$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
M protein-related disorders are characterized by the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M protein) in the serum and/or urine. These proteins are typically secreted by clonal plasma cells or B lymphocytes and are primarily associated with malignant plasma cell dyscrasias or benign monoclonal gammopathies1,2. The clinical spectrum of these conditions includes monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), solitary plasmacytoma (SPC), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), multiple myeloma (MM), plasma cell leukemia (PCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), systemic light-chain amyloidosis (AL), B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD)3. A retrospective study conducted in Spain reported that among these conditions, MGUS is the most prevalent, accounting for 54.1% of cases, followed by MM (31.3%) and other malignant gammopathies (14.6%)4. It is also important to note that M protein may also be produced in response to certain non-neoplastic conditions, such as nephrotic syndrome5.
M protein testing plays a critical role in the diagnosis and monitoring of M protein-related disorders6. However, early diagnosis remains a clinical challenge, as patients with MM are often asymptomatic in the initial stages, leading to delayed diagnosis at a relatively advanced phase of the disease. Approximately 1% of individuals with MGUS progress to a malignant condition annually-most commonly to MM, WM, or SPC7. Although nearly all MM cases are believed to evolve from MGUS, fewer than 10% of MM patients have a documented history of prior MGUS diagnosis. Consequently, timely identification of M protein in serum and/or urine can provide valuable clues for early diagnosis of these disorders, which is crucial for improving patient survival and prognosis. Research indicates that patients with MGUS identified through active screening experience fewer complications than those diagnosed incidentally8. During therapeutic monitoring, information regarding the isotype and electrophoretic migration pattern of the M protein is essential to distinguish between recurrence of the original monoclonal protein and the emergence of oligoclonal bands or a secondary reactive M protein9. The appearance of a new M protein, often observed following autologous stem cell transplantation, is generally regarded as a favorable prognostic indicator for most patients10. Consistent with this observation, comparative survival data indicate that patients who develop a secondary M protein exhibit a median overall survival of 115.3 months, in contrast to 31.0 months among those who do not11.
Protein electrophoresis is a highly sophisticated analytical technique. A range of methods is available for detecting serum M protein, including serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), IFE, capillary electrophoresis immunotyping (IT), free light chain (FLC) assay, heavy and light chain (HLC) detection, and mass spectrometry (MS). Each approach offers distinct advantages while also facing inherent limitations. SPE can be further subdivided into agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) and CE. AGE, which uses an agarose-based medium, is a simple, cost-effective method suitable for rapid separation and analysis. However, it is limited by relatively low sensitivity, with a typical detection limit of 0.3-0.5 g/L12, which may result in failure to detect small-volume or low-concentration M proteins. Furthermore, the technique is susceptible to band bending and deformation, which compromises reproducibility.
IFE is widely recognized as the gold standard for M protein typing. Following initial electrophoresis, specific antibodies (anti-IgG, anti-IgA, anti-IgM, κ, λ) are applied to form immunoprecipitated bands, enabling the identification of immunoglobulin type and light-chain subtype. IFE can detect M protein at concentrations as low as 0.05-0.15 g/L, providing a sensitivity more than 10 times that of SPE. Despite this advantage, specialized pretreatment is required for certain samples, such as those containing M protein polymers, to ensure dissociation with β-mercaptoethanol. Inadequate treatment may lead to misleading results. Additionally, patients undergoing novel combination therapies (e.g., regimens containing daratumumab, bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide/lenalidomide) may yield false‑positive IFE findings13. A key limitation of IFE is that it provides only qualitative results, as it cannot quantify M protein levels and is therefore unsuitable for monitoring therapeutic efficacy14. Among treated patients, IFE results may remain positive even as M protein concentration declines during successful treatment.
In contrast, IT employs capillary buffers as the separation medium, offering higher resolution than conventional IFE. Nevertheless, the process requires laborious sample pretreatment steps, such as antiserum mixing, which prolongs the overall detection workflow. FLCs, which are immunoglobulin light chains (κ and λ) not bound to heavy chains, are directly quantified in serum using antibodies targeting their "hidden zone" epitopes, providing high sensitivity for detecting light chain-related disorders with a detection limit as low as 10–30 mg/L. In MM, elevated serum FLC levels correlate with tumor burden and allow for earlier assessment of treatment response, owing to their shorter half-life compared to intact immunoglobulins15. However, its clinical application should be combined with other diagnostic methods, such as electrophoresis, to rule out other conditions and ensure a comprehensive evaluation. For example, impaired renal function may lead to falsely elevated light-chain levels. HLC assays represent another quantitative approach that uses antibodies targeting epitopes on both the constant and light chains of immunoglobulin. This design allows for the separate quantification of isotype-specific immunoglobulin pairings (e.g., IgGκ and IgGλ), and the derived HLC ratio serves as a sensitive indicator of clonality. However, the results may be influenced by background polyclonal immunoglobulin levels, and the method may be less reliable when analyzing complex M-protein variants. MS offers exceptional sensitivity and enables in-depth proteomic characterization for M proteins. However, its application is constrained by high equipment costs, lengthy analytical procedures, and specialized expertise required for data interpretation.
CE is a powerful analytical separation technique that employs elastic fused-silica capillaries as separation channels and a high-voltage direct electric field as the driving force. It delivers high-resolution separation by leveraging differences in the electrophoretic mobility and/or partitioning behavior of target analytes. Since its inception, the technology has progressed from single-capillary configurations to high-throughput capillary arrays and miniaturized microfluidic devices. Its applications now span diverse fields, including pharmaceutical analysis, biomedical and clinical diagnostics, food safety testing, and biotherapeutic characterization16,17. CE is increasingly recognized as a crucial tool for the screening and quantitative analysis of M proteins. It determines the percentage of M protein relative to total protein, which can then be multiplied by the total protein concentration to calculate absolute M protein levels. Most notably, its minimal sample requirement makes it particularly suitable for analyzing precious or volume-limited specimens.
CE offers three key technical advantages. Firstly, its high analytical sensitivity (0.1–0.5 g/L) enables the effective detection of low-concentration M proteins, thereby reducing the risk of misdiagnosis in conditions such as MGUS and light-chain diseases. Secondly, the fully automated workflow eliminates the subjective interpretation errors inherent in traditional gel-based staining methods. Finally, the assay time is significantly reduced to 15–20 min, markedly shorter than the 60–90 min required for conventional electrophoresis. As a pivotal analytical technique between zone electrophoresis and liquid chromatography, CE performs electrophoretic separation in a free solution. Under an applied electric field, protein molecules are primarily separated by electroosmotic flow within an alkaline buffer at a specific pH. Following dilution with a dedicated buffer, samples are injected at the capillary anode under high voltage to initiate rapid, efficient protein separation, and then detected at the cathode at 200 nm. After each analytical cycle, the capillaries undergo automated cleaning and buffer replenishment to process subsequent samples. Protein separation occurs in the following order: gamma-globulin, beta-2-globulin, beta-1-globulin, alpha-2-globulin, alpha-1-globulin, and albumin, enabling the identification of abnormalities in one or more serum protein fractions. Notably, CE provides enhanced resolution within the beta region, distinctly separating it into beta-1 and beta-2 globulin components, thereby delivering more detailed clinical information18. Driven by the integration of artificial intelligence and ongoing advancements in multi-parameter detection, CE is poised to evolve into a first-line screening modality for M protein detection. Therefore, this protocol describes the use of capillary electrophoresis for the rapid detection, localization, and quantitative analysis of serum monoclonal proteins in clinical samples.