6.18
Returns to Scale II
Returns to scale can also be decreasing or constant, in addition to increasing. A firm could experience decreasing returns to scale. This means that a…
Decreasing returns to scale occurs when a firm's output grows proportionally less than the inputs in the long run. This means that if all inputs are doubled, the production is less than doubled.
Here, the addition of inputs lowers productivity.
For example, a television manufacturing firm may establish multiple factories and offices in various locations.
However, it becomes difficult to monitor the activities of employees working in different offices and factory operations at multiple locations. As a result, communication becomes impersonal and less effective. This reduces the productivity of inputs.
Managerial talent and corporate culture are inputs that are difficult to replicate. This is another major reason for decreasing returns to scale.
As the firm expands, it may experience a higher number of conflicts between managers and workers, which can sometimes reduce productivity.
On the other hand, constant returns to scale occur when the output changes in the same proportion as all the inputs. This means that if inputs are doubled, the production also doubles. Understanding these concepts helps explain why some industries have many smaller firms, while others can sustain larger enterprises.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What happens to output when a firm doubles all its inputs under decreasing returns to scale?
Under decreasing returns to scale, output increases proportionally less than the inputs. If a firm doubles all inputs, production increases by less than double—for example, only 60%. This occurs because adding inputs lowers productivity due to monitoring difficulties, challenges replicating managerial talent, and increased conflicts across operations.
Q2: Why do geographically dispersed operations reduce a firm's productivity?
When a television manufacturing firm establishes multiple factories and offices across locations, monitoring employee activities becomes difficult. Communication becomes impersonal and less effective, reducing input productivity. These coordination challenges are a primary reason firms experience decreasing returns to scale as they expand geographically.
Q3: How does managerial talent affect a firm's ability to scale?
Managerial talent and corporate culture are inputs that are difficult to replicate at scale. As firms expand, replicating the same quality of management and organizational culture across new locations becomes challenging. This limitation contributes significantly to decreasing returns to scale and explains why some industries sustain many smaller firms rather than large enterprises.
Q4: What is the difference between decreasing and constant returns to scale?
Decreasing returns to scale occur when doubling inputs produces less than double the output. Constant returns to scale occur when doubling inputs produces exactly double the output, indicating a one-to-one relationship between input scale and output increase. Understanding these distinctions helps explain industry structure and firm size variation.
Q5: How do internal conflicts affect productivity as firms grow?
As firms expand, they often experience higher numbers of conflicts between managers and workers. These conflicts can reduce overall productivity, contributing to decreasing returns to scale. Additionally, complications in maintaining timely communications across longer assembly lines or larger warehouses further diminish input effectiveness during expansion.
Q6: Why do some industries have many small firms while others support large enterprises?
Industry structure depends on returns to scale patterns. Industries where firms face decreasing returns to scale tend to have many smaller firms, as expansion beyond a certain point reduces efficiency. Conversely, industries with constant or increasing returns to scale can sustain larger enterprises profitably. Understanding these concepts explains the relation between total product, marginal product and average product across different firm sizes.
Q7: What role does the expansion path and long run total cost curve play in understanding returns to scale?
The expansion path and long run total cost curve illustrate how costs change as firms scale production. These tools help visualize whether a firm experiences decreasing, constant, or increasing returns to scale by showing the relationship between input proportions and output levels over the long run.