Method Article

A Closed-Loop ta-VNS System Synchronized with BCI-Based Motor Training for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation

DOI:

10.3791/69272

⸱

April 14th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study demonstrates a standardized protocol for a closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training. Furthermore, it compares the efficacy of the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training with that of sham ta-VNS, providing significant evidence for its clinical application in stroke rehabilitation.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) involves applying electrical stimulation via electrodes to the auricular concha. This activates vagal afferent fibers, initiating an ascending pathway from the periphery to the brainstem, which ultimately stimulates central vagal projections and promotes neural plasticity. Previous studies have demonstrated that combining ta-VNS with motor training offers synergistic benefits for motor recovery after stroke. However, these combined approaches typically employ open-loop stimulation with fixed parameters, lacking real-time closed-loop responsiveness to dynamic neural activity. To address this limitation, we developed a novel closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with electroencephalography (EEG)-triggered brain-computer interface (BCI) motor training. This system was designed to enhance corticospinal coupling and promote synaptic plasticity. We established a standardized protocol for applying this closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training in stroke patients. Using EEG-based functional assessment, we compared the effects of the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training to those of sham ta-VNS synchronized with BCI-based motor training. This work provides the methodological and theoretical groundwork for the clinical application of this approach in stroke rehabilitation.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used to ameliorate post-stroke motor impairments1. This method entails stimulating the auricular concha with electrodes to activate the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Such stimulation initiates the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS)-locus coeruleus (LC) pathway2, which ascends to central vagal projections in the motor cortex, frontal lobe, thalamus, and cerebellum. This process enhances neural plasticity and network reorganization3. Compared with traditional invasive vagus nerve stimulation, ta-VNS preserves therapeutic efficacy while mitigating surgical risks and complication rates4. These advantages establish it as a prominent research focus within rehabilitation science5,6,7.

Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of combined ta-VNS and motor training in enhancing post-stroke motor function. Chang et al.8 randomized 36 stroke patients with upper limb impairment into two groups: active ta-VNS paired with robotic motor training versus sham ta-VNS with robotic training. The active ta-VNS group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in upper limb spasticity and electromyogram activity than the sham group, indicating enhanced motor recovery. Complementing these findings, Zheng et al.9 employed motor evoked potentials to demonstrate that stroke patients receiving ta-VNS synchronized with robotic training exhibited increased primary motor cortex (M1) excitability (amplitude) and improved conduction efficiency (reduced latency) compared to those receiving robotic training alone. This suggests that combined ta-VNS promotes functional cortical reorganization to enhance motor recovery.

However, existing combined interventions typically employ fixed-parameter open-loop stimulation, lacking dynamic closed-loop responsiveness to neural states. To address this limitation, we designed a novel electroencephalography (EEG)-triggered closed-loop system that integrates ta-VNS with brain-computer interface (BCI)-based motor training (Figure 1), comprising four components: a synchronization system, an EEG acquisition unit, a pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation, and a ta-VNS device. The EEG acquisition unit captures motor-intent-related brain engagement by decoding EEG signals, utilizing real-time engagement characteristics as a biomarker to trigger the pneumatic glove and ta-VNS device10. Both devices connect to the synchronization host via wired serial ports. When brain engagement reaches a predefined threshold, the devices activate synchronously, enabling closed-loop ta-VNS intervention precisely matched to motor training. This synchronization is hypothesized to enhance synaptic efficacy between the motor cortex and spinal motor neurons, as prior research suggests that ta-VNS paired with motor training can modulate cortical excitability and synaptic function11. Conversely, ta-VNS is not triggered if the brain engagement value is below the threshold. It is anticipated that this system may strengthen corticospinal coupling and promote synaptic plasticity, given that closed-loop ta-VNS synchronized with movement has shown potential in enhancing motor recovery outcomes12, thereby holding significant promise for neurorehabilitation studies.

The system is primarily suitable for stroke patients experiencing upper limb motor dysfunction. Eligibility requires patients to have sufficient cognitive capacity for task compliance as well as stable vital signs. Key contraindications include the presence of implanted electronic devices, skin lesions or abnormalities at the auricular stimulation site, diagnosed cervical vagus nerve pathology, or specific arrhythmias. Operational constraints involve the necessity for trained personnel to administer the intervention and continuous monitoring during initial sessions to ensure stimulation tolerance and procedural safety.

