Review Article

Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Risk Assessment of Transfusion Adverse Reactions: A Scikit-learn-Based Review

DOI:

10.3791/69658

January 20th, 2026

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This review examines the potential of the scikit-learn machine learning library for predicting transfusion adverse reactions. It outlines a data-driven framework to improve risk assessment, address limitations of conventional approaches, and support the development of precision transfusion medicine.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Transfusion adverse reactions (TARs) encompass undesirable effects occurring during or after blood transfusion, resulting from the administration of blood, blood products, or transfusion-associated materials. These reactions may cause mild to severe clinical manifestations, including allergic reactions, hemolysis, and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). Current conventional approaches -- such as ABO/Rh blood group matching and massive transfusion protocols -- can improve patient outcomes but fail to address complex patient-specific factors. Consequently, developing a dedicated TAR risk model is essential. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can leverage large-scale clinical and laboratory datasets to construct diagnostic and prognostic models, advancing personalized and precision medicine. Notably, the scikit-learn (SK-learn) ML algorithmhas not yet been directly applied to TAR risk assessment; nevertheless, its efficacy in constructing similar medical risk prediction models has gained significant recognition. This review presents an ML-based framework for predicting and preventing TAR, with a specific emphasis on the role of SK-learn across diverse clinical contexts. Our analysis lays the groundwork for future precision diagnosis of TAR and the development of SK-learn algorithms. Crucially, our synthesis of the literature indicates that sklearn offers a versatile and powerful toolkit for this task; however, its successful translation into clinical practice is contingent upon overcoming key challenges, including multi-center data heterogeneity and the need for robust model interpretability.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Blood transfusion is a life-saving intervention used in various clinical contexts, including trauma care, surgical procedures, obstetric emergencies, oncological treatments, and the management of chronic hematological disorders1,2. Despite significant therapeutic benefits, transfusions may cause various adverse events, collectively termed Transfusion Adverse Reactions (TARs)3,4. TAR represents a multifactorial condition with manifestations ranging from mild allergic reactions to severe complications. The most frequent reactions include febrile non-hemo....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Review and Perspective

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Overview of TAR
Pathogenesis of TAR
TAR encompasses a diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations and pathophysiological mechanisms (Table I). These reactions are primarily categorized into immune-mediated and nonimmune-mediated subtypes7,9,18,19. Immune-mediated reactions typically involve antigen-antibody interactions, leading to hemolysis or systemic inflammatory responses. A representative example is ABO incompatibility, which can trigger acute hemolytic transfusion ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Conclusions

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

figure-results-1
Figure 1: Illustration of TAR categories and the current risk assessment model combined with potential strategies of SK-learn in TAR risk assessment. (A) TAR can be divided into two types: immune-mediated reactions and nonimmune-mediated reactions. (B) Current risk assessment models targeting TAR. (C) Hypothesis.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This work was supported by the Luzhou Science and Technology Bureau, No. 2024JYJ034, Title: Effects of Irradiation and Storage Time on Extracellular Vesicles in Platelet Concentrates.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Tanhehco, Y. C. Red blood cell transfusion. Clin Lab Med. 41 (4), 611-619 (2021).
  2. Albright, C. M., Spillane, T. E., Hughes, B. L., Rouse, D. J. A regression model for prediction of cesarean-associated blood transfusion. Am J Perinatol. 36 (9), 879-885 (2019).
  3. Abdallah, R., Ra....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Transfusion Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningRisk AssessmentPrecision MedicineScikit LearnBlood TransfusionClinical Prediction ModelsModel InterpretabilityMedical Risk PredictionData Heterogeneity

Related Articles