26.6
Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the s…
Animals need to forage. That is, find and eat food to survive. Optimal foraging theory postulates that evolution favors foraging behaviors that balance the benefits of getting food with the costs of obtaining it, such as energy expenditure, and the risk of predation.
One example is the Northwestern crow, which picks up whelks, sea snails, then flies upwards and drops them onto the rocks below to crack open the shell, allowing the crow to eat the insides. The crow repeats this process until the shell is broken. If it flies higher, the shell will break with fewer drops.
However, that uses more energy. Scientists have found that the crows, on average, fly to a height that yields the most amount of food relative to the energy used to obtain it.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What is optimal foraging theory?
Optimal foraging theory states that natural selection favors foraging strategies balancing the benefits of food, such as energy and nutrients, with the costs of obtaining it, including energy expenditure and predation risk. Evolution shapes foraging behaviors to maximize benefits while minimizing costs, allowing animals to survive efficiently in their environments.
Q2: How do Northwestern crows optimize their foraging for whelks?
Northwestern crows crack open whelks by flying upward and dropping them onto rocks. Flying higher breaks shells faster but uses more energy. Scientists found that crows, on average, fly to heights yielding the most food relative to energy expended. Crows also select larger whelks, which break more easily and contain more calories, further optimizing their foraging strategy.
Q3: What costs do animals balance when foraging?
Animals balance multiple foraging costs including energy expenditure required to obtain food and the risk of predation. For example, mule deer spend more time foraging in open areas despite less available food because predation risk from mountain lions is lower there. This trade-off between food availability and safety demonstrates how evolution shapes optimal foraging decisions.
Q4: Why do crows select larger whelks over smaller ones?
Larger whelks break more easily than smaller whelks and contain more caloric energy. By selecting larger whelks and making multiple attempts to crack a single shell, crows minimize energy spent searching for additional prey. This selective strategy maximizes nutritional gain relative to total energy investment, supporting optimal foraging principles.
Q5: How does predation risk influence foraging behavior?
Predation risk is a significant cost in foraging decisions. Mule deer demonstrate this by preferring open areas for foraging, even though forest edges contain more food. The lower predation risk in open areas outweighs the benefit of higher food availability at forest edges. This behavioral trade-off reflects how natural selection optimizes survival alongside nutritional needs.
Q6: What evidence supports optimal foraging theory?
Northwestern crows provide strong evidence: scientists calculated the optimal height to drop whelks for energy efficiency, and crows average flying close to that height. Mule deer further support the theory by choosing safer foraging areas despite lower food availability. These observations across species demonstrate that animal behavior has evolved to balance food benefits against obtaining costs.
Q7: How does energy expenditure affect foraging height in crows?
Higher drops break whelk shells with fewer repetitions but require more energy to fly upward. Lower drops use less energy but require more drops to crack shells. Crows have evolved to fly to intermediate heights that optimize the energy-to-food ratio. This balance between flight energy and shell-cracking efficiency demonstrates how natural selection refines foraging behaviors.