Given the novelty of this integrated system, a standardized application protocol is paramount to ensure consistent administration and replication of the method. Therefore, the primary aim of this methodological article is to present a standardized protocol for the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training. Furthermore, using EEG-based functional assessment in a representative case, we aimed to preliminarily explore the neuromodulatory effects of the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training compared to sham ta-VNS synchronized with BCI-based motor training. This work establishes the methodological groundwork and demonstrates the initial feasibility of applying this synchronized intervention in a clinical setting.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Association of the Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Shenzhen, China) (approval number: KY-2025-318-01) on April 30, 2025. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2500104317) on June 16, 2025. The subject signed the informed consent form.

1. Recruitment

  1. Inclusion criteria
    1. Recruit subjects with stroke diagnosis that meets the criteria (encompassing cerebral hemorrhage and infarction) established by the Fourth National Cerebral Vascular Disease Academic Conference.
    2. Recruit subjects with first-episode, confirmed cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction by cranial CT or MRI, 2 weeks ≤ disease duration ≤ 6 months.
    3. Recruit subjects aged 18-80 years.
    4. Recruit subjects with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥21.
    5. Recruit subjects with post-stroke motor dysfunction of the upper limbs and hands.
    6. Recruit subjects with stable vital signs.
    7. Recruit subjects with voluntarily signed informed consent.
  2. Exclusion criteria
    1. Exclude subjects with a history of bilateral/unilateral vagus nerve injury or surgery.
    2. Exclude subjects with pacemakers or neurostimulators.
    3. Exclude subjects with cognitive dysfunction.
    4. Exclude subjects with infection, ulcers, or scarring at stimulation sites.
    5. Exclude subjects with heart rate <60 bpm.
    6. Exclude women during pregnancy and lactation.
    7. Exclude subjects with severe visual or auditory impairment that prevents perception of the experimental cues.

2. Basic information collection

  1. Collect and record the basic information of the subject, including age, gender, disease duration, stroke type, hemiplegic side, hand Brunnstrom stage, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function (FMA-UE).
  2. Implement a within-subject crossover design, in which the subject completes both intervention conditions: closed-loop ta-VNS synchronized with BCI-based motor training and sham ta-VNS synchronized with BCI-based motor training, separated by a 6-day washout period.

