Name: High-resolution Quantification of Odor-guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Using the Flywalk Paradigm (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2015-12-11T15:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 13 min 31 s
Description: Learn the Flywalk method for high-resolution quantification of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. This automated tracking system enables precise analysis of insect olfactory responses.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We thank Daniel Veit for technical assistance and Pedro Gouveia at Electricidade Em P&#242; (electricidadeempo.net) for customizing the tracking software for our demands. We&#160;also thank Tom Retzke for support during the filming process. This study was supported by the Max Planck Society.

The construction and technical details of Flywalk have been described elsewhere26 (in case of any problems of establishing this set up, further information can be obtained from MK). Here we focus on detailed instructions on the handling of the paradigm that will help to obtain reliable results.
1. Fly Handling
<ol>
	<li>Rear flies in low to medium density cultures on food medium27 under a 12 hr:12 hr light:dark regime at 23-25 &#176;C and 70% relative humidity. To this end, allow 20-30 newly emerged adult flies to reproduce in a big food vial for 1 week, then discard adult flies and wait for offspring to emerge.</li>
	<li>Collect 30-40 newly emerged (age &#60;24 hr) adult flies and age them on in new a vial containing food medium27 for 3-5 days.</li>
	<li>Twenty-four hr before the start of the behavioral experiment: Transfer all 30-40 previously collected 3-5 d old (see 2.2) flies to a new vial containing a moist rubber foam plug or a moist tissue paper using an aspirator. 
	NOTE: Do not anaesthetize flies using CO2.</li>
</ol>
2. Preparation of the Flywalk Setup&#160;
<ol>
	<li>Use 250 ml bottles as humidifiers. Fill humidifiers with 100 ml of distilled water.</li>
	<li>Prepare odor vials.
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare 500 &#181;l 10-3 dilutions of the pure odors ethyl acetate, ethyl butyrate, isopentyl acetate and 2,3-butanedione in the solvent mineral oil.</li>
		<li>Attach two ball check valves per odor vial. Note that check valves allow for uni-directional airflow only. Therefore, connect check valves in such a way that air can enter the vial on one side and leave it on the other side.</li>
		<li>Remove the lid of a 200 &#181;l PCR reaction tube. Pipette 100 &#181;l of every odor dilution into a separate reaction tube and place the tubes in separate odor vials. Also prepare one odor vial containing only the solvent mineral oil.</li>
		<li>Tightly seal the odor vials by closing them using stainless steel plugs and rubber gaskets.</li>
		<li>Connect the 5 odor vials (4 containing odors and 1 containing mineral oil) to the odor delivery system. Make sure to connect them in the right flow direction. A wrong connection will not only compromise the planned experiment, but it may also contaminate the delivery system.&#160;</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Check for leaks by sealing the outlet of the mixing chamber of the stimulus device. Make sure, that all airflows before the stimulus device now progressively drop to zero. If not, check for leaks which can now be identified by the hissing sound of air leaving the system.</li>
	<li>Carefully transfer 15 individual flies to 15 individual glass tubes using an aspirator and close glass tubes on both sides using the corresponding adapters.&#160; 
	Note: Because the system must be hermetically sealed for successful experiments, ensure that adapters fit glass tubes tightly and note that glass tubes may break during this step. Take care to avoid injuries by wearing protective gloves and goggles.</li>
	<li>Connect the glass tubes to the Flywalk setup and, from here on, wait for at least 15 min before starting the experiment to allow flies to habituate to the new environment.</li>
	<li>After attaching glass tubes: check the readout of the downstream digital flow meters on computer 1 if the 16 airflows after the glass tubes add up to the airflow entering the system. Also check on computer 1, if humidity is between 60% and 80%.</li>
	<li>Design stimulus protocol controlling the sequence and timing of odor stimuli presented to the flies. To obtain e.g. the described data, present 4 odors and the control (mineral oil) singly and all possible ternary and the quarternary mixtures of the odors simultaneously for 40 times each. Set pulse duration to 500 msec at an interstimulus interval of 90 sec and randomize stimulus sequence.</li>
	<li>Switch on the light source (LED-cluster; &#955; = 630). Make sure to provide enough light for efficient tracking without increasing the temperature inside the glass tubes.</li>
	<li>Set up a region of interest of the tracking system by dragging a frame across the area to be monitored in such a way that all 15 glass tubes are included and approximately 5 mm of the edges of the tubes are excluded.</li>
	<li>Set up 14 parallel separation lines between individual tubes in the tracking system by changing their Y-positions in the corresponding script to keep individual flies identifiable throughout the experiment. Make sure to position them in such a way that there is always one glass tube between two such separator lines, because only one fly will be tracked between any set of two lines.</li>
	<li>Make sure to set camera parameters in such a way that flies are reliably tracked throughout the glass tubes. If flies are lost at the edges of the region of interest, increase brightness or gain of the tracking software. Avoid mechanical vibrations of the tracking system. Track using commercial software according to manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
	<li>Start experiment by starting the stimulus protocol. Record flies&#180; XY-coordinates at 20 fps (frames per sec) and log in combination with the odor valve status in text files.</li>
</ol>
3. Data Analysis
NOTE: The following steps in the data analysis are automatized using custom-written routines programmed in R. Because these steps are crucial to obtain meaningful results the analysis will nevertheless be presented in a step-by-step manner. The raw data for the analysis are .csv-files containing synchronized information on odor valve status, pulse number in the experiment and 15 fly x-positions in cm on a common time axis for one odor stimulation cycle. Custom code for data analysis can be provided upon request.
<ol>
	<li>Open .csv-file, find time-point of valve opening signified by a change in the column representing the valve status.</li>
	<li>Calculate the linear function of odor position of the form 
	f(t) = s*t + i 
	where t is time in the stimulation cycle, s is the wind speed (here 20 cm/sec) and the intercept i can be calculated using the time-point the odor enters the tubes at position 0 (valve opening plus delay).</li>
	<li>Find the time point at which odor and fly x-position intersect for every fly and set this time-point to 0. Note: This way fly positions are aligned to each individual&#180;s encounter with the odor.</li>
	<li>Exclude flies sitting at the very edges of the region of interest.</li>
	<li>Calculate speed from X-positions by dividing displacement along the x-axis by the time interval (100 msec) and repeat procedure for every stimulation cycle.</li>
	<li>To obtain speed time-courses as shown in Figure 2E calculate mean speed time-course for every fly and odor and from those the mean time-course for a given odor.</li>
	<li>To obtain net displacement as shown in Figure 3C calculate the net displacement within 4 sec after the odor pulse for every tracking event and afterwards the mean net displacement per fly and odor.</li>
</ol>
4. Cleaning Procedure
<ol>
	<li>Clean Glass Tubes
	<ol>
		<li>Remove flies and adapters from glass tubes and soak glass tubes in detergent.</li>
		<li>Rinse glass tubes under running distilled water and dry them using pressurized air.</li>
		<li>Heat glass tubes at 200 &#176;C for 8 hr.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Clean Odor Delivery System
	<ol>
		<li>Remove all odor vials and tubing from the central mixing chamber.</li>
		<li>Remove tubing adapters from the mixing chamber.</li>
		<li>Clean mixing chamber by rinsing it with laboratory cleaning solution and solvents (e.g. ethanol, acetone). Perform these steps under the laboratory hood.</li>
		<li>Dry mixing chamber using pressurized air and heat it at 200 &#176;C for 8 hr.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Clean Odor Vials and Check Valves
	<ol>
		<li>Remove steel plug (discard rubber gasket) and check valves from odor vials and soak all components in laboratory cleaning solution.</li>
		<li>Sonicate components in an ultrasound bath and rinse them with distilled water.</li>
		<li>Clean all components except check valves with ethanol and acetone. Perform these steps under the laboratory hood.</li>
		<li>Dry components using pressurized air and heat them at 200 &#176;C for 8 hr.</li>
		<li>Clean check valves on the inside by flushing them with ethanol and acetone using a syringe (consider flow direction). Perform these steps under the laboratory hood wearing laboratory goggles. Because acetone attacks rubber parts, immediately dry check valves by flushing them with pressurized air.</li>
		<li>Remove residual odors by pulsing air through check valves for several days. Use an incubator at 60 &#176;C and a 1 sec air on/1 sec air off regime for this cleaning step.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Murlis, J., Elkinton, J. S., Cardé, R. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Odor+plumes+and+how+insects+use+them%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annu.+Rev.+Entomol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Odor plumes and how insects use them.</a> Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 505-532 (1992).</li>
<li>Kennedy, J. S., Marsh, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Pheromone-regulated+anemotaxis+in+flying+moths%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Pheromone-regulated anemotaxis in flying moths.</a> Science. 184 (4140), 999-1001 (1974).</li>
<li>Budick, S. A., Dickinson, M. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Free-flight+responses+of+Drosophila+melanogaster+to+attractive+odors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Exp.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors.</a> J. Exp. Biol. 209 (15), 3001-3017 (2006).</li>
<li>Buehlmann, C., Graham, P., Hansson, B. S., Knaden, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Desert+ants+locate+food+by+combining+high+sensitivity+to+food+odors+with+extensive+crosswind+runs%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Desert ants locate food by combining high sensitivity to food odors with extensive crosswind runs.</a> Curr. Biol. 24 (9), 960-964 (2014).</li>
<li>Van Breugel, F., Dickinson, M. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Plume-tracking+behavior+of+flying+Drosophila+emerges+from+a+set+of+distinct+sensory-motor+reflexes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Plume-tracking behavior of flying Drosophila emerges from a set of distinct sensory-motor reflexes.</a> Curr. Biol. 24 (3), 274-286 (2014).</li>
<li>Schuckel, J., Meisner, S., Torkkeli, P. H., French, A. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dynamic+properties+of+Drosophila+olfactory+electroantennograms%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Comp.+Physiol.+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dynamic properties of Drosophila olfactory electroantennograms.</a> J. Comp. Physiol. A. 194 (5), 483-489 (2008).</li>
<li>Geffen, M. N., Broome, B. M., Laurent, G., Meister, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Neural+encoding+of+rapidly+fluctuating+odors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Neural encoding of rapidly fluctuating odors.</a> Neuron. 61 (4), 570-586 (2009).</li>
<li>Nagel, K. I., Wilson, R. I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Biophysical+mechanisms+underlying+olfactory+receptor+neuron+dynamics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Biophysical mechanisms underlying olfactory receptor neuron dynamics.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 14 (2), 208-216 (2011).</li>
<li>Martelli, C., Carlson, J. R., Emonet, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Intensity+invariant+dynamics+and+odor-specific+latencies+in+olfactory+receptor+neuron+response%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Intensity invariant dynamics and odor-specific latencies in olfactory receptor neuron response.</a> J. Neurosci. 33 (15), 6285-6297 (2013).</li>
<li>Szyszka, P., Gerkin, R. C., Galizia, C. G., Smith, B. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((High-speed+odor+transduction+and+pulse+tracking+by+insect+olfactory+receptor+neurons%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+USA%22%5BJournal%5D)">High-speed odor transduction and pulse tracking by insect olfactory receptor neurons.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111 (47), 16925-16930 (2014).</li>
<li>Nagel, K. I., Hong, E. J., Wilson, R. I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Synaptic+and+circuit+mechanisms+promoting+broadband+transmission+of+olfactory+stimulus+dynamics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Synaptic and circuit mechanisms promoting broadband transmission of olfactory stimulus dynamics.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 18 (1), 56-65 (2014).</li>
<li>Larsson, M. C., Domingos, A. I., Jones, W. D., Chiappe, M. E., Amrein, H., Vosshall, L. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Or83b+encodes+a+broadly+expressed+odorant+receptor+essential+for+Drosophila+olfaction%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction.</a> Neuron. 43 (5), 703-714 (2004).</li>
<li>Knaden, M., Strutz, A., Ahsan, J., Sachse, S., Hansson, B. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Spatial+representation+of+odorant+valence+in+an+insect+brain%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Spatial representation of odorant valence in an insect brain.</a> Cell Rep. 1 (4), 392-399 (2012).</li>
<li>Zaninovich, O. A., Kim, S. M., Root, C. R., Green, D. S., Ko, K. I., Wang, J. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+single-fly+assay+for+foraging+behavior+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Vis.+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">A single-fly assay for foraging behavior in Drosophila.</a> J. Vis. Exp. (81), e50801(2013).</li>
<li>Farhan, A., Gulati, J., Groβe-Wilde, E., Vogel, H., Hansson, B. S., Knaden, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+CCHamide+1+receptor+modulates+sensory+perception+and+olfactory+behavior+in+starved+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci.+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">The CCHamide 1 receptor modulates sensory perception and olfactory behavior in starved Drosophila.</a> Sci. Rep. 3 (2765), 1-6 (2013).</li>
<li>Flügge, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Geruchliche+Raumorientierung+von+Drosophila+melanogaster%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Z.+Vgl.+Physiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Geruchliche Raumorientierung von Drosophila melanogaster.</a> Z. Vgl. Physiol. 20 (4), 462-500 (1934).</li>
<li>Borst, A., Heisenberg, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Osmotropotaxis+in+Drosophila+melanogaster%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Comp.+Physiol.+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Osmotropotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster.</a> J. Comp. Physiol. A. 147 (4), 479-484 (1982).</li>
<li>Louis, M., Huber, T., Benton, R., Sakmar, T. P., Vosshall, L. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Bilateral+olfactory+sensory+input+enhances+chemotaxis+behavior%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Bilateral olfactory sensory input enhances chemotaxis behavior.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 11 (2), 187-199 (2008).</li>
<li>Gomez-Marin, A., Stephens, G. J., Louis, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Active+sampling+and+decision+making+in+Drosophila+chemotaxis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Active sampling and decision making in Drosophila chemotaxis.</a> Nat. Commun. 2 (441), 1-10 (2011).</li>
<li>Gaudry, Q., Hong, E. J., Kain, J., de Bivort, B. L., Wilson, R. I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Asymmetric+neurotransmitter+release+enables+rapid+odour+lateralization+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Asymmetric neurotransmitter release enables rapid odour lateralization in Drosophila.</a> Nature. 493 (7432), 42442-42448 (2013).</li>
<li>Quinn, W. G., Harris, W. A., Benzer, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Conditioned+behavior+in+Drosophila+melanogaster%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+USA%22%5BJournal%5D)">Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 71 (3), 708-712 (1974).</li>
<li>Ramdya, P., Lichocki, P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mechanosensory+interactions+drive+collective+behaviour+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mechanosensory interactions drive collective behaviour in Drosophila.</a> Nature. 519 (7542), 233-236 (2014).</li>
<li>Bhandawat, V., Maimon, G., Dickinson, M. H., Wilson, R. I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Olfactory+modulation+of+flight+in+Drosophila+is+sensitive%2C+selective+and+rapid%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Exp.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Olfactory modulation of flight in Drosophila is sensitive, selective and rapid.</a> J. Exp. Biol. 213 (21), 3625-3635 (2010).</li>
<li>Duistermars, B. J., Chow, D. M., Frye, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Flies+require+bilateral+sensory+input+to+track+odor+gradients+in+flight%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Flies require bilateral sensory input to track odor gradients in flight.</a> Curr. Biol. 19 (15), 1301-1307 (2009).</li>
<li>Claridge-Chang, A., Roorda, R. D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Writing+memories+with+light-addressable+reinforcement+circuitry%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Writing memories with light-addressable reinforcement circuitry.</a> Cell. 139 (2), 405-415 (2009).</li>
<li>Steck, K., Veit, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+high-throughput+behavioral+paradigm+for+Drosophila+olfaction+-+The+Flywalk%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci.+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">A high-throughput behavioral paradigm for Drosophila olfaction - The Flywalk.</a> Sci. Rep. 2 (361), 1-9 (2012).</li>
<li>Lewis, E. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+new+standard+food+medium%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Drosoph.+Inf.+Serv%22%5BJournal%5D)">A new standard food medium.</a> Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 34, 117-118 (1960).</li>
<li>Lebestky, T., Chang, J. S. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Two+different+forms+of+arousal+in+Drosophila+are+oppositely+regulated+by+the+dopamine+D1+receptor+ortholog+DopR+via+distinct+neural+circuits%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Two different forms of arousal in Drosophila are oppositely regulated by the dopamine D1 receptor ortholog DopR via distinct neural circuits.</a> Neuron. 64, 522-536 (2009).</li>
<li>Thoma, M., Hansson, B. S., Knaden, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Compound+valence+is+conserved+in+binary+odor+mixtures+in+Drosophila+melanogaster%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Exp.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Compound valence is conserved in binary odor mixtures in Drosophila melanogaster.</a> J. Exp. Biol. 217 (20), 3645-3655 (2014).</li>
<li>Olsson, S. B., Kuebler, L. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+novel+multicomponent+stimulus+device+for+use+in+olfactory+experiments%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci.+Meth%22%5BJournal%5D)">A novel multicomponent stimulus device for use in olfactory experiments.</a> J. Neurosci. Meth. 195 (1), 1-9 (2011).</li>
</ol>

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Although the Flywalk system appears rather sophisticated at first glance, once set up and running it is easy to use and produces very robust results. To stress the consistency of the results produced with the bioassay it may be said that the representative results shown here were obtained almost 2 years after some of the results shown in a previous study29 with a modified setup using a new tracking software and light source. Nevertheless, the attractant responses are - despite slightly higher response amplitud...

The overarching goal of any neuroethological research is to establish a causal link between the activity states of single neurons or neuronal circuits and the behavior of an organism. To achieve this goal neuronal activity and behavior should be monitored under identical stimulus conditions and these stimulus conditions should ideally be similar to those the nervous system under scrutiny evolved to make sense of. Particularly when it comes to behavioral bioassays, these requirements have historically proven quite demanding in Drosophila melanogaster olfactory neuroethology.
Once released from the source, odor plumes rapidly break up into thin filaments with turbulent diffusion caused by air movement being the main determinant of odor distribution1. As a result, an insect navigating towards an odor source experiences intermittent stimulation with odor packages interspersed with variable intervals of clean air. Both walking and flying insects - including Drosophila- have been demonstrated to exploit this intermittent stimulation regime for navigation by surging upwind upon plume encounter and predominantly moving cross-wind in the absence of odors2-5. Whereas stimulation procedures in physiological experiments largely mimic those an insect may experience in its natural environment by either providing single puffs of odors interspersed with extended periods of clean air or dynamic stimulation sequences6-11, many behavioral bioassays used in Drosophila neuroethology such as trap assay, open-field arenas or T-maze rely on odor-gradients12-15. However, because odor gradients by definition are variable in concentration depending on the distance from the odor source, a particular behavior cannot be attributed to a precise odor concentration using these paradigms. In addition, the slope of an odor gradient critically depends on the physicochemical properties of the odorant. A gradient of a highly volatile compound will be shallower than that created by a less volatile compound and therefore also harder to track for an organism relying on measuring concentration differences in space as the only means of navigation16-20, which may lead to a misinterpretation of olfactory preferences particularly in choice assays. This effect is also highly detrimental when investigating behavior towards odor mixtures because it leads to different blend component ratios at every point in space and therefore again precludes a clear correlation between physiology and behavior.
While vinegar flies tend to aggregate on fermenting fruit, they are solitary in their navigation towards food sources and oviposition sites. Nevertheless, rather than testing individual animals many behavioral paradigms used in Drosophila neuroethology examine the odor-guided behavior of cohorts of flies and attraction is scored as the fraction of flies choosing the odor over a control stimulus. These cohort experiments have contributed greatly to the understanding of fly neuroethology and many of the observations made by using them could be confirmed in single-fly experiments. However, it has been observed that flies can influence each other&#180;s decision21 and in extreme cases the evaluation of an odor can switch from indifference to avoidance depending on population density22. Additionally, results from these kinds of experiments often provide only the endpoint of a sequence of behavioral decisions rather than observing what the fly is doing while it is doing it, which would be desirable when attempting to correlate behavior with neuronal activity. These rather low-resolution cohort experiments are contrasted by high-resolution single-fly methods such as tethered flight arenas and treadmills which allow for a direct observation of behavioral responses at the time the stimulus is presented20,23,24. Nevertheless, cohort experiments are still popular, because they are very efficient and provide robust results even at comparably low sample sizes because inter-individual and inter-trial variability are partially averaged out due to the observation of populations over extended periods of time. While tethered flight and treadmill probably provide the gold standard concerning stimulus presentation and temporal resolution, the arenas used are designed for single animals and it is therefore time-consuming to obtain sample sizes necessary for a statistical analysis. Several other approaches have recently been developed that allow an efficient acquisition of high-resolution behavioral data in combination with a well-defined stimulus regime. These include unsupervised 3D-tracking of multiple vinegar flies in a windtunnel in combination with an accurate 3D-model of the odor plume5, tracking of multiple individual flies in choice chambers supplied with airstreams from both sides25 and the Flywalk paradigm26.
In Flywalk, 15 individual flies are situated in small glass tubes and continuously monitored by an overhead camera under red-light conditions. Odors are added to a continuous airstream of 20 cm/sec and travel through the glass tubes at a constant speed. The airstream is humidified by passing it through 250 ml bottles containing distilled water (humidifiers) before entering the odor delivery system. The flies&#180; positions are recorded within a square region of interest (ROI) encompassing most of the length of the odor tubes (but excluding the outer edges of the tubes (approximately 5 mm at each side) where the flies cannot move further up- or downwind) around the time of odor presentation (Figure 1A, B). Fly identities are kept constant by the tracking system throughout the experiment on the basis of their Y-positions (i.e. their glass tube limits). Odor stimulation is achieved using a multi-component stimulus device which allows the presentation of up to 8 single odors and all possible mixtures thereof26,29 (Figure 1B). The course of an experiment is controlled by a computer regulating the odor delivery system and collecting temperature and humidity information (computer 1, Figure 1C). This computer also controls a datalogger (start/stop recording) on a second computer which continuously tracks fly positions at 20 frames per sec (computer 2). Fly positions, odor valve status (i.e. time-point of valve opening), odor ID, temperature and humidity around odor stimulation cycles are logged on computer 2. This way information on odor and fly positions are synchronized and exported as .csv-files which can be further processed and analyzed using custom-written analysis routines. Because the whole system is computer-controlled, no human intervention is necessary during an experimental session.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Flywalk setup</td><td>Custom</td><td></td><td>details available upon request</td></tr><tr><td>stimulus device</td><td>Custom</td><td></td><td>details available upon request</td></tr><tr><td>LED cluster</td><td>Custom</td><td></td><td>details available upon request</td></tr><tr><td>HD Pro Webcam C920</td><td>Logitech, Lausanne, Switzerland</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2 Computers</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Flywalk Reloaded v1.0 software</td><td>Electricidade Em P&amp;oacute; (electricidadeempo.net)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Labview 11.0 software</td><td>National Instruments, Austin, TX</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Standard fly food</td><td>Custom</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Standard fly vials</td><td>Greiner bio-one GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Standard fly vials</td><td>Greiner bio-one GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>aspirator</td><td>Custom</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>mineral oil</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich (www.sigmaaldrich.com)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>odors</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich (www.sigmaaldrich.com)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>200 &amp;micro;l PCR reaction tubes</td><td>Biozym Scientific GmbH, Oldendorf, Germany</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

high-resolution quantification of odor-guided behavior in drosophila melanogaster using the flywalk paradigm

High-resolution Quantification of Odor-guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Using the Flywalk Paradigm

In their natural environment, insects such as the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster are bombarded with a huge amount of chemically distinct odorants. To complicate matters even further, the odors detected by the insect nervous system usually are not single compounds but mixtures whose composition and concentration ratios vary. This leads to an almost infinite amount of different olfactory stimuli which have to be evaluated by the nervous system.
To understand which aspects of an odor stimulus determine its evaluation by the fly, it is therefore desirable to efficiently examine odor-guided behavior towards many odorants and odor mixtures. To directly correlate behavior to neuronal activity, behavior should be quantified in a comparable time frame and under identical stimulus conditions as in neurophysiological experiments. However, many currently used olfactory bioassays in Drosophila neuroethology are rather specialized either towards efficiency or towards resolution.
Flywalk, an automated odor delivery and tracking system, bridges the gap between efficiency and resolution. It allows the determination of exactly when an odor packet stimulated a freely walking fly, and to determine the animal&#180;s dynamic behavioral reaction.

Because flies are allowed to distribute freely within their glass tubes between odor pulses and the odor pulse travels through the glass tubes at a constant speed flies encounter the odor at different times depending on their x-position at the time of stimulation. As a result, the onsets of the upwind trajectories evoked by a 500 msec pulse of an attractive 10-3 dilution of ethyl acetate are delayed by about 1 sec for flies at the downwind end of their glass tubes compared to those of flies sitting closer to t...

The automated tracking system Flywalk is used for high-resolution quantification of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

In their natural environment, insects such as the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster are bombarded with a huge amount of chemically distinct odorants. To ...

The overall goal of this behavioral bioassay is to investigate odor guided behavior in vinegar flies. Fly Walk is a high throughput system that tracks and analyzes the behavioral responses of multiple individual flies to olfactory stimuli automatically. This new technique can help answer key questions in the area of insect olfaction.Like what is the hedonic balance of an odor, or what does the addition of additional odorants mean to this balance? The main advantage of this experiment is that we can odor guided behavior in high temporary resolution, and we use odor stimuli that are similar to those that insects experience in nature or to those that we also use in electrophysiological recordings. Generally, individuals who try to use this method might struggle because it really, it needs an airtight system, so you need to know where the air is going through and you need to be sure that there are no leaks at all where the air can leave the system I For these experiments, it is important to rear the flies under a 12 to 12 light dark cycle in low to midden cultures containing a normal food medium.Keep the room temperature between 23 and 25 degrees Celsius, and the relative humidity should be around 70%in preparation. Using large culture vials made 20 to 30 adults for a week and collect groups of 30 to 40 offspring of mixed sex to make an experimental cohort. When a cohort is two to four days old, transfer it to a new vial containing a moist foam plug or a moist tissue paper.Let the flies starve in this vial for 24 hours before the test. It is vital that the flies are not anesthetized during this transfer. For this setup, 250 milliliter bottles serve as many humidifiers.Fill each bottle with 100 milliliters of distilled water. Next, prepare half milliliter working stocks of each odorant as one 1000 dilution of the pure odors and mineral oil. Similarly, prepare one PCR tube with just mineral oil to serve as a negative control.Now prepare the odor delivery system for each odorant. In the experiment. Connect two ball check valves to each odor vial.Make sure to connect the odor vials in the right flow direction. A wrong connection will not only compromise the planned experiment, but it may also contaminate the delivery system. Next, check the system for leaks.First, seal the outlet of the mixing chamber. Then check that all airflow before the stimulus device drops to zero. If there are leaks in the system, listen for them.They can usually be resolved by exchanging rubber gaskets at crucial connections or exchanging Teflon tubing. For the first step of this procedure, breaking glass is a concern, so put on protective gear. Carefully transfer 15 individual test flies to the individual glass tubes Using an aspirator, close the glass tubes on both sides using the corresponding adapters, they must fit very tightly.Next, connect the loaded glass tubes to the fly walk set up. Once all the tubes are attached, let the flies habituate to the new environment for at least 15 minutes before starting the experiment. Now switch on the light source.Make sure to provide enough light for efficient tracking without increasing the temperature inside the glass tubes. The odor vials must all be connected at this point to create a closed system. The habituation period relies on a closed system without leaks, so the airflow through the tubes is at the same speed as during the test periods.Check the airflow on the computer, connect it to the digital flow meters. The total airflows exiting the system should equal the airflow entering the system. If not, there is a leak present.The leak will affect airflow in all tubes, but the problematic tube usually is the one that displays the largest drop in airflow. If a new leak is identified, it is usually caused by a glass tube that broke inside the adapter, or it is caused by shards of glass within the adapters from previous experiments. During this process, make certain the humidity of the air exiting the system between 60 and 80%After the flies have acclimated to their tubes, the experiment can be run.In principle, any sequence of odors can be presented thus far. The best results can be obtained by randomizing the stimuli and separating them by at least 90 seconds. In total.Present each odor 40 times in 500 millisecond pulses. Next, set up a region of interest by dragging a frame across the area to be monitored. Include all 15 glass tubes in the frame, but exclude the outer five millimeters of the tubes ends.The next step is to turn off the tracking software and make modifications to the script. That will change the Y-axis position of the 14 parallel lines that separate the individual tubes. When the tracking software is back on, only one fly should be present between any two lines.Next, make certain the camera parameters are set so that the flies are reliably tracked throughout the glass tubes. If the flies are lost at the edges of the region of interest, increase the brightness or gain of the tracking software. Now that the system is fully prepared, start the stimulus protocol.Record the flies positions at a rate of 20 frames per second and log these coordinate positions in combination with the odor valve status into text files. Because the experiment is very sensitive to odors, regular cleaning is required to clean the glass tubes, soak them in detergent, and then rinse them off under running distilled water. Following the rinse, dry the tubes under pressurized air and then heat them to 200 degrees Celsius for eight hours.To clean the odor delivery system first, remove all the odor vials and tubing from the central mixing chamber. Then remove the tubing adapters from the mixing chamber. Clean the emptied mixing chamber by rinsing it with a solvent under a hood like the tubes.Dry the mixing chamber using pressurized air and heat it at 200 degrees Celsius for eight hours. To clean the odor vials and the valves, remove the steel plugs, discard the rubber gaskets, and remove the check valves, soap check valves and ethanol, and other components in both ethanol and acetone. Next, sonicate the soaked components for 30 minutes at the maximum setting and rinse them off with distilled water.As before, use pressurized air for drying and heat the components to 200 degrees Celsius for eight hours. Flush them with ethanol When acetone in the direction of the airflow, because acetone attacks rubber parts, immediately dry each flushed check valve with pressurized air to remove all the residual odors from the flushed check valves. Pulse air through them for several days, set them up in a 60 degree Celsius incubator with airflow pulsing on and off on one second intervals.15 starved female flies were exposed to ethyl butyrate. The yellow bar represents the odor pulse. The blue squares depicts upwind movement within a 100 millisecond timeframe.Correspondingly red squares depict downwind movement. The same flies also displayed upwind movement in response to stimulation with isop pentyl acetate, ethyl acetate or two three butane d averaged to the population. The fly's response to ethyl acetate had a sharp onset, high amplitude, and a short duration.In contrast, the response to two three butane Dion had a later average onset, lower amplitude, and longer duration. Ultimately, data from each odorant was resolved in this manner and then further analyzed to show all four odors elicited a higher upwind displacement within four seconds than the solvent. In addition, by opening odorant vials, synchronously flies were exposed to all possible mixtures.After stimulating the flies with the four individual odors stimulations with blends of the four odors were all at least as attractive as the most attractive single compound in the blend. Once master, you can run this experiment within one hour, and then it runs for eight hours and already 30 minutes later you can visualize your first results. So this method really allows obtaining data from many flies in short time with high temporary resolution.But be careful. This experiment requires extensive cleaning between the experiments. If your system still is contaminated with the ants from the last experiment, you can forget about your results in the fly walk.You can of course, also test genetically modified flies you by that you can investigate the impact of individual or factory neural circuits on the OD guided behavior. After the development of this new technique, it paved the way for us doing research in this area, insect faction, to understand coding of these odors in the brain of the insect. And importantly, using the same kind of stimulation for behavior in the fly walk and for physiological experiment means that we can really compare these two different experimental paradigms.After watching this video, you should have a good idea about how to establish the fly walk, and you should be able to establish this experiment in your own lap and start your own high throughput experiments on insect affection soon. But don't forget, working with glassware and chemicals can be extremely dangerous, so therefore, always wear a lab coat. Use goggles and gloves.

high-resolution-quantification-odor-guided-behavior-drosophila

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

In this video article, we describe a new method allowing the construction of odorant gradients with stable and controllable geometries. We briefly illustrate how these gradients can be used to screen for olfactory defects (full and partial anosmia) and to study more subtle features of chemotaxis behavior.

High-resolution Measurement of Odor-Driven Behavior in Drosophila Larvae

The study of complex locomotor behavior in Drosophila melanogaster is dependent upon the ability to quantify changes in a given fly's movement.  This article demonstrates how to do this using a high-resolution tracking system.

High-Resolution Video Tracking of Locomotion in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Here we describe how to optimize the acquired video image for an olfactory magnetic-tether (OMT) apparatus. We also describe two sample experimental protocols for studying visuo-olfactory fusion.

Visually Mediated Odor Tracking During Flight in Drosophila

We describe an established technique to measure and analyze odor-evoked calcium responses in the antennal lobe of living Drosophila melanogaster.

Calcium Imaging of Odor-evoked Responses in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe

This video describes how to track freely walking flies to assess their general locomotion ability. The featured protocol demonstrates the assay's setup and data analysis using video tracking software.

Tracking Freely Walking Flies: A Method to Assess Locomotion in Drosophila

Fruit flies have a complex olfactory system, can discriminate hundreds of odorants, and use their sense of smell to direct behavioral decisions. This video describes the four-way olfactometer assay, a method to study olfactory behavioral responses in flies. The featured protocol clip shows how to handle test flies and what are critical steps while performing the assay.

Four-Way Olfactometer Assay: A Method to Assess Odorant-Cued Responses in Drosophila

In this video article, we describe an automated assay to measure the effect of hunger or satiety on olfactory dependent food search behavior in the adult fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

We present a choice test to reveal the influence of odorants on Drosophila behavior using a Y-maze assay.

Testing Drosophila Olfaction with a Y-maze Assay

We describe here a behavioral setup and data analysis method for assaying olfactory responses of up to 100 vinegar flies (Drosophila melanogaster). This system may be used with single or multiple olfactory stimuli, and adaptable for optogenetic activation or silencing of neuronal subsets.

Olfactory Behaviors Assayed by Computer Tracking Of Drosophila in a Four-quadrant Olfactometer

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is associated with impaired social and communicative behavior and the emergence of repetitive behavior. For studying the interrelation between ASD genes and behavioral deficits in the Drosophila model, five behavioral paradigms are described in this paper for assaying social spacing, aggression, courtship, grooming, and habituation behavior.

Paradigms for Behavioral Assessment in Drosophila Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Learn the Flywalk method for high-resolution quantification of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. This automated tracking system enables precise analysis of insect olfactory responses.

High-resolution Quantification of Odor-guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Using the Flywalk Paradigm

Explore More Videos