Name: Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2021-04-28T15:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 6 min 44 s
Description: Learn to quantify DNA end resection in HeLa cells using BrdU labeling and cell cycle discrimination imaging. This immunofluorescence protocol distinguishes homologous recombination from non-homologous end joining repair pathways.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We thank Marie-Christine Caron for outstanding technical advice. This work is supported by funding from Canadian Institutes of Health Research J.Y.M (CIHR FDN-388879). J.-Y.M. holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in DNA Repair and Cancer Therapeutics. J.O&#39;S is an FRQS PhD student fellow, and S.Y.M is a FRQS postdoctoral fellow.

1. Cell culture, treatments, and coverslip preparation
NOTE: All cell plating, transfections, and treatments, aside from irradiation, should take place under a sterile cell-culture hood.
<ol>
	<li>Day 1
	<ol>
		<li>In a 6-well plate, place a single coverslip in each well for as many conditions as needed. Plate ~150,000 HeLa cells for transfection or drug treatment, as desired. 
		NOTE: If transfecting, it is recommended to do a reverse transfection at the time of plating, or it is possible to do a forward transfection several hours after plating to allow for adherence. A reverse transfection is accomplished by adding the transfection mix to the coverslip before the cells are added; thus, transfection begins before the cells start adhering. A forward transfection, by contrast, is the addition of the transfection mix post-adherence to the surface usually on the following day. However, it is possible to do this on the same day, provided enough time is given for the cells to adhere.</li>
		<li>For this method, use 4 wells: Well 1: siRNA control (termed siCTRL); Well 2: siRNA against PARP-1 (siPARP-1); Well 3: untreated; Well 4: Cells to be treated with 5 &#181;M BMN673 1 h prior to irradiation. 
		NOTE: In this protocol, all the tests were conducted under irradiated conditions (see section 1.3).</li>
		<li>Incubate the cells at 37 &#176;C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator overnight, although the transfection protocol allows for up to 3 days of incubation. The incubation time prior to BrdU treatment will depend on the siRNA transfection efficiency. If there is no transfection, incubation for 16 h is sufficient to allow for adherence to the coverslip and some cell growth. 
		NOTE: Incubator conditions can be changed according to the cell line used.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Day 2
	<ol>
		<li>Add BrdU at a final concentration of 10 &#181;M in the appropriate culturing media, and incubate for 16 h (one cell cycle). 
		NOTE: The BrdU solution is prepared in dimethylsulfoxide; the stock solution used is 10 mM and is stored in aliquots at -20 &#176;C.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Day 3
	<ol>
		<li>Irradiate the plates with a total dose of 5 Gy of X-ray irradiation (vary the dose of irradiation depending on the irradiator type, for example, small animal irradiators vs. benchtop irradiators). See the Table of Materials for the brand and model of irradiator used.</li>
		<li>Return the plates to the incubator, and release the cells for 3 h.</li>
		<li>During the 3 h incubation period, prepare the two buffers, A and B, and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). 
		NOTE: Buffers A and B and the sucrose should be prepared fresh the day of fixation, using fresh sucrose solution to prevent contamination.
		<ol>
			<li>Prepare buffer A (Pre-Extraction Buffer), according to the order (30 mL) described in Table 1. 
			NOTE: The 1M sucrose should be prepared the day of use to prevent contamination.</li>
			<li>Prepare buffer B (Cytoskeleton Stripping Buffer) according to the order described in Table 1 (30 mL). 
			&#8203;NOTE: Buffer B must be prepared in the cited order to prevent precipitation of Tween-20 and sodium deoxycholate solution.</li>
			<li>Prepare 4% PFA, 2 mL per condition (10 mL), under a chemical hood (Table 1).</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Pre-extraction and fixation
NOTE: All pre-extraction and&#160;fixation are performed with the coverslips remaining in the tissue culture plate on ice or at 4 &#176;C; the coverslip is only lifted in the last step of mounting (see discussion).
<ol>
	<li>Pre-extraction
	<ol>
		<li>Aspirate the medium, carefully wash the cells twice with 1x PBS, and remove the PBS. Add 2 mL of Pre-extraction Buffer A and immediately incubate at 4 &#176;C for 10 min. 
		NOTE: It is important that incubation time in buffer A is not extended. Extended incubation in the pre-extraction buffers will result in an increased number of detached cells from the coverslip. Alternatively, instead of incubation at 4&#176;C, incubation can be done on ice.</li>
		<li>Remove Buffer A through aspiration. 
		NOTE: Do not wash the coverslips after removing buffer A. Proceed to the next step.</li>
		<li>Add 2 mL of Cytoskeleton Stripping Buffer B and immediately incubate at 4 &#176;C for 10 min. Carefully aspirate Buffer B, and carefully wash the cells once with 1x PBS. Carefully aspirate the 1x PBS.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Fixation
	<ol>
		<li>Fix the cells by adding 2 mL of 4% PFA under the chemical hood. 
		NOTE: PFA is toxic and must be manipulated under a chemical hood.</li>
		<li>Incubate the cells at room temperature for 20 min. Wash the coverslips twice with 1x PBS, and aspirate the excess.</li>
		<li>Cover the coverslips with 100% cold methanol, and incubate the coverslips at -20 &#176;C for 5 min. Wash twice with 1x PBS. 
		&#8203;NOTE: The protocol can be paused here. The coverslips can be stored at 4 &#176;C in 1x PBS and the plate wrapped in aluminum foil if necessary. The cells should not be kept more than 5 days before continuing the IF protocol.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Permeabilization
<ol>
	<li>Incubate the cells with 2 mL of 1x PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 15 min. Wash the coverslips three times with 2 mL of 1x PBS.</li>
</ol>
4. Immunostaining
<ol>
	<li>Blocking step
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare enough fresh blocking buffer (3% BSA in 1x PBS) to use 2 mL per coverslip. 
		&#8203;NOTE: Prepare an extra 5mL of blocking buffer to make the antibody solutions.</li>
		<li>Add 2 mL of blocking buffer to each well and incubate at room temperature for 1 h.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Primary antibody incubation
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare the primary antibody solution in fresh blocking buffer: BrdU RPN202 1:1000 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) 1:500, 100 &#181;L per coverslip. 
		NOTE: To preserve the antibody, a smaller volume can be used, 75-100 &#181;L for a 22 x 22 mm coverslip, 50-75 &#181;L for an 18 x 18 mm coverslip.</li>
		<li>On each coverslip, add 100 &#181;L of primary antibody solution. Cover the coverslips with a square of parafilm using tweezers, and carefully position the parafilm to not create bubbles.</li>
		<li>Cover the plate in aluminum foil, and incubate the primary antibody overnight at 4 &#176;C in a humidified chamber.</li>
		<li>Remove the parafilm squares, and wash the coverslips three times with 2 mL of sterile 1x PBS.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Secondary antibody incubation
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare enough secondary antibody solution in fresh blocking buffer: anti-mouse 488 fluorescent secondary A11011 (for BrdU) dilution 1:800 and anti-rabbit 568 fluorescent secondary A11011 (for PCNA) dilution 1:800. 
		NOTE: The colors used can be changed to suit the experimental needs. The specific brand used can be found in the Table of Materials.</li>
		<li>Add on each coverslip 100 &#181;L of secondary antibody solution, cover the coverslips with a square of parafilm using tweezers, and carefully position the parafilm without bubbles.</li>
		<li>Incubate the secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h with the plate covered in aluminum foil.</li>
		<li>Wash the coverslips three times with 2 mL of 1x PBS.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Nuclear staining
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare a volume of 2 mL per coverslip of 1x PBS containing 4&#39;,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at a final concentration of 1 &#181;g/mL (1:1000).</li>
		<li>Add on each coverslip 2 mL of the DAPI solution. Incubate the coverslips at room temperature for 10 min with the plate covered in aluminum foil. Wash the coverslips twice with 1x PBS.</li>
		<li>Cover the coverslips with 1x PBS, and use either a needle or fine tweezers to lift the coverslip from the bottom of the well.Carefully blot the off the excess liquid by tapping one edge gently on a paper towel. 
		NOTE: Be careful not to drop the slide or allow the flat surface with the adherent cells to touch the paper.</li>
		<li>Mount the coverslips on slides using 10-20 &#181;L of IF-specific mounting media.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
5. Image acquisition and analysis
NOTE: Image acquisition can be done on several types of fluorescent microscopes. An epifluorescence microscope with a 63x oil objective was used; see the Table of Materials for the brand and model. Z-stacks are not required, although they may be of use depending on the cell line and level of mitochondrial staining.
<ol>
	<li>Image analysis
	<ol>
		<li>For each image, create multiple tiff files; merge all planes, but keep the color channels separate. Import these files into Cell Profiler (The Broad Institute https://cellprofiler.org/home) and analyze using the Speckle Counting pipeline (Supplemental Video 1).</li>
		<li>Upload the images (Supplemental Figure S1A).
		<ol>
			<li>To begin creating the project, load the speckle counting pipeline into the program and the images to be analyzed in the provided area.</li>
			<li>Use the NamesAndTypes module to assign a meaningful name to each image by which other modules will refer to it-C01: Representing BrdU Channel; C02: Representing PCNA Channel; C03: Representing DAPI Channel. 
			NOTE: These identifiers will depend on the microscope; there should be an identifier in the file name to distinguish between the channels.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Identify which file will be used to identify the nuclei and name it (change this name as required) (see Supplemental Figure S1B and Supplemental Figure S1C).
		<ol>
			<li>Select the diameter of the object between 50 and 300 pixel units, which is the acceptable size range for nuclei, but change the value to fit the nuclei in the image. 
			NOTE: It may be that 50 is too large a value and prevents smaller nuclei from being identified; likewise, 300 may allow for large groupings of nuclei to be counted as 1.</li>
			<li>Discard objects outside of the diameter range to ensure only those that match the criteria will be counted.</li>
			<li>Discard objects touching borders to remove cells that may only be partially in the field.</li>
			<li>Apply the threshold to fit the specific images. Note the following settings as an example. Change the thresholding correction factor based on how stringent the thresholding strategy will be. Other settings include threshold strategy: Global; thresholding method: Otsu; two class or three class thresholding: Two class; threshold smoothing scale: 1; threshold smoothing factor: 1; lower and upper bounds on threshold: 0.0 and 1.0; method to distinguish clumped objects: Shape; and method to draw dividing lines between clumped objects: Propagate. 
			NOTE: For each parameter, cell profiler provides complementary definitions and available possibility for the variable setting.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Identify the primary object to identify the foci (Supplemental Figure S2A).
		<ol>
			<li>Use the following settings: select the input image: Maskedgreen; named the primary object to be identified: BrdUFoci; typical diameter of the object: 1-15; discard the object outside the diameter range: Yes; discard the object touching the border of the image : No; threshold strategy: Adaptative; thresholding method: Otsu; two class or three class thresholding: Three class; threshold smoothing scale: 1; threshold smoothing factor: 3; and size of smoothing filter: 4.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Measure intensity (Supplemental Figure S2B).
		<ol>
			<li>Select the image to be measured: OrigGreen.</li>
			<li>Click on Add another image. Select the image to be measured: PCNA. Select objects to measure: Nuclei. 
			NOTE: This will be used to measure the BrdU and PCNA intensity-the final data that will be graphed.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Mouw, K. W., Goldberg, M. S., Konstantinopoulos, P. A., D'Andrea, A. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((DNA+damage+and+repair+biomarkers+of+immunotherapy+response%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cancer+Discovery%22%5BJournal%5D)">DNA damage and repair biomarkers of immunotherapy response.</a> Cancer Discovery. 7 (7), 675-693 (2017).</li>
<li>Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., Willis, N. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((DNA+double-strand+break+repair-pathway+choice+in+somatic+mammalian+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Reviews+Molecular+Cell+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells.</a> Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 20 (11), 698-714 (2019).</li>
<li>Chang, H. H. Y., Pannunzio, N. R., Adachi, N., Lieber, M. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Non-homologous+DNA+end+joining+and+alternative+pathways+to+double-strand+break+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Reviews+Molecular+Cell+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.</a> Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 18 (8), 495-506 (2017).</li>
<li>Heyer, W. D., Ehmsen, K. T., Liu, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Regulation+of+homologous+recombination+in+eukaryotes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annual+Review+of+Genetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes.</a> Annual Review of Genetics. 44, 113-139 (2010).</li>
<li>Ronato, D. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Limiting+the+DNA+double-strand+break+resectosome+for+genome+protection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Trends+in+Biochemical+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Limiting the DNA double-strand break resectosome for genome protection.</a> Trends in Biochemical Science. 45 (9), 779-793 (2020).</li>
<li>Hu, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((PARP1-driven+poly-ADP-ribosylation+regulates+BRCA1+function+in+homologous+recombination-mediated+DNA+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cancer+Discovery%22%5BJournal%5D)">PARP1-driven poly-ADP-ribosylation regulates BRCA1 function in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair.</a> Cancer Discovery. 4 (12), 1430-1447 (2014).</li>
<li>Satoh, M. S., Lindahl, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Role+of+poly%28ADP-ribose%29+formation+in+DNA+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair.</a> Nature. 356 (6367), 356-358 (1992).</li>
<li>Sugimura, K., Takebayashi, S., Taguchi, H., Takeda, S., Okumura, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((PARP-1+ensures+regulation+of+replication+fork+progression+by+homologous+recombination+on+damaged+DNA%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Cell+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">PARP-1 ensures regulation of replication fork progression by homologous recombination on damaged DNA.</a> Journal of Cell Biology. 183 (7), 1203-1212 (2008).</li>
<li>Bryant, H. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Specific+killing+of+BRCA2-deficient+tumours+with+inhibitors+of+poly%28ADP-ribose%29+polymerase%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.</a> Nature. 434 (7035), 913-917 (2005).</li>
<li>Farmer, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Targeting+the+DNA+repair+defect+in+BRCA+mutant+cells+as+a+therapeutic+strategy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.</a> Nature. 434 (7035), 917-921 (2005).</li>
<li>Zhou, P., Wang, J., Mishail, D., Wang, C. Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Recent+advancements+in+PARP+inhibitors-based+targeted+cancer+therapy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Precision+Clinical+Medicine%22%5BJournal%5D)">Recent advancements in PARP inhibitors-based targeted cancer therapy.</a> Precision Clinical Medicine. 3 (3), 187-201 (2020).</li>
<li>Noordermeer, S. M., van Attikum, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((PARP+inhibitor+resistance%3A+a+tug-of-war+in+BRCA-mutated+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Trends+in+Cell+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">PARP inhibitor resistance: a tug-of-war in BRCA-mutated cells.</a> Trends in Cell Biology. 29 (10), 820-834 (2019).</li>
<li>Caron, M. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Poly%28ADP-ribose%29+polymerase-1+antagonizes+DNA+resection+at+double-strand+breaks%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature+Communications%22%5BJournal%5D)">Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 antagonizes DNA resection at double-strand breaks.</a> Nature Communications. 10 (1), 2954(2019).</li>
<li>Zhou, Y., Caron, P., Legube, G., Paull, T. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Quantitation+of+DNA+double-strand+break+resection+intermediates+in+human+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nucleic+Acids+Research%22%5BJournal%5D)">Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells.</a> Nucleic Acids Research. 42 (3), 19(2014).</li>
<li>Raderschall, E., Golub, E. I., Haaf, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Nuclear+foci+of+mammalian+recombination+proteins+are+located+at+single-stranded+DNA+regions+formed+after+DNA+damage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences+of+the+United+States+of+America%22%5BJournal%5D)">Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 96 (5), 1921-1926 (1999).</li>
<li>Sartori, A. A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Human+CtIP+promotes+DNA+end+resection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection.</a> Nature. 450 (7169), 509-514 (2007).</li>
<li>Huertas, P., Cruz-García, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Single+molecule+analysis+of+resection+tracks%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+in+Molecular+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Single molecule analysis of resection tracks.</a> Methods in Molecular Biology. 1672, 147-154 (2018).</li>
<li>Soniat, M. M., Myler, L. R., Kuo, H. -C., Paull, T. T., Finkelstein, I. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((RPA+phosphorylation+inhibits+DNA+resection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Molecular+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">RPA phosphorylation inhibits DNA resection.</a> Molecular Cell. 75 (1), 145-153 (2019).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

This paper describes a method that makes use of IF staining to measure variations in DNA resection in cellulo. The current standard for observing an effect on DNA resection is through RPA staining; however, this is an indirect method that may be influenced by DNA replication. Previously, another BrdU incorporation-based DNA resection IF technique has been described for classifying the resulting intensities in BrdU-positive and BrdU-negative cells. This method allowed for cells that are not undergoing HR to be co...

Modulation of DNA repair factors is an ever-evolving method for cancer therapy, particularly in DNA DSB repair-deficient tumor environments. The inhibition of specific repair factors is one of the ingenious strategies used to sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. Decades of research led to the identification of various mutations of DNA repair genes as biomarkers for therapeutic strategy choices1. Consequently, the DNA repair field has become a hub for drug development to ensure a wide range of treatments, empowering the personalized medicine concept. 
DSBs are repaired by two main pathways: NHEJ and HR2. The NHEJ pathway is error-prone, rapidly ligating the two DNA ends with little to no DNA end-processing and involving the protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), the Ku70/80 complex, 53BP1, and RIF1 proteins3. In contrast, HR is a faithful mechanism initiated by BRCA14. An essential step in HR repair is the DNA-end resection process, which is the degradation of the broken ends leading to single-stranded (ss) DNA with 3'-OH ends. BRCA1 facilitates the recruitment of the downstream proteins that form the resectosome MRN/RPA/BLM/DNA2/EXO1, which are involved in the 5' to 3' DNA resection5. 
The initial end-resection is accomplished through the endonuclease activity of MRE11, allowing for further processing by the DNA2 and EXO1 nucleases. The generated ssDNA overhangs are quickly coated by Replication Protein A (RPA) to protect them from further processing. Subsequently, BRCA2, PALB2, and BRCA1 engage to mediate the displacement of RPA and the assembly of the RAD51 nucleofilament required for homology-directed repair mechanism. A fine balance between the usage of NHEJ and HR is necessary for the optimal maintenance of genomic integrity. The pathway choice depends on the cell cycle phase. HR is preferentially used during the S to G2 phases wherein DNA resection is at the highest level, and the sister chromatids are available to ensure proper repair.
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is one of the earliest proteins recruited to the DSB. It regulates both resection activity and the assembly of downstream effectors involved in the NHEJ5,6. PARP-1 is also required for DNA single-stranded break repair during replication7,8. Due to its important role in DNA repair, PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are used as cancer therapies. In several HR-deficient cancers, PARPi treatment leads to a synthetic lethal response due to the incapacity of HR-deficient cells to repair the accumulated damage via an alternative pathway9,10. There are currently four FDA approved PARPi: Olaparib, Rucaparib, Niriparib, and Talazoparib (also called BMN 673), which are used for various breast and ovarian cancer treatments11. However, PARPi resistance is common, and one potential cause arises through the reacquisition of HR proficiency12. Loss or inhibition of PARP-1 in the presence of irradiation dysregulates the resectosome machinery, leading to the accumulation of longer ssDNA tracts13. Therefore, an in-depth study of DNA resection in vivo is critical for a clearer understanding of the DNA repair pathways and the subsequent development of new strategies to treat cancer and to overcome PARPi resistance. 
There have been several methods employed to detect DNA resection events5. One such method is the classical IF-based technique allowing for indirect staining and visualization of the resected DNA after stress-induced DSB by using an anti-RPA antibody. Labelling genomic DNA with 5-bromo-2&#8242;-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and detecting only ssDNA is a direct measurement of DNA resection events. It circumvents the monitoring of RPA, which is involved in multiple cellular processes such as DNA replication. In the method described here, cells incubated with BrdU for a single cell cycle allow BrdU to be incorporated into one strand of the replicating cellular DNA. Following resection, IF staining is performed under conditions allowing wherein BrdU detection only in the ssDNA form, with the use of an anti-BrdU antibody. This antibody can only access exposed BrdU nucleotides and will not detect those integrated into double-stranded DNA. Using fluorescence microscopy, the resected DNA can be visualized in the form of punctate BrdU/ssDNA foci. The nuclear intensity of these foci can be used as a readout to quantify resection following DNA damage. This paper describes step-by-step the processes of this method, which can be applied to most mammalian cell lines. This method should be of broad utility as a simple way of monitoring DNA end resection in cellulo, as a proof of concept.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Alexa 568 goat anti-rabbit</td><td>Molecular probes</td><td>A11011</td><td>1:800</td></tr><tr><td>Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse</td><td>Molecular probes</td><td>A11001</td><td>1:800</td></tr><tr><td>Anti PARP1 (F1-23)</td><td>Homemade</td><td></td><td>1:2500</td></tr><tr><td>Anti PCNA (SY12-07)</td><td>Novus</td><td>NBP2-67390</td><td>1:500</td></tr><tr><td>Anti-Alpha tubulin (DM1A)</td><td>Abcam</td><td>Ab7291</td><td>1:100000</td></tr><tr><td>anti-BrdU</td><td>GE Healthcare</td><td>RPN202</td><td>1:1000</td></tr><tr><td>Benchtop X-ray Irradiator</td><td>Cell Rad</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BMN673</td><td>MedChem Express</td><td>HY-16106</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)</td><td>Sigma</td><td>B5002</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BSA</td><td>Sigma</td><td>A7906</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cell profiler</td><td>Broad Institute</td><td>V 3.19</td><td>https://cellprofiler.org/</td></tr><tr><td>Curwood Parafilm M Laboratory Wrapping Film 4in / 250 ft</td><td>Fisher scientific</td><td>13-374-12</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DAPI (4&#039;,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole, Dihydrochloride)</td><td>Invitrogen Life Technology</td><td>D1306</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMEM high glucose</td><td>Fisher scientific</td><td>10063542</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>EGTA</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>E3889</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine serum</td><td>Gibco</td><td>12483-020</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fisherbrand Cover Glasses: Squares 22 x 22</td><td>Fisher scientific</td><td>12 541B</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fluorescent microscope</td><td>Leica</td><td>DMI6000B</td><td>63x immersion objective</td></tr><tr><td>HeLa</td><td>ATCC</td><td>CCL-2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HERACELL 160I CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; INCUBATOR CU 1-21 TC 120V</td><td>VWR</td><td>51030408</td><td>37% CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;</td></tr><tr><td>MgCl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;</td><td>BioShop Canada</td><td>MAG520.500</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NaCl</td><td>BioShop Canada</td><td>SOD002.10</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Needle</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PBS 1x</td><td>Wisent Bio Products</td><td>311-010-CS</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PFA 16%</td><td>Cedarlane Labs</td><td>15710-S(EM)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PIPES</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>P6757-100G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant</td><td>Invitrogen Life Technology</td><td>P-36930</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RNAiMAX</td><td>Invitrogen</td><td>13778-075</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>siPARPi</td><td>Dharmacon</td><td></td><td>AAG AUA GAG CGU GAA GGC GAA dTdT</td></tr><tr><td>siRNA control</td><td>Dharmacon</td><td></td><td>UUCGAACGUGUCACGUCAA</td></tr><tr><td>Sodium Deoxycholcate</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>D6750-100G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sucrose</td><td>BioShop Canada</td><td>SUC507.5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tris-base</td><td>BioShop Canada</td><td>TRS001.5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trition X-100</td><td>Millipore Sigma</td><td>T8787-250ML</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tween20</td><td>Fisher scientific</td><td>BP337500</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tweezers</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

assessment of global dna double-strand end resection using brdu-dna labeling coupled with cell cycle discrimination imaging

Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging

The study of the DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex and essential field, which has only become more important due to the use of DDR-targeting drugs for cancer treatment. These targets are poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), which initiate various forms of DNA repair. Inhibiting these enzymes using PARP inhibitors (PARPi) achieves synthetic lethality by conferring a therapeutic vulnerability in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cells due to mutations in breast cancer type 1 (BRCA1), BRCA2, or partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2). 
Cells treated with PARPi accumulate DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). These breaks are processed by the DNA end resection machinery, leading to the formation of single-stranded (ss) DNA and subsequent DNA repair. In a BRCA1-deficient context, reinvigorating DNA resection through mutations in DNA resection inhibitors, such as 53BP1 and DYNLL1, causes PARPi resistance. Therefore, being able to monitor DNA resection in cellulo is critical for a clearer understanding of the DNA repair pathways and the development of new strategies to overcome PARPi resistance. Immunofluorescence (IF)-based techniques allow for monitoring of global DNA resection after DNA damage. This strategy requires long-pulse genomic DNA labeling with 5-bromo-2&#8242;-deoxyuridine (BrdU). Following DNA damage and DNA end resection, the resulting single-stranded DNA is specifically detected by an anti-BrdU antibody under native conditions. Moreover, DNA resection can also be studied using cell cycle markers to differentiate between various phases of the cell cycle. Cells in the S/G2 phase allow the study of end resection within HR, whereas G1 cells can be used to study non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). A detailed protocol for this IF method coupled to cell cycle discrimination is described in this paper.

In this protocol, the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-based assay was used to quantitatively measure the resection response of HeLa cells to irradiation-induced damage. The generated ssDNA tracks are visualized as distinct foci after immunofluorescence staining (Figure 1A). The identified foci were then quantified and expressed as the total integrated intensity of the BrdU staining in the nuclei (Figure 1B, Supplemental Figure S1, Supplemental Figure S2,</stron...

In the present protocol, we demonstrate how to visualize DNA double-strand end resection during S/G2 phase of the cell cycle using an immunofluorescence-based method.

The study of the DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex and essential field, which has only become more important due to the use of DDR-targeting drugs ...

assessment-global-dna-double-strand-end-resection-using-brdu-dna

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

This article describes GFP-based fluorescence in vivo assays that separately quantify homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells.

Analysis of DNA Double-strand Break (DSB) Repair in Mammalian Cells

Determining the cell cycle position of a population of cells, or understanding how signals affect proliferation, can be readily measured by flow cytometry using this protocol.  We report a simple experimental approach to staining cells and quantifying their position in the cell cycle.

Analysis of Cell Cycle Position in Mammalian Cells

Tracking subtle changes in the progression and kinetics of cell cycle stages can be accomplished by use of a combination of metabolic labeling of nucleic acids with BrdU and total genomic DNA staining via Propidium Iodide.  This method avoids the need of chemical synchronization of cycling cells, thereby preventing the introduction of non-specific DNA damage, which in turn affects cell cycle progression.

Measuring Cell Cycle Progression Kinetics with Metabolic Labeling and Flow Cytometry

Administration of two analogs of thymidine, EdU and BrdU, in pregnant mice allows the analysis of cell cycle progression in neural and progenitor cells in the embryonic mouse brain. This method is useful to determine the effects of genotoxic stress, including ionizing radiation, during brain development.

Assessing Cell Cycle Progression of Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells in the Mouse Developing Brain after Genotoxic Stress

Repair of double-strand DNA breaks is a dynamic process, requiring not only formation of repair complexes at the breaks, but also their resolution after the lesion is addressed. Here, we use immunofluorescence microscopy for transient and long-lasting double-stranded breaks as a tool to dissect this genome maintenance mechanism.

Characterizing DNA Repair Processes at Transient and Long-lasting Double-strand DNA Breaks by Immunofluorescence Microscopy

The presented method combines the quantitative analysis of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), cell cycle distribution and apoptosis to enable cell cycle-specific evaluation of DSB induction and repair as well as the consequences of repair failure.

Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of &#947;H2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry

Cell cycle analysis with 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) and phospho-histone H3 (pH3) labeling is a multi-step procedure that may require extensive optimization. Here, we present a detailed protocol that describes all steps for this procedure including image analysis and quantification to distinguish cells in different cell cycle phases.

5-Ethynyl-2'-Deoxyuridine/Phospho-Histone H3 Dual-Labeling Protocol for Cell Cycle Progression Analysis in Drosophila Neural Stem Cells

Here we present a flow cytometry-based method for visualization and quantification of multiple senescence-associated markers in single cells.

Simultaneous Imaging and Flow-Cytometry-based Detection of Multiple Fluorescent Senescence Markers in Therapy-Induced Senescent Cancer Cells

The following protocol presents the detection of single-stranded DNA foci in the G1 phase of the cell cycle utilizing cell cycle synchronization followed by RPA2 immunofluorescent staining.

Visualizing Single-Stranded DNA Foci in the G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle

We present protocols for the assessment of double strand break repair pathway proficiency in cells using a suite of luminescence-based extrachromosomal reporter substrates.

Assessment of DNA Double Strand Break Repair Activity Using High-throughput and Quantitative Luminescence-Based Reporter Assays

Learn to quantify DNA end resection in HeLa cells using BrdU labeling and cell cycle discrimination imaging. This immunofluorescence protocol distinguishes homologous recombination from non-homologous end joining repair pathways.

Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging

Explore More Videos