Name: Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2016-09-01T13:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 32 s
Description: Learn psychophysical methods to measure vibration detection thresholds and tactile spatial acuity in human subjects. These quantitative techniques support clinical diagnosis and basic neuroscience research.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

The research and development leading to the above described vibration test was funded by the European Research Council (ERC, ADG 294678) and the German Research Council (grant, SFB665). Thanks go to the Max-Delbr&#252;ck-Center technical and support staff, Mr. R. Fischer, B. Neumann, and Mr. M. Pflaume, who provided invaluable assistance with the project.

The testing protocol was approved by the Charit&#233;-Universit&#228;tsmedizin Ethics Committee.
1. Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT)
<ol>
	<li>Device and Testing Protocol Assembly&#160;&#8211; Pretesting
	<ol>
		<li>Assemble the components of the device according to Figure 1A. Place a smooth-surfaced board (40 cm x 80 cm) on a table. Place the brass bar on the board.</li>
		<li>Connect the piezoelectric actuator (vibration stimulator) to the controller unit.</li>
		<li>Connect the response box and the monitor device to the data acquisition system (see supplemental code file).</li>
		<li>Connect the data acquisition system to a computer (or laptop), and to piezo actuator controller unit.</li>
		<li>Screw the custom-made stimulating probe to the moving part of the piezoelectric actuator (for specifics of the probe see Materials).</li>
		<li>Mount the piezoelectric actuator with the probe on the balanced brass bar.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Testing Protocol
	<ol>
		<li>Script a test protocol that implements the two interval forced-choice and transformed-rule up and down method. See supplemental code file for an outline of the script.</li>
		<li>Construct the waveform of the vibration stimulus as a sinusoidal wave and specify stimulus duration, rise and fall characteristics.
		<ol>
			<li>Open software (e.g., LabChart). Select Setup &#62; Stimulator.</li>
			<li>Choose a custom waveform and configure the stimulator options. Create 2 stimulus waveforms pertaining to each interval (stim1 and stim2). 
			NOTE: The waveform stim1 is composed of 3 parts: a delay of 4 sec, followed by a sinusoidal wave of 1.8 sec, and a delay of 1.8 sec (no stimulus). The waveform stim 2 is composed of 3 parts: a delay of 4 sec, followed a delay of 1.8 sec (no stimulus), and by a sinusoidal wave of 1.8 sec.</li>
			<li>For the sinusoidal waveform, create new variable parameters for frequency and amplitude. Modify the sinusoidal wave function by inputting the following functions to the rise and fall. 
			Rise waveform: (1-e-bt)&#8729;Amplitude&#8729;sine(frequency), b = 9.1 
			Fall waveform: (e-bt)&#8729;Amplitude&#8729;sine(frequency), b = 9.1</li>
			<li>In the data panel of the lab chart, create the set of 35 voltage outputs pertaining to the 35 amplitude intensities (or levels) of the vibration stimulus. See Table 1.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Set the starting/default amplitude of the vibration stimulus for the tested vibration frequency in the macro script for the testing procedure (see supplemental code file section).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparation and Training of Subjects &#8211; Testing Session
	<ol>
		<li>Inform test subjects about the testing procedure and have them sign a written consent form. To ensure anonymity and fulfill data protection requirements, assign each participant a number.</li>
		<li>Seat the subjects comfortably in a quiet room at temperatures between 20-30 &#176;C. Instruct them about the test in a simple and clear manner so that the subject knows what to expect during the testing.</li>
		<li>Place the arm of the subject on the board. Pad the little finger with medical dough to minimize movement. Place the brass bar on the board to position the probe on the little finger of the tested hand just below the nail bed. Ensure proper contact between the probe and the skin and adjust the position of the probe to a horizontal position using the water-level. Avoid skin contact with the edges of the circular flat probe. 
		NOTE: This ensures that the flat surface of the probe applies around 30 g (0.3 N) to the skin surface. Sharp edges can lead to decreased detection thresholds. The heavy mass of the brass bar prevents the transmission of distracting oscillations from the surroundings to the device and minimizes dissipation of the applied sine wave.</li>
