The outlined protocol describes streamlined methods for recognizing any exogenous DNA while generating mutations only on those exogenous DNAs in Escherichia coli.
Method Article
The outlined protocol describes streamlined methods for recognizing any exogenous DNA while generating mutations only on those exogenous DNAs in Escherichia coli.
Mutagenesis technologies have been widely used in variation breeding, directed evolution, and protein engineering. However, most methods can only induce random genomic DNA mutations that are uncontrollable, leading to deformities or even lethal effects. Here, by leveraging the fusion of three systems: cytosine base editor (CBE), blue light-inducible p-Mag/n-Mag elements, and split T7 RNA polymerase, this outlined method incorporates a blue-light-controllable, DNA region-specific, semi-random mutagenesis system.
This system can mutate cytosine to thymine on DNAs starting from the T7 promoter and ending in the T7 terminator. Any exogenous gene downstream of the T7 promoter can be potentially mutated. These tools were also designed in two parts to make the system blue-light-controllable. The first part was created by fusing CBE with n-Mag and the N-terminal-T7 RNA polymerase gene. The second part involved fusing p-Mag with the C-terminal-T7 RNA polymerase. Under blue light, these two parts were assembled to function as a mutation generator on DNAs between the T7 promoter and the T7 terminator. Without blue light, p-Mag is detached from n-Mag, releasing the CBE from editing the DNA.
The aim of this protocol is to generate region-specific random mutations in Escherichia coli with blue light control and further validate the mutated plasmids. The system can be adapted to an in vivo evolution system where the function of the gene of interest can be selected, and the desired mutations can be collected for further study.
Random mutation and natural selection are the key forces driving evolution, which has generated large genetic variation across species. The evolutionary process has been utilized as a powerful tool to engineer proteins with optimized or novel functions1. Natural mutation rates from DNA replication have been estimated to be about one in 109 bases per cell division in multiple prokaryotes and eukaryotes2. Low natural mutation rates make it impractical to generate large genetic diversity in laboratories. Studies have focused on developing methods that increase the mutation rates to cover as many sites as possible in a given gene within a reasonable amount of time.
Multiple systems have been developed to achieve higher mutation rates in laboratory evolution studies3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. In vitro evolution systems leverage error-prone PCR, site-directed saturation mutagenesis, or computational library design to introduce mutations in genes of interest1. The DNA libraries are transformed into host cells where the protein products are screened or selected. The mutagenesis and selection steps in in vitro evolution are not coupled, limiting the efficiency and scale of populations that can be generated11. In vivo evolution systems have overcome the limitations by introducing mutation systems into cells and coupling the mutagenesis and selection steps to enable continuous evolution. Earlier in vivo mutagenesis methods employed chemical mutagens3,4 and mutator strains5,6. However, these methods suffer from low mutation rates, lack of control, and narrow or uneven mutational spectrum12. Recent studies have developed novel and improved in vivo evolution systems, represented by OrthoRep, an orthogonal error-prone DNA replication system7,8; MutaT7, a fusion of cytidine deaminase to T7 RNA polymerase9; and EvolvR, a fusion of nickase Cas9 to error-prone DNA polymerase10. These methods have different host cells, target context, and ease of implementation.
T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP), a key component of the MutaT7 system, has been extensively studied and engineered in the field of synthetic biology. Fragments of T7 RNAP have been co-expressed at different levels at different time points to build a resource allocator13. A split T7 RNAP with C-terminal fragments of different promoter specificity has been built to create AND logic gate14. The ability of T7 RNAP fragments to assemble to reconstitute a functional polymerase has led to the development of light- and small molecule-activated biosensors where dimerization of interaction partners fused to each of the N- and C-terminals of T7 RNAP generates transcriptional output15. The split T7 RNAP has also been fused to n-Mag and p-Mag domains to build light-inducible gene expression control in Escherichia coli16. Upon blue light activation, the Magnet domains dimerize, bringing two domains of the split T7 RNAP spatially close to carry out polymerase function. This system enables precise spatiotemporal control of gene expression with low basal expression and a large dynamic range.
This paper presents a protocol to build a blue light-controllable, in vivo, semi-random mutagenesis system (Figure 1). It is built on rAPOBEC1 deaminase fused to n-Mag-N-T7 RNAP. Co-expression of p-Mag-C-T7 RNAP from the same plasmid enables blue light control of the polymerase and base editing activities. The system combines the base editing capacity of rAPOBEC1 with light-controlled split T7 RNAP. It has been validated in E. coli using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as the target gene where its intensity is selected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Compared to the original MutaT7 system, our blue light-controlled system introduces semi-random mutations in the target gene by modulating the light interval. Instead of converting all cytosine to uracil bases in the target gene, it generates a larger mutation profile by editing a subset of the nucleotides through light control. The system can be easily adapted to an in vivo evolution system where the GFP can be replaced by other genes of interest and the function can be selected by cell fitness or survival.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The following protocol outlines how to perform exogenous DNA mutagenesis design using CBE-Mag-T7 polymerase mutagenesis system (Step 1). Once the exogenous DNA plasmid is constructed, steps for transformation of the two plasmids are described for expressing CBE-Mag-T7 polymerase mutagenesis in the E. coli BL21 strain by adding isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and followed by irradiating with blue light forinitiating the mutagenesis (Steps 2-9.2). The quality control steps for evaluating how many mutations were generated on either GFP or exogenous DNA were performed using Sanger sequencing (Steps 9.3-11.2).
1. Design exogenous DNA and construct the CBE-Mag-T7 polymerase mutagenesis system
2. Bacterial strain activation
3. Plasmid amplification
4. Plasmid extraction
5. Plasmid transformation (E. coli BL21 chemically competent cells)
6. Expressing CBE-Mag-T7 polymerase mutation generator (inactive form)
7. Activate the CBE-Mag-T7 polymerase mutation generator
8. Selection of mutations for increased protein function and continued mutagenesis
NOTE: Here, we use gfp gene as an exogenous DNA for mutagenesis and are looking for mutations that can enhance the fluorescent intensity of GFP protein.
9. Stop the mutagenesis and verify the mutations
10. Data analysis and mutation frequency calculation
11. Bacterial glycerol stock preparation
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The methods outlined in this protocol are for the creation of mutations on exogenous DNA using a split CBE-Mag-T7 RNA polymerase mutation generator. Genes for building the CBE-Mag-T7 RNA polymerase mutation system and the target gene for mutagenesis are all incorporated into the pET-11a plasmid backbone. Successful transformation and blue light irradiation were performed without any damage to the bacterial genomic DNA, shown through normal and comparable colony numbers on LB-agar (Figure 2)....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The polymerase-guided base editing tool was first created by Cravens et al. in 2021, using a protein fusion strategy17. Mutations on four DNA nucleotides were successfully incorporated at rates greater than 10-4 mutations per bp. However, since mutations were continuously introduced between T7 promotor and terminator without additional control by researchers18, "good" mutations could not be preserved from ongoing editing. To address this limitation, we in...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 mL Conical Centrifuge Tubes | Falcon | CLS352070 | |
| Ampicillin | Thermo Scientific Chemicals | J60977.14 | |
| Blue-light irradiator | Thorlabs | LIU470A | |
| DNA Assembly Cloning Kit | NEB | E5520S | |
| DNA/Prmers synthesis | BGI Genomics | ||
| EndoFree Plasmid Midi Kit | CWBIO | CW2106S | Buffer P1: resuspension buffer, Buffer P2: lysis buffer, Buffer E3: equilibration buffer, Buffer PS: neutralization buffer, Buffer PW: wash buffer,Endo-Free Buffer EB: DNA purification buffer,RNase A Endo-Remover FM: endotoxin removal buffer, Spin Columns DM with Collection Tubes |
| Glycerol | Fisher Chemical | G33-4 | |
| Incubated Shaker | Thermo Scientific | SK2001CPKG | |
| IPTG (isopropylthio-β-galactoside) | Invitrogen | 15529019 | |
| Microplate Reader | Thermo Scientific | Varioskan LUX | |
| Microscope | Leica | DMI 4000B | |
| Multiskan FC | Thermo Scientific Chemicals | ||
| One Shot BL21(DE3) Chemically Competent E. coli | Invitrogen | C600003 | |
| PureLink Fast Low-Endotoxin Midi Plasmid Purification Kit | Invitrogen | A36227 | |
| Pyrex heavy-duty round-bottom centrifuge tubes, with phenolic screw cap and rubber liner | Corning 8422 | CLS8422100 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission