Method Article

Application of Modified Single-Incision Technique for Fluorescence-Guided Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

DOI:

10.3791/69434

⸱

December 5th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The manuscript details the steps involved in fluorescence-induced modified single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and discusses its clinical advantages and appropriate indications.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard surgical procedure for benign gallbladder diseases. With advancements in LC techniques and the ongoing pursuit of minimally invasive surgery, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has emerged to further reduce surgical trauma and postoperative pain for patients. However, while reducing the number of abdominal incisions, SILC introduces several challenges. Conventional single-incision laparoscopic techniques are prone to the chopstick effect, requiring a higher level of surgical skill and a significant learning curve. For surgeons with limited experience in single-port surgery, this may lead to an increased risk of accidental injuries and prolonged operative time. This article outlines the main steps for performing a fluorescence-guided modified single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The advantages of this modified technique include: the subxiphoid insertion of the electrocautery hook aligns with conventional LC operating practices, effectively overcoming the chopstick effect associated with SILC. This modification shortens the learning curve while reducing both operative time and hemorrhagic complications (with only one case of post-operative fever). Preservation of the minimally invasive benefits of SILC-only the umbilical incision remains, with other wounds healing rapidly. Fluorescence navigation aids in real-time visualization of the biliary tract, further enhancing surgical safety.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Gallstones affect approximately 20% of the global population, representing a significant worldwide health burden1. Cholecystectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for gallstones. Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) became the mainstream approach in the 1990s, minimally invasive techniques have continued to evolve, particularly over the past decade, driven by innovations in surgical instrumentation and imaging technology2.

With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has emerged as a promising approach, offering superior postoperative pain control and cosmetic outcomes3. However, its widespread adoption remains hindered by the inherent chopstick effect. Unlike conventional laparoscopic surgery's inverted-triangle workspace, SILC requires all instruments and the camera to share a single port, leading to frequent instrument collisions and compromised visualization -- factors that collectively elevate procedural risks. Studies suggest this configuration may prolong operative time, increase the risk of biliary tract injury, and elevate the incidence of postoperative incisional hernias4,5,6. Furthermore, the altered ergonomics and constrained working space necessitate a steeper learning curve for surgeons. Current SILC innovation is thus centered on a critical challenge: how to retain the minimally invasive benefits of a single-port approach while mitigating its spatial limitations.

Recently, near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG-NIRF) has gained widespread adoption in hepatobiliary surgery7,8,9. Clinical studies demonstrate that ICG-NIRF significantly improves surgical outcomes compared to conventional white-light imaging: it reduces postoperative adverse events from 12.8% to 6.4%, decreases mean operative time by 7.5 min, and substantially lowers conversion rates to open surgery in technically challenging cases -- particularly those involving acute inflammation, obesity, or Mirizzi syndrome10. These demonstrated benefits establish a solid foundation for combining ICG-NIRF with the single-incision technique to address its inherent technical limitations.

Inspired by these findings, our center developed an innovative modified SILC plus ICG-NIRF technique, building upon conventional SILC. This approach maintains a 2.5 cm umbilical incision as the primary working port while incorporating a subxiphoid micro-incision for electrocautery hook insertion. The modification requires no additional trocars and preserves stable CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

By externalizing the energy device, this technique significantly reduces instrument crowding within the umbilical port. Surgeons regain the ergonomic benefits of traditional triangular instrument arrangement, facilitating more intuitive retraction, coagulation, and dissection. The familiar configuration enables a seamless transition from standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy to SILC, while preserving the minimally invasive and cosmetic advantages of single-port surgery (Figure 1A-B).

The integration of ICG-NIRF fluorescence imaging provides dual benefits: enhanced biliary tree visualization and improved surgical field exposure (Figure 1C-D). This combination proves particularly valuable in managing complex cases involving inflammation, obesity, or anatomical variations, where it substantially reduces the risk of iatrogenic injury. In our preliminary clinical application involving 31 patients, the technique demonstrated promising outcomes, including a mean operative time of 63.3 ± 17.9 min, minimal blood loss (6.2 ± 4.9 mL), and a short postoperative hospital stay (2.2 ± 1.0 days). No bile duct injury or conversion to open surgery occurred, with only one case of post-operative fever. These quantitative results strengthen the rationale for adopting this integrated approach.

This study aims to further evaluate the clinical efficacy of the modified operation and confirm the reproducibility and broad applicability of this modification.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient for performing this study. This research was performed in compliance with the guidelines of the human research ethics committee of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. All human biological materials and surgical waste were handled in accordance with institutional biomedical waste disposal protocols.

1. Patient selection and preoperative preparation

  1. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria: Include elective patients with benign gallbladder disease who have cosmetic concerns or desire reduced postoperative pain, with ASA class I-II. Exclude patients with acute severe cholecystitis, biliary duct stones, a history of upper abdominal surgery, suspected malignancy, severe comorbidities, or umbilical infection.
  2. Preoperative preparation involved a standard workup. Perform clinical assessment, laboratory tests (complete blood count, liver/renal function, coagulation, etc.), non-contrast computed tomography (CT) of the upper abdomen, pre-anesthesia evaluation, prophylactic antibiotic administration, and preoperative fasting.

2. Fluorescence imaging

  1. Dissolve 1 vial of ICG (25 mg) in 10 mL of normal saline. Subsequently, inject 1 mL of the solution into 100 mL of normal saline for dilution. Finally, administer an intravenous injection of 10 mL of the final diluted solution (0.25 mg ICG) to the patient 45 min before the surgery11.
  2. Set up the DPM-I fluorescence system, a dual-channel image-guided device, operating in white-light (380-665 nm) and near-infrared (810-1,200 nm) spectrums11.
    NOTE: It is recommended to configure the fluorescence system at a medium initial sensitivity level and adjust the signal sensitivity in real time during surgery according to the visualization outcome.
  3. Under white light mode, aim the laparoscope at a pure white sterile gauze and press the white balance button. Then, aim the laparoscope at a target with a clear texture (such as gauze) and adjust the focus.

3. Modified single-port trocar advancement

  1. Position the patient in a supine position. After administering general anesthesia, identify the surgical sites for the modified SILC procedure: the umbilicus, for the primary 2.5 cm single-incision port, and the subxiphoid area, for the anticipated 3 mm micro-incision.
  2. Shave and thoroughly sterilize the entire abdominal field from the xiphoid process to the pubic symphysis to accommodate both access points. Complete all necessary aseptic procedures, including wearing a surgical hood and sterile gloves. Finally, create a sterile field using sterile drapes centered on the umbilicus and encompassing the subxiphoid area.
  3. Make a 2.5 cm supraumbilical incision through the skin and fascia using a pointed-tip blade. Then, place the single-incision laparoscopic device and establish pneumoperitoneum at 11-13 mmHg (Figure 2A).
  4. Make a stab incision 2 cm inferior to the xiphoid process using a scalpel, then insert the electrocautery hook (Figure 2B). No additional trocar is required. Insert the electrocautery hook under continuous coagulation to prevent bleeding.

4. Gallbladder suspension

  1. Fix a suture to the gallbladder's fundus-body junction using a Hem-o-lok clip. Insert a single-use suture passer at the body surface projection of the gallbladder (Figure 2C).
  2. Grasp the suture, then elevate and fix the gallbladder to the abdominal wall (Figure 2D).

