This study developed and preliminarily validated a rat model of delayed wound healing under high-altitude hypobaric hypoxia conditions.
Research Article
This study developed and preliminarily validated a rat model of delayed wound healing under high-altitude hypobaric hypoxia conditions.
High-altitude hypobaric conditions may cause prolonged wound hypoxia and impaired healing, yet standardized models remain scarce. In this study, we developed a wound delayed healing model and preliminarily validated it by simulating high-altitude hypoxia using a controlled hypobaric system. Rats were housed at simulated altitudes of 3000 m (air pressure: 70.1 kPa, partial oxygen pressure: 14.7 kPa) to 8000 m (air pressure: 35.6 kPa, partial oxygen pressure: 7.5 kPa) to determine safety thresholds, with oxidative stress and skin hypoxia assessed. Results showed increased mortality risk at simulated 6000 m altitude, with tolerance observed below 5000 m. Elevated altitudes were associated with worsening oxidative stress and increased skin hypoxia; exhibited altitude-dependent delays in wound healing, reduced perfusion, suppressed collagen remodeling, and exacerbated inflammatory responses. Despite upregulation of vascular regenerative factors, microvascular density decreased. Overall, this study developed and preliminarily validated a rat model suitable for investigating mechanisms and interventions in high-altitude hypoxia-induced chronic wounds.
Skin wound repair presents a widespread and significant clinical challenge. From acute trauma to various types of non-healing wounds, these conditions impose a persistent burden on healthcare systems and patients' quality of life1,2,3,4,5,6. Wound healing is not a singular event but a highly coordinated, overlapping multistage process: inflammatory cells, stromal cells, keratinocytes, and the microvascular system collectively rebuild barriers and remodel tissues under the joint regulation of the extracellular matrix and diverse signaling networks7,8,9,10. Given the energy-intensive nature of repair and its extreme sensitivity to the internal environment, alterations in systemic metabolism and physiological states—such as heightened oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, and impaired microcirculatory perfusion—can disrupt the normal repair cascade at multiple points, leading to prolonged inflammation, inadequate regeneration, and abnormal remodeling9,11,12,13,14,15.
Oxygen supply is a key factor limiting wound repair processes, participating in energy metabolism and cell migration/proliferation while also modulating angiogenesis and inflammatory responses through hypoxia signaling pathways16,17,18. Transient hypoxia in the early wound phase stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor and initiates adaptive repair programs. However, when hypoxia becomes excessive or persistent, although angiogenesis signals may be compensatorily upregulated, they may fail to translate into effective microvascular reconstruction. Meanwhile, macrophage phenotype switching and inflammatory regression become more prone to imbalance, forming a vicious cycle of "hypoxia-inflammation-revascularization deficiency"19,20,21,22. This is particularly relevant in high-altitude environments: reduced atmospheric pressure lowers inspired oxygen partial pressure, inducing persistent hypoxia that heightens risks of impaired wound healing and infection-related complications23,24,25,26.
Exposure to high altitudes triggers a marked hypoxic stress response in humans27. High-altitude environments can lead to persistent tissue hypoxia, inadequate perfusion, and inflammatory responses at wound sites28. These pathophysiological changes may impair the healing process by promoting excessive reactive oxygen species, activating proteases, and inducing cellular senescence, while simultaneously disrupting the function of mesenchymal stem cells29,30. Studies directly evaluating the effects of high-altitude exposure on human skin wound healing remain limited. Therefore, the use of hypobaric hypoxic animal models can help validate the impact of altitude-related factors on wound repair.
Previous animal models at fixed altitudes have reported delayed wound healing; however, the altitude-dependent effects, the safety threshold for prolonged exposure to hypobaric conditions, and direct evidence of local skin hypoxia remain unclear26. Furthermore, there is a lack of systematic assessment of healing impairments, which has limited research into the underlying mechanisms and the identification of potential intervention targets31. In this study, we developed and preliminarily validated a skin wound model based on a hypobaric control system to simulate high-altitude hypobaric hypoxia under controlled conditions. Employing a graded simulated altitude exposure strategy, we first defined the safety margins for sustained hypobaric exposure and assessed the biological effects of hypobaric hypoxia through systemic indicators. Crucially, we further validated in vivo that the hypobaric environment indeed caused localized skin oxygen supply limitation. Subsequently, we demonstrated that sustained hypobaric hypoxia delays wound closure in an altitude-dependent manner, accompanied by histological alterations and key pathway abnormalities. Overall, this study developed and preliminarily validated an animal model platform for chronic wounds associated with high-altitude hypoxia, enabling mechanism elucidation and systematic evaluation of subsequent therapeutic strategies32.
All experimental procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the ethics committees of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (No. 106142025091534170) and the Army Medical University (No. AMUWEC20265509). The graphical workflow for the experimental design and analysis involved in this study is shown in Figure 1. Additionally, the reagents and equipment employed in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
Experimental animals and ethical statement
This study utilized male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, purchased from Chengdu Dashuo Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., China. All animals underwent a 7-day acclimatization period under standard conditions prior to experimentation.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Animal inclusion criteria were as follows: male SD rats, 6 to 8 weeks of age, body weight 200–250 g, appearing healthy and exhibiting normal behavior, and free of skin lesions or infections.
Animal exclusion criteria were as follows: wounds showing obvious infection following wound modeling; wounds with non-standard healing or lacerations; death during the experiment or accidental death due to anesthesia.
Data point exclusion criteria were as follows: wound images with extensive scabbing, hair obstruction, or uneven illumination; laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) images showing motion artifacts; tissue sections exhibiting obvious wrinkles, fragmentation, or missing target areas; serum samples showing obvious hemolysis; Immunofluorescence (IF) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) images with overexposure or incorrect antibody localization
Handling of exclusions:
For all excluded animals or data points, valid data were re-obtained through supplementary experiments to ensure that the final valid sample size for each group was N ≥ 3 for all endpoint analyses.
Hypobaric control system and simulated high-altitude hypoxia environment
The simulated high-altitude hypoxic environment was established using a hypobaric control system. This system allows precise regulation of cabin air pressure to reproduce atmospheric pressure corresponding to different altitudes, thereby lowering ambient oxygen partial pressure and inducing controlled hypoxic exposure (Figure 2A).
Cabin pressure was adjusted to simulate altitudes of 3000 m, 4000 m, 5000 m, 6000 m, 7000 m, and 8000 m, with detailed parameters provided in Table 1. Throughout the experiment, SD rats were housed in groups according to their experimental allocation. During cabin operation, internal pressure, temperature, and humidity were continuously monitored to ensure that, apart from pressure, all environmental conditions remained comparable to those of standard laboratory housing. The housing environment maintained a temperature of 22–24 °C, relative humidity of 50%–60%, a 12-h light/dark cycle, and provided free access to standard chow and drinking water.
Safety assessment of hypobaric exposure and survival analysis
To evaluate the safety margins for sustained hypobaric exposure, rats were individually numbered and randomly assigned to experimental groups using a computer-generated random number sequence (the RAND function in Excel). The allocation was performed by an investigator not involved in subsequent animal care, data collection, or outcome assessment. Based on reference animal studies involving exposure to high-altitude gradients, the sample size for each group was set at 1233. Rats were divided into a normoxic control group (500 m above sea level) and simulated altitude groups at 3000 m, 4000 m, 5000 m, 6000 m, 7000 m, and 8000 m. Rats in each group were continuously housed in their respective environments for 30 days. Every 2 days, the hypobaric control system is briefly restored to sea-level conditions for 30 min to allow for cage cleaning and the provision of food and water. During decompression and recompression, the rate of pressure variation is maintained at approximately 300 m/min to minimize the risk of barotrauma. During this period, the general condition of all rats and any mortality events were observed and recorded daily. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival differences between groups.
Detection of serum oxidative stress-related markers
On day 21 of hypobaric exposure, venous blood samples were collected from rats under anesthesia. After standing at room temperature, serum was separated by centrifugation (1,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C) and stored at -80 °C for subsequent use. Serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were measured using corresponding assay kits.
Assessment of hypoxic conditions in skin tissue
The hypoxia detection kit was used to assess hypoxia in skin tissue. In brief, on days 4 and 7 of hypobaric exposure, rats were intraperitoneally injected with pimozide (60 mg/kg); the rats were euthanized 1 h after injection, and skin tissue from the back was collected for analysis. The detailed euthanasia procedure is as follows: According to the American Veterinary Medical Association's guidelines on euthanasia, the animal was placed in an induction chamber and induced anesthesia using oxygen containing 4–5% isoflurane. Once the animal has lost consciousness, the isoflurane concentration is reduced to 2–3% and maintained for at least 10 min. Before performing cervical dislocation as a confirmatory method, it must be confirmed that the heartbeat and breathing have ceased. Tissue samples were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C for subsequent use. Sections were prepared using a cryostat microtome. IF staining was performed to label hypoxic regions within the tissue.
