-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Medicine
Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experimen...
Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experimen...
JoVE Journal
Medicine
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Medicine
Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Validation of Nanobody and Antibody Based In Vivo Tumor Xenograft NIRF-imaging Experiments in Mice Using Ex Vivo Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Full Text
11,984 Views
08:09 min
April 6, 2015

DOI: 10.3791/52462-v

Peter Bannas*1, Alexander Lenz*1,2, Valentin Kunick1,2, William Fumey1,2, Björn Rissiek2, Joanna Schmid1,2, Friedrich Haag2, Axel Leingärtner3, Martin Trepel4, Gerhard Adam1, Friedrich Koch-Nolte2

1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology,University Medical Center, Hamburg, 2Institute of Immunology,University Medical Center, Hamburg, 3University Cancer Center Hamburg,University Medical Center, Hamburg, 4Department of Oncology and Hematology,University Medical Center, Hamburg

Summary

This protocol outlines the steps required to perform ex vivo validation of in vivo near-infrared fluorescence xenograft imaging experiments in mice using fluorophore labelled nanobodies and conventional antibodies.

Transcript

The overall goal of this procedure is to perform ex vivo validation of in vivo near infrared fluorescence xenograft imaging experiments in mice using Fluor four labeled nano bodies or conventional antibodies. This is accomplished by first administering near infrared fluoro, four labeled antigen specific antibodies and conventional antibodies to mice bearing both antigen positive and negative xenografts. The second step is to perform in vivo imaging.

After imaging, the mice are sacrificed to remove the xenografts, which are processed for ex vivo analyses. Ultimately, ex vivo flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy are used to validate in vivo imaging results. The advantage of this method over existing methods like nuclear imaging, is that the use of a near infrared fluorescent dye allows for a comprehensive in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo multimodality imaging comparison with a single probe for flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, and near infrared fluorescence imaging.

This method can help answer key questions in the tumor imaging field, such as localizing metastases during surgery and monitoring the efficiency of anti-tumor therapies. The labeling of antibodies with fluoro force allows the exact ex vivo quantification of cell bound antibodies. This allows us to distinguish whether specific singles that we see in vivo are due to antibodies, bound to cell surface antigens, or unspecific due to the so-called enhanced permeability and retention effect.

Seven to nine days after the tumor cells were injected when the tumors should be around eight millimeters in diameter. Prepared to image the mice first, apply ophthalmic ointment and initialize the imaging system. Then position the anesthetized mice on the heated stage with their tumors directed to the camera.

Maintain one to 2%ISO fluorine for the duration of the imaging procedure using the isof fluorine manifold housed in the imaging chamber. Monitor the respiration rates. If any are too fast, then the anesthesia is too light, and if it is slow or irregular, then the anesthesia is too deep.

Then image the mice after getting the baseline image. Inject the mice with 50 micrograms of LOR six 80 labeled antibody constructs. Do this in a volume of 200 microliters saline into the tail vein.

After imaging euthanize the mouse and mount it to a styrofoam block and clean it with 70%ethanol. Then cut open the skin to expose the tumors. Remove the tumors with a scalpel and keep the tumors intact.

Once removed, cut the tumors in half and transfer one half to a dish of P-B-S-A-E-B-S-F solution on ICE for fax analysis and transfer the other half to twice cold, 4%PFA for immunohistochemistry. After 24 hours in fixative at four degrees Celsius, transfer the tumors to PBS with 30%sucrose and keep them at four degrees Celsius until they fully sunk into the solution. Then dice the tumors into pieces that will fit into cryo molds.

Fill the molds with OCT compound and transfer the tumor chunks to the molds. The tissue must be fully immersed in OCT. Then transfer the cryo molds to dry ice and when they are completely frozen, store them at minus 80 degrees Celsius until they can be processed.

To prepare the cells, transfer the tumor half to a cell, strainer in the strainer. Cut it into three to four pieces, and then take the plunger out of a two milliliter syringe and use the plunger to mash the tissue against the strainer. Collect the solution that flows through the strainer After the tissues have been mashed up, flush the strainer with PBS.

Then transfer the collected suspension to a new tube and spin it down at 500 G for five minutes. We suspend the cell pellet in 10 milliliters of PBS with 0.2%BSA. Then count the cells aliquot one to 5 million lymphoma cells to a five milliliter fax tube, and spin the tube down at 500 G and discard the supernatant.

Then suspend the cells in 100 microliters of PBS with 0.2%BSA. At this point, it is possible to block FCR using an antibody to bind FC gamma R.Wait 10 minutes and wash the cells once with PBS with 0.2%BSA. Now add an anti CD 45 monoclonal antibody to identify the leukocytes.

Incubate the cells for 20 minutes in the dark with this antibody, and then use two washes to remove it just before fax analysis. Stain the cells with propidium iodide for 15 minutes on ice to identify dead cells. Then wash them clean with plain PBS.

Follow this by Resus suspending the cells in 150 microliters of PBS and proceed the facts. Mice were injected with 50 micrograms of nano body and monoclonal antibody to evaluate the specificity of the fluorescently labeled constructs. For in vivo imaging.

All imaging was performed six hours after injection flow. Cytometric analysis of tumor cell suspensions showed specific labeling of antigen positive tumor cells with both AF six 80 conjugates. There was no non-specific labeling of antigen negative cells with either construct.

The tumor. Cryo sections showed a strong and almost homogenous labeling of antigen positive cells with the nano body. However, the monoclonal antibody gave a much weaker in homogeneous stain as expected antigen.

Negative tumors showed no staining of the antibody antigen negative tumors showed non-specific scattered staining in the interstitial space after injection of the conventional antibody. This was very similar to the staining scene in the antigen. Positive tumors after injection of the conventional antibody Once mastered.

The imaging part of this technology can be performed in a single day Following this procedure. Other methods like radio labeling of nano bodies can be performed in order to investigate the biodistribution of the injected conjugates into different tissues or other questions. After watching this video, you should have a good understanding of how to perform multimodality ex vivo validation of your in vivo, near infrared fluorescence imaging experience with a fluoro four labeled probe.

Thus providing you with a technique for evaluation of new antibody constructs for preclinical molecular imaging.

Explore More Videos

NanobodyAntibodyIn VivoTumor XenograftNIRF ImagingFlow CytometryMicroscopySubcutaneous TumorAntigen-negativeAntigen-positiveAlexaFluor680Non-invasive ImagingEx Vivo Validation

Related Videos

Evaluation of Nanoparticle Uptake in Tumors in Real Time Using Intravital Imaging

08:04

Evaluation of Nanoparticle Uptake in Tumors in Real Time Using Intravital Imaging

Related Videos

18.7K Views

Viral Nanoparticles for In vivo Tumor Imaging

14:04

Viral Nanoparticles for In vivo Tumor Imaging

Related Videos

17.6K Views

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging to Localize Antibodies in a Mouse Tumor Xenograft Model

03:10

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging to Localize Antibodies in a Mouse Tumor Xenograft Model

Related Videos

491 Views

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

07:59

A Comprehensive Procedure to Evaluate the In Vivo Performance of Cancer Nanomedicines

Related Videos

9.3K Views

Radionuclide-fluorescence Reporter Gene Imaging to Track Tumor Progression in Rodent Tumor Models

10:04

Radionuclide-fluorescence Reporter Gene Imaging to Track Tumor Progression in Rodent Tumor Models

Related Videos

12.4K Views

Fluorescence Molecular Tomography for In Vivo Imaging of Glioblastoma Xenografts

07:52

Fluorescence Molecular Tomography for In Vivo Imaging of Glioblastoma Xenografts

Related Videos

9.3K Views

Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice

05:32

Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice

Related Videos

7.1K Views

In Vivo Immunofluorescence Localization for Assessment of Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibody Biodistribution in Cancer Research

08:53

In Vivo Immunofluorescence Localization for Assessment of Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibody Biodistribution in Cancer Research

Related Videos

9.4K Views

Monitoring of Nanodrug Accumulation in Murine Breast Cancer Metastases

09:48

Monitoring of Nanodrug Accumulation in Murine Breast Cancer Metastases

Related Videos

654 Views

Nanoparticle Delivery of an Oligonucleotide Payload in a Glioblastoma Multiforme Animal Model

09:02

Nanoparticle Delivery of an Oligonucleotide Payload in a Glioblastoma Multiforme Animal Model

Related Videos

3K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code