Name: Isolation of Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Using Fibronectin Adhesion and Migratory Assay (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2024-10-04T14:30:00.000+00:00
Duration: 8 min 9 s
Description: Learn fibronectin adhesion and migratory assays to isolate chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors from human articular cartilage. This method advances cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We would like to acknowledge Ms. Bhavini Krishnan and Ms.Merin Mary Zachariah for their intellectual input and the Centre for Stem Cell Research (A unit of inStem Bengaluru), Department of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, for infrastructural support. The ongoing projects are supported by the Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR32777/MED/31/415/2019), Govt. of India, Science and Engineering Research Board (CRG/2022/004277), Govt. of India, and Fluid Research Grants, Christian Medical College, Vellore.

The protocol has been approved and complies with the appropriate regulations and guidelines of the Institutional Review Board (Research and Ethics Committee). After obtaining written informed consent, human tibiofemoral joints are procured from osteoarthritis (OA) patients (Kellgren-Lawrence radiological score 4)30 who require total knee replacement as part of their treatment. The joints of patients with any signs of tumors, infections, or inflammatory arthritis (such as rheumatoid arthritis or gout) were excluded from the study. It is ensured that all procedures are conducted under sterile conditions, adhering to standard laboratory protocols throughout the experimental process.
1. Obtaining tibiofemoral joints
<ol>
	<li>Obtain knee joints (tibiofemoral joints) from human donors requiring above-knee amputation as part of treatment or from those with Grade IV osteoarthritis30 (radiological evidence showing marked reduction of joint space with chondral sclerosis) undergoing total knee replacement. 
	NOTE: Ensure that informed consent is obtained from patients following the Helsinki Declaration&#39;s principles. Ensure adherence to Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Board rules.</li>
	<li>Exclude any joints showing symptoms of infection or inflammation.</li>
</ol>
2. Processing harvested joints
<ol>
	<li>Place the harvested tibiofemoral joints in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution under sterile conditions.</li>
	<li>Prepare a sterile area under the hood by placing a sterile underpad. Transfer the harvested joints onto the underpad.</li>
	<li>Stabilize the sectioned tibiofemoral joints by holding the subchondral bone with the cartilage facing in the upward direction.</li>
	<li>Using a scalpel blade (no. 22), harvest rectangular-shaped cartilage shavings from the non-weight bearing areas for OA patients within 1-2 h of obtaining the joint.</li>
	<li>Harvest the cartilage sections of 8 mm x 10 mm from the superficial layer to the deeper layer.</li>
	<li>Wash the cartilage slices with 1x PBS solution and place them in a Petri dish containing 1-2 mL of plain DMEM medium.</li>
	<li>Mince the cartilage slices nicely to a size of less than 1 mm x 1mm x 1mm with a scalpel blade (no.22). 
	NOTE: Ensure that the cartilage slices or minced cartilage do not dry out; place them in a culture medium or PBS devoid of serum.</li>
</ol>
3. Isolation of chondrocytes
<ol>
	<li>Place the minced cartilage in an upright T-25 flask containing 10 mL of Dulbecco&#39;s Modified Eagle Medium F12 (DMEM-F12) with 0.15% collagenase type II for enzymatic digestion. Leave the flask undisturbed for 12-14 h in a CO2 incubator, ensuring standard culture conditions31. 
	NOTE: Plain DMEM-F12 medium without traces of serum should be used, as serum inactivates the enzymatic action.</li>
	<li>Following overnight digestion, transfer the medium containing the released cells into a fresh, sterile centrifuge tube containing an equal volume of DMEM-F12 + 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), using a cell strainer to separate the cells from the debris. The released cells are the &#34;chondrocytes&#34;.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the filtered cells at a speed of 1200 x g for 5 mins at 37 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Discard the supernatant without disturbing the pellet. Reconstitute the obtained pellet in 1 mL of medium and count the viable cells released using a trypan blue exclusion assay.</li>
	<li>Load the chondrocytes in a T-25 flask at a concentration of 10,000 cells/cm&#178; and expand to the required passage number using DMEM-F12 containing 10% FBS. Additional components in the medium include ascorbic acid (62 &#181;g/mL), L-glutamine (2.5 mM/L), penicillin-streptomycin (100 IU/mL), and amphotericin-B (2 &#181;g/mL).</li>
	<li>Refresh the medium every 3 days and harvest cells at sub-confluence using 0.125% Trypsin containing Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA).</li>
</ol>
4. Isolation of Fibronectin Adhesion Assay-Derived Chondroprogenitors (FAA-CPs)
<ol>
	<li>12 h prior to the release of the chondrocytes, prepare 10 mL of 1x PBS containing 1 mM of MgCl2 (10 &#181;L) and 1 mM of CaCl2 (10 &#181;L), and 100 &#181;L of Fibronectin (10 &#181;L/mL)32.</li>
	<li>Coat the required number of wells of a 6-well plate (1.5 mL/9.3 cm2) using the prepared solution.</li>
	<li>Seal the plate tightly and refrigerate overnight at 4 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Additionally, obtain cartilage shavings in a manner similar to that explained for isolation of chondrocytes (steps 2.1-2.5).</li>
	<li>Subject the cartilage shavings to sequential overnight enzymatic digestion (0.2% Pronase for 3 h; followed by 0.04% Collagenase type II for 12 h) in a shaking water bath maintained at 37 &#176;C for obtaining individual chondrocytes.</li>
	<li>The following day, remove the Fibronectin-coated 6-well plate from the refrigerator and remove excess Fibronectin. 
	NOTE: Excess Fibronectin should be removed slowly and gently without disturbing the coating on the bottom of the well. The presence of MgCl2 (10 &#181;L) and 1 mM of CaCl2 is crucial to ensure the attachment of cells.</li>
	<li>Add 2-3 mL of plain DMEM-F12 medium into the coated wells.</li>
	<li>Seed the released chondrocytes onto the coated wells at a loading density of 4000 cells/well and leave the plate undisturbed for a period of 20 min.</li>
	<li>Post incubation, remove the excess media and non-adherent cells. Add 2-3 mL of standard growth media as used for chondrocytes (DMEM-F12 + 10% FBS).</li>
	<li>Maintain the adherent cells under standard culture conditions for 10-12 days to obtain CPC clones (colonies of &#62;32 cells).</li>
	<li>Isolate using 0.125% trypsin-EDTA for 180 s, re-plate the clones at a ratio of 1 clone/5 cm&#178;, and expand the enriched polyclonal CPs to the required confluence. These cells obtained are referred to as the &#34;FAA-CPCs&#34;.</li>
	<li>Culture the cells further in DMEM-F12 medium + 10% FBS + transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGF&#946;2: 1 ng/mL) + fibroblast growth factor (FGF2: 5 ng/mL). 
	NOTE: The incubation of cells on fibronectin-coated plates should not exceed 20 min, as chondrocytes may also begin to adhere. During the 20 min adhesion period, the medium must be devoid of serum. Next, the cells that adhere to form clones must be cultured in a medium additionally containing FBS. The clones must be isolated only after ensuring that each clone has more than 32 cells; this is to avoid transit amplifiers. Further expansion of the clones after trypsinization should include the additional growth factors mentioned. A loading density of 4000 chondrocytes/9.3 cm2 of a fibronectin-coated plate, following a 20 min incubation followed by a wash, results in the adhesion of 80-100 cells in total. Out of these, around 20 clones will progress to grow and achieve a population doubling of 5 within 10-12 days.</li>