		<li>Prior to testing, get the participants familiarized with the setup. Depending on the testing frequency, present both an easy (level 23) and a hard (level 7) to perceive vibration stimulus by varying the amplitude until the subject perceives a vibration to ensure that the experimental procedure is understood.</li>
		<li>If necessary, reset the starting (default) amplitude at the selected frequency so that the subject can easily detect the stimulus when the testing protocol starts (see 1.2.3).</li>
		<li>Minimize interactions between subject and examiner during the test.</li>
		<li>Start the test by running the script that uses the two-alternative forced-choice procedure with the up-down adaptive method22. 
		NOTE: Actions in 1.3.7-1.3.12 are automated by the program script.</li>
		<li>In each trial, randomly administer a vibration stimulus during one of the two intervals that are visually indicated to the test subject as &#34;1&#34; and &#34;2&#34; on the screen of the monitor (Figure 1B). Have the subject indicate if the first or second sequential intervals contained the vibration stimulus by pressing one of two buttons &#34;1&#34; or &#34;2&#34; on the response box. Let the subject make a guess if he or she is not sure when the stimulus is presented. 
		NOTE: The forced-choice technique requires that the subject responds even when the vibration is not perceived.</li>
		<li>In a trial series, which consists of 6 to a maximum of 9 single trials, repeat the same vibration stimulus at one amplitude level at least six times consecutively. If the responses are all correct, reduce the stimulus intensity level (down rule) for the subsequent trial series.</li>
		<li>Based on the decision rule of the adaptive method (logical operators in script), grant the subject more trials to the same stimulus intensity if the subject makes errors in a trial series. Reduce the stimulus intensity if the stimulus is correctly identified in at least 5 trials, and incorrectly in less than 2 trials.</li>
		<li>Increase the stimulus level if the subject makes the 2 incorrect responses in a trial series; or, more than one incorrect response and fewer than 5 correct responses.</li>
		<li>Document the change in the direction of stimulus intensity, as reversal point. Change the stimulus intensity according to reversal point number: prior to the third reversal point by 4 intensity levels; at the 3rd reversal point by 2 intensity levels; else by 1 level (for more detail see supplemental code file and Figure 4B).</li>
		<li>End the testing when the subject completes a total of 8 reversals.</li>
		<li>Calculate the VDT by taking the median of the stimulus amplitude value of the last 6 reversals.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Tactile Spatial Acuity Test
<ol>
	<li>Determine tactile acuity with a two-alternative forced choice grating orientation test using the Tactile Acuity Cube (TAC). The TAC is comprised of 6 sides each containing a grating (bar and groove) whose widths are 0.75 mm, 1.25 mm, 1.75 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 6.0 mm.</li>
	<li>Seat subjects in a quiet room at temperatures between 20-30 &#176;C and instruct on the task.</li>
	<li>During the experiment, blindfold the test subjects using shielded eyeglasses. Place the dominant hand on a table with the palmar surface facing up.</li>
	<li>On each trial, apply the TAC to the finger pad at one of two grating orientations: vertically (parallel direction) or horizontally (transverse direction) aligned to the long axis of the finger. Randomly choose the order of the grating orientation for each trial.</li>
	<li>Apply the gratings of the TAC for 2 sec to the finger pad of the index finger so that the cube exerts its whole weight on the finger (233 g). Avoid pressing the TAC on the finger pad.</li>
	<li>Ask the subjects to determine the orientation of the alignment before the cube is removed from their finger.</li>
	<li>Avoid movement of the participant&#39;s finger because it might provide a cue to the orientation. Discard the trial if the experimenter senses that the finger has moved. 
	NOTE: Beware that small finger movements might not be detected by the experimenter in the procedure.</li>
	<li>Employ a two-down and one-up adaptive method in the staircase algorithm.</li>
	<li>Start with the largest grating, 6.0 mm.</li>
	<li>Decrease the grating width after two correct identification of the orientation (correct response).</li>
	<li>Test the next, smaller width and continue with the stepping rule until the subject makes an incorrect response and document the grating width as a reversal point.</li>
	<li>Increase the grating width stepwise again until the two orientations of a width are determined correctly again.</li>
	<li>End the test after completion of thirteen reversals.</li>
	<li>Calculate the tactile grating orientation threshold by taking the median of the grating widths of the last 10 reversals.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Poole, K., Herget, R., Lapatsina, L., Ngo, H. D., Lewin, G. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tuning+Piezo+ion+channels+to+detect+molecular-scale+movements+relevant+for+fine+touch%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tuning Piezo ion channels to detect molecular-scale movements relevant for fine touch.</a> Nat Commun. 5, 3520(2014).</li>
<li>Lechner, S. G., Lewin, G. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Hairy+sensation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Physiology+%28Bethesda%29%22%5BJournal%5D)">Hairy sensation.</a> Physiology (Bethesda). 28 (3), 142-150 (2013).</li>
<li>Heidenreich, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((KCNQ4+K%28%2B%29+channels+tune+mechanoreceptors+for+normal+touch+sensation+in+mouse+and+man%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">KCNQ4 K(+) channels tune mechanoreceptors for normal touch sensation in mouse and man.</a> Nat Neurosci. 15 (1), 138-145 (2012).</li>
<li>Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H., Darian-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Neural+basis+of+the+sense+of+flutter-vibration%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Neural basis of the sense of flutter-vibration.</a> Science. 155 (3762), 597-600 (1967).</li>
<li>Bolanowski, S. J. Jr, Gescheider, G. A., Verrillo, R. T., Checkosky, C. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Four+channels+mediate+the+mechanical+aspects+of+touch%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Acoust.+Soc.+Am%22%5BJournal%5D)">Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch.</a> J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 (5), 1680-1694 (1988).</li>
<li>Johansson, R. S., Vallbo, A. A. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Detection+of+tactile+stimuli.+Thresholds+of+afferent+units+related+to+psychophysical+thresholds+in+the+human+hand%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Physiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand.</a> J Physiol. 297 (1), 405-422 (1979).</li>
<li>Frenzel, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+Genetic+Basis+for+Mechanosensory+Traits+in+Humans%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">A Genetic Basis for Mechanosensory Traits in Humans.</a> PLoS Biol. 10 (5), (2012).</li>
<li>Van Boven, R. W., Johnson, K. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+limit+of+tactile+spatial+resolution+in+humans%3A+grating+orientation+discrimination+at+the+lip%2C+tongue%2C+and+finger%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurology%22%5BJournal%5D)">The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger.</a> Neurology. 44 (12), 2361-2366 (1994).</li>
<li>Haseleu, J., Omerbašić, D., Frenzel, H., Gross, M., Lewin, G. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Water-induced+finger+wrinkles+do+not+affect+touch+acuity+or+dexterity+in+handling+wet+objects%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Water-induced finger wrinkles do not affect touch acuity or dexterity in handling wet objects.</a> PLoS ONE. 9 (1), e84949(2014).</li>
<li>Bensmaia, S. J., Hsiao, S. S., Denchev, P. V., Killebrew, J. H., Craig, J. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+tactile+perception+of+stimulus+orientation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Somatosens+Mot+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">The tactile perception of stimulus orientation.</a> Somatosens Mot Res. 25 (1), 49-59 (2008).</li>
<li>Poole, K., Moroni, M., Lewin, G. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sensory+mechanotransduction+at+membrane-matrix+interfaces%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Pflugers+Arch%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sensory mechanotransduction at membrane-matrix interfaces.</a> Pflugers Arch. , (2014).</li>
<li>Schrenk-Siemens, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((PIEZO2+is+required+for+mechanotransduction+in+human+stem+cell-derived+touch+receptors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">PIEZO2 is required for mechanotransduction in human stem cell-derived touch receptors.</a> Nat. Neurosci. , (2014).</li>
<li>Woo, S. H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Piezo2+is+required+for+Merkel-cell+mechanotransduction%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction.</a> Nature. 509 (7502), 622-626 (2014).</li>