All fluorescence images were acquired using an automated slide scanner. The fluorescence parameters settings were as follows: DAPI (excitation wavelength 365 nm ± 10 nm, emission wavelength 440 nm ± 40 nm), Cy3 (excitation wavelength 542–566 nm, emission wavelength 579–611 nm), and Cy5 (excitation wavelength 628 nm, emission wavelength 692 nm). Hypoxia signals were quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ software.
Full-thickness skin wound model in rats
To assess alterations in skin wound healing under sustained hypobaric conditions, rats were first grouped and acclimated to their respective environments before wound modeling. Rats were individually numbered and randomly assigned to either the normoxic control group or the hypobaric exposure groups simulating altitudes of 3000 m, 4000 m, and 5000 m using a computer-generated random number sequence (the RAND function in Excel). The randomization was performed by an investigator who was not involved in the subsequent wound creation, postoperative care, or outcome assessment. The detailed parameters for each group are as follows: the normoxic control group was located at 500 m above sea level (atmospheric pressure: 101 kPa, partial oxygen pressure: 21 kPa); the 3000 m group (70.1 kPa, 14.7 kPa); the 4000 m group (61.6 kPa, 13.1 kPa); and the 5000 m group (54 kPa, 11.3 kPa).
After the 7-day adaptation period, SD rats were anesthetized and maintained under anesthesia via inhalation of 2% isoflurane. Simultaneously, a local infiltration injection of 5% lidocaine containing epinephrine (dilution ratio: 1:100,000) is administered to the marked surgical site to provide perioperative analgesia and hemostasis. Using a biopsy punch (with a 10-mm-diameter circular blade at the base), create a skin incision. Press the biopsy punch against the rat's dorsal skin, then gently rotate it so that the circular blade gradually cuts through the skin until it reaches the superficial subcutaneous fascia. Upon removing the biopsy punch, a regular circular skin incision approximately 10 mm in diameter will be formed.
Following wound creation, rats in each group were returned to and maintained within their original environments until the experimental endpoint, ensuring that the entire wound healing process proceeded under the predetermined oxygen conditions.
Macroassessment of wound healing process
Photographs of the wound were taken at days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 post-wound formation under uniform lighting and consistent imaging distance. Wound area was measured using Image J. Briefly, wound images obtained at each time point were imported into Image J, calibrated according to the scale bar, and the wound margins were manually outlined to determine the wound area34. Wound healing was calculated as follows: Wound healing (%) = (Initial wound area − Current wound area)/Initial wound area × 100%.
Assessment of wound microcirculation
On the 7th day of wound healing, microcirculatory blood perfusion in the wound area was evaluated using an LSCI system. Prior to the examination, rats were anesthetized via inhalation with 2% isoflurane and secured to a temperature-controlled operating table to maintain body temperature. The dorsal wound area was fully exposed, and the laser speckle probe was positioned vertically approximately 20 cm above the wound. The probe power was set to 110 mW, the sampling frequency to 30 Hz, and the exposure time to 3 seconds. Under dark conditions, acquire a blood flow perfusion pseudocolor image of the wound area. Use the LSCI software to manually outline the wound area on the blood flow perfusion pseudocolor image; the software will then automatically calculate the blood flow perfusion value for that area over a 3-s period (in arbitrary units [A.U.]). Finally, export the perfusion values to an appropriate software for plotting.
Histological staining and collagen remodeling analysis
Animals were euthanized at designated time points, and intact wound and surrounding skin tissues were harvested, fixed, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE): used to evaluate wound width, re-epithelialization extent, and regenerated epidermal thickness; Masson's trichrome staining: used to assess collagen fiber deposition and calculate collagen volume fraction; Sirius red staining: used to distinguish collagen type I (COL I) and collagen type III (COL III) under polarized light microscopy and calculate the COL I/COL III ratio.
Immunohistochemical staining
Paraffin sections underwent dewaxing, rehydration, and antigen retrieval before IHC or IF staining. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by the addition of corresponding secondary antibodies. Specific antibody information and corresponding dilution are provided in the Table of Materials. IHC sections were developed with DAB, while IF sections used fluorescent secondary antibodies with DAPI counterstaining for nuclei35,36. All images were acquired under identical conditions and quantified using ImageJ software.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism software. For comparisons among multiple groups at a single time point, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied, and when a significant overall difference was detected, Tukey's multiple comparison test was used for subsequent intergroup analyses. For wound healing data assessed across multiple time points, two-way ANOVA was performed with treatment group and time included as independent factors to evaluate main effects as well as their interaction. Post-hoc analyses were likewise conducted using Tukey's multiple comparison test. To further assess the statistical power, a post-hoc power analysis was conducted in the G*Power software based on the primary endpoint (wound healing at day 14).
Survival analysis employed the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves, with log-rank tests used to compare survival differences between groups. For pairwise comparisons among multiple groups, the Bonferroni correction was applied to control the risk of Type I errors from multiple comparisons. All statistical tests were two-tailed, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
All outcome assessments, including wound area measurements, histological and immunohistochemical quantitative analyses, and LSCI analyses, were performed by a single investigator who was blinded to the study group assignments.
Validation of safety margins for persistent hypoxia induced by low pressure
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated a gradual downward shift in survival curves as simulated altitude increased, with mortality events first observed in the 6000 m group (Figure 2B). Pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction revealed no statistically significant differences in survival rates between the control group and the 6000 m to 8000 m groups. By day 30, the final survival rates for the control group, 3000 m group, 4000 m group, 5000 m group, 6000 m group, 7000 m group, and 8000 m group were 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 83.33%, 75.00%, and 58.33%, respectively. No significant survival risk increase was observed in rats exposed to simulated altitudes ≤5000 m during 30-day exposure. Based on these survival data, the upper experimental limit for subsequent studies was defined. An altitude of 5000 m was selected as a relatively safe threshold because no deaths occurred at this altitude or below, whereas higher altitudes (≥6000 m) pose a significant risk of death, which would compromise the follow-up study on wound healing. From a biological perspective, 5000 m (oxygen partial pressure ≈ 11.3 kPa) represents a reliable, sustained level of hypobaric hypoxia sufficient to induce delayed wound healing without causing severe hypoxic mortality26,31.
Detection and validation of hypoxia-related markers
On day 21 of hypobaric exposure (3000 m to 5000 m), serum SOD, MDA, and LDH levels were measured. With increasing simulated altitude, SOD activity exhibited a significant decreasing trend (Figure 2C), whereas MDA and LDH levels increased progressively (Figure 2D,E). Body weight gain rates declined gradually with increasing altitude (Figure 2F).
IF detection of pimonidazole adducts in dorsal skin on days 4 and 7 demonstrated progressively increased hypoxia signal intensity in the 3000 m, 4000 m, and 5000 m groups compared with normoxia (Figure 2G,H). Quantitative analysis of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) confirmed a significant altitude-dependent increase (Figure 2I,J).
Wound healing progress under hypobaric exposure
Full-thickness dorsal wounds (10 mm diameter) were created and monitored for 14 days. By day 14, the normoxic group achieved near-complete closure with a mean healing rate of 93.80%. Wound healing decreased progressively in the 3000 m (81.51%), 4000 m (69.85%), and 5000 m (49.61%) groups (Figure 3A,B). LSCI on day 7 showed the highest perfusion in the normoxic group, with progressive reductions in perfusion in the 3000 m, 4000 m, and 5000 m groups (Figure 3C,D).
Histopathological analysis of wound tissue
H&E staining showed reduced wound width, continuous regenerated epithelium, and organized structure in the normoxic group. In contrast, hypobaric groups displayed increased wound width, discontinuous neoepidermis, and visible exudate in the 4000 m and 5000 m groups (Figure 3E). Quantitative analysis confirmed progressive deterioration in wound width, re-epithelialization percentage, and neoepidermal thickness with increasing altitude (Figure 3F–H). Masson's trichrome staining demonstrated densely arranged collagen fibers in the normoxic group (collagen volume fraction ≈88.73%). Collagen volume fractions declined to 77.76%, 68.73%, and 64.91% in the 3000 m, 4000 m, and 5000 m groups, respectively (Figure 3I,J). Sirius red staining revealed progressive reduction in COL I signal intensity and an increase in COL III signal intensity with rising altitude (Figure 3K). The COL I/COL III ratio decreased from 4.98 (normoxia) to 2.40, 1.51, and 0.72 in the 3000 m, 4000 m, and 5000 m groups, respectively (Figure 3L).