</ol>
5. Isolation of migratory chondroprogenitors
<ol>
	<li>Shave cartilage explants (10 mm x 5 mm x 1 mm ) from the harvested articular joint and place them in a sterile 6-well plate containing DMEM-F12 media with 10% FBS and 10 mM Glutamax (2-3 explants/well)33.</li>
	<li>Leave the plate with the explants undisturbed for 48 h in a CO2 incubator maintained at 37 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>After 2 days, transfer the explants to a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL of 0.1% collagenase solution for enzymatic digestion. Incubate the tube at 37 &#176;C for 2 h. 
	NOTE: The explants require to be rinsed with 1x PBS before enzymatic digestion, as traces of serum can inactivate the enzyme action. For washing, dip the explants in a Petri dish filled with 2-3 mL of 1x PBS; this is also to ensure non-contamination with any released chondrocytes. The handling of the explants must be kept to a minimum, and this is to avoid stressing the progenitors that have started to migrate.</li>
	<li>Post digestion, rinse the explants with 1x PBS and place them back in the same wells of the plate containing fresh DMEM-F12 media with 10% FBS and 10 mM of Glutamax medium.</li>
	<li>Maintain the plate in standard culture conditions in the incubator. Observe for the migration of chondroprogenitors in the subsequent days.</li>
	<li>On reaching sub confluence, harvest the MCPs using 0.125% of Trypsin containing EDTA.</li>
	<li>Expand the MCPs using the standard expansion medium, which includes DMEM-F12, which contains 10% FBS and 10 mM of Glutamax.</li>
</ol>
6. Phenotypic characterization of chondrocytes, FAA-CPs and MCPs
<ol>
	<li>Flow Cytometric Analysis (FACS) 
	NOTE: The following steps are followed for FACS analysis of the harvested cell groups.
	<ol>
		<li>Trypsinize the cells as per standard protocol using 0.125% Trypsin and centrifuge at 1200 x g, 5 min, room temperature to obtain the cell pellet.</li>
		<li>Discard the supernatant, wash, and re-suspend the pellet with 1x PBS.</li>
		<li>Transfer the suspension to labeled tubes for FACS.</li>
		<li>Divide the suspension equally into two tubes: an &#39;unstained&#39; tube that acts as a control (cell suspension without antibody) and &#39;stained&#39; tubes that act as tests (cell suspension with antibody).</li>
		<li>Follow the technical data sheet of individual antibodies/Cluster of differentiation (CD) markers for staining. Antibodies for comparison include CD105-FITC, CD73-PE, CD90-PE, CD106-APC (positive expression markers); CD34-PE, CD45-FITC, and CD14-FITC (negative expression markers)34,35; CD166-BB515 and CD146-PE (potential chondrogenic markers)36,37. 
		NOTE: CD markers are light-sensitive. To ensure the steps are done in the dark.</li>
		<li>Incubate the cell suspension with antibody for 30 min in the dark.</li>
		<li>Post staining, add 1 mL of 1x PBS to the tubes and centrifuge at 1200 x g, 5 min, room temperature to obtain the cell pellet.</li>
		<li>Discard three-fourths of the supernatant. Re-suspend the pellet in the remaining supernatant content by gentle trituration.</li>
		<li>Proceed for FACS analysis.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
7. qRT-PCR
NOTE: qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression involves evaluation of Collagen type I (COL1A1), Collagen type X (COL10A1), and Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX2) for hypertrophic expression, and SOX-9, Aggrecan (ACAN), and Collagen type II (COL2A1) for chondrogenesis.
<ol>
	<li>Extract RNA from the cell groups using commercially available kits as per the manufacturer&#39;s instructions.</li>
	<li>Post extraction, evaluate the A260/A280 ratio and the RNA concentration.</li>
	<li>Utilize 280 ng of the extracted RNA to construct complementary DNA (cDNA).</li>
	<li>Initiate qRT-PCR using Sybr Green, each reaction containing a final concentration of 7 ng of cDNA on a thermocycler.</li>
	<li>Normalize each gene&#39;s relative mRNA expression to the GAPDH reference housekeeping gene (&#916;Ct).</li>
	<li>Calculate the relative expression of each gene using the 2-&#916;&#916;Ct technique by comparing each individual gene&#39;s &#916;Ct value to that of the FAA-CPs (&#916;&#916;Ct)37.</li>
</ol>
8. Multilineage differentiation
NOTE: Commercially available differential media induces trilineage differentiation into adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic lineages.
<ol>
	<li>For adipogenic differentiation, seed cells at a loading density of 1000 cells/cm2 in a cell culture plate and culture using adipogenic differentiation medium (medium change - once in 3 days) till a sub confluence of 80% for 3 weeks.</li>
	<li>For osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, follow the 28-day pellet culture system38.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge 0.5 x 106 cells at 400 x g for 12 min at 37 &#176;C to form pellets and initiate differentiation using osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation medium.</li>
	<li>Fix, embed, and section the pellets for confirmatory staining (step 9).</li>
</ol>
9. Confirmatory staining
<ol>
	<li>In the case of adipogenic lineage cells, fix the cells with buffered formalin, wash, and stain with Oil Red O (0.5%). Stain the controls (cultured on a standard DMEM medium with 10% FBS) as well.</li>
	<li>Observe under a microscope and acquire the images.</li>
	<li>For the differentiated osteogenic lineage cells, stain with Alizarin Red (2%). 
	NOTE: Multiple confirmatory staining protocols are applicable for the chondrogenic differentiated cells.</li>
	<li>Alcian Blue staining: Stain the fixed cells with Alcian blue for 5 min and counterstain with Neutral Red.</li>
	<li>For assessing Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, perform Safranin O staining: Stain the slides with Wiegert&#39;s Iron Hematoxylin followed by subsequent incubation with acid alcohol (1%), fast green solution (0.05%), acetic acid (1%), and Safranin O solution (1%).</li>
	<li>Toluidine Blue staining: Stain the slides with Toluidine Blue (0.1%) for 5 min.</li>
	<li>PicroSirius Red staining: Stain the slides with Picrosirius Red (0.1%) and counterstain using Hematoxylin dye. 
	NOTE: Following staining, dehydrate the slides using graded alcohol and clear using xylene. Mount slides using Dibutylphthalate Polystyrene Xylene (DPX) mountant, observe them under a microscope, and acquire images.</li>
	<li>For immunohistochemistry (type II collagen) staining of the chondrogenic differentiated pellet, subject the pellet sections to enzymatic antigen retrieval using the enzymes pronase (1 mg/mL) and hyaluronidase (2.5 mg/mL).</li>
	<li>Incubate the sections with primary mouse monoclonal anti-collagen type II antibody, followed by 1:250 secondary HRP labeled goat anti-mouse antibody.</li>
	<li>Stain the slides with 3,3&#8242;-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen and counterstain them using Hematoxylin.</li>
	<li>Observe under a microscope and capture images.</li>
</ol>
10. Determining GAG/DNA content
<ol>
	<li>Digest the chondrogenic differentiated pellets using papain-cysteine solution at 65 &#176;C for 16 h.</li>
	<li>Estimate DNA concentration using Picrogreen reagent38 and acquire the fluorescence intensity at wavelengths- excitation: 480 nm, emission: 520 nm using an ELISA plate reader.</li>
	<li>Evaluate total GAG content using the dimethyl methylene blue dye method38.</li>
	<li>Measure optical density at 525 nm using an ELISA plate reader.</li>
	<li>Normalize the GAG values to the DNA values and calculate the total GAG/DNA ratio.</li>
</ol>

Chondroprogenitor and Chondrocyte Isolation from Human Articular Cartilage

<ol><li>Muthu, S., Visawanathan, V., Chellamuthu, G., Thabrez, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Clinical+effectiveness+of+various+treatments+for+cartilage+defects+compared+to+microfracture%3A+A+network+meta-analysis+of+randomized+controlled+trials%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Cartilage+Joint+Preserv%22%5BJournal%5D)">Clinical effectiveness of various treatments for cartilage defects compared to microfracture: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</a> J Cartilage Joint Preserv. 4 (2), 100163(2023).</li>
<li>Sophia Fox, A. J., Bedi, A., Rodeo, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+basic+science+of+articular+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sports+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">The basic science of articular cartilage.</a> Sports Health. 1 (6), 461-468 (2009).</li>
<li>Brittberg, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Clinical+articular+cartilage+repair-An+up-to-date+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annals+of+Joint%22%5BJournal%5D)">Clinical articular cartilage repair-An up-to-date review.</a> Annals of Joint. 3 (0), (2018).</li>
<li>Muthu, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Failure+of+cartilage+regeneration%3A+emerging+hypotheses+and+related+therapeutic+strategies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Rev+Rheumatol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Failure of cartilage regeneration: emerging hypotheses and related therapeutic strategies.</a> Nat Rev Rheumatol. 19 (7), 403-416 (2023).</li>
<li>Lavrentieva, A., Hatlapatka, T., Neumann, A., Weyand, B., Kasper, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Potential+for+osteogenic+and+chondrogenic+differentiation+of+MSC%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Adv+Biochem+Eng+Biotechnol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Potential for osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSC.</a> Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 129, 73-88 (2013).</li>
<li>Fernandez-Moure, J. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Enhanced+osteogenic+potential+of+mesenchymal+stem+cells+from+cortical+bone%3A+a+comparative+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Stem+Cell+Res+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Enhanced osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells from cortical bone: a comparative analysis.</a> Stem Cell Res Ther. 6, 203(2015).</li>
<li>Goldberg, A., Mitchell, K., Soans, J., Kim, L., Zaidi, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+use+of+mesenchymal+stem+cells+for+cartilage+repair+and+regeneration%3A+a+systematic+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Orthop+Surg+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review.</a> J Orthop Surg Res. 12, 39(2017).</li>
<li>Zha, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Heterogeneity+of+mesenchymal+stem+cells+in+cartilage+regeneration%3A+From+characterization+to+application%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22NPJ+Regen+Med%22%5BJournal%5D)">Heterogeneity of mesenchymal stem cells in cartilage regeneration: From characterization to application.</a> NPJ Regen Med. 6 (1), 1-15 (2021).</li>
<li>Hayes, A. J., Tudor, D., Nowell, M. A., Caterson, B., Hughes, C. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Chondroitin+Sulfate+sulfation+motifs+as+putative+biomarkers+for+isolation+of+articular+cartilage+progenitor+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Histochem+Cytochem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Chondroitin Sulfate sulfation motifs as putative biomarkers for isolation of articular cartilage progenitor cells.</a> J Histochem Cytochem. 56 (2), 125-138 (2008).</li>
<li>Dowthwaite, G. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+surface+of+articular+cartilage+contains+a+progenitor+cell+population%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Cell+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population.</a> J Cell Sci. 117 (Pt 6), 889-897 (2004).</li>
<li>Williams, R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Identification+and+clonal+characterization+of+a+progenitor+cell+sub-population+in+normal+human+articular+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PloS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Identification and clonal characterization of a progenitor cell sub-population in normal human articular cartilage.</a> PloS One. 5 (10), e13246(2010).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Parameswaran, R., Ramasamy, B., Kachroo, U. Pondering the potential of hyaline cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors for tissue regeneration: A systematic review. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aVinod%2C+E+%22Cartilage%22">Cartilage</a>. , (2020).</li>
<li>Khan, I. M., Bishop, J. C., Gilbert, S., Archer, C. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Clonal+chondroprogenitors+maintain+telomerase+activity+and+Sox9+expression+during+extended+monolayer+culture+and+retain+chondrogenic+potential%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Osteoarthritis+Cartilage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Clonal chondroprogenitors maintain telomerase activity and Sox9 expression during extended monolayer culture and retain chondrogenic potential.</a> Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 17 (4), 518-528 (2009).</li>
<li>Fellows, C. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Characterization+of+a+divergent+progenitor+cell+sub-populations+in+human+osteoarthritic+cartilage%3A+the+role+of+telomere+erosion+and+replicative+senescence%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Characterization of a divergent progenitor cell sub-populations in human osteoarthritic cartilage: the role of telomere erosion and replicative senescence.</a> Sci Rep. 7, 41421(2017).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Kachroo, U., Amirtham, S. M., Ramasamy, B., Sathishkumar, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparative+analysis+of+fresh+chondrocytes%2C+cultured+chondrocytes+and+chondroprogenitors+derived+from+human+articular+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Histochem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparative analysis of fresh chondrocytes, cultured chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors derived from human articular cartilage.</a> Acta Histochem. 122 (1), 151462(2019).</li>
<li>Korpershoek, J. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Selection+of+highly+proliferative+and+multipotent+meniscus+progenitors+through+differential+adhesion+to+Fibronectin%3A+A+novel+approach+in+meniscus+tissue+engineering%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Mol+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Selection of highly proliferative and multipotent meniscus progenitors through differential adhesion to Fibronectin: A novel approach in meniscus tissue engineering.</a> Int J Mol Sci. 22 (16), 8614(2021).</li>
<li>Wang, J., Roberts, S., Li, W., Wright, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Phenotypic+characterization+of+regional+human+meniscus+progenitor+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Bioeng+Biotechnol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Phenotypic characterization of regional human meniscus progenitor cells.</a> Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10, 1003966(2022).</li>
<li>Koelling, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Migratory+chondrogenic+progenitor+cells+from+repair+tissue+during+the+later+stages+of+human+osteoarthritis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell+Stem+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Migratory chondrogenic progenitor cells from repair tissue during the later stages of human osteoarthritis.</a> Cell Stem Cell. 4 (4), 324-335 (2009).</li>
<li>Seol, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Chondrogenic+progenitor+cells+respond+to+cartilage+injury%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Arthritis+Rheum%22%5BJournal%5D)">Chondrogenic progenitor cells respond to cartilage injury.</a> Arthritis Rheum. 64 (11), 3626-3637 (2012).</li>
<li>Xue, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Isolation+and+identification+of+stem+cells+in+different+subtypes+of+cartilage+tissue%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Expert+Opin+Biol+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Isolation and identification of stem cells in different subtypes of cartilage tissue.</a> Expert Opin Biol Ther. 15 (5), 623-632 (2015).</li>
<li>McCarthy, H. E., Bara, J. J., Brakspear, K., Singhrao, S. K., Archer, C. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+comparison+of+equine+articular+cartilage+progenitor+cells+and+bone+marrow-derived+stromal+cells+as+potential+cell+sources+for+cartilage+repair+in+the+horse%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Vet+J%22%5BJournal%5D)">The comparison of equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and bone marrow-derived stromal cells as potential cell sources for cartilage repair in the horse.</a> Vet J. 192 (3), 345-351 (2012).</li>
<li>Elsaesser, A. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Characterization+of+a+migrative+subpopulation+of+adult+human+nasoseptal+chondrocytes+with+progenitor+cell+features+and+their+potential+for+in+vivo+cartilage+regeneration+strategies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell+%26+Biosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Characterization of a migrative subpopulation of adult human nasoseptal chondrocytes with progenitor cell features and their potential for in vivo cartilage regeneration strategies.</a> Cell & Biosci. 6, 11(2016).</li>
<li>Batschkus, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mapping+the+secretome+of+human+chondrogenic+progenitor+cells+with+mass+spectrometry%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ann+Anat%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mapping the secretome of human chondrogenic progenitor cells with mass spectrometry.</a> Ann Anat. 212, 4-10 (2017).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Migratory+chondroprogenitors+retain+superior+intrinsic+chondrogenic+potential+for+regenerative+cartilage+repair+as+compared+to+human+fibronectin-derived+chondroprogenitors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin-derived chondroprogenitors.</a> Sci Rep. 11, 23685(2021).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Intraarticular+injection+of+allogenic+chondroprogenitors+for+treatment+of+osteoarthritis+in+rabbit+knee+model%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Clin+Orthop+Trauma%22%5BJournal%5D)">Intraarticular injection of allogenic chondroprogenitors for treatment of osteoarthritis in rabbit knee model.</a> J Clin Orthop Trauma. 10 (1), 16-23 (2018).</li>
<li>Xue, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cartilage+progenitor+cells+combined+with+PHBV+in+cartilage+tissue+engineering%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Trans+Med%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cartilage progenitor cells combined with PHBV in cartilage tissue engineering.</a> J Trans Med. 17 (1), 104(2019).</li>
<li>Carluccio, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Progenitor+cells+activated+by+platelet+lysate+in+human+articular+cartilage+as+a+tool+for+future+cartilage+engineering+and+reparative+strategies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cells%22%5BJournal%5D)">Progenitor cells activated by platelet lysate in human articular cartilage as a tool for future cartilage engineering and reparative strategies.</a> Cells. 9 (4), E1052(2020).</li>
<li>Wang, R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Intra-articular+delivery+of+extracellular+vesicles+secreted+by+chondrogenic+progenitor+cells+from+MRL%2FMpJ+superhealer+mice+enhances+articular+cartilage+repair+in+a+mouse+injury+model%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Stem+Cell+Res+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Intra-articular delivery of extracellular vesicles secreted by chondrogenic progenitor cells from MRL/MpJ superhealer mice enhances articular cartilage repair in a mouse injury model.</a> Stem Cell Res Ther. 11 (1), 93(2020).</li>
<li>Wang, H. C., Lin, T. H., Hsu, C. C., Yeh, M. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Restoring+osteochondral+defects+through+the+differentiation+potential+of+cartilage+stem%2Fprogenitor+cells+cultivated+on+porous+scaffolds%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cells%22%5BJournal%5D)">Restoring osteochondral defects through the differentiation potential of cartilage stem/progenitor cells cultivated on porous scaffolds.</a> Cells. 10 (12), 3536(2021).</li>
<li>Kellgren, J. H., Lawrence, J. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Radiological+assessment+of+osteo-arthrosis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Ann+Rheum+Dis%22%5BJournal%5D)">Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.</a> Ann Rheum Dis. 16 (4), 494-502 (1957).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Kachroo, U., Rebekah, G., Yadav, B. K., Ramasamy, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Characterization+of+human+articular+chondrocytes+and+chondroprogenitors+derived+from+non-diseased+and+osteoarthritic+knee+joints+to+assess+superiority+for+cell-based+therapy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Histochem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Characterization of human articular chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors derived from non-diseased and osteoarthritic knee joints to assess superiority for cell-based therapy.</a> Acta Histochem. 122 (6), 151588(2020).</li>
<li>Nelson, L., McCarthy, H. E., Fairclough, J., Williams, R., Archer, C. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evidence+of+a+viable+pool+of+stem+cells+within+human+osteoarthritic+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cartilage%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evidence of a viable pool of stem cells within human osteoarthritic cartilage.</a> Cartilage. 5 (4), 203-214 (2014).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparison+of+methods+for+the+isolation+and+culture+of+Migratory+chondroprogenitors+from+Human+articular+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Connect+Tissue+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparison of methods for the isolation and culture of Migratory chondroprogenitors from Human articular cartilage.</a> Connect Tissue Res. 64 (4), 389-399 (2023).</li>
<li>Dominici, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Minimal+criteria+for+defining+multipotent+mesenchymal+stromal+cells.+The+International+Society+for+Cellular+Therapy+position+statement%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cytotherapy%22%5BJournal%5D)">Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.</a> Cytotherapy. 8 (4), 315-317 (2006).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Boopalan, P. R. J. V. C., Sathishkumar, S. Reserve or resident progenitors in cartilage? Comparative analysis of chondrocytes versus chondroprogenitors and their role in cartilage repair. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aVinod%2C+E+%22Cartilage%22">Cartilage</a>. , (2017).</li>
<li>Dicks, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Prospective+isolation+of+chondroprogenitors+from+human+iPSCs+based+on+cell+surface+markers+identified+using+a+CRISPR-Cas9-generated+reporter%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Stem+Cell+Res+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Prospective isolation of chondroprogenitors from human iPSCs based on cell surface markers identified using a CRISPR-Cas9-generated reporter.</a> Stem Cell Res Ther. 11 (1), 66(2020).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. Prospective isolation and characterization of chondroprogenitors from human chondrocytes based on CD166/CD34/CD146 surface markers. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aVinod%2C+E+%22Cartilage%22">Cartilage</a>. , (2021).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Migratory+chondroprogenitors+retain+superior+intrinsic+chondrogenic+potential+for+regenerative+cartilage+repair+as+compared+to+human+Fibronectin-derived+chondroprogenitors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human Fibronectin-derived chondroprogenitors.</a> Sci Rep. 11 (1), 23685(2021).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Human+fetal+cartilage-derived+chondrocytes+and+chondroprogenitors+display+a+greater+commitment+to+chondrogenesis+than+adult+cartilage+resident+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PloS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Human fetal cartilage-derived chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors display a greater commitment to chondrogenesis than adult cartilage resident cells.</a> PloS One. 18 (4), e0285106(2023).</li>
<li>Joos, H., Wildner, A., Hogrefe, C., Reichel, H., Brenner, R. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Interleukin-1+beta+and+tumor+necrosis+factor-alpha+inhibit+migration+activity+of+chondrogenic+progenitor+cells+from+non-fibrillated+osteoarthritic+cartilage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Arthritis+Res+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibit migration activity of chondrogenic progenitor cells from non-fibrillated osteoarthritic cartilage.</a> Arthritis Res Ther. 15 (5), R119(2013).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Parameswaran, R., Amirtham, S. M., Rebekah, G., Kachroo, U. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparative+analysis+of+human+bone+marrow+mesenchymal+stem+cells%2C+articular+cartilage+derived+chondroprogenitors+and+chondrocytes+to+determine+cell+superiority+for+cartilage+regeneration%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Histochem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparative analysis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors and chondrocytes to determine cell superiority for cartilage regeneration.</a> Acta Histochem. 123 (4), 151713(2021).</li>
<li>Vinod, E., Padmaja, K., Ramasamy, B., Sathishkumar, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Systematic+review+of+articular+cartilage+derived+chondroprogenitors+for+cartilage+repair+in+animal+models%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Orthopaed%22%5BJournal%5D)">Systematic review of articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors for cartilage repair in animal models.</a> J Orthopaed. 35, 43-53 (2022).</li>
</ol>

The potential regeneration of articular cartilage, containing hyaline tissue, may be achieved through the optimization of its two native cell types: chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors. While extensive research on chondrocytes has provided valuable insights into their role in cartilage repair, questions about the nature of the regenerated tissue have prompted efforts to enhance their phenotype and explore alternative therapies3. Chondroprogenitors, identified as a relatively recent cellular subpopulation, show promise due to their inherent mesenchymal properties, heightened chondrogenesis, and limited hypertrophic traits12. The two primary techniques for harvesting and enhancing progenitors involve differential fibronectin adhesion and migration-based explant assay18,32. The isolation of human FAA-CPs has also been described using meniscal tissue, reporting high proliferative and multipotent potential16,17. In vitro characterization studies comparing FAA-CPs and MCPs to chondrocytes indicate a superior potential for FAA-CPs and MCPs to exhibit higher chondrogenic and lower hypertrophic phenotypes, reflecting a favorable profile with increased GAG accumulation and production15,24,31,39. Limited in vivo studies suggest that chondroprogenitors can attenuate osteoarthritis progression and demonstrate beneficial outcomes in repairing osteochondral defects when used in conjunction with bioscaffolds. In recent years, significant research efforts have been made to enhance and uncover the full potential of chondroprogenitors.
This article provides a detailed protocol for the isolation of cartilage-resident cells. The primary and most common cells released from the cartilage are the chondrocytes. However, enzymatically digested cartilage is a heterogeneous population of cells that not only contains chondrocytes but also progenitors at a very low concentration, which requires enrichment under in vitro conditions.
Observing circumstantial evidence indicating the involvement of these cells in driving appositional growth, Dowthwaite et al. undertook the isolation and characterization of chondroprogenitors. These progenitors were derived from the superficial layer of articular cartilage through the utilization of a fibronectin adhesion assay10. This distinct population was extracted from fetal calves through a process involving selective adhesion to Fibronectin. It was demonstrated to possess phenotypic flexibility and a high capacity for forming colonies, alongside the cell fate selector gene Notch-1 expression. Besides these initial investigations, the characterization of progenitors from human articular cartilage revealed elevated levels of SOX9 and Notch1 expression, a preference for CD49e/CD29, and increased telomerase activity in comparison to mature chondrocytes12,32. This protocol has also been established in osteoarthritic human cartilage tissue, with reports showing its presence not only in the superficial cartilage but also in the deeper layers of the cartilage, with many groups employing polyclonal cultures to monoclonal cultures11,12.
On the other hand, Koelling et al. investigated the potential involvement of chondroprogenitors in homing and migration in response to cartilage injury, thereby contributing to tissue repair18. Furthermore, Seol et al. demonstrated that, in response to cartilage injury, progenitors exhibited increased migration through High Mobility Group Box 1 Protein (HMGB1) and RAGE-mediated chemotaxis19. Elsaesser et al. also observed the superior migratory capacity of nasal chondroprogenitors in comparison to chondrocytes and BM-MSCs22. A study conducted by Joos et al. found that the release of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) enhanced the migration of chondroprogenitors, whereas Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1&#946;) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF&#945;) inhibited progenitor movement following injury40. A recent report comparing four different methods of MCP isolation in terms of their isolation methods and culture conditions was conducted, and the recommended method is explained in this article33. The approach of isolating progenitors based on their migratory capabilities resulted in cells that not only exhibited a high chondrogenic potential but also displayed characteristics similar to mesenchymal stem cells.
In the laboratory, following standardized protocols, successful isolation of all three subtypes has been achieved. Furthermore, pioneering comparative studies have demonstrated the superior attributes of FAA-CPs in comparison to chondrocytes12,15,41. Comparisons between chondroprogenitors have also been explored, revealing that MCPs exhibit higher potential24. It must be kept in mind that, since the three subtypes are isolated from the same tissue and the progenitor in its native form is very low in its presence upon initial release from the articular cartilage - which primarily contains chondrocytes - there is a need to enrich them using in vitro cultures.
Comprehensive evaluation methods encompassed Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), electron microscopic analysis, growth factor titration studies, cell labeling techniques, immunoprofiling, and assessment of their therapeutic potential for treating osteoarthritis and chondral defects using in vivo models12,24,42.
The current findings indicate that the isolation of all three subtypes is feasible even from osteoarthritic joints, albeit requiring a prolonged expansion duration. Notably, we emphasize the significance of avoiding the addition of growth factors during clonal growth, highlighting the crucial need to introduce additional factors during the expansion of these cells. Crucial steps, such as timing for incubation on fibronectin-coated plates, the addition of growth factors at different time points, and minimal handling of explants, among other mentioned essentials, play a significant role in the culture and expansion of the harvested cells. It is also essential to ensure that the cells reach a confluence of no more than 75%-80% at any given time point.
The potential of chondroprogenitors has garnered significant interest due to their superiority over commonly used cell-based therapies in the field of cartilage repair, namely BM-MSCs and chondrocytes. These progenitors show promise, with several in vivo experiments demonstrating their efficiency in replacing the current standard of care. As a recently discovered subset, characterization and information on their phenotype are still underway, with the first clinical trial using FAA-CPs for the treatment of chondral defects scheduled to start in 2024. Thus, the isolation and expansion of cartilage-derived cells, particularly chondroprogenitors, are crucial and hold promise for cell-based repair in the field of cartilage regeneration.

