Name: Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2019-01-19T14:45:00.000+00:00
Duration: 6 min 42 s
Description: Learn to conduct fNIRS hyperscanning experiments for measuring brain-to-brain synchrony in adult-child dyads. This protocol enables researchers to explore neurobiological mechanisms underlying social interactions.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This work was funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal state and governments (ERS Seed Fund, OPSF449). The Hitachi NIRS system was supported by a funding of the German Research Foundation DFG (INST 948/18-1 FUGG).

Prior to participation, all parents / children provided informed consent / assent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of RWTH Aachen University.
1. Preparation before the Participant Arrives
<ol>
	<li>Prepare NIRS caps.
	<ol>
		<li>Choose the cap sizes the same size or slightly larger than the participant&#8217;s head circumference.</li>
		<li>Cut 15 holes with a diameter of approximately 15 mm each, arranged in a horizontal 3x5 grid, into the forehead area of each of 2 raw EEG caps (see Table of Materials). Make sure that the holes are spaced 30 mm from each other in any direction, that the middle column of holes is located in the center of the forehead, i.e., above the nose, and that the bottom row is located above the eyebrows.</li>
		<li>In order to make the caps more comfortable and minimize pressure marks, attach soft foam material (e.g., adhesive window sealing tape or similar flat foam rubber material) at the inner side of the holder grid between the probe sockets and at the edges. Use double-faced adhesive tape or sewing thread if necessary.</li>
		<li>Mount an empty 3x5 probe holder grid (see Table of Materials) to each of the modified EEG caps such that the holder grid itself is placed on the inside of the cap and the holder sockets stick in the holes. 
		NOTE: The NIRS measurement system (see Table of Materials) has two separate probe sets, use one probe set for each participant.</li>
		<li>Gently insert the probes into the appropriate holder sockets on the grids such that only the first ridge of each probe is mounted in the socket, which results in one clicking sound.</li>
		<li>Open the probe set monitor window at the NIRS measurement system and select 2 probe sets arranged in a 3x5 grid each, one for the participating child and one for the adult. Ensure that the probe arrangements of the two caps corresponds to the arrangements in the probe set window (i.e., same location of the respective emitter and receiver probe numbers).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Prepare the experiment.
	<ol>
		<li>Start the NIRS measurement system with laser diodes switched on 30 min. before measuring, such that the system reaches a stable operating temperature.</li>
		<li>Set all necessary options at the NIRS measurement system. Make sure that the device is set to event-related measurement and that the RS232 serial input, necessary for receiving triggers from the experimental paradigm, is active. 
		Note: The experiment is an adapted version by a paradigm devised by Cui et al.12, programmed in the non-commercial Psychophysics Toolbox extensions, version 3.0.1116.</li>
		<li>Prepare the experimental paradigm by starting the technical computing software (see Table of Materials) that serves as base for the Psychophysics Toolbox extensions and setting the current directory to the folder that the paradigm is saved in.</li>
		<li>Place two&#160;chin rests in front of the computer screen to prevent head movements during the experiment.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Participant Arrival in the Laboratory
<ol>
	<li>Prepare the participants.
	<ol>
		<li>Show and explain the experimental setup including the NIRS measurement system to the participants. Always make sure that the participants do not look directly into the laser beam of the NIRS measurement system as this may be harmful to the eye.</li>
		<li>Seat the participants next to each other in front of the computer screen. Adjust the height of the chin rests such that both participants sit comfortably.</li>
		<li>Instruct the participants and administer practice trials of both the cooperative and the competitive game. Give additional instructions during the practice trials if necessary.</li>
		<li>Measure and mark the Fpz point according to the 10-20 system, which is 10% of the distance between nasion and inion, on each participant&#8217;s head.</li>
		<li>Place the caps with the probes carefully on the participants&#8217; heads, with the laser turned off. Place the front of the cap, including the probe grid, on the participant&#8217;s forehead first and then pull down the back of the cap towards the neck. Make sure that the middle probe of the bottom row is placed on Fpz and the middle probe column is aligned along the sagittal reference curve.</li>
		<li>Place the fiber strings on the holder arm attached to the NIRS measurement system so that they hang loosely without contact with the participant or chair and that they do not pull on the caps. Use an additional holder (e.g., modified microphone stand or similar) for the second participant if necessary.</li>
		<li>Push each probe further into its socket until the small white nose in the center of the top of the probe casing is visible. 
		Note: The nose is pushed upwards by a coil spring mechanism as soon as the probe tip touches the participant&#8217;s scalp.</li>
		<li>Turn the laser on again and test the signal quality by clicking on the Auto Gain button in the probe set monitor window of the NIRS measurement system.</li>
		<li>If a channel does not have a sufficient signal (i.e., if it is marked in yellow), gently put the hair underneath the surrounding probe tip aside. If necessary, push the probes further into their sockets but ensure the comfort of the participant. Check whether the signal quality has improved (i.e., the channel is now marked in green) by clicking on the Auto Gain button again.</li>
		<li>If step 2.1.9. does not lead to a signal improvement, adjust the signal intensity. If there is too much signal (i.e., if the channel is marked in red), change the signal intensity to low signal intensity by repeatedly clicking on the respective probe&#8217;s symbol in the probe set monitor window of the NIRS measurement system. If there is not enough signal (i.e., if the channel is marked in yellow), change the signal intensity to high signal intensity, again by repeatedly clicking on the respective probe&#8217;s symbol.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Run the experiment
	<ol>
		<li>When there are no questions after the practice trials and a good signal quality is ensured, start the experimental paradigm.</li>
		<li>Place a towel over the participants&#8217; hands so that they cannot see the hand movements of their respective game partner.</li>
		<li>After the experiment, save the data and export the raw light intensity data as a text file by clicking on the Text File Out button. Do not apply any filters in the NIRS measurement system.</li>
		<li>Clean all necessary materials (probes, probe holders, chin rests) with ethanol. Wash the caps&#160;in a gentle cycle with mild detergent.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Data Analysis
<ol>
	<li>Data Preprocessing 
	Note: There are several non-commercial software packages available for fNIRS data analysis, e.g., HomER17, NIRS Brain AnalyzIR18&#160;or SPM for fNIRS19. The latter was used for the following preprocessing steps. For more information on how to perform these steps, please see the toolbox manual.
	<ol>
		<li>Convert the data files to the SPM for fNIRS data format.</li>
		<li>Calculate oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb concentration changes using the modified Beer-Lambert law by pressing the Convert button in the main window. Enter the age of the subject and the distance between source and detector (e.g., 3 cm). Accept the default values for the molar absorption coefficients of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb at wavelength (&#955;) 1 and &#955; 2 as well as the default values for the differential pathlength factor (DPF) at &#955; 1 and &#955; 2.</li>
		<li>Preprocess the time series of hemodynamic changes to reduce motion artifacts by selecting the MARA button (for more information on the MARA algorithm see Scholkman et al.20).</li>
		<li>Preprocess the time series to reduce slow drifts by selecting the DCT button.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Bad channel detection 
	Note: Bad channel detection can be performed before and / or after fNIRS data preprocessing. In this protocol, different objective criteria for detecting bad channels and visual inspection are combined. Please note that the proposed list of objective criteria is not exhaustive. For bad channel detection, self-written scripts were used (for the technical computing software see Table of Materials).
	<ol>
		<li>Exclude channels in which there is no signal change for several continuous samples, which is indicated by a flat line when plotting the time series.</li>
		<li>Calculate the coefficient of variation CV = SD/mean*100 for the raw attenuation data. Exclude channels in which the CV is above a predefined percentage (e.g., 10%; see for instance van der Kant et al.21).</li>
		<li>Plot the power spectrum of the signal. If there is no heartbeat visible in the signal spectrum around 1 Hz, as indicated by an increased power in this frequency band, exclude the channel from the analysis.</li>
		<li>Visually inspect all data before and/or after preprocessing. Decide whether to include the channel based on the objective criteria, described in 3.2.1 &#8211; 3.2.3, as well as on subjective visual detection of noisy channels.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Brain-to-brain connectivity 
	Note: Two different estimate types of brain connectivity can be distinguished: non-directed estimates, which quantify the strength of the connectivity, and directed estimates, which seek to establish statistical evidence for causation from the data22. Here the focus was on the wavelet transform coherence (WTC), a widely applied non-directed estimate for fNIRS brain-to-brain connectivity. Several non-commercial software solutions for the computation of the WTC are available, e.g., one by Grinsted and colleagues23&#160;or the ASToolbox24, which was used in this protocol for the following steps.
	<ol>
		<li>In the AWCO function of the ASToolbox, specify the mother wavelet (e.g., Generalized Morse Wavelet with its parameters beta and gamma), which is used to transform each time series into the time and frequency domain by the continuous wavelet transformation.</li>
		<li>Specify the smoothing window type (e.g., Hanning window) and the smoothing window size for the time and scale domain in the AWCO function.</li>
		<li>To examine the significance of the WTC coefficients and to calculate their p-values, specify the number of surrogate time series (n &#8805; 300) and the ARMA model (e.g., AR (1)) in the AWCO function.</li>
		<li>With the parameters specified in steps 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, calculate the wavelet coherence of two corresponding channels (the same channel in two participants).</li>
		<li>Choose a frequency band of interest in which the task-related brain-to-brain synchrony is expected to occur based on previous studies and visual inspection of the data (for an alternative approach see Nozawa et al. 25).</li>
		<li>Calculate the mean of the WTC coefficients and / or the percentage of significant WTC coefficients in the task-related frequency band for each task block in each channel and for each dyad. Use this value as an outcome measure of brain-to-brain synchrony for further statistical analysis (for more information see Reindl et al.11).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Comparison to Random Pairs 
	Note: To validate the results, we recommend comparing the WTC of the actual dyads to the WTC of random adult-child pairings, who did not play with each other but performed the same experimental task.
	<ol>
		<li>Calculate the WTC, as described in 3.3., for participant pairs who did not play together but performed the same experimental task (i.e., random pairs). Choose the number of random pairs (e.g., 300 for each condition) and calculate the WTC for each random pair.</li>
		<li>Compare the coherence of the random and actual pairs to avoid the detection of spurious synchronicity.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Babiloni, F., Astolfi, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Social+neuroscience+and+hyperscanning+techniques%3A+past%2C+present+and+future%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuroscience+%26+Biobehavioral+Reviews%22%5BJournal%5D)">Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future.</a> Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 44, 76-93 (2014).</li>
<li>Hari, R., Henriksson, L., Malinen, S., Parkkonen, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Centrality+of+social+interaction+in+human+brain+function%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Centrality of social interaction in human brain function.</a> Neuron. 88 (1), 181-193 (2015).</li>
<li>Funane, T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Synchronous+activity+of+two+people%27s+prefrontal+cortices+during+a+cooperative+task+measured+by+simultaneous+near-infrared+spectroscopy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Biomedical+Optics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Synchronous activity of two people's prefrontal cortices during a cooperative task measured by simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy.</a> Journal of Biomedical Optics. 16 (7), 077011(2011).</li>
<li>Lindenberger, U., Li, S. -C., Gruber, W., Müller, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Brains+swinging+in+concert%3A+cortical+phase+synchronization+while+playing+guitar%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22BMC+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar.</a> BMC Neuroscience. 10, 22(2009).</li>
<li>Jiang, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Neural+synchronization+during+face-to-face+communication%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication.</a> Journal of Neuroscience. 32 (45), 16064-16069 (2012).</li>
<li>Dikker, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Brain-to-brain+synchrony+tracks+real-world+dynamic+group+interactions+in+the+classroom%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Current+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Brain-to-brain synchrony tracks real-world dynamic group interactions in the classroom.</a> Current Biology. 27 (9), 1375-1380 (2017).</li>
<li>Liu, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((NIRS-based+hyperscanning+reveals+inter-brain+neural+synchronization+during+cooperative+Jenga+game+with+face-to-face+communication%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Human+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals inter-brain neural synchronization during cooperative Jenga game with face-to-face communication.</a> Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10, 82(2016).</li>
<li>Hoshi, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy%3A+current+status+and+future+prospects%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Biomedical+Optics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects.</a> Journal of Biomedical Optics. 12 (6), 062106(2007).</li>
<li>Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., Elwell, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Illuminating+the+developing+brain%3A+the+past%2C+present+and+future+of+functional+near+infrared+spectroscopy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuroscience+%26+Biobehavioral+Reviews%22%5BJournal%5D)">Illuminating the developing brain: the past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy.</a> Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 34 (3), 269-284 (2010).</li>
<li>Huppert, T. J., Hoge, R. D., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., Boas, D. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+temporal+comparison+of+BOLD%2C+ASL%2C+and+NIRS+hemodynamic+responses+to+motor+stimuli+in+adult+humans%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans.</a> NeuroImage. 29 (2), 368-382 (2006).</li>
<li>Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., Konrad, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Brain-to-brain+synchrony+in+parent-child+dyads+and+the+relationship+with+emotion+regulation+revealed+by+fNIRS-based+hyperscanning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Brain-to-brain synchrony in parent-child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS-based hyperscanning.</a> NeuroImage. 178, 493-502 (2018).</li>
<li>Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., Reiss, A. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((NIRS-based+hyperscanning+reveals+increased+interpersonal+coherence+in+superior+frontal+cortex+during+cooperation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation.</a> NeuroImage. 59 (3), 2430-2437 (2012).</li>
<li>Baker, J. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sex+differences+in+neural+and+behavioral+signatures+of+cooperation+revealed+by+fNIRS+hyperscanning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Scientific+Reports%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sex differences in neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning.</a> Scientific Reports. 6, 26492(2016).</li>
<li>Cheng, X., Li, X., Hu, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Synchronous+brain+activity+during+cooperative+exchange+depends+on+gender+of+partner%3A+a+fNIRS-based+hyperscanning+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Human+Brain+Mapping%22%5BJournal%5D)">Synchronous brain activity during cooperative exchange depends on gender of partner: a fNIRS-based hyperscanning study.</a> Human Brain Mapping. 36 (6), 2039-2048 (2015).</li>
<li>Pan, Y., Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Li, X., Hu, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cooperation+in+lovers%3A+an+fNIRS-based+hyperscanning+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Human+Brain+Mapping%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cooperation in lovers: an fNIRS-based hyperscanning study.</a> Human Brain Mapping. 38 (2), 831-841 (2017).</li>
<li>Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((What%27s+new+in+Psychtoolbox-3%3F%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Perception%22%5BJournal%5D)">What's new in Psychtoolbox-3?</a> Perception. 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement (2007).</li>
<li>Huppert, T. J., Diamond, S. G., Franceschini, M. A., Boas, D. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((HomER%3A+a+review+of+time-series+analysis+methods+for+near-infrared+spectroscopy+of+the+brain%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Applied+Optics%22%5BJournal%5D)">HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain.</a> Applied Optics. 48 (10), D280-D298 (2009).</li>
<li>Santosa, H., Zhai, X., Fishburn, F., Huppert, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+NIRS+Brain+AnalyzIR+Toolbox%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Algorithms%22%5BJournal%5D)">The NIRS Brain AnalyzIR Toolbox.</a> Algorithms. 11 (5), 73(2018).</li>
<li>Tak, S., Uga, M., Flandin, G., Dan, I., Penny, W. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sensor+space+group+analysis+for+fNIRS+data%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Neuroscience+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sensor space group analysis for fNIRS data.</a> Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 264, 103-112 (2016).</li>
<li>Scholkmann, F., Spichtig, S., Muehlemann, T., Wolf, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((How+to+detect+and+reduce+movement+artifacts+in+near-infrared+imaging+using+moving+standard+deviation+and+spline+interpolation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Physiological+Measurement%22%5BJournal%5D)">How to detect and reduce movement artifacts in near-infrared imaging using moving standard deviation and spline interpolation.</a> Physiological Measurement. 31 (5), 649-662 (2010).</li>
<li>van der Kant, A., Biro, S., Levelt, C., Huijbregts, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Negative+affect+is+related+to+reduced+differential+neural+responses+to+social+and+non-social+stimuli+in+5-to-8-month-old+infants%3A+a+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy-study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Developmental+Cognitive+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Negative affect is related to reduced differential neural responses to social and non-social stimuli in 5-to-8-month-old infants: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy-study.</a> Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 30, 23-30 (2018).</li>
<li>Bastos, A. M., Schoffelen, J. -M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+tutorial+review+of+functional+connectivity+analysis+methods+and+their+interpretational+pitfalls%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Systems+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis methods and their interpretational pitfalls.</a> Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 9, 175(2016).</li>
<li>Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., Jevrejeva, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Application+of+the+cross+wavelet+transform+and+wavelet+coherence+to+geophysical+time+series%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nonlinear+Processes+in+Geophysics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series.</a> Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. 11, 561-566 (2004).</li>
<li>Aguiar-Conraria, L., Soares, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+continuous+wavelet+transform%3A+moving+beyond+uni-and+bivariate+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Economic+Surveys%22%5BJournal%5D)">The continuous wavelet transform: moving beyond uni-and bivariate analysis.</a> Journal of Economic Surveys. 28 (2), 344-375 (2014).</li>
<li>Nozawa, T., Sasaki, Y., Sakaki, K., Yokoyama, R., Kawashima, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Interpersonal+frontopolar+neural+synchronization+in+group+communication%3A+an+exploration+toward+fNIRS+hyperscanning+of+natural+interactions%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Interpersonal frontopolar neural synchronization in group communication: an exploration toward fNIRS hyperscanning of natural interactions.</a> NeuroImage. 133, 484-497 (2016).</li>
<li>Burgess, A. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((On+the+interpretation+of+synchronization+in+EEG+hyperscanning+studies%3A+a+cautionary+note%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Human+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: a cautionary note.</a> Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7, 881(2013).</li>
<li>Tsuzuki, D., Dan, I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Spatial+registration+for+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy%3A+from+channel+position+on+the+scalp+to+cortical+location+in+individual+and+group+analyses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Spatial registration for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: from channel position on the scalp to cortical location in individual and group analyses.</a> NeuroImage. 85, 92-103 (2014).</li>
<li>Tachtsidis, I., Scholkmann, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((False+positives+and+false+negatives+in+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy%3A+issues%2C+challenges%2C+and+the+way+forward%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurophotonics%22%5BJournal%5D)">False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward.</a> Neurophotonics. 3 (3), 031405(2016).</li>
<li>Palumbo, R. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Interpersonal+autonomic+physiology%3A+a+systematic+review+of+the+literature%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Personality+and+Social+Psychology+Review%22%5BJournal%5D)">Interpersonal autonomic physiology: a systematic review of the literature.</a> Personality and Social Psychology Review. 21 (2), 99-141 (2016).</li>
<li>Pinti, P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+present+and+future+use+of+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy+%28fNIRS%29+for+cognitive+neuroscience%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annals+of+the+New+York+Academy+of+Sciences%22%5BJournal%5D)">The present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience.</a> Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. , (2018).</li>
<li>Brigadoi, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Motion+artifacts+in+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy%3A+a+comparison+of+motion+correction+techniques+applied+to+real+cognitive+data%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data.</a> NeuroImage. 85 (1), 181-191 (2014).</li>
<li>Cooper, R. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+systematic+comparison+of+motion+artifact+correction+techniques+for+functional+near-infrared+spectroscopy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">A systematic comparison of motion artifact correction techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy.</a> Frontiers in Neuroscience. 6, 147(2012).</li>
<li>Hirsch, J., Zhang, X., Noah, J. A., Ono, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Frontal+temporal+and+parietal+systems+synchronize+within+and+across+brains+during+live+eye-to-eye+contact%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NeuroImage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Frontal temporal and parietal systems synchronize within and across brains during live eye-to-eye contact.</a> NeuroImage. 157, 314-330 (2017).</li>
<li>Scholkmann, F., Holper, L., Wolf, U., Wolf, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+new+methodical+approach+in+neuroscience%3A+assessing+inter-personal+brain+coupling+using+functional+near-infrared+imaging+%28fNIRI%29+hyperscanning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Human+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">A new methodical approach in neuroscience: assessing inter-personal brain coupling using functional near-infrared imaging (fNIRI) hyperscanning.</a> Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7, 813(2013).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

In this protocol, we show how to conduct fNIRS hyperscanning experiments and one possible way to analyze brain-to-brain synchrony, measuring concentration changes of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb at frontal brain regions of two subjects simultaneously. FNIRS hyperscanning is relatively easy to apply: a single NIRS device is sufficient to measure brain activities of both subjects by splitting the optodes between them. Thus, no synchronization between different devices is necessary1. Moreover, since fNIRS doe...

In recent years, neuroscientists have started to study social interactions by recording the brain activities of two or more persons simultaneously, an approach termed hyperscanning1. This technique opens new opportunities to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these interactions. To fully understand social interactions, it may not be sufficient to study single brains in isolation but rather the joint activities of brains of interacting persons2. Using different neuroimaging techniques, hyperscanning studies have shown that brain activities of interacting persons or groups synchronize, e.g., while they coordinate their actions3, make music4, communicate5, engage in classroom activities6 or cooperate7.
The article presents a protocol for conducting simultaneous recordings with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Similar to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), fNIRS measures the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb) are calculated based on the amount of diffusively transmitted near-infrared light through tissue8. fNIRS is well suited for conducting hyperscanning experiments, especially with children, because it can be applied in less constrained and more natural settings than fMRI. Moreover, it is less prone to movement artifacts than both, fMRI and EEG9. In addition, fNIRS data can be acquired at high sampling frequencies (e.g., 10 Hz), thus it highly oversamples the relatively slow hemodynamic response and thereby potentially provides a more complete temporal picture of the brain hemodynamics10.
This protocol was developed within the study of Reindl et al.11 and has been slightly modified (in particular with respect to the channel placement and bad channel identification) more recently. The aim of the study was to examine synchronized brain activity of parent-child dyads. Using fNIRS hyperscanning, we assessed brain-to-brain synchrony in prefrontal brain areas of children (aged five to nine years) and their parents, mostly mothers, during a cooperative and a competitive computer task. Prefrontal brain regions were targeted as they had been identified as important regions for social interactive processes in previous hyperscanning studies1. The cooperative and competitive task were originally developed by Cui et al.12&#160;and recently employed by several previous studies13,14,15. For the study of Reindl et al.11, the tasks were modified to be suitable for children. Participants were instructed to either respond jointly via button presses in response to a target (cooperation) or to respond faster than the other player (competition). Each child performed each task once with the parent and once with an adult stranger of the same sex as the parent. Within each child-adult dyad, wavelet coherence was calculated for the oxy-Hb signals of corresponding channels as a measure of brain-to-brain synchrony.
This protocol describes the procedures to collect fNIRS hyperscanning data of parent and child during the cooperative and competitive game. The overall procedure, however, is not specific to this research design but is appropriate for different populations (e.g., adult strangers, romantic partners, siblings, etc.) and can be adapted for a number of different experimental tasks. This protocol also outlines one possible analytical procedure, which covers necessary and optional data analysis steps, including fNIRS data preprocessing, bad channel detection, wavelet coherence analysis and validation by random pair analysis.

<table><tbody><tr><td>NIRS measurement system with probe sets and probe holder grids</td><td>Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan</td><td>ETG-4000 Optical Topography System&amp;nbsp;</td><td>The current study protocol requires an optional second adult probe set for 52 channels of measurement in total as well as two 3x5 probe holder grids.&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>raw EEG caps</td><td>EASYCAP GmbH, Herrsching, Germany</td><td>C-SCMS-56; C-SCMS-58</td><td>Caps must be provided with holes for NIRS probes by the experimenter. Choose cap size the same size or slightly larger than participant&#039;s head circumference.</td></tr><tr><td>Technical computing software</td><td>The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA</td><td>MATLAB R2014a (or later versions)</td><td>Serves as base for Psychophysics Toolbox extensions (stimulus presentation), SPM for fNIRS toolbox&amp;nbsp; (fNIRS data analysis), and ASToolbox (WTC computation).</td></tr></tbody></table>

conducting hyperscanning experiments with functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Concurrent brain recordings of two or more interacting persons, an approach termed hyperscanning, are gaining increasing importance for our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of social interactions, and possibly interpersonal relationships. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is well suited for conducting hyperscanning experiments because it measures local hemodynamic effects with a high sampling rate and, importantly, it can be applied in natural settings, not requiring strict motion restrictions. In this article, we present a protocol for conducting fNIRS hyperscanning experiments with parent-child dyads and for analyzing brain-to-brain synchrony. Furthermore, we discuss critical issues and future directions, regarding the experimental design, spatial registration of the fNIRS channels, physiological influences and data analysis methods. The described protocol is not specific to parent-child dyads, but can be applied to a variety of different dyadic constellations, such as adult strangers, romantic partners or siblings. To conclude, fNIRS hyperscanning has the potential to yield new insights into the dynamics of the ongoing social interaction, which possibly go beyond what can be studied by examining the activities of individual brains.