<li>Ranade, S. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Piezo2+is+the+major+transducer+of+mechanical+forces+for+touch+sensation+in+mice%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice.</a> Nature. 516 (7529), 121-125 (2014).</li>
<li>Wetzel, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+stomatin-domain+protein+essential+for+touch+sensation+in+the+mouse%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">A stomatin-domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse.</a> Nature. 445 (7124), 206-209 (2007).</li>
<li>McMillin, M. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mutations+in+PIEZO2+cause+Gordon+syndrome%2C+Marden-Walker+syndrome%2C+and+distal+arthrogryposis+type+5%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Am.+J.+Hum.+Genet%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mutations in PIEZO2 cause Gordon syndrome, Marden-Walker syndrome, and distal arthrogryposis type 5.</a> Am. J. Hum. Genet. 94 (5), 734-744 (2014).</li>
<li>Gandhi, M. S., Sesek, R., Tuckett, R., Bamberg, S. J. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Progress+in+vibrotactile+threshold+evaluation+techniques%3A+a+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Hand+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Progress in vibrotactile threshold evaluation techniques: a review.</a> J Hand Ther. 24 (3), 240-255 (2011).</li>
<li>Güçlü, B., Bolanowski, S. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Vibrotactile+thresholds+of+the+Non-Pacinian+I+channel%3A+I.+Methodological+issues%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Somatosens+Mot+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Vibrotactile thresholds of the Non-Pacinian I channel: I. Methodological issues.</a> Somatosens Mot Res. 22 (1-2), 49-56 (2005).</li>
<li>Lindsell, C. J., Griffin, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Normative+vibrotactile+thresholds+measured+at+five+European+test+centres%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+Arch+Occup+Environ+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">Normative vibrotactile thresholds measured at five European test centres.</a> Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 76 (7), 517-528 (2003).</li>
<li>Morioka, M., Griffin, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dependence+of+vibrotactile+thresholds+on+the+psychophysical+measurement+method%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+Arch+Occup+Environ+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dependence of vibrotactile thresholds on the psychophysical measurement method.</a> Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 75 (1-2), 78-84 (2002).</li>
<li>Tannan, V., Dennis, R., Tommerdahl, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+novel+device+for+delivering+two-site+vibrotactile+stimuli+to+the+skin%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci.+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">A novel device for delivering two-site vibrotactile stimuli to the skin.</a> J. Neurosci. Methods. 147 (2), 75-81 (2005).</li>
<li>Zwislocki, J. J., Relkin, E. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((On+a+psychophysical+transformed-rule+up+and+down+method+converging+on+a+75%25+level+of+correct+responses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.S.A%22%5BJournal%5D)">On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 (8), 4811-4814 (2001).</li>
<li>Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Pope, J. V., Verrillo, R. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+four-channel+analysis+of+the+tactile+sensitivity+of+the+fingertip%3A+frequency+selectivity%2C+spatial+summation%2C+and+temporal+summation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Somatosens+Mot+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation.</a> Somatosens Mot Res. 19 (2), 114-124 (2002).</li>
<li>Kuroki, S., Watanabe, J., Nishida, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Contribution+of+within-+and+cross-channel+information+to+vibrotactile+frequency+discrimination%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Brain+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Contribution of within- and cross-channel information to vibrotactile frequency discrimination.</a> Brain Res. 1529, 46-55 (2013).</li>
<li>Levitt, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Transformed+up-down+methods+in+psychoacoustics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Acoust.+Soc.+Am%22%5BJournal%5D)">Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.</a> J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 (2), (1971).</li>
<li>International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration-Vibrotactile perception thresholds for the assessment of nerve dysfunction-Part 1: Methods of measurement at the fingertips. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22ISO+13091-1%22">ISO 13091-1</a>. , Geneva, Swizerland. (2001).</li>
<li>International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration-Vibrotactile perception thresholds for the assessment of nerve dysfunction-Part 2: Analysis and interpretation of measurements at the fingertips. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22ISO+13091-2%22">ISO 13091-2</a>. , Geneva, Switzerland. (2003).</li>
<li>Holden, J. K., Nguyen, R. H., Francisco, E. M., Zhang, Z., Dennis, R. G., Tommerdahl, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+novel+device+for+the+study+of+somatosensory+information+processing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Neurosci+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">A novel device for the study of somatosensory information processing.</a> J Neurosci Methods. 204 (2), 215-220 (2012).</li>
<li>Güçlü, B., Oztek, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tactile+sensitivity+of+children%3A+effects+of+frequency%2C+masking%2C+and+the+non-Pacinian+I+psychophysical+channel%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Exp+Child+Psychol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel.</a> J Exp Child Psychol. 98 (2), 113-130 (2007).</li>
<li>Cohen, J. C., Makous, J. C., Bolanowski, S. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Under+which+conditions+do+the+skin+and+probe+decouple+during+sinusoidal+vibrations%3F%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Exp+Brain+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Under which conditions do the skin and probe decouple during sinusoidal vibrations?</a> Exp Brain Res. 129 (2), 211-217 (1999).</li>
<li>Makous, J. C., Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+effects+of+static+indentation+on+vibrotactile+threshold%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Acoust.+Soc.+Am%22%5BJournal%5D)">The effects of static indentation on vibrotactile threshold.</a> J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (5), 3149-3153 (1996).</li>
<li>Goldreich, D., Kanics, I. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tactile+Acuity+is+Enhanced+in+Blindness%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tactile Acuity is Enhanced in Blindness.</a> J. Neurosci. 23 (8), 3439-3445 (2003).</li>
<li>Peters, R. M., Goldreich, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tactile+Spatial+Acuity+in+Childhood%3A+Effects+of+Age+and+Fingertip+Size%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tactile Spatial Acuity in Childhood: Effects of Age and Fingertip Size.</a> PLoS One. 8 (12), (2013).</li>
<li>Tong, J., Mao, O., Goldreich, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Two-point+orientation+discrimination+versus+the+traditional+two-point+test+for+tactile+spatial+acuity+assessment%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Hum+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.</a> Front Hum Neurosci. 7, 579(2013).</li>
<li>Goldreich, D., Wong, M., Peters, R. M., Kanics, I. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+Tactile+Automated+Passive-Finger+Stimulator+%28TAPS%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Vis+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS).</a> J Vis Exp. (28), (2009).</li>
<li>Coste, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Piezo+proteins+are+pore-forming+subunits+of+mechanically+activated+channels%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels.</a> Nature. 483 (7388), 176-181 (2012).</li>
<li>Martinez-Salgado, C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Stomatin+and+Sensory+Neuron+Mechanotransduction%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Neurophysiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Stomatin and Sensory Neuron Mechanotransduction.</a> J Neurophysiol. 98 (6), 3802-3808 (2007).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The techniques used to evaluate VDT vary as to device specifications, hardware, and testing protocols. The International Organization for Standardization specifies the methods and procedures to analyze and interpret vibrotactile thresholds including recommendations for the various components of a vibrometer (ISO 13091-1 and 226,27) The described testing system abides to the relevant ISO recommendations for testing frequency range (4-125 Hz), method (variant of up-down staircase and forced choice), probe size (...

Specialized mechanosensory receptors in the skin mediate the perception of vibration and grating orientation. Each mechanosensory receptor type is tuned to detect distinct features of tactile stimuli1,2. This property provides the psychophysical basis for a differentiated assessment of mechanosensory function by using tests that deliver simple sinusoidal oscillations (vibration) or fine gratings. It is known that psychophysical thresholds for vibration perception are lower for high than low frequency vibration3,4. Two types of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors associated with the Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles primarily detect low (10-40 Hz) and high (100-200 Hz) frequency vibration stimuli, respectively5. It is thought that the psychophysical thresholds for vibration perception rely to a considerable extent on the activation of these two sets of mechanoreceptors at their best frequencies6,7. Tactile spatial acuity is tested by the grating orientation task to determine the finest grating whose orientation can be discriminated by a subject7-9. Merkel cell-neurite complex afferents are essential for detecting grating orientation8,10. Interestingly, there has been considerable recent progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of how mechanoreceptors detect extremely small tactile stimuli11. Mechanosensitive ion channels like Piezo2 and modulators like STOML3 have been directly implicated in the detection of fine tactile stimuli in touch receptors12-15. There are already human patients identified with function altering mutations in the Piezo2 gene and it will be important to test whether such patients have touch deficits16. 
The determination of the vibrotactile threshold relies on the delivery of a vibrating stimulus to the skin. Vibration detection thresholds vary with the vibration frequency. Vibration frequency to detection threshold curves were described by von Bekesey, Verillo, and Bolanowski, among many others, from the 1930s up to the 1990s5,17. The devices in the early days were based on shakers and power amplifiers and several devices have been commercialized and there are a lot of variation as to choice of stimulator (testing frequency), the diameter of the probe in contact with skin, the use of a surround to limit the stimulation to one area of the skin, and the testing protocol that determines the threshold (see the following references for more detailed insight on the device and testing features)18-20. Most devices usually test one site; however, there are new devices that use vertical displacement stimulators equipped with 2 probes to deliver vibratory stimuli with separation ranges that can be varied21. Also detection thresholds are measured based on vibration frequency or intensity discrimination with continuous stimulation; or with intermittent vibration stimuli with or without a masking stimulus. Therefore, we recommend that the reader be aware of the plethora of developments in this field. 
Here, we describe the components of the device and a step-by-step guide on how to conduct psychophysical tests to estimate vibration detection threshold in human subjects. We then show how to assess tactile acuity manually by using the tactile acuity cube. We use a two-interval, forced-choice paradigm: the stimulus is always presented during one of two intervals and the subject has to indicate which interval has the vibration stimulus. We employ a transformed-rule up and down as the adaptive method that executes a threshold search by changing the stimulus intensity based on the performance during the test. Both psychophysical protocols can be used by investigators as a screening tool for evaluation of alterations in touch sensitivity.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Piezo actuator</td><td>Physik Instrument, Germany</td><td>P-602.1L</td><td>The linear piezoelectric actuator, with integrated position sensor and motion amplifier, contains a piezoceramic material that elongates and contracts when voltage is applied. The piezoelectric actuator travels up to100 &amp;micro;m. The actuator is equipped with a flexure guide that ensures straight motion without tilting or lateral offset. The displacement is linear and calibration is done and checked by the manufacturer. It is recommended that on-axis movement of the probe be checked under the microscope. According to the manufacturer, the stimulus amplitude dampens by less than 20% at oscillating frequencies of 1000 Hz. This can be checked by using a force or displacement measuring device (e.g. force transducer from Kleindiek).</td></tr><tr><td>Piezo Amplifier/Servo Controller</td><td>Physik Instrument, Germany</td><td>E-665</td><td>E-665 amplifier/controller drives and controls the displacement of a low-voltage piezoelectric actuator in a system with sensor position feedback (SGS sensors). The servo-controller provides the option for closed loop operation. When applying sinusoidal and oscillating stimuli the amplitude signal deviates from the set amplitude starting from 500 Hz and reaches a maximum decrease of 20% at 1000Hz.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>LabChart Software</td><td>ADInstruments, USA</td><td>LabChart 7, MLU60/8</td><td>Can create, store and run macro of the psychophysical testing algorithm.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>PowerLab</td><td>ADInstruments, USA</td><td>PowerLab 4/35 PL3504</td><td>Data Acquisition Hardware. Used with LabChart software.</td></tr><tr><td>Brass bar</td><td>Custom-made</td><td></td><td>Bar made of pure brass, weighs 15.5 kg. When the peizoelectric actuator is mounted on the brass bar it should exert a force of 30 g weight on skin surface.</td></tr><tr><td>Monitor</td><td>Custom-made</td><td></td><td>To mark the 1st and the 2nd interval. The monitor indicates to the subject the time intervals during which the stimulus may be presented.</td></tr><tr><td>Response box</td><td>Custom-made</td><td></td><td>The subject indicates the interval at which stimulus occurred.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Board&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Custom-made</td><td></td><td>Upper surface should be smooth (Plastic), lower surface made of foam to prevent stray vibration ot be transmitted to the stimulating pobe.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Probe</td><td>Custom-made</td><td></td><td>A flat circular probe with smoothed edges (thermoplastic material) attached to a screw head. The screw should be of appropriate size to be tightened directly to the moving part of piezoelectric actuator. Size of the probe can be according to preference; in our case, diameter 8.21 mm and surface area 52.9 mm&lt;sup&gt;2.&lt;/sup&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>Labchart Script</td><td></td><td></td><td>Can be sent on request. See supplementary code file.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Tactile Acuity Cube</td><td>MedCore</td><td></td><td>The cube is comprised of 6 sides each containing a grating (bar and groove) whose widths are 0.75, 1.25, 1.75, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 mm.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table>

measurement of vibration detection threshold and tactile spatial acuity in human subjects

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Tests that allow the precise determination of psychophysical thresholds for vibration and grating orientation provide valuable information about mechanosensory function that are relevant for clinical diagnosis as well as for basic research. Here, we describe two psychophysical tests designed to determine the vibration detection threshold (automated system) and tactile spatial acuity (handheld device). Both procedures implement a two-interval forced-choice and a transformed-rule up and down experimental paradigm. These tests have been used to obtain mechanosensory profiles for individuals from distinct human cohorts such as twins or people with sensorineural deafness.

The piezoelectric actuator provides the vibration stimulus to the subject. The vibration stimulus has a total duration of 1.8 sec and is presented only once during a trial during the first or second interval (Figure 2A). The rise and fall time at the onset and offset of the stimulus is determined by the functions (1-e-bt)∙Amplitude∙sine(frequency), and (e-bt)∙Amplitude∙sine(frequency), respectively, where b is set at 9.1. The rise and fall time at on...

Here, we present protocols to determine vibration detection thresholds and tactile acuity using psychophysical methods in man.

Tests that allow the precise determination of psychophysical thresholds for vibration and grating orientation provide valuable information about ...

The overall goal of this psychophysical procedure is to determine the threshold for vibration detection in tactile spatial acuity. This method can help us ask some quite interesting questions about sense medicine through physiology, in particular, about the sense of touch. The main advantage of this method is that we can obtain quantitative information about mechani-sensory profiles in individuals and this information can be used for both for clinical diagnosis as well as for basic research.We first applied this method in a twin study to test whether touch traits in people are heritable. Visual demonstration of this method is critical as depiction of the procedure as well as the adaptive method we use are complex. Begin to assemble the components of the device by placing a 40 cm by 80 cm smooth surface board on a table.Then, place a brass bar on this board. Afterwards, ready the controller unit. Next, connect the response box and the monitor device to the data acquisition system.Then, screw the custom-made stimulating probe to the moving part of the piezoelectric actuator. Finally, mount the piezoelectric actuator with the probe on the balance brass bar. Begin by bringing the subject into a quiet room and seat them near the device.Inform the subject about the testing procedure and have them sign a written consent form. Then, place their arm on the board and pad the little finger with medical dough to minimize movement. Next, place the brass bar on the board and use a water level to position the probe horizontally on the little finger of the tested hand just below the nail bed.Avoid skin contact with the edges of the circular flat probe. Prior to starting the test, ensure that the procedure is understood by presenting both an easy to perceive vibration stimulus, and a hard one by varying the amplitude until the subject perceives a vibration. Then, start the test by running a script that uses a two alternative forced-choice procedure with the up-down adaptive method.For each trial, randomly administer a vibration stimulus during one of the two intervals which are visually indicated to the test subject as one or two on the screen in front of them. Ask the subject to indicate if the first or second interval contained the vibration stimulus by pressing the number one or two on the response box. Have the subject make a guess response if they are not sure when the stimulus was presented.Complete a total of six to nine trials, and repeat the same vibration stimulus at the one amplitude level at least six times consecutively. If all responses are correct, reduce the stimulus intensity level for the subsequent trial series. Based on the decision rule of the adaptive method, grant the subject more trials at the same stimulus intensity if the subject makes errors in a trial series.Reduce the stimulus intensity if the stimulus is correctly identified in at least five trials, and incorrectly in less than two trials. Increase the stimulus level if the subject makes two incorrect responses in a trial series or more than one incorrect response and fewer than five correct responses. Document the change in the direction of stimulus intensity as the reversal point.Change the stimulus intensity according to reversal point number. For example, prior to the third reversal point, Change by four intensity levels. Or at the third reversal point, change by two intensity levels.Otherwise, by one level. End testing when the subject completes a total of eight reversals. Finally calculate the vibration detection threshold or VDT by taking the median of the stimulus amplitude value of the last six reversals.Begin by providing instructions about the task in a quiet room set at a temperature between 20 and 30 degrees Celsius. Next, blindfold the subject using shielded eye glasses. Place the dominant hand on a table with the palm surface facing up.During each trial, apply the tactile acuity cube or TAC to the finger pad at one of two grating orientations. Vertically or horizontally aligned to the long axis of the finger. Apply the gratings of the TAC to the finger pad of the finger for two seconds so that the cube exerts its whole weight on the finger.Then, ask the subject to determine the orientation of the alignment before the cube is removed from their finger. Start with the largest grating at 6.0 millimeters and decrease the grating width after two correct identifications of the orientation. Then, test the next smaller width and continue with the stepping rule until the subject makes and incorrect response.Then, document this grating width as a reversal point. Increase the grating width step-wise again until the two orientations of the width are determined correctly again. Finally, end the test after the completion of 13 reversals and calculate the tactile grating orientation threshold by taking the median of the grating widths of the last 10 reversals.Here, a typical testing session to determine the vibration detection threshold at 125 Hz is shown. A decrease in stimulus intensity requires at least six sequential correct responses. Furthermore, a change in the direction of stimulus intensity marks a reversal point in the trial series track and requires at least two incorrect responses.The stimulus intensity is changed in steps of four levels when the number of reversals is less than three, followed by two levels at the third reversal, and finally one level steps to finally determine the threshold. For the tactile cube experiment, where each trial consists of two stimulations, vertical and horizontal, the threshold is 1.6 millimeters, which is the median value of the grating widths of the last 10 reversal points. Once mastered, this technique can be done in about 30 minutes, if it's done properly.After watching this video, you should get a good idea about how to measure vibration detection threshold as well as tactile acuity in humans.

measurement-vibration-detection-threshold-tactile-spatial-acuity

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

We describe a computer-controlled device for investigating the sense of touch: the Tactile Automated Passive-finger Stimulator (TAPS). We describe the components of TAPS, and show how TAPS is used to administer a two-interval forced-choice tactile grating orientation test.

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

We describe two tactile sensory testing methods for acute or chronic periods of spinal cord injury in rats.  These validated procedures can detect the development and maintenance of allodynia-like sensations.

Acute and Chronic Tactile Sensory Testing after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

Electronic von Frey measurements are an effective and improved alternative to classical von Frey filaments, as they allow rapid and precise measurement of changes in rodent mechanical withdrawal thresholds to continuously applied pressure stimuli before and after an inflammatory event.

Measuring Changes in Tactile Sensitivity in the Hind Paw of Mice Using an Electronic von Frey Apparatus

Here we explore contralateral tactile masking between the forearms in which tactile detection thresholds are modulated by vibration applied to a remote site. The details of which remote sites have an effect can tell us about how the body is represented in the brain.

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

This article describes a technique for applying vibrotactile stimuli to the thigh of a human participant, and measuring the accuracy and reaction time of the participant's volitional response for various combinations of stimulation location and frequency.

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

The goal of this protocol is to demonstrate a practical method to temporarily interfere with proprioception in the upper limb of healthy humans.

A Simple Non-invasive Method for Temporary Knockdown of Upper Limb Proprioception

We present a protocol to apply incongruent visual-tactile stimuli during an object transfer task. Specifically, during block transfers, performed while the hand is hidden, a virtual presentation of the block shows random occurrences of false block drops. The protocol also describes adding vibrotactile feedback while performing the motor task.

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

This work describes a standard method to assess tactile sensation at the midline of the tongue tip. Using Von Frey Hair (VFH) monofilaments, this protocol provides estimates of detection and discrimination threshold estimates for oral point pressure (OPP).

Assessment of Midline Lingual Point-Pressure Somatosensation Using Von Frey Hair Monofilaments

Presented is the tactile semiautomated passive-finger angle stimulator TSPAS, a new way to assess tactile spatial acuity and tactile angle discrimination using a computer-controlled tactile stimulus system that applies raised angle stimuli to a subject's passive fingerpad, while controlling for movement speed, distance, and contact duration.

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

This protocol describes a driving simulation platform and a tactile vibrating toolkit for the investigation of driving-related research. An exemplar experiment exploring the effectiveness of tactile warnings is also...

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

This work illustrates a standard procedure and threshold determination by the R-index to assess spatial lingual tactile sensitivity using a gratings orientation test.

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Learn psychophysical methods to measure vibration detection thresholds and tactile spatial acuity in human subjects. These quantitative techniques support clinical diagnosis and basic neuroscience research.

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Explore More Videos