$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) represents an aberrant communication between the pleural space and the bronchial system. Surgical interventions, particularly lobectomy and pneumonectomy, constitute the predominant etiological factors, with reported incidence rates of 0.4% and 1.9% respectively1 and case-fatality rates ranging from 18% to 50%2. Additional pathogenic contributors include infection, secondary to chemotherapy or radiotherapy-related impairments in lung cancer, refractory spontaneous pneumothorax, and, less frequently, mycobacterial tuberculosis infection3. Early detection and effective management of the fistula are the critical determinants of prognosis.
The management of BPF encompasses three principal therapeutic modalities: conservative management, which generally applied in post-lobectomy bronchopleural fistulas with small residual cavities and decreasing air leaks4 by avoiding surgery, whereas post-pneumonectomy fistulas exhibit substantially lower closure rates (approximately 30%)5,6; Surgical repair is the primary treatment for post-pneumonectomy BPFs >8 mm7,8, achieving anatomical closure9,10, but risks include flap dehiscence, recurrent fistula formation, thoracic cage deformity, and significant cardiopulmonary compromise in patients with preexisting functional limitations; Lastly, endobronchial occlusion has emerged as a minimally invasive paradigm for peripheral fistulas originating from subsegmental bronchiolar or alveolar sources11, utilizing bronchoscopic modalities such as deployable stents, embolization coils and bioadhesive sealant. These techniques demonstrate clinical efficacy in fistulas <8 mm or high-risk surgical candidates, while some studies suggest clinical efficacy in fistulas <8 mm12, the optimal size threshold remains debated. In this approach, fistulas ≤5 mm are specifically targeted for petrolatum gauze occlusion, as smaller fistulas are more amenable to complete sealing with this technique. This cutoff is consistent with the inclusion criteria used in the retrospective study. Stent placement, while effective for fistulas >3 mm, is associated with a risk of migration. In one study, dislocation occurred in 2 of 6 patients (33%) with covered metallic stents12. Other bronchoscopic techniques, such as coil embolization and Amplatzer devices, have been reported for BPF closure. Coils are primarily used for small fistulas (<5 mm) but carry a risk of displacement, particularly during coughing, and often require adjunctive use of occlusive agents. Amplatzer devices, though originally designed for cardiac defects, have been used off-label for BPF closure with reported success rates up to 95%, but their effectiveness depends on correct sizing, and complications such as device displacement, infection, and airway obstruction have been documented13. Bioadhesive sealants such as fibrin glue have been used for BPF closure, but may require multiple applications in complex cases, particularly when infection is present14. This study demonstrated a novel interventional technique, petrolatum gauze occlusion, designed to achieve reliable fistula closure through bronchoscopic deployment. This method was developed to address the limitations of existing endobronchial approaches (e.g., material migration, inflammatory reactions, and costs) by leveraging the unique properties of petrolatum gauze: its mechanical stability, hydrophobic anti-adhesion surface, and biocompatibility enable atraumatic, cost-effective sealing of small-to-moderate bronchial defects while minimizing tissue irritation12,15.