$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
All bibliographical data used in this study were retrieved from publicly available databases (Web of Science Core Collection). This research did not involve human participants or animal subjects; therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this analysis.
Data acquisition and search strategy
Relevant studies on the genetic and immunological mechanisms of osteomyelitis were retrieved from online bibliographic databases (see Table of Materials), specifically the Science Citation Index Expanded and the Social Sciences Citation Index, which are widely used in bibliometric research. The database was selected due to its comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed literature and high accuracy in journal classification16,17. The search strategy employed the Topic (TS) field, which encompasses the Title, Abstract, Author Keywords, and Keywords Plus. The keywords used were as follows: TS = (Osteomyelitis OR Osteomyelitides) and TS = (immune* OR "T cell" OR "B CELL" OR "NK CELL" OR neutrophil OR macrophage OR "Treg Cell"). All English-language original articles and reviews indexed from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2024, were included. While the search period covered research through the end of 2024, the final data export was performed on April 15, 2025, to ensure that all late-indexed publications from the 2024 period were captured. No automated screening tools were used. Bibliometric data were exported in "plain text" format, including full records and cited references. Two researchers independently conducted the search, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. All data utilized in this study were obtained from publicly available databases; therefore, ethical approval was not required for this analysis.
Data cataloging and standardization
Spreadsheet software (refer to Table of Materials) was used to catalog essential information, including titles, affiliations, publication sources (journals or books), authors, references, subject categories, and keywords. During processing, data cleaning was performed by standardizing keyword synonyms (e.g., merging "S. aureus" and "Staphylococcus aureus") and consolidating institutional names. This standardization ensures that the analytical software correctly identifies collaborative links and thematic clusters without redundancy.
Software-based bibliometric analysis
Bibliometric analysis was performed using a combination of specialized visualization and statistical tools. Bibliometric visualization VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) (refer to Table of Materials) was used to generate collaborative networks among countries and institutions. For these visualizations, a minimum threshold (e.g., 5 or 10 publications per node) was set to maintain clarity in the graphical representation. Bibliometric visualization CiteSpace (version 6.2.R2) (refer to Table of Materials) was utilized for reference co-citation and keyword burst analysis. The time slicing was set to 1 year per slice for the 35-year study period. The selection criteria utilized the g-index with a scale factor of k = 25. To identify research hotspots, the citation-burst sensitivity (gamma) was set to 0.7, and the minimum burst duration was set to 2 years. Statistical software (refer to Table of Materials) was used to evaluate publication trends and disciplinary distributions, while bibliometric analysis software (refer to Table of Materials) was used to evaluate citation frequencies. A knowledge synthesis approach was applied to integrate and summarize the key thematic terms identified18. All statistical procedures were independently performed by two researchers, with disagreements resolved through discussion to ensure accurate replication of the findings.