Go/no-go Test
Go/no-go Test - Related Videos
01:26
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
0 Views •
2024
Antipsychotic drugs are a crucial treatment method for acute and chronic psychoses, bipolar illness, and behavioral disorders. The selection of these drugs depends on several factors, including the state of the disease, clinical judgment, possible drug interactions, and the patient's sensitivity to adverse effects. In immediate scenarios, such as delirium and dementia, short-term treatment with low doses of high-potency typical or atypical agents can effectively manage symptom exacerbation. For...
10:31
Nonconscious Mimicry Occurs when Affiliation Goals are Present
0 Views •
2023
Source: Diego Reinero & Jay Van Bavel—New York University People are social chameleons and regularly engage in nonconscious behavioral mimicry. This occurs when an individual unwittingly imitates the behaviors of another person, such as crossing one's legs moments after a person sitting adjacent does so, or adjusting one's body posture to match a conversation partner. Rapport between two people increases behavioral mimicry, just as mimicry also increases rapport. Psychologists have posited...
05:05
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2022
Reaching is a fundamental skill that allows humans to interact with the environment. Several studies have aimed to characterize reaching behavior using a variety of methodologies. This paper offers an open-source application of transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess the state of corticospinal excitability in humans during reaching task performance.
06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
0 Views •
2017
This protocol was designed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals (e.g., an abstract thinking goal) using the task interruption and resumption paradigm. The protocol is suitable for cognitive goals that are automatically pursued once activated, as the distraction procedure prevents goal pursuit during the interruption period.
15:00
The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2021
This protocol is intended to investigate the impact of task conditions on movement strategies in chronic stroke survivors. Further, this protocol can be used to examine if a restriction in elbow extension induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulation causes trunk compensation during goal-directed arm reaches in non-disabled adults.
FAQs
Frequent go trials establish a strong tendency to respond quickly, while the rarer no-go trials require that tendency to be interrupted. This response imbalance makes withholding an action more demanding than simply selecting a response. The resulting performance reveals how effectively participants can adjust motor behavior when stimulus conditions change.
A commission error occurs when a participant responds to a no-go stimulus, indicating that the prepared motor response was not successfully withheld. Researchers interpret these errors alongside reaction time and overall accuracy rather than in isolation. Their pattern can help characterize differences in impulse regulation, inhibitory control, and executive function.
Reaction time indicates how rapidly participants respond to go stimuli, whereas accuracy reflects whether responses match the required action or inhibition. A fast response pattern may coexist with more commission errors, making both measures important for interpretation. Considering these outcomes together helps distinguish rapid responding from effective cognitive control.
The task separates two closely related demands: preparing a motor response and suppressing that response when a no-go cue appears. This contrast allows neuroscience research to examine how attention, impulse regulation, and inhibitory control contribute to action selection. It therefore provides a behavioral window into cognitive processes that organize goal-directed responding.
A typical procedure presents a series of stimuli containing many go trials and fewer no-go trials. Participants respond rapidly to the go stimuli and withhold the response when the no-go stimulus appears. The researcher then records response speed, accuracy, and incorrect responses to evaluate performance under a prepotent response condition.
Key measures include reaction time for responses to go stimuli, accuracy across trial types, and commission errors on no-go trials. These measurements capture complementary aspects of behavior: response speed, correct task performance, and failures to inhibit an action. Together, they provide quantitative indicators of executive function and cognitive control.
Researchers apply the paradigm to investigate attention, impulse regulation, and the control of action selection in both healthy and clinical populations. Comparisons across groups or experimental conditions can show differences in inhibitory performance. Because the task produces behavioral measures of cognitive control, it can connect observable responses with broader neuroscience questions about executive function.