Inflammatory response in wound tissue
On day 4 post-injury, cluster of differentiation 206 (CD206) expression decreased progressively with altitude, whereas cluster of differentiation 86 (CD86) expression increased (Figure 4A–C). The CD206/CD86 MFI ratio showed a significant altitude-dependent reduction (Figure 4D). IHC indicators are quantified by average optical density (AOD). IHC analysis revealed increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) expression with increasing altitude (Figure 4E–G), while interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression declined progressively (Figure 4E,H).
Wound revascularization
On day 7, analysis of wound tissue harvested from the wound bed revealed that hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression increased progressively with simulated altitude (Figure 5A–C). However, cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31)-positive microvessel density decreased progressively with altitude (Figure 5A,D).
Analysis of wound re-epithelialization
Cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression decreased progressively with increasing altitude (Figure 6A,B). Similarly, marker of proliferation Ki-67 (Ki-67)–positive keratinocytes were markedly reduced in the hypobaric groups compared with normoxia, with progressive decline as altitude increased (Figure 6A,C).
DATA AVAILABILITY:
All data generated or analyzed during this study have been provided in Supplementary File 1.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the overall experimental design and research approach for studying wound healing in rats under simulated gradient high-altitude hypoxia conditions using a hypobaric control system. Using a hypobaric system to simulate hypoxic states at varying altitudes, this study systematically evaluates the effects of sustained hypoxia on physiological parameters, tissue hypoxia levels, and wound healing processes in rats within a safety window determined through animal screening. Potential mechanisms underlying delayed healing are explored through histological, immunohistochemical, and perfusion analyses. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Exploration of the safety range for high-altitude hypoxia and assessment of oxidative stress and tissue hypoxia. (A) Hypobaric control system used to simulate high-altitude exposure. (B) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for rats exposed to different simulated altitudes over 30 days; N = 12. (C–E) Levels of oxidative stress-related biomarkers at different simulated altitudes: (C) SOD, (D) LDH, and (E) MDA. (F) Body weight variation during the 21-day exposure period. (G, H) Representative Hypoxyprobe IF images of skin tissue sections collected on day 4 (G) and day 7 (H) post-exposure: Hypoxyprobe (red) and DAPI (cell nuclei, blue). (I, J) Hypoxyprobe quantitative analysis corresponding to (G) and (H), respectively (N = 3). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Effects of different simulated altitudes on skin wound healing and histological evaluation. (A) Representative images of wounds in the control group and different simulated altitude groups. (B) Quantitative analysis of wound healing over time; N = 3. (C) Representative LSCI thermograms showing blood perfusion in the wound and surrounding areas. (D) Blood perfusion signals within 3 seconds for each group. (E) Representative H&E-stained tissue images of the wound. Dashed arrows indicate wound width; dashed rectangular boxes mark enlarged local regions. (F–H) Quantitative analysis based on H&E staining: wound width (F), re-epithelialization percentage (G), and epidermal thickness (H); N = 3. (I) Representative Masson trichrome staining image; dashed rectangular box indicates magnified local image. (J) Quantitative analysis of collagen volume fraction in Masson trichrome staining; N = 3. (K) Representative Sirius red staining (polarized light) image for distinguishing COL I and COL III. (L) Quantitative analysis of COL I/COL III ratio; N = 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Changes in macrophage polarization and inflammatory cytokine expression under different simulated altitude conditions. (A) Representative IF images of wound tissue sections showing CD206 (green), CD86 (red), and DAPI staining for cell nuclei (blue). (B–D) Quantitative analysis of MFI for CD206 (B), CD86 (C), and the CD206/CD86 ratio (D); N = 3. (E) Representative IHC images illustrating the expression of inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10, with brown staining indicating positive signals. (F–H) Quantitative analysis of IHC-positive signals for TNF-α (F), IL-1β (G), and IL-10 (H); N = 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Variations in tissue hypoxia, angiogenesis-related factors, and endothelial cell markers under different simulated altitudes. (A) Representative IF and IHC images of wound tissue sections collected from the wound: HIF-1α (green), VEGF-A (red), and DAPI (nuclei, blue), along with CD31 (brown for positive signal). (B, C) Quantitative analysis of MFI for HIF-1α (B) and VEGFA (C); N = 3. (D) AOD quantification of CD31 positive signals; N = 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Keratin expression and cell proliferation capacity in skin tissue under different simulated altitude conditions. (A) Representative IHC images of skin tissue sections: CK19 and Ki-67 staining (brown indicates positive signal); dashed lines delineate the epidermal-dermal junction. (B) AOD quantitative analysis of CK19 positive signals; N = 3. (C) AOD quantitative analysis of Ki-67 positive signals; N = 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Hypobaric hypoxia control system parameters | ||||||
| No. | Simulated Altitude (Meters) | Air pressure (kPa) | Oxygen partial pressure (kPa) | Pressure range of negative-pressure controller | Cabin Negative Pressure (MPa) | |
| Lower limit (kPa) | Upper limit (kPa) | |||||
| 1 | 3000 | 70.1 | 14.7 | -31.2 | -36.2 | 0.031 |
| 2 | 4000 | 61.6 | 13.1 | -39.7 | -44.7 | 0.04 |
| 3 | 5000 | 54 | 11.3 | -47.3 | -52.3 | 0.047 |
| 4 | 6000 | 47.2 | 9.9 | -54.1 | -59.1 | 0.054 |
| 5 | 7000 | 41.1 | 8.7 | -60.2 | -65.2 | 0.06 |
| 6 | 8000 | 35.6 | 7.5 | -65.7 | -70.7 | 0.066 |
Table 1: Parameters of the hypoxic control system for simulating different altitude gradients.
Supplementary File 1: Data supporting the findings of this study.Please click here to download this file.
High-altitude conditions impair the wound healing process by inducing tissue hypoxia, reduced blood perfusion, and inflammatory responses, which in turn promote excessive production of reactive oxygen species, protease activation, cellular senescence, and dysfunction of mesenchymal stem cells27,28,29,30. Given the current limitations in human research on the effects of high altitude, the development of standardized animal models mimicking high-altitude hypoxia is highly significant.
Survival analysis demonstrated that continuous exposure up to 5000 m for 30 days did not significantly increase mortality risk, whereas higher altitudes produced cumulative survival hazards. Deaths in the group simulated at altitudes ≥6000 m were concentrated primarily in the first few days. This may be related to high altitude illness23,37,38, which typically occurs within a few days of reaching high altitudes38,39,40. Its mechanisms are associated with severe hypoxemia, acute cardiopulmonary decompensation, pulmonary edema, or cerebral edema, which can lead to death38,39. Animals that survived the initial days may have developed a certain level of hypoxic adaptation, thereby reducing the risk of subsequent mortality41,42. Importantly, future research will need to include hematocrit tests or systematic autopsies to determine the specific cause of death.
Biochemical analyses revealed progressive oxidative stress, as evidenced by reduced SOD activity and elevated MDA and LDH levels. Oxidative stress is widely recognized as a central pathological feature of high-altitude hypoxia–induced tissue injury17,43,44. The altitude-dependent increase in skin hypoxia further confirms sustained restriction of local oxygen supply under hypobaric conditions45,46. Functionally, hypobaric exposure significantly delayed wound closure in a dose-dependent manner. Previous studies have shown that hypoxic environments impair skin repair16,30,47, particularly through disruption of microcirculation restoration48,49. Our perfusion data support this mechanism, demonstrating progressive reduction in wound blood supply.
Histologically, impaired re-epithelialization and disrupted collagen remodeling were prominent under sustained hypoxia. The marked reduction in the COL I/COL III ratio suggests delayed matrix maturation7,50,51, consistent with pathological features of chronic wounds. These structural abnormalities likely compromise the mechanical stability of repaired tissue. Inflammatory profiling revealed a polarization shift toward the pro-inflammatory phenotype, with elevated TNF-α and IL-1β and reduced IL-10 expression. Despite upregulation of HIF-1α and VEGFA signaling under hypobaric exposure, effective neovascular reconstruction was not achieved; this supports a correlation, but further studies—such as pathway validation, rescue experiments, or inhibitor/agonist studies—are needed to establish a mechanistic causality. Keratinocyte-associated markers CK19 and Ki-67 were progressively suppressed under hypobaric conditions, suggesting impaired keratinocyte activation and proliferation. Persistent inflammation and insufficient reperfusion are known to inhibit re-epithelialization52,53, consistent with reduced regenerative keratinocyte populations54,55,56,57,58.
