$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Recently, the hMSCs therapy has shown great promise in tissue regeneration and the treatment of many refractory diseases, such as immune dysfunction diseases, systemic hematological diseases, cancers, or trauma, in numerous clinical trials1,14,15,16,17. Among various sources of MSCs, bone marrow remains the most widely used and easily accessed source. We used human mandibular cancellous bone chips to successfully culture BMSCs using the whole bone marrow adherence method described in the present protocol. To date, there are four main approaches to isolate stem cells from bone marrow, including the whole bone marrow adherence method, density gradient centrifugation method, fluorescent cell sorting method, and magnetic-activated cell sorting method10. The whole bone marrow adherence method is simple, easy to operate, cheap, and can get large amounts of adherent cells. However, the limitation of this method was the low purity of primary cultured BMSCs, which were mixed with hematopoietic cells and fibroblasts. After refreshing the culture medium of primary cells regularly, the non-adherent hematopoietic cells were discarded along with the discarded medium. Also, the fibroblasts can be cleared through cell passage, and P3 cells were highly purified BMSCs. So P0 to P2 cells cannot be used for cell therapy, which means extra time was needed to purify the stem cells. Using fluorescent cell sorting and magnetic-activated cell sorting methods, one can get more purified BMSCs, while the two methods are expensive, and a long selection time can impair cell viability11. To prove that the cultured cells were MSCs, we referred to the definition of human MSCs proposed by the Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy, which included plastic adherent character, positive and negative expression of certain phenotypes, such as CD45, CD90 and so on, and multilineage differentiation ability18.
In most studies, femurs and iliac crest were the main sources of BMSCs, compared to maxillofacial bones, such as the mandible and maxilla9,16. However, the site-specific characteristic theory of hBMSCs in recent studies showed that hBMSCs from different bones had different characters in differentiation ability, proliferative activity, osteogenesis, and immunity6,8. The site-specific difference may be related to different embryological origins, adaptation to functional demands at each skeletal site, microenvironment, local vascular supply, hormonal effects, etc. Furthermore, studies showed that grafted iliac bone exhibited more rapid vertical loss than the jawbone within 6 months after the bone graft8. Otherwise, studies have found that the proliferative activity of MSCs from mandibular marrow was superior to those from iliac marrow5,8,19,20. And this proliferative activity difference was attributed to the characters that the mandible had more blood supply and a faster bone turnover rate than the ilium5,6,8. Studies also revealed that BMSCs from the mandible expressed a higher level of Runx-2 and OCN than those from femurs, and the osteogenic ability of BMSCs from the mandible was equal to or higher than those from femurs and ilium5,19,21. The adherence to titanium ability of hmBMSCs was also found stronger than BMSCs from femurs, which suggested hmBMSCs were more appropriate to be used in oral implantology5. In addition, a 3-year clinical study to reconstruct the alveolar defect found that the regenerated bone of MSCs from the dental pulp was composed of a fully compact bone with a higher matrix density, while the hm BMSCs regenerated spongy bone similar to normal human alveolar bone struct22. In conclusion, hmBMSCs were ideal therapeutic stem cells for maxillofacial regeneration and other diseases due to the same embryological origin and their superior characteristics.
However, the mandible has less bone marrow than femurs and ilium, so it is important to obtain enough bone marrow and BMSCs from the mandible for clinical use. Human iliac aspirates can obtain large amounts of bone marrow to isolate MSCs. Researchers also used the mandibular aspirates to obtain MSCs, while the initial yield of the MSCs from mandibular aspirates was three times lower than that of iliac aspirates21. Additional incisions were needed to collect enough mandible marrow aspirates, adding additional surgical trauma. Furthermore, studies have shown that the proliferative potential of the MSCs from mandible bone chips may be superior to those from mandible marrow aspirates8,21. Therefore, in this study, the discarded mandible cancellous bone chips were used to isolate MSCs. Because both sides of the mandible were included in sagittal split ramus osteotomy or mandibular angle reduction plasty, we can get enough mandible marrow from the patients without any extra harm. Recently, computer-assisted technology has been widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve the surgical effect and reduce surgical complications23. To avoid injury of the mandible and nerve during mandible bone marrow harvesting, the 3D CT image of the donors' mandible was obtained, and surgical planning of the donors was analyzed to decide the donor sites and to implement surgical simulation in the study; thus, none of the surgical complications happened. The ultrasonic osteotome blade, a tissue-specific device allowing surgeons to make precise osteotomies while protecting adjacent soft tissue24, was also used to avoid soft tissue injury and preserve the obtained bone marrow activity.
In summary, this study described a reliable, simple, safe, and cheap protocol to isolate and culture adequate human mandibular MSCs, which can be used in cell therapies of dental and maxillofacial tissues.