5. Exposure of Calot's triangle

  1. Dissect Calot's triangle using an electrocautery hook to achieve the Critical View of Safety (CVS)12. The dissection is considered complete when the following criteria are met: (1) the hepatocystic triangle is cleared of fat and fibrous tissue, (2) the lower one-third of the gallbladder is separated from the liver bed, and (3) only two structures -- the cystic duct and the cystic artery -- are seen entering the gallbladder.
  2. Switch to fluorescence mode and proceed with the dissection of Calot's triangle under fluorescent guidance (Figure 2E). If obscured anatomy, active bleeding, or suspected biliary injury occurs, convert to multiport laparoscopy or open surgery immediately.
  3. Isolate the cystic artery, then ligate its proximal end with a Hem-o-lok clip. Subsequently, divide the artery completely into a single action using the electrocautery hook between the clip and the gallbladder.

6. Removal of the gallbladder

  1. Dissect the gallbladder from its fossa (Figure 2F). Isolate the cystic duct. Apply two Hem-o-lok clips proximally (close to the common bile duct) and one clip distally (close to the gallbladder). Then, sharply divide the cystic duct completely into a single cut with scissors between the proximal and distal clips.
  2. Place the gallbladder into a specimen retrieval bag and extract it from the abdominal cavity. Place a drainage tube through the umbilical incision in cases of severe local inflammation, suspected bleeding, or bile leakage.

7. Post-operative procedures

  1. Suture the umbilical incision subcutaneously, followed by a cosmetic intradermal closure with 4-0 polyglactin. The subxiphoid incision for electrocautery hook insertion requires only one or two intradermal stitches.
  2. Submit the gallbladder specimen for pathological biopsy. Recheck inflammatory markers and liver function tests on postoperative day 2.
  3. Remove the drainage tube when the drainage is clear and less than 20 mL per day. This completes the fluorescence-guided modified SILC procedure.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Between August and December 2024, a total of 31 cases of fluorescence-guided modified single-port LC were recorded in our center, with demographic data presented in Table 1. Among these, 28 cases were successfully completed, while 3 cases were converted to conventional multi-port LC (2 due to inadequate exposure of the Calot's triangle and 1 due to severe inflammatory adhesions discovered during the procedure), resulting in a success rate of 90% (28/31). Peri-operative patient outcomes are summarized in ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

LC is the traditional gold-standard surgical approach for benign gallbladder diseases13. With the ongoing advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques, SILC has emerged, aiming to further reduce postoperative pain and improve cosmetic outcomes for patients3,14. However, single-incision laparoscopic techniques present several challenges, including the chopstick effect -- caused by the parallel arrangement of instruments through the...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82272105), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant numbers 2023A1515011521, 2023A1515010475)

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
4-0 Coated VICRYLETHICONVCP310The Suture Material
Electrocautery HookZhejiang Shiyou Instruments & Equipment Co., Ltd.SY-IVB-DElectrocautery Hook
Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging SystemZHUHAI DI PU MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. DPM-ENDOCAM-03Fluorescence Laparoscope Equipment
Hem-O-lock ClipsSINOLINKS MEDICAL INNOVOATION, INC.B240714Hem-O-lock Clips
Indocyanine Green for InjectionDANDONG YICHUANG PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. H20055881Fluorescence Dye
Single-Incision Laparoscopic DeviceHangzhou Grand Medical Devices Co., Ltd.191-JQST4C635Single-Incision Laparoscopic Device
Single-Use Suture PasserJiangsu Anneng Medical Devices (Changshu) Co., Ltd.ANONG-FB120Used for gallbladder suspension

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Lammert, F., et al. Gallstones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2, 16024(2016).
  2. Edebo, A., et al. Benefits and risks of using laparoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 38 (9), 5096-5107 (2024).
  3. Navarra, G., Pozza, E., Occhionorelli, S., Carcoforo, P., Donini, I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 84 (5), 695(1997).
  4. Evers, L., Bouvy, N., Branje, D., Peeters, A. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 31 (9), 3437-3448 (2017).
  5. Arezzo, A., et al. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc. 31 (7), 2872-2880 (2017).
  6. Pisanu, A., Reccia, I., Porceddu, G., Uccheddu, A. Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg. 16 (9), 1790-1801 (2012).
  7. He, P., et al. An exploratory human study of superstable homogeneous lipiodol-indocyanine green formulation for precise surgical navigation in liver cancer. Bioeng Transl Med. 8 (2), e10404(2023).
  8. Liu, Y., et al. A meta-analysis of indocyanine green fluorescence image-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 32, 101948(2020).
  9. Tang, J., et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 56, 105245(2025).
  10. Xu, C., et al. Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography improves the clinical effects of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 37 (8), 5836-5846 (2023).
  11. Zhang, L., et al. The Role of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Complex Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Navigation. J Vis Exp. (215), e67562(2025).
  12. Strasberg, S. M., Brunt, L. M. Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 211 (1), 132-138 (2010).
  13. Begos, D. G., Modlin, I. M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol. 19 (4), 325-330 (1994).
  14. Ross, S., et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for LESS cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 26 (10), 2711-2716 (2012).
  15. Yin, H., et al. A specific instrument to facilitate single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an initial experience. Surg Innov. 18 (3), 289-293 (2011).
  16. Chow, A., Purkayastha, S., Aziz, O., Paraskeva, P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. 24 (3), 709-714 (2010).
  17. Chaudhary, S., Bhullar, J. S., Subhas, G., Mittal, V. K., Kolachalam, R. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) using non-articulating instruments and conventional trocars-single surgeon experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 17 (4), 809-813 (2013).
  18. Hao, L., Liu, M., Zhu, H., Li, Z. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 22 (6), 487-497 (2012).
  19. Haueter, R., Schutz, T., Raptis, D. A., Clavien, P. A., Zuber, M. Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. Br J Surg. 104 (9), 1141-1159 (2017).
  20. Wagner, M. J., Kern, H., Hapfelmeier, A., Mehler, J., Schoenberg, M. H. Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients. World J Surg. 37 (5), 991-998 (2013).
  21. Subirana, H., et al. Single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory surgery setting: A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. J Minim Access Surg. 17 (3), 311-317 (2021).
  22. Um, M. H., et al. Completion of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the modified Konyang standard method. Surg Endosc. 36 (7), 4992-5001 (2022).
  23. Nguyen, Q. T., Tsien, R. Y. Fluorescence-guided surgery with live molecular navigation--a new cutting edge. Nat Rev Cancer. 13 (9), 653-662 (2013).
  24. Pimentel, T., et al. Indocyanine green fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 181, 109149(2025).
  25. van den Bos, J., et al. Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FALCON): an international multicentre randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 37 (6), 4574-4584 (2023).
  26. Fortuna, L., et al. Indocyanine Green and Hepatobiliary Surgery: An Overview of the Current Literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 34 (10), 921-931 (2024).
  27. Ortenzi, M., et al. Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons with different cholangiographic techniques (SCOTCH): a prospective non-randomized trial on the impact of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainees. Surg Endosc. 38 (2), 1045-1058 (2024).
  28. Zhan, F., et al. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with indocyanine green: A propensity score study. J Minim Access Surg. , (2025).
  29. Meillat, H., et al. Do height and weight affect the feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 29 (12), 3594-3599 (2015).
  30. Yilmaz, H., Alptekin, H., Acar, F., Calisir, A., Sahin, M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients. Obes Surg. 24 (1), 123-127 (2014).
  31. Lee, S. J., et al. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea. J Minim Invasive Surg. 26 (4), 180-189 (2023).
  32. Park, H. J., et al. The real-world application of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Surg. 12 (12), 1254-1257 (2014).
  33. Sato, N., et al. Preoperative factors predicting the need for additional ports during single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 9 (3), 192-197 (2016).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Laparoscopic CholecystectomySingle Incision TechniqueFluorescence GuidanceMinimally Invasive SurgerySingle Port SurgeryBiliary Tract VisualizationElectrocautery HookSurgical Learning CurveOperative Time ReductionPostoperative Pain
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles