Mouse Fur Removal
Mouse Fur Removal - Related Videos
02:21
Radical Mastectomy: Surgical Removal of the Entire Mammary Gland from a Mouse to Study Cancer Progression
0 Views •
2023
This video describes a technique of radical mastectomy, which is used for the surgical removal of the entire mammary gland from a mouse to study cancer progression.
12:35
Clinical Testing and Spinal Cord Removal in a Mouse Model for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
0 Views •
Cited by 20 •
2012
A mouse model for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is examined clinically and behaviorally. As a prerequisite for an accompanying immunohistological analysis the preparation of the spinal cord is depicted in detail.
11:00
Adenovirus-mediated Genetic Removal of Signaling Molecules in Cultured Primary Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2010
In this video we use an adenovirus carrying the Cre recombinase gene to infect primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts carrying a floxed Rac1 allele.
07:56
Photobiomodulation Under Electroencephalographic Controls of Sleep for Stimulation of Lymphatic Removal of Toxins from Mouse Brain
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2024
This study presents an original and portable tPBM technology under electroencephalographic (EEG) control of deep or non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in non-anesthetized male C57BL/6 mice of different ages to stimulate lymphatic clearance of Aβ from the brain into the peripheral lymphatic system (the deep cervical lymph nodes, dcLNs).
06:43
Rotary Evaporation to Remove Solvent
0 Views •
2023
Source: Dr. Melanie Pribisko Yen and Grace Tang — California Institute of Technology Rotary evaporation is a technique most commonly used in organic chemistry to remove a solvent from a higher-boiling point compound of interest. The rotary evaporator, or "rotovap", was invented in 1950 by the chemist Lyman C. Craig. The primary use of a rotovap is to dry and purify samples for downstream applications. Its speed and ability to handle large volumes of solvent make rotary evaporation a preferred...
FAQs
The two approaches alter fur in different ways: clippers shorten it mechanically, whereas a depilatory agent removes it by disrupting hair structure. This distinction matters because the selected approach can affect how clearly the skin surface is seen and how much handling the area receives. Researchers should match the preparation method to the planned examination, treatment, or sampling task.
Skin irritation can complicate interpretation by introducing unintended inflammation at the site being studied. Careful handling during fur removal helps preserve the local tissue condition so observed immune responses, barrier damage, or disease-related changes more accurately reflect the experimental treatment or infection. This is especially important when researchers compare treated areas, monitor progression, or collect tissue from the prepared region.
Standardization reduces differences in how much of the skin is exposed and how consistently investigators can apply or observe materials. Comparable preparation supports more uniform pathogen, antigen, or topical treatment placement and makes photographs, lesion assessments, and tissue collection easier to compare across animals. Consistency therefore helps separate biological variation from variation caused by preparation.
The choice depends on the study’s intended examination, treatment, or sampling requirements, as well as the need to limit handling and skin irritation. Clippers provide a way to shorten fur, while depilatory treatment disrupts hair structure for removal. Because either approach can affect access to the skin surface, researchers must consider visibility and tissue condition when selecting a method.
Preparation begins by selecting the skin area relevant to the study and choosing either clipping or depilatory treatment to clear the fur. The area is handled carefully to minimize irritation and unintended inflammation. Once the surface is accessible, researchers can apply the planned pathogen, antigen, or topical treatment, examine lesions, photograph changes, or collect tissue as required.
In infection studies, exposed skin supports more consistent application of pathogens and improves direct visualization of local disease changes. Researchers can photograph lesions over time and relate visible progression to barrier damage or other local responses. The preparation is therefore useful when the experiment focuses on a defined skin site rather than on changes that cannot be localized or visually monitored.
Clearing fur makes the underlying skin easier to examine and sample, supporting assessment of local immune responses and tissue barrier damage. It also helps investigators follow disease progression at a defined site and compare visible changes with experimental treatments or infections. Careful preparation is essential because irritation from the technique itself could otherwise confound interpretation of these outcomes.