18.6
A dominant strategy is one that results in the highest payoff for a player, no matter what the other players decide to do.
Conversely, a dominated strategy is one that leads to a worse payoff for a player compared to other strategies, regardless of the opponent's actions.
Consider two competing ice cream vendors at a beach. They can choose to sell high-quality or low-quality products.
To determine if Vendor A has a dominant strategy, the payoffs from Vendor A's perspective for each of Vendor B's strategies are compared.
If Vendor B chooses 'high-quality,' Vendor A compares its payoffs between $100 and $50. Here, $100 is better, so the 'high-quality' is a better strategy for Vendor A in this case.
If Vendor B chooses ' low-quality,' Vendor A compares its payoffs between $150 and $80. Here, $150 is better, so the 'high-quality' strategy is better for Vendor A.
Since 'high-quality' yields a better payoff for Vendor A regardless of Vendor B's strategy, it is Vendor A's dominant strategy.
Low-quality' for Vendor A results in a lower payoff in each case compared to 'high-quality,' low-quality is the dominated strategy for Vendor A.
In strategic decision-making, a dominant strategy is one that always provides the best outcome for a player, no matter what the other players decide.…
Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.