in the shuttle box before training began. Each trial started with a 6‑s conditioned stimulus (70‑dB, 1000‑Hz tone combined with a 500‑lux light), followed by a 3‑s, 0.3‑mA foot shock delivered through the grid floor, and concluded with a 12 s inter‑trial interval. If the mouse crossed to the opposite compartment during the conditioned stimulus, the shock was omitted, and the response was recorded as active avoidance. If the mouse did not cross during the conditioned stimulus but crossed during the foot shock, it was recorded as a passive avoidance response. If the mouse failed to cross throughout the trial, it was recorded as an escape failure. Training was repeated for 4 consecutive days with 30 trials per day. During the test period (day 5), the foot shock was omitted while all other parameters remained the same as in the learning period. The number of active avoidance responses was recorded as the primary measure of learning and memory.
Morris water maze
The Morris water maze test was used to assess the spatial learning and memory abilities of experimental animals26. The experiment was carried out in a tank that had a diameter of 120 cm and a depth of 50 cm. The tank was filled with turbid white water, and the temperature was maintained at 21 °C. A platform with a diameter of 10 cm was installed 1 cm below the water surface in one of the quadrants. Visual clues were placed around the pool as spatial landmarks for the mice. The learning process was conducted over four consecutive days, with each day's session beginning in one of three quadrants. Start positions varied pseudo-randomly among the four cardinal points. In each trial, the procedure ended when the animal successfully reached the platform. A maximum trial duration of 60 s was established; if the animal failed to locate the platform within this timeframe, it was carefully guided to the platform. After reaching the platform, the animal was given a brief 10 s respite before being returned to its home cage. After the learning period ends, the test period begins 24 h later. Mice are placed from the opposite quadrant of the platform on Day 5. The escape latency of the test period, the movement time of the target quadrant, and the number of crossings of the original underwater platform area were recorded.
Colony nesting test
The daily activities of experimental animals were assessed using the colony nesting test27. The experiment lasted 24 h, with three animals per group. After the drug administration on the same day, new cages were set up and lined with 6 g soft paper for nesting, and photographs were taken at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. At the end of the experiment, the paper was scattered throughout the cage, and no bite was given. 1 point. The paper pieces were clustered to the side of the cage, but loosely, with no formed nests, no obvious tearing or folding for 2 points; The paper pieces gathered and folded into a formed but relatively flat nest without obvious tearing was 3 points; A deep nest with extensively shredded paper was assigned a score of 4. At the end of the experiment, the remaining untorn tissue (defined as paper fragments weighing >0.1 g that were not shredded or incorporated into the nest) was carefully collected, air‑dried, and weighed using an electronic balance (precision: 0.01 g).
Sampling and sample collection
We collected samples only from the WT, 5xFAD, and QFY (2.12 g/kg/d) groups. After CO2 asphyxiation, the heads were cut off, the right hemisphere was quickly opened to separate the hippocampus and cortex, rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and placed in 1.5 mL frozen tubes in liquid nitrogen. It was stored at -80 oC for biochemical tests. The left hemisphere was fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, dehydrated by immersion in absolute ethanol, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 5 µm, and deparaffinized for immunohistochemical detection.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
ELISAs were performed to quantify target protein levels in brain tissues. Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 contents in hippocampal homogenates were measured using commercial kits, whereas cortical levels of GAP-43, PSD-95, and SYN were determined using kits sourced from Jiangsu Enzyme Immunoassay Industry. All procedures were carried out strictly in accordance with the manufacturers' protocols. Standard series were prepared by serial dilution following the kit instructions. The microplate layout included blank wells, standard wells, 5xFAD sample wells, QFY‑treated (2.12 g/kg/d) sample wells, and wild‑type wells. Prior to loading, all samples were diluted twofold with the provided diluent. Reagents were added with the pipette tip held perpendicular to the bottom of the well, then gently agitated to ensure thorough mixing.
After plate sealing, the initial incubation was conducted at 37 °C for 30 min. During this period, the wash buffer was prepared by diluting the concentrated stock with ultrapure water at a 1:29 ratio (1 mL concentrate to 29 mL water). Following incubation, the sealing film was removed, the liquid discarded, and the plate blotted dry. Each well was then filled with 200 µL of wash buffer, allowed to stand for 30 s, and emptied; the cycle was repeated 5 times. Enzyme‑labeled reagent (50 µL) was subsequently added to all wells except the blanks, and the plate was resealed and incubated again at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by an identical five‑cycle washing step.
For color development, 50 µL of chromogen solution A was added to each well, followed by 50 µL of chromogen solution B, with gentle mixing after each addition. The plate was incubated at 37 °C in the dark for 10 min. The enzymatic reaction was terminated by adding 50 µL of stop solution per well, which promptly converted the blue color to yellow. Absorbance (optical density) was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader, with blank wells serving as the reference; all readings were obtained within 15 min after stopping the reaction.
