$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
KLIF offers a distinct alternative to conventional fusion techniques. Based on our comprehensive reviews10,11, the KLIF procedure offers four distinct advantages compared to other fusion surgeries.
Minimally Invasive Cage Insertion
The use of a specialized open square cannula (8 mm x 10 mm) allows for cage insertion through a small skin incision (approximately 12–15 mm). This minimizes muscle damage compared to other fusion techniques10,12.
Avoidance of Major Visceral Complications
Unlike Anterior LIF (ALIF), XLIF, and OLIF, which require careful navigation around major vessels, the ureter, or the bowel, the KLIF corridor is devoid of these intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal organs10,12. The ENR is the primary concern, which is visualized and protected throughout the procedure.
Reduced Risk of Hematoma and Dural Injury
Conventional TLIF or PLIF often necessitates laminectomy or total facetectomy, which can increase the risk of postoperative hematoma or dural tears13. Since KLIF does not require such extensive bony resection, these risks are significantly minimized8,10. Consequently, the use of a postoperative suction drain is generally unnecessary (drain-free).
Lower Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rate
Minimally invasive approaches are expected to reduce surgical site infection (SSI) rates by limiting tissue exposure and dead space. A systematic review by Parker et al. compared minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) to open TLIF and demonstrated a significantly lower cumulative incidence of SSI (0.6% vs. 4.0%)14. In our systematic review11 and other reported KLIF series (e.g., Nagahama et al6., Nakamura et al7.), no SSIs were observed, suggesting that full-endoscopic KLIF may further reduce infection risks. These findings indicate a potential reduction in infection risk, although further comparative studies are required.
Additionally, this technique facilitates reproducible execution of key procedural steps, including controlled foraminoplasty and systematic screw locking sequences, which contribute to the observed clinical advantages in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis15. This protocol may be modified based on patient anatomy, such as adjusting the entry angle or extent of foraminoplasty in cases with severe foraminal stenosis. Compared to conventional TLIF and OLIF techniques, KLIF provides a more direct and tissue-sparing approach, although it may require higher technical expertise and specialized training.
Anatomically, this technique is distinct from conventional TLIF, which typically requires facetectomy that exposes the dural sac as the medial boundary. This method represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive spine surgery by enabling safe interbody fusion through a fully endoscopic approach while preserving anatomical structures. In contrast, KLIF preserves the facet joint structure to a greater degree (only partial resection) and accesses the disc via Kambin's triangle, where the medial wall comprises the SAP and dural sac. Therefore, the nomenclature "Trans-Kambin Triangle LIF" is anatomically more accurate than "Endoscopic TLIF"8,9,12. Although the fundamental concept of trans-Kambin triangle endoscopic fusion has been introduced in the literature under various names (e.g., PETLIF, PELIF), the current protocol differs from previously reported techniques in several key aspects. First, KLIF explicitly defines the extent of bony resection as partial ventral foraminoplasty only, thereby preserving the dorsal facet joint structure, which distinguishes it from facet-sacrificing approaches. Second, the protocol incorporates a specific screw locking sequence tailored to the direction of vertebral slippage, enabling simultaneous decompression and reduction. Third, the use of an expandable cage inserted through an open square cannula via a strictly defined 12 mm safety aperture represents a standardized, reproducible workflow not fully described in earlier reports. These procedural distinctions are intended to address the lack of standardization in the field and to provide surgeons with a clearly defined, step-by-step protocol suitable for adoption. This method is particularly suitable for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and preserved disc space requiring minimally invasive fusion.
The success of this procedure relies on the establishment of a 12 mm safety aperture16. The most critical steps of this protocol include precise identification of Kambin’s triangle, controlled foraminoplasty to achieve a 12 mm safety aperture, and careful protection of the ENR during cage insertion. Enlarging Kambin's triangle to at least 12 mm via foraminoplasty is critical to accommodate the cage without compressing the ENR. Our results, showing only one transient nerve irritation in the early learning curve and none in subsequent cases, support the safety of this protocol when strictly followed. If inadequate visualization or nerve irritation occurs, repositioning of the working cannula and further controlled foraminoplasty may be required to safely expand the working corridor. In such cases, reposition the cannula, increase foraminoplasty width, and reassess under direct endoscopic visualization before proceeding.
Limitations include a steep learning curve typical of endoscopic surgery. Additional limitations include restricted visualization in cases of severe anatomical distortion, limited applicability in high-grade spondylolisthesis, and dependence on fluoroscopic guidance, which may increase radiation exposure. Surgeons should master basic endoscopic decompression before attempting KLIF. Additionally, short-term outcomes in this representative case were favorable; however, larger studies are required to confirm long-term efficacy.
In conclusion, KLIF is a minimally invasive technique that enables safe and effective lumbar interbody fusion through a structured, reproducible protocol. This protocol provides a structured approach for performing KLIF with reproducible procedural steps. Its success depends on adherence to critical procedural steps, including precise access through Kambin’s triangle and maintenance of the safety aperture. With further refinement and broader clinical validation, this method has the potential to expand its role in minimally invasive spine surgery. Future applications of this technique may include its adaptation for multi-level fusion procedures and integration with navigation or robotic-assisted systems to further improve accuracy and safety.