Material selection
For the preparation of phosphorus-32 (32P) patches, various types of filter paper were sourced from reputable local suppliers. The insoluble matrix designed to retain radioactive substances must exhibit permeability, ductility, and liquid adsorption capabilities. The choice of filter paper type for impregnation with the appropriate medicinal solution significantly impacts the reliability of experimental outcomes. Owing to its balanced permeability and sufficient flexibility, this material enables uniform distribution of the medicinal solution. A micropipette was utilized to apply saline solution as a blank control onto the filter paper. Excessively thin filter paper leads to inadequate liquid retention, resulting in insufficient drug concentration on the substrate. Conversely, overly thick filter paper causes uneven drug distribution, reduced pliability, and poor adhesion to local lesion tissues after application. Through iterative experimentation, a filter paper with moderate thickness and excellent conformability was ultimately selected. Furthermore, systematic testing established an empirical correlation between the dispensed liquid volume and the filter paper's surface area.
This version maintains technical precision while emphasizing the critical role of filter paper properties in radiopharmaceutical patch preparation, aligning with academic writing standards for 32P-related research.
Preparation process of the 32P radioactive patch
The calculations of the 32P drug preparation and concentration are summarized in Table 1, and the calculations of the lesion graphic area were performed according to the following procedure (Figure 2).
Table 1: Preparation information of 32P. Please click here to download this Table.
Drug concentration calculation: the calibrated dose is the radiation dose on the manufacturer's labeling date and the radioactivity on the actual date (preparation date) of use, based on the half-life of the drug of 14.3 days.

A: Represents the activity (mci) on the actual date of use
A0: Represents the calibration dose (radiation dose on the manufacturer's labeling date)
t: Represents the time elapsed from the manufacturer's labeling date to the actual date of use.
T: Represents the half-life of the drug; here, T is 14.3 days.
This formula can be used to calculate activity A on the actual date of use. For example, substituting this formula into Table 1, it is known that the calibrated dose A0 is 131.6 mci and the interval of use t is 9 days, so the calculation is as follows:
A (mci) = 131.60 x 0.5 9/14.3 = 85.07
32P drug concentration formula:

C: Drug concentration (mci/ml) representing the actual date of use
A: Represents the activity (mci) on the actual date of use
V1: Represents the volume of the drug
V2: Represents the volume of saline
For example, substituting this formula into Table 1, C (mci/mL) = 85.07/(2.8 + 1.8) = 18.49
32P Patch Therapeutic Dose Calculation Formula12:

Here 1R (exposure) ≈ 0.93rad (absorbed dose)
D (rad/h) = (1770 x A/S) x 0.93
D (rad/min) = [ (1770 AS) x 0.93]/60
=(1646.1x AS) /60
=27.435 x AS
Patient's required 32P activity (mci) A = 0.03645 x D x S
D: Absorbed Dose Rate (rad/min)
S: Irradiated area(cm2)
P: Irradiation rate(R/h)
A: 32P activity (mci)
Exposure P can only be used as a measure of the radiation field of X-rays or γ-rays, describing the ionizing power of ionizing radiation in air.
Absorbed dose D can be used for any type of ionizing radiation, responding to the extent to which the irradiated medium absorbs the energy of the radiation, but is mutually convertible between different quantities under certain conditions. For rays of the same type and energy and for the same irradiated substance, the absorbed dose is proportional to the amount of exposure.
Since X-rays or γ-rays in the air produce 1 pair of ion pairs of the average energy of 32.5 eV, the entire irradiation amount of 1R X-rays or γ-rays in the air absorbed dose is about 0.838 rad, and in the soft tissue, the absorbed dose is about 0.931 rad. Example calculation is in Table 1, where the calculated drug concentration is 18.49 mci/mL, the amount of drug dropped per cm2 is 20 µL, then the drug dose of 20 µL /cm2 is 18.49 x 20/1000 = 0.37 mci.
According to A = 0.03645 x D x S and assuming that the absorbed dose of 1 cm2 is 1D, 1D = A/0.03645 = 0.37/0.03645 = 10.15(rad/min)
It is known that the area of the patient's lesion in Figure 2 is 16.84 cm2, and the therapeutic dose is 30 Gy (3000 rad). Therefore, the patient's drug volume is 20 x 16.84 = 336.8 µL. The treatment time is 3000/10.15 = 295.6 min = 4.9 h≈4 h 55 min. Using this method, the treatment information for each patient was calculated and summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: 32P Radiation therapy patient information form. Please click here to download this Table.
For this study, a total of 80 patients were stratified by treatment sessions and lesion burden (Table 3) as described below:
Group A (Single session): 49 patients (98 lesions)
Group B (Two sessions): 28 patients (63 lesions)
Group C (Three sessions): 3 patients (3 lesions)
Table 3: Comparison of treatment groups. Please click here to download this Table.
The cohort comprised 37 females and 43 males, with a mean age of 32.89 ± 10.96 years (range: 18-62 years). All groups collectively underwent 164 lesion treatments.
The following indicators were observed as described earlier13: Effective Pruritus and pain symptoms resolved or significantly alleviated; 60%-70% of lesions softened and flattened with no recurrence within 12 months post-treatment.
Cured: Complete resolution of pruritus and pain symptoms; all lesions fully flattened with no recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period.
Ineffective: (1) Scar size showed no significant reduction or even enlargement compared to baseline; (2) Symptoms exhibited only partial alleviation or no change; (3) Recurrence observed within 12 months despite initial improvement.
Case presentation
The main steps are described in the case of one patient as an example. The patient is a 62-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 2015 for multiple episodes of cholecystitis. Postoperatively, scar tissue hyperplasia developed at the upper abdominal incision. In 2022, she began experiencing pain and pruritus at the keloid site. The patient had undergone closed treatment (which refers to the injection of anesthetics into the keloid tissue to eliminate the pain in the skin and thus treat the keloid), but the results were not satisfactory. The size of the keloid was 7.5 x 4.0 x 0.3 cm (Figure 7A). In September 2023, she was treated with a 32P radioactive patch (30 Gy), which resulted in relief of pain and itching, and the size of the keloid was reduced compared to before. The size of the keloid was 6.0 x 3.5 x 0.2 cm (Figure 7B). In January 2024, she received a second treatment with a 32P radioactive patch (30 Gy), which showed that the keloid was reduced in size, flattened, and lightened in color (Figure 7C). In addition, her painful pruritus symptoms were no longer evident.

Figure 1:Lesion delineation process. (A) Mark the outline of the lesion with a black marker. (B) Tape was applied to the lesion to model the shape of the lesion. After removing the tape, attach it to plain white paper and cut out the shape along with the outline of the lesion. Place the cut shape on filter paper, outline the shape with a pencil, and cut the filter paper along with the pencil outline. (C) Compare the cut filter paper with the lesion. (D) After confirming the size and shape of the filter paper, mark the correct direction. If multiple lesions are involved in the same patient, mark them with serial numbers. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Calculating area using Image J. (A) Contrasting lesion filter paper with a 1 cm2 sample paper. (B) Open the software to open the picture correctly. (C) Selecting the 8-bit Pixel Option. (D) Selecting picture brightness thresholds. (E) The process of adjusting the brightness threshold of the picture. (F) Example of a completed image brightness adjustment. (G) Schematic diagram of analyzing image operations. (H) Graph of completed image analysis results. Example No.4 is the lesion filter paper pixel 63048, and No.9 is the 1 cm2 reference pixel 2744. The other values are background interference pixels. So 63048/2744=16.84, the area of the lesion is 16.84 cm2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Saline solution sample addition process. Use a pipette gun to accurately aspirate the solution and mix the calculated amount of drug with the amount of saline. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: 32P radioactive patchdiagram (A) Schematic diagram of 32P radioactive patch layering. The transparent film dressing is composed of a polyurethane film backing and an acrylate adhesive. Filter paper containing 32P radioactive solution. (B)32P radioactive patch final drawing. Two layers of transparent film dressing frame style are bonded together, with filter paper containing 32P liquid in the middle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Mixture distribution diagram for 32P and methylene blue. Distribution diagram of the 32P solution and methylene blue mixture across three different shape filter paper configurations. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Completed patient application. When a patient has multiple keloid lesions, the topiaries are numbered according to their part, shape, and size. Double-check that the 32P radioactive patches are applied corresponding to the numbers. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Spectrum of the case before and after treatment. (A) The lesion before the 32P radioactive patch treatment. (B) At 2 months after the first 32P radioactive patch treatment. (C) At 2 months after the second 32P radioactive patch treatment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.