Luminex
Cortical levels of SASP factors were measured using the Bio‑Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine 23‑plex Assay kit, with all procedures performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reagents were removed from 4 °C storage and allowed to equilibrate to room temperature for 30 min prior to use. Standard stocks were serially diluted to generate a seven‑point standard curve, plus one blank well, according to the kit protocol. Magnetic beads were premixed and diluted to the recommended working concentration; detection antibodies were prepared as working solutions; and the wash buffer concentrate was diluted to 1x with deionized water. PE‑streptavidin conjugate was also diluted to 1x using the supplied dilution buffer.
For the assay, 50 µL of bead suspension, standards, quality controls, and diluted tissue samples (5.6 µg/µL) were added sequentially to designated wells according to the plate layout. The plate was then sealed and incubated overnight at 4 °C with orbital shaking at 800 rpm. Following incubation, the beads were washed three times with 200 µL of wash buffer per well. Subsequently, 50 µL of the prepared detection antibody was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 h with shaking at 800 rpm. After another three wash cycles, 50 µL of PE‑streptavidin working solution was introduced, and the plate was incubated for an additional 30 min at room temperature under the same shaking conditions. A final wash step (three times with 200 µL wash buffer) was performed, after which 150 µL of wash buffer was added to each well, and the plate was shaken at room temperature for 2 min at 800 rpm before being read on the Bio‑Plex instrument.
SA-β-Gal staining and immunohistochemistry
SA-β-Gal staining was performed according to the Senescence β-Galactosidase Staining Kit. After SA-β-Gal staining, sections were subjected to antigen retrieval by heating in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating the sections in a peroxidase-blocking solution for 10 min at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with a rabbit monoclonal anti‑Aβ₁-₄₂ antibody (1:400) at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the sections were incubated with an anti‑rabbit/mouse IgG secondary antibody for 20 min at room temperature. Following further washing, immunoreactivity was visualized with DAB for 2 min. Finally, the sections were dehydrated, cleared, and mounted with neutral resin for microscopic examination.
Immunofluorescence
For immunofluorescence staining, paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene (3 x 15 min) and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series (100%, 95%, and 75%; 2 x 5 min each). Antigen retrieval was performed by immersing the sections in 1x sodium citrate buffer at 95 °C for 30 min, then gradually cooling to room temperature. After three rinses with phosphate-buffered saline with Tween 20 (PBST) (5 min each), sections were permeabilized and blocked with 10% normal goat serum containing 0.3% Triton X‑100 for 90 min at room temperature. Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies against p21/CIP1/CDKN1A (1:200) and Aβ₁‑₄₂ (1:400) at 37 °C for 2 h. Following four washes with PBST (5 min each), sections were incubated with species‑matched Alexa Fluor‑conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500) at 37 °C for 2 h in the dark. After additional washing (4 x 5 min in PBST), sections were mounted with DAPI‑containing antifade mounting medium and imaged using a fluorescence microscope.
Golgi-Cox staining
Golgi‑Cox staining was performed using a commercial kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Solutions A and B were mixed 24 h prior to the experiment. After mice were euthanized, brain tissues were rapidly removed, rinsed with PBS, and immersed in the mixture of Solutions A and B. Tissues were stored at room temperature in the dark for 6 h, after which the impregnation solution was replaced with fresh solution and incubation continued for an additional 2 weeks at room temperature in the dark (at least 2 mL of impregnation solution per brain tissue). Tissues were then transferred to Solution C and incubated for 24 h, then replaced with fresh Solution C and incubated for an additional 7 days at room temperature in the dark. Brain tissues were sectioned at 100 µm thickness using a vibratome. Sections were mounted onto gelatin‑coated slides and allowed to dry at room temperature for 3 days. Slides were rinsed twice with distilled water (5 min each), then immersed in a mixture of Solution D, Solution E, and distilled water (1:1:2 ratio) for 15 min. After two additional rinses with distilled water (5 min each), sections were dehydrated through graded ethanol solutions (50%, 75%, and 95%; 5 min each), followed by four rinses in absolute ethanol (4 min each) and three rinses in xylene (5 min each). Finally, sections were coverslipped with mounting medium. Images were captured with a microscope, and dendritic spine density was quantified using ImageJ.
Statistical analysis
All results were reported as mean ± SD. The data were analyzed and graphed using GraphPad Prism 8.1.0. The Student’s t-test was used to compare two groups. For comparisons involving multiple groups, a one-way ANOVA was used, with pairwise comparisons performed using Dunnett's test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Multivariate and correlation analyses
Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 to visualize group-wise clustering of SASP factors (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, IFN-γ, CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5) among the WT, 5xFAD, and QFY (2.12 g/kg/day) groups (n = 8 per group). The score plot was generated based on the first two principal components. No data transformation was applied prior to PCA. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate linear relationships between SASP factors and synaptic proteins (PSD-95, GAP-43, and SYN), as well as Aβ₁₋₄₀, Aβ₁₋₄₂, and the Aβ₁₋₄₂/Aβ₁₋₄₀ ratio. The analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, with a two-tailed significance threshold of p < 0.05. Correlation matrices and a heatmap were generated to visualize the strength and direction of associations.