Limitations should be acknowledged. Only male SD rats were used; sex-related differences were not evaluated. Notably, unlike mice, rats have limited physiological adaptability to chronic hypoxia, including an inability to initiate a metabolic downregulation response59,60. Rats' relative vulnerability to hypoxia may result in more pronounced impairments in wound healing28,29,30. Therefore, future research is needed to clarify the pathophysiological differences among animal models in wound healing at high altitudes. In addition, a post-hoc statistical power analysis based on the primary outcome measure (wound healing at day 14) indicated a significant effect size. However, due to the small sample size, this estimate of the effect size should be interpreted with caution, and its robustness requires validation in larger-scale studies.
Overall, this study developed and preliminarily validated a rat model suitable for investigating the mechanisms underlying chronic wounds caused by high-altitude hypoxia and testing potential interventions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, UESTC (ZYGX2025YGLH006); Health Science Research Project of Sichuan Province (2025-205); Natural Science Foundation of Shigatse, Tibet, China (RKZ2024ZR-003).
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automated slide scanner | Olympus | VS200 | Tissue Section Scanning |
| Bovine serum albumin (BSA) | Servicebio | GC305010 | Blocking reagent for IHC/IF |
| CD206 antibody | Proteintech | 18704-1-AP | Detection of M2 macrophages (Dilution 1:200) |
| CD31 antibody | Abcam | ab182981 | Detection of microvessel density (Dilution 1:800) |
| CD86 antibody | HuaBio | ER1906-01 | Detection of M1 macrophages (Dilution 1:200) |
| CK19 antibody | HuaBio | ET1601-6 | Evaluation of re-epithelialization (Dilution 1:200) |
| DAB Substrate Kit | ZSGB-BIO | ZLI-9018 | Chromogenic substrate for IHC staining |
| FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG | Servicebio | GB22303 | Fluorescent secondary antibody for IF (Dilution 1:100) |
| G*Power | University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany | www.gpower.hhu.de | Calculation of Statistical Power |
| GraphPad Prism software | GraphPad Software | https://www.graphpad.com/ | Statistical analysis and graph generation |
| Hematoxylin staining solution | J&K Scientific | LM10N13 | H&E staining |
| HIF-1α antibody | Bioss | BS-0737R | Detection of hypoxia-related signaling (Dilution 1:100) |
| HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG | Servicebio | GB23303 | Secondary antibody for IHC (Dilution 1:100) |
| Hypobaric control system | Shanghai Yuyan Instruments Co., Ltd. | LP-1500 | Used to simulate graded high-altitude hypobaric hypoxia |
| Hypoxyprobe-1 Kit | Hypoxyprobe Inc. | HP1-100 | Used for in vivo hypoxia detection |
| IF555 Tyramide signal amplification kit | Servicebio | G1233 | Used for enhanced fluorescence signal amplification |
| IL-10 antibody | HuaBio | HA722032 | Detection of anti-inflammatory cytokine (Dilution 1:100) |
| IL-1β antibody | HuaBio | HA723965 | Detection of pro-inflammatory cytokine (Dilution 1:100) |
| ImageJ software | National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA | https://imagej.net/ij/download.html | Image quantification |
| Isoflurane | RWD Life Science Co., Ltd. | R510-22-16 | |
| Ki-67 antibody | HuaBio | HA721115 | Detection of keratinocyte proliferation (Dilution 1:400) |
| Laser speckle blood flow imaging system | RWD Life Science Co., Ltd. | RFLSI ZW | Assessment of blood perfusion |
| LDH Assay Kit | Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute | A005-1-2 | Serum LDH measurement |
| Masson’s trichrome staining kit | Servicebio | G1006-100ML | Collagen deposition analysis |
| MDA assay kit | Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute | A003-1-1 | Lipid peroxidation assessment |
| Sirius red staining kit | Servicebio | G1078-100ML | Collagen I/III differentiation |
| SOD assay kit | Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute | A001-1-1 | Serum SOD activity measurement |
| TNF-α antibody | HuaBio | ER65189 | Detection of pro-inflammatory cytokine (Dilution 1:200) |
| VEGF-A antibody | HuaBio | ET1604-28 | Detection of angiogenesis-related signaling (Dilution 1:200) |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission