Name: Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2021-09-17T15:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 6 min
Description: Learn to assess spatial lingual tactile sensitivity using a grating orientation test. This standardized method evaluates tongue sensitivity for research on speech clarity, swallowing disorders, and food texture perception.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We acknowledge all the participants, volunteers, and others involved in the study. We are grateful to Sandra Stolzenbach W&#230;hrens and Wender Bredie (University of Copenhagen) for designing the squares used in the present gratings orientation test. This research was funded by the University of Milan, Piano di sostegno alla ricerca 2018.

An informed, written consent has been signed by all participants. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Milan (n. 48/19) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
1. Training of experimenters
<ol>
	<li>Take the grating tool and apply a force of 100 g on a sponge placed on a scale. 
	NOTE: Refer to Figure 1 for the schematic of the grating tool used in this study</li>
	<li>Repeat this procedure at least 10 times to reduce variation in the force applied by the grating on the subjects' tongues during testing, both within and across experimenters.</li>
</ol>
2. Assessment procedure
NOTE: Conduct the assessment of tactile acuity following the required health and safety standard to guarantee the subject's safety (e.g., mask, gloves, and lab coat).
<ol>
	<li>Display all gratings (0.20 mm, 0.25 mm, 0.50 mm, 0.75 mm, 1.00 mm, 1.25 mm) (Figure 2) on a table out of sight of the participant.</li>
	<li>Seat the participant in a comfortable chair and inform them that they can leave the experiment at any time.</li>
	<li>Inform the participant that they will be blindfolded during the experiment and asked to stick out their tongue in a comfortable and relaxed way.</li>
	<li>Prior to the beginning of the experiment, familiarize the subjects with the procedure using the largest grating (1.25 mm) to demonstrate the force applied (100 g for 3 s).</li>
	<li>Notify the participants that they can take a sip of water whenever deemed appropriate.</li>
	<li>Apply each grating onto the subjects' tongue (anterior region of the tongue just around the midline).</li>
	<li>After each touch, ask the subjects to indicate, using their hands, the tool's orientation (either horizontal or vertical) and their degree of sureness (sure, unsure). Subjects must guess if they do not know.</li>
	<li>After each touch, record all the answers (horizontal, vertical, sure, not sure) for each subject on a spreadsheet (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
	<li>Repeat each grating as many times as deemed necessary for the R-Index cut-off selected, for instance, 6 times, 3 horizontally, and 3 vertically (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
	<li>Sterilize each grating after testing each participant (refer to section 4). 
	NOTE: The tongue should protrude gently from the mouth without effort by the volunteers to avoid excessive fatigue, which would lead to an alteration in their performance results. It is important to note that the higher the repetitions by grating, the more reliable the measurement16.</li>
</ol>
3. Cleaning protocol
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a solution consisting of 20 mL of sodium hypochlorite (see Table of Materials) diluted in 1 L of water according to the manufacturer's instructions.</li>
	<li>Manually shake the solution for a few seconds.</li>
	<li>Fill 6 cups with approximately 20 mL of the disinfectant solution to fully immerse each tool in the solution.</li>
	<li>Place each tool in the corresponding cup.</li>
	<li>Let the tools soak for 15-20 min.</li>
	<li>Rinse the tools with plenty of water according to the manufacturer's instructions and scrub them with a toothbrush to ensure removing any sodium hypochlorite residue.</li>
	<li>Allow the tools to air dry.</li>
</ol>
4. R-index calculation
<ol>
	<li>Create a response matrix for each volunteer and for all the tools (Figure 3) based on the response frequencies used to calculate the R-index using the following equation: 
	<img alt="Ratio equation R for chemical equilibrium analysis; equation features variables a-h." src="/files/ftp_upload/62898/62898eq01.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788282455000" data-alt="Equation 1"> 
	NOTE: R-index expresses individual tactile sensitivity for each tool16. R- index is based on SDT17 and represents an estimated probability of discerning a target stimulus (i.e., the signal) from an alternative stimulus (i.e., the noise). The signal and the noise correspond to the correct or incorrect identification of the horizontal-vertical orientation of the grating. Four response options for both signal and noise can occur: "horizontal-sure", "horizontal-unsure", "vertical-unsure" and "vertical-sure"16. R-index values range between 0-1. A higher R-index value indicates better discrimination.</li>
</ol>
5. Sensitivity and threshold determination by the R-index estimates
<ol>
	<li>To determine whether a subject can discriminate the orientation of each tool, calculate the cut-off using a table of critical values for R-index significance tests18 
	NOTE: Considering the present example, corresponding to 36 presentations (i.e., each grating presented 6 times, 3 horizontal and 3 vertical), the cut-off value for discrimination is set to 0.7426 according to the one-sided R-index critical values for α = 0.0518.</li>
	<li>If a sufficiently high number of tools is used (e.g., six different grating dimensions)19, derive R-index threshold estimations.</li>
	<li>To calculate the threshold for each subject, interpolate the two R-indices immediately below and above of the cut-off value20.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Guinard, J. X., Mazzucchelli, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+sensory+perception+of+texture+and+mouthfeel%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Trends+in+Food+Science+%26+Technology%22%5BJournal%5D)">The sensory perception of texture and mouthfeel.</a> Trends in Food Science & Technology. 7 (7), 213-219 (1996).</li>
<li>Jeltema, M., Beckley, J., Vahalik, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Food+texture+assessment+and+preference+based+on+mouth+behavior%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Food+Quality+and+Preference%22%5BJournal%5D)">Food texture assessment and preference based on mouth behavior.</a> Food Quality and Preference. 52, 160-171 (2016).</li>
<li>Scott, C. L., Downey, R. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Types+of+food+aversions%3A+animal%2C+vegetable%2C+and+texture%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Journal+of+Psychology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Types of food aversions: animal, vegetable, and texture.</a> The Journal of Psychology. 141 (2), 127-134 (2007).</li>
<li>Laureati, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Individual+differences+in+texture+preferences+among+European+children%3A+Development+and+validation+of+the+Child+Food+Texture+Preference+Questionnaire+%28CFTPQ%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Food+Quality+and+Preference%22%5BJournal%5D)">Individual differences in texture preferences among European children: Development and validation of the Child Food Texture Preference Questionnaire (CFTPQ).</a> Food Quality and Preference. 80, 103828(2020).</li>
<li>de Lavergne, M. D., Derks, J. A., Ketel, E. C., de Wijk, R. A., Stieger, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Eating+behaviour+explains+differences+between+individuals+in+dynamic+texture+perception+of+sausages%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Food+Quality+and+Preference%22%5BJournal%5D)">Eating behaviour explains differences between individuals in dynamic texture perception of sausages.</a> Food Quality and Preference. 41, 189-200 (2015).</li>
<li>Engelen, L., de Wijk, R. A. Oral processing and texture perception. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aEngelen%2C+L+%22Food+Oral+Processing%3A+Fundamentals+of+Eating+and+Sensory+Perception%22">Food Oral Processing: Fundamentals of Eating and Sensory Perception</a>. 8, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 157-176 (2012).</li>
<li>Stokes, J. R., Boehm, M. W., Baier, S. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Oral+processing%2C+texture+and+mouthfeel%3A+From+rheology+to+tribology+and+beyond%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Current+Opinion+in+Colloid+%26+Interface+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Oral processing, texture and mouthfeel: From rheology to tribology and beyond.</a> Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 18 (4), 349-359 (2013).</li>
<li>Engelen, L. Oral receptors. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aEngelen%2C+L+%22Food+Oral+Processing%3A+Fundamentals+of+Eating+and+Sensory+Perception%22">Food Oral Processing: Fundamentals of Eating and Sensory Perception</a>. , Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 15-38 (2012).</li>
<li>Yackinous, C., Guinard, J. X. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Relation+between+PROP+taster+status+and+fat+perception%2C+touch%2C+and+olfaction%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Physiology+%26+Behavior%22%5BJournal%5D)">Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction.</a> Physiology & Behavior. 72 (3), 427-437 (2001).</li>
<li>Etter, N. M., Breen, S. P., Alcala, M. I., Ziegler, G. R., Hayes, J. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Assessment+of+midline+lingual+point-pressure+somatosensation+using+Von+Frey+hair+monofilaments%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Visualized+Experiments%3A+JoVE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Assessment of midline lingual point-pressure somatosensation using Von Frey hair monofilaments.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (156), (2020).</li>
<li>Essick, G. K., Chen, C. C., Kelly, D. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+letter-recognition+task+to+assess+lingual+tactile+acuity%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Oral+and+Maxillofacial+Surgery%22%5BJournal%5D)">A letter-recognition task to assess lingual tactile acuity.</a> Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 57 (11), 1324-1330 (1999).</li>
<li>Essick, G. K., Chopra, A., Guest, S., McGlone, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Lingual+tactile+acuity%2C+taste+perception%2C+and+the+density+and+diameter+of+fungiform+papillae+in+female+subjects%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Physiology+%26+Behavior%22%5BJournal%5D)">Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects.</a> Physiology & Behavior. 80 (2-3), 289-302 (2003).</li>
<li>Van Boven, R. W., Johnson, K. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+limit+of+tactile+spatial+resolution+in+humans%3A+grating+orientation+discrimination+at+the+lip%2C+tongue%2C+and+finger%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurology%22%5BJournal%5D)">The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger.</a> Neurology. 44 (12), 2361(1994).</li>
<li>Moritz, J., Turk, P., Williams, J. D., Stone-Roy, L. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Perceived+intensity+and+discrimination+ability+for+lingual+electrotactile+stimulation+depends+on+location+and+orientation+of+electrodes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Frontiers+in+Human+Neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Perceived intensity and discrimination ability for lingual electrotactile stimulation depends on location and orientation of electrodes.</a> Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11, 186(2017).</li>
<li>Bach-y-Rita, P., Kaczmarek, K. A., Tyler, M. E., Garcia-Lara, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Form+perception+with+a+49-point+electrotactile+stimulus+array+on+the+tongue%3A+a+technical+note%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+Of+Rehabilitation+Research+and+Development%22%5BJournal%5D)">Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note.</a> Journal Of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 35, 427-430 (1998).</li>
<li>O'Mahony, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Understanding+discrimination+tests%3A+A+user-friendly+treatment+of+response+bias%2C+rating+and+ranking+R-index+tests+and+their+relationship+to+signal+detection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Sensory+Studies%22%5BJournal%5D)">Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection.</a> Journal of Sensory Studies. 7 (1), 1-47 (1992).</li>
<li>Lee, H. S., Van Hout, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Quantification+of+sensory+and+food+quality%3A+The+R-index+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Food+Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Quantification of sensory and food quality: The R-index analysis.</a> Journal of Food Science. 74 (6), 57-64 (2009).</li>
<li>Bi, J., O'Mahony, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Updated+and+extended+table+for+testing+the+significance+of+the+R-index%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Sensory+Studies%22%5BJournal%5D)">Updated and extended table for testing the significance of the R-index.</a> Journal of Sensory Studies. 22, 713-720 (2007).</li>
<li>Bertoli, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Taste+sensitivity%2C+nutritional+status+and+metabolic+syndrome%3A+Implication+in+weight+loss+dietary+interventions%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22World+Journal+of+Diabetes%22%5BJournal%5D)">Taste sensitivity, nutritional status and metabolic syndrome: Implication in weight loss dietary interventions.</a> World Journal of Diabetes. 5 (5), 717(2014).</li>
<li>Robinson, K. M., Klein, B. P., Lee, S. Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Utilizing+the+R-index+measure+for+threshold+testing+in+model+caffeine+solutions%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Food+Quality+and+Preference%22%5BJournal%5D)">Utilizing the R-index measure for threshold testing in model caffeine solutions.</a> Food Quality and Preference. 16 (4), 283-289 (2005).</li>
<li>Appiani, M., Rabitti, N. S., Methven, L., Cattaneo, C., Laureati, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Assessment+of+lingual+tactile+sensitivity+in+children+and+adults%3A+Methodological+suitability+and+challenges%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Foods%22%5BJournal%5D)">Assessment of lingual tactile sensitivity in children and adults: Methodological suitability and challenges.</a> Foods. 9 (11), 1594(2020).</li>
<li>Cattaneo, C., Liu, J., Bech, A. C., Pagliarini, E., Bredie, W. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cross-cultural+differences+in+lingual+tactile+acuity%2C+taste+sensitivity+phenotypical+markers%2C+and+preferred+oral+processing+behaviors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Food+Quality+and+Preference%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cross-cultural differences in lingual tactile acuity, taste sensitivity phenotypical markers, and preferred oral processing behaviors.</a> Food Quality and Preference. 80, 103803(2020).</li>
<li>Abraira, V. E., Ginty, D. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+sensory+neurons+of+touch%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">The sensory neurons of touch.</a> Neuron. 79 (4), 618-639 (2013).</li>
<li>Johnson, K. O., Phillips, J. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tactile+spatial+resolution.+I.+Two-point+discrimination%2C+gap+detection%2C+grating+resolution%2C+and+letter+recognition%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Neurophysiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition.</a> Journal of Neurophysiology. 46 (6), 1177-1192 (1981).</li>
<li>Phillips, J. R., Johnson, K. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tactile+spatial+resolution.+II.+Neural+representation+of+bars%2C+edges%2C+and+gratings+in+monkey+primary+afferents%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Neurophysiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents.</a> Journal of Neurophysiology. 46 (6), 1192-1203 (1981).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Few valid instruments are available for measuring tactile acuity10,11,13,22. Von Frey filaments have been shown to be an adequate method for measuring both skin and oral tactile acuity10,21,22. However, these instruments measure a different dimension of lingual tactile acuity than the gratings orientat...

The texture and mouthfeel of food play an important role in liking1,2,3,4, and while research has found differences in texture perception due to factors such as chewing behavior2,5,&#160;saliva flow, and composition6,7, there are limited methods available to assess variation in oral tactile receptors (mechanoreceptors). The oral cavity houses different types of mechanoreceptors found in the mouth: Merkel receptors, Ruffini cylinders, and Meissner corpuscles8. Mechanoreceptors can be classed into two groups: slowly adapting and rapidly adapting. Slowly adapting mechanoreceptors (Ruffini cylinders and Merkel receptors) produce signals continuously while being stimulated. In contrast, rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors (Meissner&#39;s corpuscles) respond to the beginning and end of stimulation with a signal. Tactile acuity varies widely across tongue surfaces and between individuals, possibly due to differences in mechanoreceptor sensitivity. The location and the number of mechanoreceptors in the oral cavity, the differences in the spatial arrangement/density of the mechanoreceptors (spatial acuity), or the differences in their sensitivity when activated could be the cause of this intra- and inter-individual variability. Several methods to evaluate and screen for variation in mechanoreceptor sensitivity in the oral cavity have been published, including von Frey filaments9,10, letter recognition11,12, grating orientation tests13, and flexible electrode array14,15. The gratings orientation test requires square gratings (Figure 1, Figure 2) with different groove widths to be placed on the tongue of a blindfolded subject. They indicate if subjects perceive the gratings to be in either a horizontal or vertical orientation. Responses are used to calculate average thresholds based on the subject&#39;s ability to discriminate the orientation for the different grating sizes.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Custom-made squares</td><td>University of Reading; University of Copenhagen</td><td></td><td>Squares of 1 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)</td></tr><tr><td>Disinfenctant solution (20% sodium hypochlorite)</td><td>Amuchina, Angelini S.p.A., Roma, Italy</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Eye masks</td><td>Various</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gloves</td><td>Various</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lab coat</td><td>Various</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Plastic cup for drinking water</td><td>Various</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Excel</td><td>Microsoft</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

assessment of spatial lingual tactile sensitivity using a gratings orientation test

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Individual thresholds by R-index estimates are calculated using a gratings orientation test (6 different tools of increasing grating size from 0.20-1.25 mm) to assess spatial lingual tactile sensitivity. During the experiment, the subjects are blindfolded and asked to specify the orientation of the grating (either horizontal or vertical) placed on the tongue. R-index is based on Signal Detection Theory (SDT), and it is an estimated probability of correctly identifying a target stimulus (the signal, e.g., the correct orientation) compared to an alternative stimulus (the noise, e.g., the incorrect orientation). Once the R-index values for each subject and each tool dimension are calculated, it is possible to derive the individual threshold by interpolating the two R-indices immediately below and above the established cut-off (typically 75%) based on one-sided R-index critical values. This procedure can be helpful in the medical field to study the association between oral tactile sensitivity, speech clarity, and swallowing disorders, as well as in sensory and consumer studies to explore individual variation in texture perception, food preferences, and eating behavior.

A total of 70 healthy adults (age range = 19-33 years; mean age = 22.0; 52.9% women) were involved in the study, as shown in Appiani et al. (2020)21.
As an example, the R-index distribution by age for square 0.75 mm is reported in Figure 4. Each point represents a different subject. Subjects above the dotted line (cut-off value: 0.7426) are those who correctly identify the orientation of the grating (more sensitive).
<p class="jove_cont...

This work illustrates a standard procedure and threshold determination by the R-index to assess spatial lingual tactile sensitivity using a gratings orientation test.

Individual thresholds by R-index estimates are calculated using a gratings orientation test (6 different tools of increasing grating size from 0.20-1.25 ...

assessment-spatial-lingual-tactile-sensitivity-using-gratings

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

We describe a computer-controlled device for investigating the sense of touch: the Tactile Automated Passive-finger Stimulator (TAPS). We describe the components of TAPS, and show how TAPS is used to administer a two-interval forced-choice tactile grating orientation test.

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

We describe two tactile sensory testing methods for acute or chronic periods of spinal cord injury in rats.  These validated procedures can detect the development and maintenance of allodynia-like sensations.

Acute and Chronic Tactile Sensory Testing after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

Oral chemoreception of fatty acids and the association with diet and fatty food preferences may enable the identification of mechanisms involved with the development of obesity and why dietary changes may be difficult for many individuals.

Measuring Oral Fatty Acid Thresholds, Fat Perception, Fatty Food Liking, and Papillae Density in Humans

Here, we present protocols to determine vibration detection thresholds and tactile acuity using psychophysical methods in man.

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

We describe a surgical procedure in an anesthetized rat model for determining the muscle tone and viscoelastic properties of the tongue. The procedure involves specific stimulation of the hypoglossal nerves and application of passive Lissajous force/deformation curves to the muscle.

In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of the Rat Tongue

This protocol measures human taste responses and includes a brief anatomical assessment, a short taste test, and a validation method using the subject's reported sensation and taste receptor genotype.

Taste Exam: A Brief and Validated Test

The perception of gravity is commonly determined by the subjective visual vertical in the head upright position. The additional assessment at head tilts of ± 15° and ± 30° in the roll plane ensures increased information content for the detection of impaired graviceptive perception.

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm

This work describes a standard method to assess tactile sensation at the midline of the tongue tip. Using Von Frey Hair (VFH) monofilaments, this protocol provides estimates of detection and discrimination threshold estimates for oral point pressure (OPP).

Assessment of Midline Lingual Point-Pressure Somatosensation Using Von Frey Hair Monofilaments

Presented is the tactile semiautomated passive-finger angle stimulator TSPAS, a new way to assess tactile spatial acuity and tactile angle discrimination using a computer-controlled tactile stimulus system that applies raised angle stimuli to a subject's passive fingerpad, while controlling for movement speed, distance, and contact duration.

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

This protocol describes the assessment of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic orofacial pain using an operant-based orofacial pain assessment device.

Assessment of Nerve Injury-Induced Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Rats Using an Orofacial Operant Pain Assay

Learn to assess spatial lingual tactile sensitivity using a grating orientation test. This standardized method evaluates tongue sensitivity for research on speech clarity, swallowing disorders, and food texture perception.

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Explore More Videos