Name: A Novel Behavioral Assay to Investigate Gustatory Responses of Individual, Freely-moving Bumble Bees (Bombus terrestris) (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2016-07-21T14:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 30 s
Description: Learn a novel behavioral assay to investigate gustatory responses in freely-moving bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). This method measures feeding behavior and toxin detection with precise video analysis.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This work was funded by the Leverhulme Trust grant (RPG-2012-708) and a BBSRC grant (BB/M00709X/1) to GAW.

1. Capturing Bees from the Colony and the Starvation Period
Note: Experiments described here were performed at Newcastle University, UK with Bombus terrestris audax. Multiple (2-3) commercially purchased colonies were used per treatment. The colonies have been maintained on a bench at laboratory conditions (25 ± 2 °C and 28 ± 2% RH) in constant darkness and were fed with honey bee collected pollen and sugar solutions ad libitum.
<ol>
	<li>Collect individual worker bumble bees using a plastic vial (7 cm long, 2.8 cm inner diameter) with a perforated plastic stopper, after having opened the gate to the colony just long enough for one bee to exit and be trapped.</li>
	<li>Prior to the experiment, individually starve all bumble bees for 2-4 hr in the plastic vials and keep at room temperature in complete darkness.</li>
</ol>
2. Transferring Bees into the Holding Tubes and the Habituation Phase
<ol>
	<li>After the starvation period, transfer a bumble bee directly from the plastic vial into a holding tube. The holding tube is a modified 15 ml centrifuge tube (length: 119 mm; diameter 17 mm), with a 4 mm hole drilled at the tip and a piece of steel mesh (base: 8 mm; height 30 mm) fixed inside by melting the plastic of the tube with a heated dissecting steel needle.</li>
	<li>Fix the holding tube containing the bumble bee onto a polystyrene holder with dental wax. Fix two pieces of cardboard on either side of the holding tube. This is to shield the bee from visual stimuli that might interfere with the experiment.</li>
	<li>Position a digital microscopic camera 5 cm above the tip of the holding tube and connect the camera to a compatible laptop.</li>
	<li>Adjust the holding tube so that at least the first 18 mm of the holding tube tip is within the video frame. Prior to the experiment, commence the 3 min habituation period.</li>
</ol>
3. Pre-test Phase: Presenting a Drop of Sucrose
<ol>
	<li>Connect a syringe to a female adapter containing a droplet of sucrose solution (~3.5 µl, 500 mM sucrose dissolved in deionized water). Present the sucrose inside the holding tube tip to motivate the extension of the proboscis.</li>
	<li>Give the bumble bee up to 5 min to consume the sucrose droplet. If the droplet is not consumed, remove the bumble bee from the experiment.</li>
	<li>Begin video recording after the habituation period. In this study, the proboscis activity was recorded at 26.7 frames/sec-1 with a 25X magnification rate.</li>
</ol>
4. Test Phase: Presenting the Test Solution
<ol>
	<li>Fill a 100 µl microcapillary tube with the test solution. Connect it to a piece of silicone tubing (6 cm length, 1 mm inside diameter) and fix it to a micro manipulator.
	<ol>
		<li>Connect the tubing via a male adapter to another silicone tubing (6 cm length, 4 mm inside diameter), which acts as a pipette bulb.</li>
		<li>Position the microcapillary tube 5-10 mm away from the holding tube tip. Gently squeeze the tubing to maintain the feeding solution at the tip of the microcapillary tube.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>After the bumble bee consumes the sucrose droplet, immediately remove the syringe containing the 500 mM sucrose solution.</li>
	<li>Begin the 2 min test phase when the bumble bee's proboscis contacts the solution inside the microcapillary tube.
	<ol>
		<li>To control for possible evaporation, fill two additional microcapillary tubes with sucrose or water and manipulate it exactly as during the test phase.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Before and after each trial scan the liquid levels inside the microcapillary tube using a scanner at 600 dpi to measure the amount of food consumed (Figure 4A).</li>
</ol>
5. Image Analyses
<ol>
	<li>Determine the volume of solution consumption using ImageJ (version 1.48), an image processing software.
	<ol>
		<li>Upload the image file and zoom into the image (~400%). To set the reference scale, select the straight line tool and draw a line between the two ends of the microcapillary tube. Select 'Analyze' then 'Set Scale'. Input the total length of the tube under 'Known distance' and the corresponding unit under 'Unit of length'.</li>
		<li>Select the straight line tool again and draw a line between the two ends of the liquid level. Select 'Analyze' then 'Measure'. In the results window the length of the liquid is given under the 'Length' column.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Calculate the volume of solution consumption by using the formula: 
	<img alt="Static equilibrium equation: (100µl·x1-100µl·x2)/a, mathematical analysis for research." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233eq1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Equation 1"> 
	where <img alt="Static equilibrium diagram, ΣF=0 equation, balance analysis, educational study." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233eq2.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Equation 2"> is the length of the microcapillary tube and <img alt='Equation symbol "x₁" for algebraic expression or mathematical problem-solving.' src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233eq3.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Equation 3"> and <img alt="Quadratic equation solution, x2 in formula representation, mathematical concept for calculations." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233eq4.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Equation 4"> are the measured lengths of the liquid inside the microcapillary tube before and after the test phase, respectively.</li>
</ol>
6. Video Analyses
<ol>
	<li>Score the feeding behaviors during the 2 min testing phase of each video using an event logging software (See Materials Table).
	<ol>
		<li>At first, define the feeding behaviors (i.e. the elements) in the behavioral classes menu of the recording software. The feeding behaviors are as followed: (1) proboscis out/contact: the proboscis extends and is in contact with the solution inside the microcapillary tube (2) proboscis out/no contact: the proboscis extends and is not in contact with the solution inside the microcapillary tube, (3) proboscis stowed: the proboscis is not extended but instead stowed under the head and (4) out of sight: the bumble bee is out of the video frame.</li>
		<li>Set each behavior as a 'state' and 'mutually exclusive' in the properties menu and make continuous recordings for a 2 min interval. Replay the videos in slow-motion mode (2 times slower) for more precision.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Measure the speed of proboscis retraction from the test solution after the first contact between two consecutive frames (separated by 37.5 msec in the video recordings shown here) using a motion tracking video software (See Materials Table).
	<ol>
		<li>Upload the video file and skip to the frame where the proboscis first contacts the solution.</li>
		<li>To set the reference scale, select the line tool and draw a line on the width of the microcapillary tube in the video frame. Right click on the line and select 'Calibrate measure'. Input the width of the capillary tube and the corresponding unit.</li>
		<li>Select 'Image' then 'Coordinate system origin'. On the new window click on the tip of the proboscis and select 'Apply'.</li>
		<li>Select the hand move tool, right click on the tip of the proboscis on the video frame and select 'Track Path'. Move to the next frame and readjust the tracking point to the tip of the proboscis.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Right click on the tracking point and select 'Configuration'. Select 'Complete Path' and select 'Speed' under measurement. Select 'Apply'. The speed is then displayed.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Adler, L. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+ecological+significance+of+toxic+nectar%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Oikos%22%5BJournal%5D)">The ecological significance of toxic nectar.</a> Oikos. 91, 409-420 (2000).</li>
<li>Hagler, J. R., Buchmann, S. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Honey+bee+%28Hymenoptera%2C+Apidae%29+foraging+responses+to+phenolic-rich+nectars%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Kansas+Entomol+Soc%22%5BJournal%5D)">Honey bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae) foraging responses to phenolic-rich nectars.</a> J Kansas Entomol Soc. 66, 223-230 (1993).</li>
<li>Irwin, R. E., Cook, D., Richardson, L. L., Manson, J. S., Gardner, D. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Secondary+compounds+in+floral+rewards+of+toxic+rangeland+plants%3A+Impacts+on+pollinators%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Agr+Food+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Secondary compounds in floral rewards of toxic rangeland plants: Impacts on pollinators.</a> J Agr Food Chem. 62, 7335-7344 (2014).</li>
<li>Praz, C. J., Mueller, A., Dorn, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Specialized+bees+fail+to+develop+on+non-host+pollen%3A+Do+plants+chemically+protect+their+pollen%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ecology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: Do plants chemically protect their pollen.</a> Ecology. 89, 795-804 (2008).</li>
<li>Baker, H. G., Baker, I. Studies of nectar-constitution and pollinator-plant coevolution. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aBaker%2C+HG+%22Coevolution+of+animals+and+plants%22">Coevolution of animals and plants</a>. Gilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. , University of Texas Press. 100-140 (1975).</li>
<li>Stout, J. C., Parnell, J. A. N., Arroyo, J., Crowe, T. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Pollination+ecology+and+seed+production+of+Rhododendron+ponticum+in+native+and+exotic+habitats%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Biodivers+Conserv%22%5BJournal%5D)">Pollination ecology and seed production of Rhododendron ponticum in native and exotic habitats.</a> Biodivers Conserv. 15, 755-777 (2006).</li>
<li>Tiedeken, E. J., Stout, J. C., Stevenson, P. C., Wright, G. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Bumblebees+are+not+deterred+by+ecologically+relevant+concentrations+of+nectar+toxins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Exp+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Bumblebees are not deterred by ecologically relevant concentrations of nectar toxins.</a> J Exp Biol. 217, 1620-1625 (2014).</li>
<li>Ayestaran, A., Giurfa, M., de Brito Sanchez, M. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Toxic+but+drank%3A+Gustatory+aversive+compounds+induce+post-ingestional+malaise+in+harnessed+honeybees%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Plos+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Toxic but drank: Gustatory aversive compounds induce post-ingestional malaise in harnessed honeybees.</a> Plos One. 5, (2010).</li>
<li>Wright, G. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Parallel+reinforcement+pathways+for+conditioned+food+aversions+in+the+honeybee%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Parallel reinforcement pathways for conditioned food aversions in the honeybee.</a> Curr Biol. 20, 2234-2240 (2010).</li>
<li>Hurst, V., Stevenson, P. C., Wright, G. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Toxins+induce+%27malaise%27+behaviour+in+the+honeybee+%28Apis+mellifera%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Comp+Physiol+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Toxins induce 'malaise' behaviour in the honeybee (Apis mellifera).</a> J Comp Physiol A. 200, 881-890 (2014).</li>
<li>Whitehead, A. T., Larsen, J. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Electrophysiological+responses+of+galeal+contact+chemoreceptors+of+Apis+mellifera+to+selected+sugars+and+electrolytes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Insect+Physiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Electrophysiological responses of galeal contact chemoreceptors of Apis mellifera to selected sugars and electrolytes.</a> J Insect Physiol. 22, 1609-1616 (1976).</li>
<li>de Brito Sanchez, M. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+tarsal+taste+of+honey+bees%3A+behavioral+and+electrophysiological+analyses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Behav+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">The tarsal taste of honey bees: behavioral and electrophysiological analyses.</a> Front Behav Neurosci. 8, 25(2014).</li>
<li>de Brito Sanchez, M. G., Giurfa, M., Mota, T. R. D., Gauthier, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Electrophysiological+and+behavioural+characterization+of+gustatory+responses+to+antennal+%27bitter%27+taste+in+honeybees%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22European+Journal+of+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Electrophysiological and behavioural characterization of gustatory responses to antennal 'bitter' taste in honeybees.</a> European Journal of Neuroscience. 22, 3161-3170 (2005).</li>
<li>Bitterman, M. E., Menzel, R., Fietz, A., Schafer, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Classical+conditioning+of+proboscis+extension+in+honeybees+%28Apis+mellifera%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Comp+Psychol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).</a> J Comp Psychol. 97, 107-119 (1983).</li>
<li>Laloi, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Olfactory+conditioning+of+the+proboscis+extension+in+bumble+bees%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Entomol+Exp+Appl%22%5BJournal%5D)">Olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension in bumble bees.</a> Entomol Exp Appl. 90, 123-129 (1999).</li>
<li>Smith, B. H., Burden, C. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+proboscis+extension+response+protocol+for+investigating+behavioral+plasticity+in+insects%3A+Application+to+basic%2C+biomedical%2C+and+agricultural+Research%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Vis+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">A proboscis extension response protocol for investigating behavioral plasticity in insects: Application to basic, biomedical, and agricultural Research.</a> J Vis Exp. , (2014).</li>
<li>Felsenberg, J., Gehring, K. B., Antemann, V., Eisenhardt, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Behavioural+Pharmacology+in+classical+conditioning+of+the+proboscis+extension+response+in+honeybees+%28Apis+mellifera%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Vis+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">Behavioural Pharmacology in classical conditioning of the proboscis extension response in honeybees (Apis mellifera).</a> J Vis Exp. , (2011).</li>
<li>Pankiw, T., Page, R. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+pheromones%2C+hormones%2C+and+handling+on+sucrose+response+thresholds+of+honey+bees+%28Apis+mellifera+L.%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+comparative+physiology.+A%2C+Neuroethology%2C+sensory%2C+neural%2C+and+behavioral+physiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of pheromones, hormones, and handling on sucrose response thresholds of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).</a> Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 189, 675-684 (2003).</li>
<li>Scheiner, R., Page, R. E., Erber, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sucrose+responsiveness+and+behavioral+plasticity+in+honey+bees+%28Apis+mellifera%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Apidologie%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera).</a> Apidologie. 35, 133-142 (2004).</li>
<li>Kessler, S. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Bees+prefer+foods+containing+neonicotinoid+pesticides%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides.</a> Nature. 521, 74-76 (2015).</li>
<li>Mommaerts, V., Wackers, F., Smagghe, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Assessment+of+gustatory+responses+to+different+sugars+in+harnessed+and+free-moving+bumblebee+workers+%28Bombus+terrestris%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Chem+Senses%22%5BJournal%5D)">Assessment of gustatory responses to different sugars in harnessed and free-moving bumblebee workers (Bombus terrestris).</a> Chem Senses. 38, 399-407 (2013).</li>
<li>Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., Bock, F., Dornhaus, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Psychophysics%3A+Bees+trade+off+foraging+speed+for+accuracy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Psychophysics: Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy.</a> Nature. 424, 388(2003).</li>
<li>Kessler, S., González, J., Vlimant, M., Glauser, G., Guerin, P. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Quinine+and+artesunate+inhibit+feeding+in+the+African+malaria+mosquito+Anopheles+gambiae%3A+the+role+of+gustatory+organs+within+the+mouthparts%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Physiol+Entomol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Quinine and artesunate inhibit feeding in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae: the role of gustatory organs within the mouthparts.</a> Physiol Entomol. 39, 172-182 (2014).</li>
<li>Iacovone, A., Salerno, G., French, A. S., Conti, E., Marion-Poll, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Antennal+gustatory+perception+and+behavioural+responses+in+Trissolcus+brochymenae+females%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Insect+Physiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Antennal gustatory perception and behavioural responses in Trissolcus brochymenae females.</a> J Insect Physiol. 78, 15-25 (2015).</li>
<li>French, A. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dual+mechanism+for+bitter+avoidance+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dual mechanism for bitter avoidance in Drosophila.</a> J. Neurosci. 35, 3990-4004 (2015).</li>
<li>LeDue, E., Chen, Y. -C., Jung, A. Y., Dahanukar, A., Gordon, M. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Pharyngeal+sense+organs+drive+robust+sugar+consumption+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Pharyngeal sense organs drive robust sugar consumption in Drosophila.</a> Nat. Commun. 6, 6667(2015).</li>
</ol>

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

With this novel behavioral assay, quinine is shown to deter feeding of the buff-tailed bumble bee. The reduced proboscis contact time and feeding bout frequency with water or the sucrose solution laced with quinine is interpreted here as a refusal to initiate further feeding on non-nutritive or potentially toxic solutions. When quinine is added to 1 M sucrose solution, bumble bees not only reduce the volume of solution they consume, they also retract the proboscis faster, thus reducing contact time between the mouthparts and the solution containing a toxin. Together, these results suggest that quinine is perceived by the gustatory receptor cells on the mouthparts of the bumble bee, as already previously identified in the honey bee9. Quinine is a toxin for insects that induces malaise-like behavior in the honey bee10 and knockdown in the malaria mosquito (Anopheles gambiae)23. This assay could well lead to the identification of some deterrent and potentially toxic compounds that are perceived by the taste receptor cells on the mouthparts in the bumble bees.
It is crucial for the microcapillary tube to be filled with a sufficient volume of test solution to last throughout the test phase. It is recommended that at least around three quarters of the microcapillary tube (e.g. 70-80 &#181;l) is filled. However, care should be taken to not completely fill the microcapillary tube to reduce the risk of spillage during the process of scanning and attaching the microcapillary tube to the experimental apparatus. Care should also be taken when presenting the 500 mM sucrose droplet to the bumble bee, so that the experimenter avoids leaking the droplet into the holding tube.
The 4 mm hole at the tip of the holding tube is large enough for an adult worker bumble bee to naturally extend its proboscis toward the test solution. However it is possible that bumble bees can taste the solution with their antennae before extending their proboscises. This might affect the probability of proboscis extension as PER could be elicited in bumble bees by stimulating their antennae with a sugar solution15. In fact the antennae of Hymenoptera like the parasitoid wasp (Trissolcus brochymenae)24 or the honey bee13 are equipped with taste sensilla, allowing them to taste sugars and toxins like quinine. Consequently, initial antennal contacts with solutions containing highly deterrent compounds like quinine could also reduce the motivation of a bumble bee to extend its proboscis and therefore affect the experimental success rate. Although antennal contact with the test solution cannot be controlled, in the present study we did not find any significant effect of antennal contact on proboscis extension toward the test solution. In this assay, immediately setting up the microcapillary tube after the pre-test phase when the bumble bees&#39; antennae are still within the holding tube can reduce the opportunity for the bumble bees to taste the test solution with their antennae.
The main limitation of this assay arises when tracking the proboscis retraction away from the test solution after the first proboscis contact using the motion tracking video software. The video footage only displays 2D movement of the proboscis, so the given output of the speed measurement can be under or over estimated. However with some modifications, this aspect of the assay could be improved.
This assay can be used to observe natural feeding responses toward solutions containing different compounds including natural-occurring plant secondary metabolites. Observing the immediate feeding responses with this assay gives detailed information about how bumble bees detect these compounds. This is advantageous over existing &#39;go-no go&#39; methods like PER18,19 and over two-choice assays7 because this method produces several behavioral response measures including food consumption during a discrete feeding bout.
Measuring several parameters simultaneously allows a better evaluation of the palatability of a compound. For example in our assay, bumble bees avoid consuming water or the sucrose solution laced with quinine. Retraction of the proboscis could be caused by a change in the responses of the sugar receptor cells12,13. Our assay shows that bumble bees retract the proboscis faster after contacting the sucrose plus quinine solution than water alone; this could suggest that quinine affects a distinct set of neurons in addition to inhibiting sugar sensing neurons9,12,13,25.
Our assay permits the analysis of the temporal pattern of behavioral responses during feeding. A similar protocol where the consumption time and the number of bouts is measured has already been implemented to evaluate the feeding response of Drosophila to nutritive and non-nutritive sugars26. We predict that bees will exhibit a more reliable response to feeding stimulants in our assay than in other methods such as PER because the bees are free to move in the holding tube21. This technique will permit an exhaustive analysis of the taste thresholds for nutrients and toxins to illuminate the mechanisms of feeding in bumble bees and potentially other bee species.

Plant-pollinator interactions are complex. Pollinators visit flowers to obtain nectar and pollen as food; in turn, pollinators facilitate sexual reproduction in plants. While this relationship is mostly mutualistic, floral nectar and pollen sometimes contain toxins or other plant compounds1-5 which can harm pollinators. The ecological rationale for the presence of such compounds in nectar and pollen is not clear in all settings. One outstanding question in this field is how pollinators such as bees can detect and avoid flowers with nectar containing toxins.
The bumble bee species, Bombus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758), is a generalist pollinator that visits the flowers of many plant species including those producing nectar containing toxins6. Bumble bees have been shown to avoid consuming solutions containing high concentrations of toxins in a 24 hr two-choice assay7. This assay of food consumption described by Tiedeken et al.7 revealed that bees can detect bitter compounds in solutions. However, this assay was unable to distinguish taste from post-ingestive processes such as malaise that could also affect feeding behavior over this time interval8-10.
Bees possess gustatory sensilla on their antennae, mouthparts and tarsi to detect compounds11-13. The proboscis extension reflex (PER) experiments involve restraining individual bees in a harness and then stimulating the bee&#39;s antennal sensilla to produce the feeding reflex14-17. Bees can be restrained in individual harnesses and then stimulated to produce the feeding reflex as an assay of their ability to taste compounds18,19. Others have modified the PER assay to study the sensitivity of the antennae or mouthparts to toxins9,20. However, bees are subjected to stress during harnessing. This could affect how they respond to compounds21.
Here, a new assay is described to assess the behavioral taste response of freely-moving bumble bees to sucrose and quinine, an alkaloid that has previously been reported to be deterrent9 and toxic10 to honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bumble bees (Bombus terrestris)7,22. Although quinine has not been found in plant nectar, this alkaloid is often used as an aversive stimulus in behavioral and physiological studies in bees7,9,12,13,22. The method involves video recording the bumble bees&#39; mouthparts at great resolution during the initial proboscis contact with the test solutions. Specifically, the fine structure of the feeding response is examined by continuously scoring behavior over a 2 min interval. The volume of solution consumed is measured during the feeding period and so the amount of food eaten can be correlated with the microstructure of the feeding behavior. Also the speed of the proboscis retraction is measured, as an indicator of an active avoidance, and therefore pre-ingestive detection.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Bumblebee colonies</td><td>Koppert Biological Systems</td><td></td><td>NATUPOL Beehive</td></tr><tr><td>Digital microscopic camera&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Dino-lite Europe</td><td>AM4815ZT</td><td>Dino-Lite Edge&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>100 &amp;mu;l microcapillary tube&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Blaubrand IntraEND</td><td>709144</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>15 ml polypropylene centifuge tube&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>11849650</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>1 ml disposable plastic luer slip syringe</td><td>BD</td><td>300013</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Dell Latitude 3550 laptop</td><td>Dell</td><td></td><td>Check for compatibility with video software&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Canon CanoScan LiDE 120</td><td>Canon</td><td></td><td>Check for compatibility with the computer/laptop</td></tr><tr><td>Observer software version 5.0.25</td><td>Noldus</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Kinovea software version 0.8.15</td><td>Kinovea&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>silicone tubing</td><td></td><td></td><td>6&amp;nbsp;cm length, 1&amp;nbsp;mm inside &amp;Oslash; &amp;amp; 6&amp;nbsp;cm length, 4&amp;nbsp;mm inside &amp;Oslash;</td></tr><tr><td>Male luer x1/16&quot; standard hose barbed polypropylene adapter</td><td>Cole-Parmer</td><td>TW-45518-22</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Female luer x 1/16&quot; standard hose barbed polypropylene adapter</td><td>Cole-Palmer</td><td>TW-45508-12</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Steel mesh&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td></td><td>0.5 mm mesh size</td></tr><tr><td>Sucrose (grade II)&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>S5391</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quinine hydrochloride dihydrate</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>Q1125</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ImageJ software version 1.48</td><td>ImageJ</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

a novel behavioral assay to investigate gustatory responses of individual, freely-moving bumble bees (bombus terrestris)

A Novel Behavioral Assay to Investigate Gustatory Responses of Individual, Freely-moving Bumble Bees (Bombus terrestris)

Generalist pollinators like the buff-tailed bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, encounter both nutrients and toxins in the floral nectar they collect from flowering plants. Only a few studies have described the gustatory responses of bees toward toxins in food, and these experiments have mainly used the proboscis extension response on restrained honey bees. Here, a new behavioral assay is presented for measuring the feeding responses of freely-moving, individual worker bumble bees to nutrients and toxins. This assay measures the amount of solution ingested by each bumble bee and identifies how tastants in food influence the microstructure of the feeding behavior.
The solutions are presented in a microcapillary tube to individual bumble bees that have been previously starved for 2-4 hr. The behavior is captured on digital video. The fine structure of the feeding behavior is analyzed by continuously scoring the position of the proboscis (mouthparts) from video recordings using event logging software. The position of the proboscis is defined by three different behavioral categories: (1) proboscis is extended and in contact with the solution, (2) proboscis is extended but not in contact with the solution and (3) proboscis is stowed under the head. Furthermore the speed of the proboscis retracting away from the solution is also estimated.
In the present assay the volume of solution consumed, the number of feeding bouts, the duration of the feeding bouts and the speed of the proboscis retraction after the first contact is used to evaluate the phagostimulatory or the deterrent activity of the compounds tested.
This new taste assay will allow researchers to measure how compounds found in nectar influence the feeding behavior of bees and will also be useful to pollination biologists, toxicologists and neuroethologists studying the bumble bee&#39;s taste system.

The novel assay is used to test the feeding responses to 1 M sucrose, 1 M sucrose solution plus 1 mM quinine and deionized water alone. The immediate feeding responses to each treatment are determined by quantifying the duration of proboscis contacts with the test solution, the frequency of the feeding bouts and the speed of the proboscis retracting away from the test solution after the first contact during the 2 min test phase. The volume of solution consumed is also measured after the test phase. In this study, we have chosen a bout criterion interval of 5 sec (Figure 1, see Supplemental File) based on previous work by French et al.25 who used a 5 sec threshold to characterize the proboscis retraction behavior by Drosophila in response to deterrent compounds25. Thus, we defined a feeding bout as a contact between the extended proboscis and the solution not interrupted by an absence of contacts of 5 sec or more.
In comparison to sucrose and deionized water alone, adding quinine to sucrose solution evidently deters feeding by bumble bees as they will rapidly move away if they detect an aversive substance (Video Figure 1).
In this experiment, the treatments have a significant effect on the cumulative duration of proboscis contacts during the test phase (ANOVA on the log-transformed data, F2,31 = 41, p &lt;0.001). The cumulative duration of contact time with sucrose containing quinine is significantly reduced in comparison to sucrose alone (p &lt;0.001) but not to deionized water alone (p = 0.219) (Figure 2). Similarly, the treatments have a significant effect on the cumulative duration of feeding bouts (ANOVA on the log-transformed data, F2,31 = 27.95, p &lt;0.001, Figure 3A). The cumulative duration of feeding bouts with sucrose containing quinine is significantly reduced in comparison to sucrose alone (p &lt;0.001) but not compared to deionized water alone (p = 0.41). The treatments have also a significant effect on the frequency of feeding bouts (Poisson GLM with a log link function, change in deviance compared to the c2 distribution: p &lt;0.050), whereby the number of bouts with sucrose containing quinine is significantly higher in comparison to sucrose (p &lt;0.01) but marginally significantly different to the deionized water treatment (p = 0.055, due to one bumblebee displaying seven feeding bouts on water, Figure 3B). Likewise, the speed of proboscis retraction differs significantly between treatments (ANOVA on the log-transformed data, F2,31 = 5.12, p &lt;0.050). Bumble bees retract the proboscis away from the test solution significantly faster after the first contact with sucrose containing quinine than with sucrose or deionized water alone (p &lt;0.050, Figure 3C). These results suggest that quinine triggers an active avoidance behavior in bumble bees. The treatments also have a significant effect on the total volume of solution consumed (ANOVA on the log-transformed data, F2,32 = 62.5, p &lt;0.001), whereby the consumption of sucrose containing quinine is reduced in comparison to sucrose (p &lt;0.001) but not to deionized water (p = 0.457) (Figure 4B). The volume of solution evaporated from the capillary during the test period is negligible. At laboratory conditions (25 ±2°C and 28 ±2% RH), the evaporation varies between 0.033 to 0.883 µl with an average of 0.276 µl and 0.171 µl for deionized water and 1 M sucrose respectively.
In this assay contacts between the antenna and the test solution cannot be prevented. Nonetheless, the percentage of bumble bees using their antennae to taste the feeding solution during the test phase (sucrose: 46.1%, sucrose plus quinine: 60.0% and deionized water: 33.3%) is not significantly different between the treatments (binomial GLM, change in deviance compared to the c2 distribution: p = 0.450). No effect of the treatments is found on the latency between the first antennal contacts and the test solution and the first contacts of the proboscis (median: 2.67 sec for sucrose; 1.10 sec for sucrose plus quinine; 0.80 sec for deionized water, ANOVA on the log-transformed data, F2,13 = 0.620, p = 0.550). In addition, the percentage of bumble bees extending the proboscis to taste the test solution remains constant across the treatments (sucrose: 66.7%; sucrose plus quinine: 50.0%; deionized water: 52.2%; binomial GLM, change in deviance compared to the c2 distribution: p = 0.840). Together these results suggest that the antennae play a minor role in the detection of the toxins in this assay.
A separate experiment examines whether it is necessary to test bees for a period of time longer than 2 min. The amount of food consumed by bees is tested with the 1 M sucrose or 1 mM quinine in 1 M sucrose solutions in two conditions: a 2 min test period and a 10 min test period. For both treatments, total food consumption does not differ for the test periods and no significant interactions occur between the test period and the treatment (N = 6 - 13, ANOVA on the log transformed data; effect of the treatments: F1,31 = 54.8, p &lt;0.001; effect of the test period: F1,31= 0, p = 0.979; effect of the interaction: F = 0.1, p = 0.457). In summary, a 2 min test period is sufficient to assess the effect of the solution on the total amount of food consumed by bumblebees and the deterrent effects of toxic or repellent substances in this assay. Thus, by measuring food consumption and assaying feeding behavior, it is possible to correlate total food consumption to the fine structure of feeding during the assay.
<img alt="Histogram comparing density of contact intervals with sucrose, sucrose+quinine, and water." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Latency Periods between the Proboscis Contacts during the First 2 Min of the Feeding Assay. Density plots of the time latency periods separating each proboscis contact with the 1 M sucrose solution, the 1 M sucrose + 1 mM quinine solution and water. The cumulative data from 13, 10 and 11 bees are represented respectively. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig1large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Histogram comparing duration of contacts with sucrose, sucrose with quinine, and water solutions." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig2.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Proboscis Contact Durations during the First 2 Min of the Feeding Assay. Density plots of the proboscis contact durations by bumblebees feeding on 1 M sucrose, 1 M sucrose + 1 mM quinine or water. Sample size as in Figure 1. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig2large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Comparison of sucrose, quinine, and water effects; box plots for bout duration, number, and retraction speed." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig3.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3: Proboscis Activity of Bumblebees Feeding on 1 M Sucrose, 1 M Sucrose + 1 mM Quinine or Water. (A) The cumulative duration of feeding bouts during the test phase (B) the frequency of feeding bouts and (C) the speed of the proboscis retraction after first contact. Lettering indicates a significant difference: treatments with different letters indicate P &lt;0.05. Box plots represent the median (black bars), the lowest and the highest data points still within 1.5 of the interquartile range (whiskers) and the outliers (circles). Sample size as in Figure 1. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig3large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Sucrose consumption experiment; pipette diagram and box plot showing volume data analysis results." src="/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig4.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4: Quinine supresses feeding by bumble bees. (A) Scanned images of the microcapillary tubes showing the level of the 1 M sucrose or the 1 M sucrose plus 1 mM quinine solution (indicated by a black line) before and after the test phase respectively. (B) Consumption of 1 M sucrose, 1 M sucrose plus 1 mM quinine or deionized water alone by bumble bees after the test phase. Lettering indicates a significant difference: treatments with different letters indicate P &lt;0.001. Box plots represent the median (black bars), the lowest and the highest data points still within 1.5 of the interquartile range (whiskers) and the outliers (circles). Sample size as in Figure 1. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/54233fig4large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
Video Figure 1: Video Recordings of the Proboscis Activity toward (A) <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/Video_figure_1A_1M_Sucrose.m4v" target="_blank">1 M Sucrose</a>, (B) <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/Video_figure_1B_Quinine.m4v" target="_blank">1 M Sucrose Plus 1 mM Quinine</a> and (C) <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/54233/Video_figure_1C_Water.m4v" target="_blank">Deionized Water during the Test Phase</a>.

A novel behavioral assay is described for investigating the short term gustatory responses of the mouthparts of freely-moving bumble bees (Bombus terrestris) toward nutrients and toxins in solution.

Generalist pollinators like the buff-tailed bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, encounter both nutrients and toxins in the floral nectar they collect from ...

The overall goal of this procedure is to assess the gustatory sensitivity of adult worker bumble bees towards nutrients and toxins. With this method, we can measure the natural feeding responses of bees in fine detail. This will allow us to identify the bee's ability to detect both nutrients and toxins in solution.The main advantage of this technique is that it provides several response measures, such as the amount of food bees consume in a short period and the duration of the feeding bout. This has several advantages in comparison to existing go-no-go methods, such as a proboscis extension reflex protocol. Assays of behavior provide valuable insights into neuronal mechanisms.This assay will provide a controlled way of studying the freely moving bees responses to toxic compounds in food. A visual demonstration of this method is really critical, as the preparation and the presentation of the solutions can be difficult to learn. They require a really precise delivery of the solutions at the correct time.This demonstration uilizes Bombus terrestris audax from commercially reared colonies. Two hours before the start of the experiment, collect individual worker bumble bees using a plastic vial with a perforated plastic stopper. To begin, transfer vials of individually collected bees to a dark environment and starve them for two to four hours.Bees are tested in a holding tube. The holding tube is a modified 15 milliliter centrifuge tube with a four millimeter hole drilled at the tip and a piece of steel mesh fixed inside. Next, fix two pieces of cardboard to the sides of the polystyrene holding tube cradle to shield the bee from visual stimuli during the experiment.After the starvation period, transfer one bee from the vial into a holding tube. Then, fix the holding tube to the polystyrene cradle using dental wax. Next, position a digital microscopic camera.Attach the camera to a suitable computer setup for recording. Then, position the camera five centimeters above the tip of the holding tube. Finally, adjust the holding tube so that at least 18 milliliters of the tip is within the video frame.The test is broken into two phases:the pretest, where a drop of sucrose is presented, and the test phase, where the solution of interest is presented. Before the start of the experiment, connect a six centimeter-long silicone tube with a one millimeter inner diameter via a male adapter to another six centimeter length of silicone tubing but with a four millimeter inner diameter. This will function like a pipette bulb.Now, set up the test solutions. First, prepare a 100 microliter microcapillary tube with the test solution, then scan the tube with a flatbed scanner at 600 dpi. Next, connect the microcapillary tube to the silicone tube.Now, insert the capillary into a micro-manipulator holder, such as a modified one milliliter syringe. Then use the manipulator to get the capillary in a ready position. Begin video recording after the habituation period.In this study, the proboscis activity is recorded at 26.7 frames per second with 25X magnification. Secondly, prepare a syringe with 500 millimolar sucrose dissolved in DI water. Then attach the syringe to a female adapter.Now, start the test. First, present the syringe with a sucrose droplet of about 3.5 microliters at the holding tube tip to motivate the bee to extend its proboscis. Give the bee up to five minutes to consume the sucrose.If the droplet is not fully consumed, remove the bee from the experiment. Once the bee finishes the droplet, immediately remove the syringe. Then, position the microcapillary five to 10 millimeters from the holding tube tip and gently squeeze the tubing as needed to keep the solution at the tip of the microcapillary tube.Run the test for two minutes, starting at the first contact of the proboscis with the solution. After two minutes, remove the microcapillary and scan it again to measure the volume of test solution consumed by the bee. Feeding responses to one molar sucrose, one molar sucrose with one millimolar quinine and pure deionized water were compared.The continued proboscis activity was scored during the first two minutes of the tests. A feeding bout is defined as contact between the extended proboscis and the solution without disruption to contact for intervals of five seconds or greater. The cumulative duration of the feeding bouts with sucrose containing quinine was significantly reduced in comparison to sucrose alone but not to deionized water alone.Similarly, the treatments have a significant effect on the frequency of feeding bouts during the test phase. Likewise, the speed of proboscis retraction differed significantly between treatments. Bumble bees retracted their proboscis away from the test solution significantly faster after the first contact with sucrose containing quinine than with sucrose or deionized water alone.The total consumption of the test solution was measured after the test phase. Bees ate significantly less of the sucrose solution containing quinine than pure sucrose solution. The response to quinine was not significantly different to deionized water.Once mastered, this technique can be done in two to three hours with approximately eight bees if it's performed correctly and all the bees respond to the solution of interest. After watching this video, you should have a good understanding of the value of this method for providing data about the types of substances that bees can detect in food. While attempting this method, it's really important not to spill any solution into the holding tube and to not leak any of the solution of interest out of the microcapillary tube.We hope that this technique will allow researchers in the field of gustation to further investigate how the bees'taste system incurs information about nutrients and toxins.

a-novel-behavioral-assay-to-investigate-gustatory-responses

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

We demonstrate how to implement a behavioral pharmacology method in an appetitive olfactory conditioning paradigm in honeybees (Apis mellifera) by systemic application of drugs. This method allows investigation of the mechanisms underlying learning and memory formation in a simple and reliable way.

Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees (Apis mellifera)

In this protocol we show how to condition harnessed honey bees to tactile stimuli and introduce a 2D motion capture technique for analyzing the kinematics of fine-scale antennal sampling pattern.

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)

A vertical, T-maze olfactometer is described for assaying the behavioral response of arthropods. The olfactometer allows the experimenter to measure choices performed by test subjects when subjected to two potential odor fields. Both attraction to and repulsion from odorants can be measured with this device.

Vertical T-maze Choice Assay for Arthropod Response to Odorants

In this protocol, we describe two strategies that simultaneously suppress two genes (double gene knockdown) in honey bees. Then we present how to use the proboscis extension response (PER) assay to study the effect of double gene knockdown on honey bee gustatory perception.

RNAi-mediated Double Gene Knockdown and Gustatory Perception Measurement in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera)

In this video article, we describe an automated assay to measure the effect of hunger or satiety on olfactory dependent food search behavior in the adult fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

A Single-fly Assay for Foraging Behavior in Drosophila

The Proboscis Extension Response (PER) conditioning protocol, developed for the honey bee (Apis mellifera), provides an ecologically-relevant and easily quantifiable means for studying several different mechanisms of learning in many insect species.

A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research

We present a choice test to reveal the influence of odorants on Drosophila behavior using a Y-maze assay.

Testing Drosophila Olfaction with a Y-maze Assay

This video describes Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) and motion-sensitive video recording methods to monitor choice behavior by bumblebees.

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

The automated tracking system Flywalk is used for high-resolution quantification of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

High-resolution Quantification of Odor-guided Behavior in Drosophila melanogaster Using the Flywalk Paradigm

This manuscript describes several protocols for administering pharmacological agents to honey bees, including simple noninvasive methods for free-flying bees, as well as more invasive variants that allow precise localized treatment of restrained bees.

Neuropharmacological Manipulation of Restrained and Free-flying Honey Bees, Apis mellifera

We present a non-lethal and automated mechanism to collect pollen from bumble bee (Bombus) workers returning to a hive. Instructions for producing, preparing, installing and using the devices are included. By using 3D-printed objects, modification to the design was timely, efficient and allowed for quick turnaround for testing.

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee (Bombus) Hive Entrances

Learn a novel behavioral assay to investigate gustatory responses in freely-moving bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). This method measures feeding behavior and toxin detection with precise video analysis.

A Novel Behavioral Assay to Investigate Gustatory Responses of Individual, Freely-moving Bumble Bees (Bombus terrestris)

Explore More Videos