The emergence of cell-based regenerative therapy represents a significant approach to treating cartilage-related ailments, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral defects1. These disorders, characterized by the breakdown or injury of cartilage within the joints, present substantial challenges during treatment. The self-repair of articular cartilage is reported to be limited due to its aneural architecture, avascularity, and low mitotic activity2.
The most utilized cells for cartilage tissue regeneration are Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and chondrocytes3. However, several studies have reported limitations in using these cells for regeneration4. These limitations include the terminal differentiation of chondrocytes during extended in vitro expansion to achieve the required cell count and the hypertrophic tendency of MSCs. These factors can result in the formation of repair tissue with a suboptimal combination of fibrocartilage and hyaline5,6,7,8.
The discovery of Chondroprogenitor cells (CPCs) arose from the quest for alternative cells in articular cartilage9. They have generated immense interest due to their resemblance to MSCs and their superior chondrogenic potential, all while exhibiting reduced hypertrophy - an indispensable combination sought after10,11. In contrast to chondrocytes, these progenitor populations have been reported to exhibit enhanced replicative and telomerase activity, as well as increased expression of Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 (NOTCH-1) and SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX-9)12,13,14,15. There are two standard methods to isolate CPCs reported both from cartilage and meniscus, including one based on their integrin receptor (CD49e/CD29) expression, isolated through a fibronectin adhesion assay - Fibronectin Adhesion Assay-derived Chondroprogenitors (FAA-CPs), and the other based on their heightened migratory potential from cartilage explants- Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs)11,13,16,17,18,19. Numerous in vitro studies demonstrate the chondrogenic superiority and reduced hypertrophy of both FAA-CPCs and MCPs compared to chondrocytes and bone marrow (BM)-MSCs20,21,22,23.
Recent in vitro investigations comparing FAA-CPCs to MCPs have demonstrated the enhanced cartilage regeneration capacity of the latter progenitor population under normal oxygen conditions24. These optimistic in vitro results showcase a hyaline-like regeneration, encouraging further in vivo experiments. Nevertheless, both populations of CPCs have been reported to efficiently repair and regenerate cartilage in OA and other osteochondral disorders in animal models25,26,27,28,29.
Our laboratory has actively contributed to standardizing CPC isolation techniques and comparing their phenotypic characteristics with chondrocytes and MSCs. This article will provide a detailed protocol explaining the steps involved in isolating and culturing cartilage resident cells, namely chondrocytes, FAA-CPCs, and MCPs.

<table><tbody><tr><td>22-scalpel blade&amp;nbsp;</td><td>GLASS VAN</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>6-well plate&amp;nbsp;</td><td>CORNING</td><td>3516</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Alcian Blue</td><td>THERMO SCIENTIFIC</td><td>J6012</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Alizarin Red&amp;nbsp;</td><td>SIGMA</td><td>130223</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amphotericin-B (2 &amp;mu;g/mL).</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>15240062</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ascorbic acid (62 &amp;mu;g/mL)</td><td>SIGMA ALDRICH</td><td>A4544-25G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>BC CytoFLEX LX flow cytometer&amp;nbsp;</td><td>BECKMAN COULTER</td><td>CYTExpert Software Version 2.5</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CaCl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;</td><td>SIGMA ALDRICH</td><td>&amp;nbsp;C34006</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD105-FITC</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>561443</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD106-APC</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>551147</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD14-FITC</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>555397</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD29-APC</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>559883</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD34-PE</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>348057</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD45-FITC</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>347463</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD49b-FITC</td><td>MILTENYL BIOTEC</td><td>&amp;nbsp;MACS 130/100337</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD49e-PE</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>555617</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD73-PE</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>550257</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CD90-PE</td><td>BD BIOSCIENCE</td><td>561970</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cell counter</td><td>DE NOVIX</td><td>Cell Drop BF</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cell strainer</td><td>HIMEDIA</td><td>TCP024</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Centrifuge</td><td>BECKMAN COULTER</td><td>Allegra X-30R</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; incubator&amp;nbsp;</td><td>THERMO SCIENTIFIC</td><td>MODEL-371</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Collagen type X (COL10A1),Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX2),SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9 (SOX-9), Aggrecan (ACAN), and Collagen type II (COL2A1)&amp;nbsp;</td><td>EUROGENTEC, BELGIUM</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Collagenase type II</td><td>WORTHINGTON</td><td>LS004176</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMEM F-12 (Dulbecco&#039;s Modified Eagle&#039;s Medium F-12)</td><td>SIGMA ALDRICH</td><td>D8900-1L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>ELISA plate reader</td><td>MOLECULAR DEVICES</td><td>SpectraMax i3x Reader</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fast Green</td><td>FISHER SIENTIFIC</td><td>2353459</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine Serum</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>10270106</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>FGF2</td><td>CLOUD CLONE CORP</td><td>APA551Hu01</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fibronectin (10 &amp;micro;L/mL)</td><td>SIGMA ALDRICH</td><td>F1141</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>First-Strand synthesis system</td><td>TAKARA BIO</td><td>6110A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Glutamax</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>35050061</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Hematoxylin</td><td>QUALIGENS</td><td>Q39411</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MgCl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;nbsp;</td><td>SIGMA ALDRICH</td><td>M8787</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Oil Red O</td><td>SIGMA</td><td>1320065</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline)</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>10010023</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PCR thermocycler&amp;nbsp;</td><td>APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS</td><td>Quantstudio 12K Flex thermocycler&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Penicillin-streptomycin (100 IU/mL)</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>15240062</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Picrosirius Red</td><td>ALFA AESAR</td><td>2610108</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Primary antibody (mouse Collagen type II)</td><td>DSHB</td><td>DSHB II II6B3</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Pronase</td><td>ROCHE</td><td>10165913103</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Quant-iT Picogreen dsDNA reagent</td><td>THERMO SCIENTIFIC</td><td>P7589</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Refrigerator</td><td>ELANPRO</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RNeasy MiniKit</td><td>QIAGEN</td><td>74104</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Safranin O</td><td>QUALIGENS</td><td>Q39962</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Secondary antibody (Goat Anti-Mouse IgG Antibody, HRP conjugate)</td><td>THERMO SCIENTIFIC</td><td>31430</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Shaking water bath&amp;nbsp;</td><td>REMI</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>StemPro differentiating kits&amp;nbsp;</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>1007201, A1007001, and A1007101</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T-25 flask&amp;nbsp;</td><td>CORNING</td><td>430639</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>TakyonTM Low Rox SYBR Master Mix dTTP Blue&amp;nbsp;</td><td>EUROGENTEC</td><td>UF-LSMT-B0701</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>TGF&amp;beta;</td><td>ABCAM</td><td>ab277760</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tissue Culture Petridish</td><td>TARSONS</td><td>960010</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Toluidine Blue</td><td>QUALIGENS</td><td>2040</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tryphan blue&amp;nbsp;</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>15250061</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Trypsin EDTA</td><td>GIBCO</td><td>25200072</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

isolation of chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors using fibronectin adhesion and migratory assay

Isolation of Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Using Fibronectin Adhesion and Migratory Assay

Chondroprogenitor cells (CPCs), recently identified as a distinct subpopulation, exhibit promise due to their mesenchymal properties, heightened chondrogenesis, and limited hypertrophic traits. The enrichment of progenitors is achieved through differential fibronectin adhesion and migration-based explant assays, with Fibronectin Adhesion Assay-derived Chondroprogenitors (FAA-CPs) and Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) demonstrating superior potential compared to chondrocytes. This article delves into the details of isolating resident cartilage-derived cells, namely chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors. While valuable insights from chondrocyte research contribute to our understanding of cartilage repair, ongoing efforts are directed toward the use of chondroprogenitors and exploring their potential as an alternative therapeutic approach. Additionally, this methodology article provides a detailed step-by-step protocol for isolating three specific cell types from cartilage: chondrocytes, FAA-CPs, and MCPs. By following standardized procedures, this protocol facilitates the successful extraction of these cell subtypes. Grounded in extensive research, the article focuses on the intricate techniques utilized in isolating the different subsets and the optimized culture conditions required to expand and maintain their cultures. The methodology encompasses enzymatic isolation of human articular cartilage-derived chondrocytes, differential fibronectin adhesion following sequential enzymatic digestion, and migration-based explant assays to obtain cartilage-resident cells.

From 86.9 mg of cartilage slices, a chondrocyte cell yield of 1.72 x 105 cells was noted. Upon loading, chondrocytes promptly adhere, presenting an initial rounded cobblestone appearance and transforming into a fibroblastic state upon further expansion (Figure 1 A,B). Seeding these chondrocytes onto fibronectin plates typically results in 2% adhesion, with each cell undergoing clonal growth (Figure 2 C,D), reaching a population doubling of 5 by days 10-12 (32 cells/clone). The clones within the 10 cm² area are combined and expanded to the necessary passage to produce FAA-CPs. Cartilage explants, sustained in culture following collagenase incubation, exhibit extracellular matrix loosening, and migration is generally observed as early as the 7th day (Figure 2E). Both FAA-CPs and MCPs display a spindle-shaped structure, a characteristic commonly associated with BM-MSCs, acquiring a honeycomb-like structure prior to confluence (Figure 1E,F).
The three types of isolated cells, namely chondrocytes, FAA-CPs, and MCPs, are closely monitored using phase-contrast imaging. The FAA-CPs are transferred only after confirmation of five population doublings.
Phenotypic characterization of the isolated and expanded cells typically includes flow cytometric analysis for putative markers of chondrogenesis, namely CD146 and CD166, as well as gene expression analysis for markers of chondrogenesis (SOX-9, ACAN, COL2A1), the fibrocartilage marker COL1A1, and markers of hypertrophy (RUNX2 and COL10A1). All three cell groups display high expression (&gt;95%) of CD105, CD73, and CD90; low to negative expression of CD34 and CD45; and high expression (&gt;98%) of CD166, with moderate, donor-dependent expression of CD146 (40%-75%)(Figure 2A).
qRT-PCR results show comparable and high expression of SOX-9, ACAN, and also COL1A1, a fibrocartilage marker, as the cells are cultured before evaluation(Figure 2B). For confirmation of chondrogenesis, positive uptake of orange-red complexes in the GAG-containing areas following Safranin O, and bluish to purplish complexes following Alcian Blue and Toluidine Blue is observed in all cell groups, with a higher proportion in the FAA-CP and MCP groups. Immunohistochemistry analysis of the chondrogenic-differentiated pellets for Collagen type II shows brownish fibrillary uptake in all three groups(Figure 3). Furthermore, GAG/DNA analysis also showed confirmation of chondrogenic differentiation with FAA-CP groups displaying higher expression(Figure 2C).
<img alt="Chondrocyte isolation diagram; enzymatic digestion, microscopy, fibronectin assay results." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig01.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Isolation and characterization of chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors. The study algorithm depicts the isolation of three cell groups and their morphological features under a phase contrast microscope immediately after isolation and after a few days of expansion. (A) Freshly isolated chondrocytes attach to adherent cultures during the early days of culture, acquiring a fibroblastic appearance with further expansion (B). (C) Chondrocytes subjected to a fibronectin adhesion assay display clonal growth, reaching a population doubling of 5 by day 10 (D). (E) Chondroprogenitors migrate from the edge of the explant by day 10 of culture and exhibit a spindle-shaped growth pattern with further expansion (F). Phase contrast image magnification: 10x; Scale bars: 100 µm. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="FACS marker analysis and RT-PCR gene expression in chondrogenesis; GAG, DNA, and GAG/DNA bar charts." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig02.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Molecular characterization data. (A) Flow cytometric analysis for positive and negative MSC markers and potential chondrogenesis markers. (B) RT-PCR expression data for the three cell groups for gene expression analysis of chondrogenic and hypertrophic markers. (C) Total GAG/DNA analysis of the chondrogenic differentiated pellets. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Chondrogenic differentiation micrographs, Safranin O, Collagen II IHC, chondrocytes, FAA CP, MCP, 10x, 40x." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig03.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3: Confirmatory staining following chondrogenic differentiation. Safranin O and immunohistochemical analysis for collagen type II between the three cell groups. Scale bars: for 10x magnification, 50 µm; 40x magnification, 200 µm. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67160/67160fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

This protocol details the isolation of chondrocytes, Fibronectin Adhesion Assay-derived Chondroprogenitors (FAA-CPs), and Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) from human articular cartilage. It covers enzymatic digestion, fibronectin adhesion, and migration-based assays for isolating and characterizing these cells.

Chondroprogenitor cells (CPCs), recently identified as a distinct subpopulation, exhibit promise due to their mesenchymal properties, heightened ...

isolation-chondrocytes-chondroprogenitors-using-fibronectin-adhesion

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

A 3D system of culturing human articular chondrocytes in high levels of synovial fluid is described. Synovial fluid reflects the most natural microenvironment for articular cartilage, and can be easily obtained and stored. This system thus can be used for studying cartilage regeneration and for screening therapeutics for treating arthritis.

A 3D System for Culturing Human Articular Chondrocytes in Synovial Fluid

The biosynthesis of cartilaginous extracellular matrix by chondrocytes can be affected by application of mechanical stimuli.  This method describes the technique of applying dynamic compressive strains to chondrocytes encapsulated in 3D constructs and the evaluation of induced changes in chondrocyte metabolism.

Mechanical Stimulation of Chondrocyte-agarose Hydrogels

Cartilage repair represents an unmet medical challenge and cell-based approaches to engineer human articular cartilage are a promising solution. Here, we describe three-dimensional (3D) biomimetic hydrogels as an ideal tool for the expansion and maturation of human articular chondrocytes.

3D Hydrogel Scaffolds for Articular Chondrocyte Culture and Cartilage Generation

We present a protocol to generate a chondrogenic lineage from human peripheral blood (PB) via induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using an integration-free method, which includes embryoid body (EB) formation, fibroblastic cells expansion, and chondrogenic induction.

Differentiating Chondrocytes from Peripheral Blood-derived Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

A method to obtain dendrimer-based uneven nanopatterns that permit the nanoscale control of local arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) surface density is described and applied for the study of cell adhesion and chondrogenic differentiation.

Dendrimer-based Uneven Nanopatterns to Locally Control Surface Adhesiveness: A Method to Direct Chondrogenic Differentiation

Obtaining a pure population of fibroblasts is crucial to studying their role in wound repair and fibrosis. Described here is a detailed method to isolate fibroblasts and myofibroblasts from uninjured and injured mouse hearts followed by characterization of their purity and functionality by immunofluorescence, RTPCR, fluorescence-assisted cell sorting, and collagen gel contraction.

Isolation and Characterization of Adult Cardiac Fibroblasts and Myofibroblasts

Infrapatellar fat pad mesenchymal stem cells (IFP-MSCs) can be isolated easily from the infrapatellar fat pad of the knee joint. They proliferate well in vitro, form CFU-F colonies, and differentiate into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages. Herein, the methodology for the isolation, expansion, and differentiation of IFP-MSCs from goat stifle joint is provided.

Isolation, Expansion, and Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Infrapatellar Fat Pad of the Goat Stifle Joint

This study describes a method for producing chondrocytic spheroids by aggregating cells into spheroids under low-adhesion conditions using gravity, followed by culturing the resulting spheroids in mini-bioreactors.

Generating Spheroids from Various Chondrocytes using Low-Adhesive Conditions under Gravity and Homemade Mini-Bioreactors

We describe a qualitative assay for yeast adhesion and agar invasion as a measure of invasive and pseudohyphal differentiation. This simple assay can be used to assess the invasive phenotype of various mutants as well as the effects environmental cues and signaling pathways on yeast differentiation.

Assay for Adhesion and Agar Invasion in S. cerevisiae

This video demonstrates the technique used for preparation of organizer and animal pole explants from Xenopus laevis embryos, including the use of the eyebrow knife - a specialized dissection tool made of one's eyebrow.  The protocol for assembling an adhesion assay is also given, which probes for the presence of key adhesion molecules present on the surface organizer or animal pole cells that are critical for proper development.

Dissection of Organizer and Animal Pole Explants from Xenopus laevis Embryos and Assembly of a Cell Adhesion Assay

Learn fibronectin adhesion and migratory assays to isolate chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors from human articular cartilage. This method advances cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research.

Isolation of Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Using Fibronectin Adhesion and Migratory Assay

Explore More Videos