3. The closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training

  1. Subject preparation
    1. Before the formal intervention, all participants received a comprehensive explanation of the experimental procedure and completed a brief practice session to ensure they understood the motor imagery task and could perceive all visual and auditory cues clearly.
  2. Pre-test preparation
    1. Prepare a 3% NaCl electrolyte solution by adding 4.5 g of sodium chloride to 150 mL of pure water, then shake vigorously until fully dissolved.
    2. Prepare the electrolyte solution in a container, then immerse 32 cotton pads and soak at room temperature for 3–5 min.
    3. Squeeze excess water from the cotton pads.
    4. Insert the cotton pad holder into the electrode base along the card slot.
    5. Pinch the electrode base while rotating clockwise until a click is heard.
    6. Sequentially install 30 EEG electrodes and 2 EOG electrodes, positioning the reference electrode at CPz and the ground electrode at FPz.
    7. Wear the EEG cap and locate the Cz point using the international 10-10 system.
      1. Acquire the EEG signals using a 32-channel saline-based wireless multi-channel EEG acquisition and analysis system. According to the international 10-10 system, position the reference electrode at A1 (left earlobe), and place the ground electrode at AFz (frontal midline). The setup included 30 recording electrodes and 2 EOG electrodes.
      2. Set the amplifier specifications as follows: input impedance of 1 GΩ, input noise < 0.4 µV, and a common-mode rejection ratio of -120 dB. Maintain the electrode-skin interface impedance below 5 kΩ during recordings, and sample the EEG signals at 250 Hz.
    8. Position the Cz electrode at the vertex—the intersection of the interauricular line (connecting both earlobes) and the nasio-bregmatic line (extending from the nasal tip to the glabella)
    9. Install the amplifier by gently inserting it into the EEG cap plug and securing it to the cap.
    10. Connect the ear clip stimulation electrode to the ta-VNS host.
    11. Remove the alcohol swab and cleanse the subject's auricular concha.
    12. Apply the stimulation electrode to the auricular concha.
    13. Don the pneumatic glove and adjust for a comfortable fit to prevent over-tightening or loosening from compromising training outcomes.
  3. Software Implementation
    1. Power on the ta-VNS host device by pressing and holding the green button located on its right side.
    2. Connect the ta-VNS stimulator to the BCI-based motor training system via the USB interface.
      NOTE: The ta-VNS stimulator was connected to a USB-to-TTL module, by which it established serial communication with the PC via a USB cable to synchronize with the BCI-based motor training system. The serial port was configured with a baud rate of 38400 bps, 1 stop bit, and no parity.
    3. Launch the brain function testing software (BCIServer-V1.0.0).
    4. Click the Start Device button in the upper right corner, followed by the 'Impedance Detection' button on the left side, ensuring electrode impedance remains below 5 kΩ. Do not proceed with the run until all electrodes show an impedance of ≤ 5 kΩ and the indicator is green/yellow.
      1. If high impedance (red indicator) is detected, adjust by: (1) gently twisting the electrode base, (2) reapplying saline to the scalp, and (3) sequentially optimizing each electrode until the indicator turns green/yellow.
      2. For persistently high impedance at any electrode, remove the cotton pads tray, re-saturate it with saline, reload it into the electrode base, and twist gently until impedance reduction is achieved.
    5. Launch the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training software (HandGame-V1.0.0) and enter the subject's demographic information: name, gender, and date of birth.
    6. Access the training settings and configure: contraction speed: high, training site: left hand, motor imagery difficulty: low, and training duration: 20 min.
      NOTE: The contraction speed parameter defines the angular velocity of the pneumatic glove's finger joints. The 'high' setting corresponds to approximately 68°/s, while the 'low' setting corresponds to 30°/s. The selection should be adjusted based on the patient's muscle tone; for example, 'high' speed is unsuitable for patients with spasticity. For the present case, a 'high' setting was selected as the patient (Brunnstrom Stage I, flaccid stage) exhibited low muscle tone. The motor imagery difficulty is defined by the minimum brain engagement threshold required to activate the BCI-based motor training system within the 5 s task period. The threshold is set to 50 for the 'low' level, 60 for the 'medium' level, and 80 for the 'high' level. For this patient's initial training session, the 'low' difficulty level was selected. Subsequent adjustments to the difficulty level are made based on the patient's performance, primarily considering the number of successful motor imagery triggers achieved during the training session.
    7. Adjust the current intensity using a default start of 1 mA and an allowable range of 0–8.0 mA, Increase the current in increments of 0.2 mA until the patient reports a strong but comfortable tingling sensation without any pain or discomfort. Immediately cease stimulation if the patient experiences pain or any discomfort (e.g., burning, muscle twitching, dizziness, palpitations, or dyspnea).
      NOTE: The ta-VNS preset parameters are fixed at: frequency: 20 Hz, pulse width: 300 µs, and stimulation duration: 5 s.
    8. Initiate training.
    9. Execute cyclic motor imagery training.
    10. Proceed with individual motor imagery training tasks sequentially in a structured cycle, as illustrated in Figure 2:
    11. Rest phase (5 s): Record the baseline EEG data during this phase for subsequent calibration and analysis.
    12. Motor imagery and EEG acquisition (5 s): 
      1. Perform visual/auditory cues induced hand grasping imagery training with synchronous EEG acquisition. The brain engagement is a dimensionless metric derived from the EEG signal to quantify attentional focus during motor imagery. 
      2. Sample the EEG signals at 250 Hz and process them by an 8–30 Hz band-pass filter to retain the frequencies of interest. Apply a sliding window (length: 4 s, step: 1 s).
      3. Compute the power spectral density (PSD) via Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for each window. Calculate the energy of the alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (14-30 Hz) bands (E_α and E_β), and derive their ratio R = E_β / E_α. Then, the ratio R was normalized to a value between 0 and 100. Subsequently calculate the brain engagement value using the formula: brain engagement = 100 × (R - min) / (max - min), where the empirical constants max = 3.50 and min = 0.35 were determined from a prior calibration dataset13.
    13. Feedback and stimulation phase (5 s, contingent on success): If the brain engagement value was greater than or equal to the predefined threshold of 50 within the task period, initiate the pneumatic glove movement and verum ta-VNS simultaneously for a duration of 5 s, constituting the synchronized BCI-ta-VNS intervention. Otherwise, neither pneumatic feedback nor ta-VNS occurred, and auditory cues were provided to encourage patient to persist.
    14. Terminate the closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training software post-training.

4. The sham ta-VNS synchronized with BCI-based motor training

  1. Follow steps 3.1 to 3.3 identically, but in step 3.3.7, reduce the ta-VNS current intensity for BCI-based motor training to zero. All parameters except ta-VNS current remain identical to those described in section 3. The training duration was 20 min.

5. Offline EEG data processing and analysis

NOTE: Offline EEG data processing and analysis were conducted using MATLAB R2021a in conjunction with the EEGLAB (v2024.2) and ERPLAB (v12.00) toolboxes. The processing pipeline comprised two main stages: preprocessing and analytical analysis.

