Bony Erosion
Bony Erosion - Related Videos
13:00
Modifying the Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Streambank Erosion in Northeastern Ohio
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2015
Streambank erosion potential can be evaluated and ranked using David Rosgen’s Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI), however this protocol has significant limitations. Here we present protocol modifications to address time constraints, allow nonprofessionals to complete accurate assessments, and account for non-alluvial stream conditions in Northeast Ohio.
08:09
Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2017
Spatial patterns of soil erosion and deposition can be inferred from differences in ground elevation mapped at appropriate time increments. Such changes in elevation are related to changes in near-surface soil carbonates. Repeatable methods for field and laboratory measurements of these quantities and data analysis methods are described here.
07:20
Laboratory and Field Protocol for Estimating Sheet Erosion Rates from Dendrogeomorphology
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2019
Characterizing erosion from dendrogeomorphology has usually focused on accurately finding the starting time of root exposure, by examining macroscopic or cell level changes caused by exposure. Here, we offer a detailed description of different novel techniques to obtain more precise erosion rates from highly accurate microtopographic data.
08:15
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2020
This protocol describes the use of 3D planning and printing for reconstruction of bony defects. We use segmentation tools to create 3D models followed by 3D design software to create patient specific implants for reconstruction purposes concomitant to ablative surgery or as a second stage.
04:17
The Establishment of Calvarial Suture-Bony Composite Defects in Rats: A Standardized Model for Suture-Regenerative Therapy Investigation
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2024
We describe the detailed surgical procedures of calvarial suture-bony composite defects in rats, alongside the investigations into the short-term and long-term prognoses of the model. We aim to construct a standardized model for developing suture-regenerative therapies.
FAQs
Inflammatory mediators can stimulate osteoclast activity, increasing the cells’ contribution to bone resorption. When this activity outpaces new bone formation, local remodeling becomes unbalanced and tissue loss can develop. This mechanism helps explain why inflammatory disease may produce erosive changes and why clinicians consider the underlying biological process when interpreting an imaging finding.
A sustained excess of resorption indicates that remodeling is not keeping pace with tissue loss. That imbalance can contribute to structural damage, making the extent and progression of erosion clinically relevant. Consequently, clinicians assess not only whether an erosion is present, but also whether it is changing over time and affecting the integrity of nearby structures.
Location, shape, and progression provide clues to the disease process associated with an erosion. Inflammation, infection, tumors, and other disorders may produce different disease patterns, so clinicians interpret the finding in relation to these features rather than viewing it in isolation. Pattern recognition supports diagnostic distinction and helps assess the likely structural significance.
Radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other imaging methods can be used to identify erosive changes. These approaches help clinicians determine where bone has been affected and characterize the associated pattern of damage. Using imaging in this way supports diagnostic evaluation and provides a basis for assessing structural involvement in medicine.
These characteristics help distinguish disease patterns and estimate how the abnormality is evolving. Location shows where structural damage is concentrated, while shape contributes to pattern recognition and progression indicates whether the process is changing. Together, they give clinicians more information for diagnosis, evaluation of damage, and assessment of possible effects on joint stability and mobility.
Imaging can establish the presence and extent of structural damage and provide a reference for later comparison. Reassessing the location, shape, or progression of an erosion helps clinicians monitor changes during treatment. This follow-up is relevant because ongoing damage may influence joint stability, mobility, and long-term function, while stable findings can inform continued clinical assessment.