Representative data of one parent-child dyad during the cooperative condition are shown in Figure 1. The cooperative task consists of three 30 s rest blocks and two task blocks, with 20 trials each, presented in alternating order. In each trial, participants have to react as simultaneously as possible to a signal to earn a point11.
<img alt="NIRS data processing workflow; gra...

The present protocol describes how to conduct fNIRS hyperscanning experiments and analyze brain-to-brain synchrony. Further, we discuss challenges and possible solutions.

Concurrent brain recordings of two or more interacting persons, an approach termed hyperscanning, are gaining increasing importance for our understanding ...

conducting-hyperscanning-experiments-with-functional-near-infrared

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

Here we describe a data collection and data analysis method for functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), a novel non-invasive brain imaging system used in cognitive   neuroscience, particularly in studying child brain development. This method provides a universal standard of data acquisition and analysis vital to data interpretation and scientific discovery.

Exploring Cognitive Functions in Babies, Children &amp; Adults with Near Infrared Spectroscopy

Source: Reindl, V., et al. Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (2019) This video demonstrates the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure brain activity during social interactions. Participants engage in a coordinated task that increases activity in the prefrontal cortex, a region critical for social behavior, while the system detects changes in light absorption due to blood oxygenation. By analyzing the synchrony...

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Recording Brain Activity During Social Interactions

Monitoring brain activity during upright motor tasks is of great value when investigating the neural source of movement disorders. Here, we demonstrate a protocol that combines functional near infrared spectroscopy with continuous monitoring of muscle and kinematic activity during 4 types of motor tasks.

Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy of the Sensory and Motor Brain Regions with Simultaneous Kinematic and EMG Monitoring During Motor Tasks

The present protocol describes how to perform concurrent EEG and fNIRS recordings and how to inspect the relationship between the EEG and fNIRS...

Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task

The protocol for conducting fNIRS hyperscanning experiments on collaborative learning dyads in a naturalistic learning environment is outlined. Further, a pipeline to analyze the Inter-Brain Synchrony (IBS) of oxygenated hemoglobin (Oxy-Hb) signals is presented.

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

The present protocol combines functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and video-based observationto measure interpersonal synchronization in quartets during a collaborative drawing task.

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Wavelet transform coherence (WTC) is a common methodology for assessing the coupling between signals that is used in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning studies. A toolbox for assessing the directionality of the signal interaction is presented in this work.

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

The protocol aims to provide a detailed description of the methodology for conducting an fNIRS hyperscanning study in psychological counseling. This includes the preparations for the experiment, the procedure for collecting data, and the subsequent data analysis process.

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) to map brain areas involved in the processing of simple sensory stimuli.

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Procedures for recording high-density EEG and gaze data during computer game-based cognitive tasks are described.  Using a video game to present cognitive tasks enhances ecological validity without sacrificing experimental control.

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking

Learn to conduct fNIRS hyperscanning experiments for measuring brain-to-brain synchrony in adult-child dyads. This protocol enables researchers to explore neurobiological mechanisms underlying social interactions.

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Explore More Videos