  1. Data preprocessing
    1. Perform data import and channel configuration:
      1. Convert the acquired continuous EEG data in .csv format to .mat format and import them into EEGLAB. Set the sampling rate to 250 Hz.
      2. Load the channel location file corresponding to the EEG cap, and plot the electrode positions to verify their coordinates. Remove the unused EOG electrodes.
    2. Filtering: Apply a bidirectional FIR band-pass filter (0.1–40 Hz) to the task-state EEG data from both interventions to remove baseline drift and suppress high-frequency noise.
    3. Perform epoching.
      1. Segment the data based on event markers. Marker 1 indicated the start of the motor imagery task. Extract epochs from -2000 ms to +5000 ms relative to Marker 1, but select only those trials that were successfully triggered (i.e., those that led to a 'success' outcome, as the primary analysis focused on the brain state during effective trials) for subsequent analysis.
      2. Apply a baseline correction using the interval from -2000 ms to -1000 ms pre-stimulus. Export an EVENTLIST to document the number and timing of markers.
    4. Remove artifact.
      1. Inspect the epoched data visually to identify and reject anomalous segments and bad channels. Interpolate identified bad channels. Subsequently, subject the data to Independent Component Analysis (ICA).
      2. Use the ICLabel toolbox to automatically classify independent components, and remove those identified as ocular or muscular artifacts with a probability exceeding 90%. This automatic rejection was followed by manual inspection to confirm the removal of artifact-related components.
    5. Re-referencing: Re-reference the data to the average of all channels.
  2. Data analysis
    1. Time-frequency analysis: Apply a wavelet transform to the task-state EEG data for time-frequency analysis. Use the period from -2000 ms to -1000 ms for baseline correction. Analyze the event-related desynchronization (ERD) phenomenon at electrode C4 within a time window of 0 ms to 5000 ms.
    2. Power spectral and topographic map analysis: Compute the average power in the alpha and beta bands (8–30 Hz) using FFT over a time window of 500 ms to 3000 ms post-cue. Plot topographic maps of the average band power to visualize the spatial distribution of sensorimotor cortex activation.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A 37-year-old male stroke patient successively underwent two interventions: a closed-loop ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training, and a sham ta-VNS system synchronized with BCI-based motor training. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. System Intervention Parameters are presented in Table 2.

For the stroke patient, the number of successful motor imagery trials was recorded for both intervention protocols. During the 20 min close...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Prior research confirms that synchronizing ta-VNS with traditional motor training optimizes therapeutic efficacy for post-stroke motor recovery, likely through precise neuromodulation that enhances neural reorganization8,14. Building on this evidence, we established a standardized experimental protocol and employed EEG biomarkers to monitor sensorimotor cortical activation patterns, particularly reflected in alpha and beta band topographic distributions during th...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was supported by the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2025A1515010360, 2023A1515010586), Shenzhen Medical Research Fund (C2301002), Shenzhen Basic Research Special (Natural Science Foundation) for basic research (JCYJ20240813150305007), and Guangzhou Clinical Characteristic Technology Program (2023C-TS19).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Alcohol padsSteady Medical Group Co., Ltd.Skin disinfection
Electrolyte bottleXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.Capacity: 150 mL, used for storing electrolyte solution
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor FunctionThe standardized assessment developed by Swedish scholar Fugl-MeyerFMA-UEIt is mainly used for clinical assessment of the reflex activities, motor control and muscle strength of the upper limbs of stroke patients.
Hand function rehabilitation training and evaluation systemXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.ZhenTec-H1The training system controlled the rehabilitation training gloves in a pneumatic way, and helped the patients gradually realize the rehabilitation training through multi-mode training
Rehabilitation training for hand muscles. The training is highly interesting, highly immersive, and has an evaluation function, which can evaluate the hand function of patients
Recovery status.
Heart rate monitorsShenzhen Huiying Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.HY-HRV-001Monitor heart rate
Lingke cottonXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.Used to absorb salt water and transmit signals
Mini-Mental State ExaminationThe standardized assessment developed by Marshal F. Folstein et al.MMSERapid screening of adult cognitive impairment
Pure waterChina Resources Tianbo Beverage (China) Co., Ltd.Yibao Purified Water150 mL is used for preparing the electrolyte solution
Saline electrode wireless multi-channel EEG acquisition and analysis systemXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.ZhenTec-NT1-GThe EEG acquisition equipment was a 32-lead saline electrode wireless multi-channel EEG acquisition and analysis system. According to the international 10-10 system, there were 30 acquisition electrodes and 2 ophthalmic electrodes. The input impedance of the device was 1 GΩ, the input noise was less than 0.4 μV, and the common mode rejection ratio was -120 dB. The electrode wear impedance was below 5 kΩ, and the EEG sampling rate was 500Hz.
Sodium chlorideXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.4.5 g, used for preparing the electrolyte solution
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulatorShenzhen Huiying Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.HY-TVNS-001The product is mainly composed of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulator host, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulator surface electrode, charging cable. The electrodes of the stimulator can be controlled by software, and the stimulation parameters include frequency, pulse width, time, mode, etc.
Wetting bottleXi'an Zhentai Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.Capacity: 250 mL, used for soaking lint cotton

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Andalib, S., et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in ischemic stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 23 (12), 947-962 (2023).
  2. Hachem, L. D., Wong, S. M., Ibrahim, G. M. The vagus afferent network: Emerging role in translational connectomics. Neurosurg Focus. 45 (3), E2(2018).
  3. Wang, Y., et al. Effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. J Neurol. 270 (2), 995-1003 (2023).
  4. Lin, X., Fang, Y., Hu, H., Ye, Z. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in the treatment of tinnitus: Protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 14 (5), e082906(2024).
  5. Li, J. N., et al. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation combined with conventional rehabilitation training in acute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial conducted for 1 year involving 60 patients. Neural Regen Res. 17 (8), 1809-1813 (2022).
  6. Wu, D., et al. Effect and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on recovery of upper limb motor function in subacute ischemic stroke patients: A randomized pilot study. Neural Plast. 2020, 8841752(2020).
  7. Capone, F., et al. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation combined with robotic rehabilitation improves upper limb function after stroke. Neural Plast. 2017, 7876507(2017).
  8. Chang, J. L., et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) delivered during upper limb interactive robotic training demonstrates novel antagonist control for reaching movements following stroke. Front Neurosci. 15, 767302(2021).
  9. Li, Z., Zhicheng, B., Qi, Z., Xuyan, R., Min, S. Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation combined with rehabilitation robot training on upper limb function in stroke patients. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice. 29 (06), 691-696 (2023).
  10. Yanhui, Y., et al. Effects of visual-motor-induced brain-computer interface technology on upper limb motor and cognitive functions in stroke patients. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice. 29 (04), 472-478 (2023).
  11. Wang, M. H., et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with task-oriented training improves upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized clinical trial. Front Neurosci. 18, 1346634(2024).
  12. Badran, B. W., et al. Motor-activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation as a potential neuromodulation approach for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: A pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 37 (6), 374-383 (2023).
  13. Yuan, Z., et al. Effect of BCI-controlled pedaling training system with multiple modalities of feedback on motor and cognitive function rehabilitation of early subacute stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 29, 2569-2577 (2021).
  14. Redgrave, J. N., et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with concurrent upper limb repetitive task practice for poststroke motor recovery: A pilot study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 27 (7), 1998-2005 (2018).
  15. Liu, H., et al. An EEG motor imagery dataset for brain computer interface in acute stroke patients. Sci Data. 11 (1), 131(2024).
  16. Fong, K. N. K., Ting, K. H., Zhang, J. J. Q., Yau, C. S. F., Li, L. S. W. Event-related desynchronization during mirror visual feedback: A comparison of older adults and people after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 15, 629592(2021).
  17. Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Shu, X., Chen, S., Jia, J. Correlation between the erd in grasp/open tasks of BCIs and hand function of stroke patients: A cross-sectional study. Biomed Eng Online. 22 (1), 36(2023).
  18. Bartur, G., Pratt, H., Soroker, N. Changes in mu and beta amplitude of the EEG during upper limb movement correlate with motor impairment and structural damage in subacute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 130 (9), 1644-1651 (2019).
  19. Lima, J. P. S., et al. Unraveling transformative effects after tDCS and BCI intervention in chronic post-stroke patient rehabilitation-An alternative treatment design study. Sensors (Basel). 23 (23), 9302(2023).
  20. Kang, D., Choi, Y., Lee, J., Park, E., Kim, I. Y. Analysis of taVNS effects on autonomic and central nervous systems in healthy young adults based on HRV, EEG parameters. J Neural Eng. 21 (4), (2024).
  21. Dettmers, C., Benz, M., Liepert, J., Rockstroh, B. Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases. Acta Neurol Scand. 126 (4), 238-247 (2012).
  22. Liepert, J., Greiner, J., Nedelko, V., Dettmers, C. Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: Clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 26 (5), 470-478 (2012).
  23. Tang, Z., et al. A BCI painting system using a hybrid control approach based on SSVEP and P300. Comput Biol Med. 150, 106118(2022).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Closed Loop ta VNSBrain Computer InterfaceMotor TrainingStroke RehabilitationUpper Limb RecoveryVagus Nerve StimulationEEG AssessmentNeural PlasticityCorticospinal CouplingSynaptic Plasticity
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles