$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Cleaning of hypertension datasets
To ensure the reliability of subsequent analyses, datasets GSE75360 and GSE74144 were first subjected to probe annotation and data normalization using the R package limma. The distributions of gene expression values before and after normalization are shown in Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S1A-D, with orange representing hypertension samples and blue representing control samples.
For GSE75360: Before normalization (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S1A), the expression value ranges of hypertension and control samples showed obvious discrepancies, with inconsistent median and quartile distributions among samples, indicating significant batch effects or technical variation. After normalization (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S1B), the expression value distributions of all samples were highly aligned—medians and quartile ranges of hypertension and control groups overlapped substantially, and the overall data dispersion was reduced, confirming effective elimination of non-biological variation.
For GSE74144: Pre-normalization (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S1C), samples exhibited heterogeneous expression patterns, with partial hypertension samples showing abnormally high or low expression values relative to controls, and poor data consistency between groups. Post normalization (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S1D), the expression profiles of hypertension and control samples were homogenized—inter-sample differences were minimized, and the data conformed to the assumptions of subsequent differential expression analysis and machine learning modeling.
Hypertension-related renin-angiotensin differentially expressed genes
GSE75360 samples were separated into hypertension and control groups, and limma was used to test for expression differences between groups. A total of 173 genes met the |logFC| > 0.45 and p < 0.05 thresholds, including 26 upregulated and 147 downregulated genes. These differential expression results were visualized in a volcano plot (Figure 2A), where RAS-related upregulated and downregulated DEGs were annotated.
To obtain RASRDEGs, the intersections of all DEGs with |logFC| > 0.45 and p < 0.05 and RASRGs were identified, and a Venn diagram was plotted (Figure 2B). A total of 18 RASRDEGs were identified, namely: AUTS2, IFNG, MTHFR, LRP1, FCER1G, CYBB, FURIN, CTSD, CST3, TBXAS1, HMOX1, EHBP1L1, ITGA2B, PPBP, VAMP2, DLG4, DNM2, and TNFRSF1A. Based on the intersection results, we analyzed expression differences in RASRDEGs across different sample groups in the GSE75360 dataset. A heatmap was plotted to present the findings using the R package pheatmap (Figure 2C). Finally, the R package RCircos was employed to analyze the localization of the 18 RASRDEGs on human chromosomes, generating a chromosomal localization map (Figure 2D). The chromosome localization map shows that many RASRDEGs are located on chromosome 12 and chromosome 17, with IFNG, LRP1, and TNFRSF1A located on chromosome 12, and ITGA2B, VAMP2, and DLG4. located on chromosome 17.
Validation of differentially expressed genes and ROC curve profiling
To explore the differential expression of RASRDEGs between hypertensive and control samples in the GSE75360 dataset, a group comparison plot (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S2A) presents the analysis results of expression levels for 18 RASRDEGs across hypertensive and control samples. The differential results indicate (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S2A) that RASRDEGs AUTS2, CST3, CTSD, CYBB, EHBP1L1, FCER1G, FURIN, HMOX1, ITGA2B, LRP1, MTHFR, PPBP, TBXAS1, and VAMP2 show statistical significance between the hypertension and control groups. Next, using the R package pROC, ROC curves were plotted based on the expression levels of statistically significant RASRDEGs within the GSE75360 dataset. The ROC curves (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S2B-E) show that the expression levels of 14 RASRDEGs with significant differences are moderately accurate (0.7 < AUC < 0.9) in classifying hypertension and control samples. Finally, we calculated the correlations among the 18 RASRDEGs and plotted a correlation heatmap to display the results (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S2F). The results indicate that MTHFR, LRP1, FCER1G, CYBB, FURIN, CTSD, CST3, TBXAS1, HMOX1, EHBP1L1, ITGA2B, PPBP, VAMP2, DLG4, DNM2, and TNFRSF1A, among the 18 RASRDEGs, mainly show positive correlations with other genes, while IFNG and AUTS2. mainly show negative correlations.
Enrichment analysis of GO and KEGG
Using GO/KEGG enrichment analyses, we characterized the functional profiles of the 18 RASRDEGs in hypertension, examining their involvement in BP, CC, MF, and key pathways. Using these 18 RASRDEGs for GO/KEGG enrichment analysis, the specific results of these analyses are shown in Supplemental Table S1. The results show that these 18 RASRDEGs are primarily involved in BP such as antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigens via MHC class II, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and other related processes in hypertension; CC such as tertiary granules, endosomal vesicle membranes, endosomal vesicles, and secretory granule membranes; and MF such as heme binding, porphyrin binding, amyloid beta binding, flavin adenine dinucleotide binding, and peptide binding. KEGG pathway analysis revealed their significant involvement in several key biological pathways, including fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis, tuberculosis, HIF-1 signaling pathway, sphingolipid signaling pathway, and platelet activation. The GO/KEGG enrichment results were visualized using bubble plots (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S3A). Simultaneously, network diagrams of BP, CC, MF, and biological pathways were drawn based on the GO/KEGG enrichment analysis results (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S3B-E). The lines indicate the annotations of molecules and their corresponding entries, with larger nodes indicating more molecules included in the entry.
GSEA
To investigate transcriptome-wide pathway patterns associated with hypertension in GSE75360, preranked GSEA was performed using the ranked gene list, and the significant results are summarized in Supplemental Table S2. The enrichment plots are shown in Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S4A-E. The results highlighted predominantly immune- and inflammation-related signatures, including an overview of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic mediators (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S4B), immune infiltration in pancreatic cancer (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S4C), IL26 signaling pathway (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S4D), and development and heterogeneity of the ILC family (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S4E). These findings support that the hypertension-associated transcriptomic changes identified in this study are linked mainly to immune and inflammatory pathway activity rather than to a single isolated signaling process.
Construction of diagnostic models
Based on the 18 RASRDEGs and two machine learning algorithms, key genes for hypertension were further selected. In the logistic model, the number of genes with p < 0.05 was 8, namely: LRP1, CTSD, MTHFR, AUTS2, FURIN, CST3, FCER1G, and TBXAS1, which were visualized using a forest plot (Figure 3A). In the RF algorithm, the top 15 important genes were selected, namely: LRP1, FCER1G, FURIN, MTHFR, EHBP1L1, CYBB, ITGA2B, VAMP2, PPBP, AUTS2, CST3, CTSD, IFNG, TBXAS1, and TNFRSF1A, visualized using a MeanDecreaseGini scatter plot (Figure 3B). Finally, the intersection of the genes selected by the two machine learning algorithms yielded 8 key genes: LRP1, CTSD, MTHFR, AUTS2, FURIN, CST3, FCER1G, and TBXAS1. (Figure 3C).
Validation of hypertension diagnostic models
First, the R package pROC was used to plot ROC curves based on the predicted probabilities from the logistic regression model in the discovery dataset GSE75360. The ROC curve indicates (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S5A) that the logistic regression model has high discrimination (AUC > 0.9) in classifying hypertension and control samples. The linear predicted value (η) in the logistic regression model is calculated using the following formula:


Next, to evaluate the calibration and discriminatory capability of the hypertension diagnostic model, a calibration curve was plotted. By fitting actual probabilities to model-predicted probabilities under varying conditions, the concordance between model predictions and actual outcomes was assessed (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S5B). The model's calibration curve demonstrated a high degree of alignment between the dotted calibration line and the diagonal line of an ideal model. The hypertension diagnostic model constructed using key genes from the GSE75360 dataset underwent decision curve analysis to evaluate its potential clinical utility, with results presented in Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S5C. Analysis indicates that within a specific range, the model curve consistently and stably outperforms both the all-positive and all-negative curves. Furthermore, the model demonstrates favorable net benefit within the analyzed threshold range.
To further illustrate the value of the hypertension diagnostic model, a nomogram was plotted based on the key genes to display their interrelationships in dataset GSE75360 (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S5D). The results indicate that the expression level of the key gene TBXAS1 significantly contributes to the utility of the hypertension diagnostic model, whereas the expression level of MTHFR contributes less.
External evaluation of the hypertension diagnostic model
First, the ROC curve was plotted based on the predicted probabilities of logistic regression in the GSE74144 dataset using the R package pROC. The ROC curve indicates (Figure 4A) that the logistic regression model has moderate discriminatory ability (0.7 < AUC < 0.9) in classifying hypertension samples and control samples. The linear predictor (η) in a logistic regression model is calculated as follows:


Next, to evaluate the calibration and discriminatory capability of the hypertension diagnostic model, the calibration curve was plotted via calibration analysis. Based on the fitting results between actual probabilities and model-predicted probabilities in different conditions, the model's predictive performance was assessed against the alignment with actual outcomes (Figure 4B). The calibration curve for this hypertension diagnosis model indicates that the dashed calibration line deviates slightly from the ideal diagonal. The potential clinical utility of the hypertension diagnostic model based on key genes in the GSE74144 dataset was assessed through DCA and results were presented (Figure 4C). Results indicate that the model curve remains stable within a specific range and consistently exceeds all positive and negative reference lines, yielding net benefit within the analyzed threshold range.
Therefore, the model should be interpreted as a candidate transcriptomic classifier evaluated within the analyzed public cohorts, rather than as a clinically validated diagnostic tool.
To further evaluate the diagnostic model for hypertension, a nomogram was plotted on the basis of key genes to illustrate the interrelationships among these genes within the GSE74144 dataset (Figure 4D). The results indicate that the expression level of the key gene MTHFR contributes more substantially to the performance of the hypertension diagnostic model than other variables, whereas the expression level of LRP1 .offers comparatively less utility.
Single-Gene GSEA
To investigate the pathways associated with the 8 key genes in the GSE75360 dataset, single-gene GSEA was performed after stratifying samples into high- and low-expression groups for each key gene. The enrichment plots are shown in Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S6A-D and Supplemental Figure S7A-D. Overall, multiple key genes were associated with recurrent immune- and inflammation-related signatures. AUTS2, CTSD, FCER1G, and FURIN were linked to signatures such as Wilcox Response to Progesterone Up, Mili Pseudopodia Haptotaxis Up, Li Wilms Tumor Vs Fetal Kidney 1 Up, and Blanco Melo Bronchial Epithelial Cells Influenza A Infection Dn (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S6A,C,D and Supplemental Figure S7A). CST3, LRP1, and TBXAS1 were enriched mainly in inflammatory and immune-regulatory pathways, including Interleukin 10 Signaling, Lian Neutrophil Granule Constituents, Medicus Reference CXCR GNB G PI3K AKT Signaling Pathway, WP IL26 Signaling Pathway, and Overview of Proinflammatory and Profibrotic Mediators (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S6B and Supplemental Figure S7B,D). MTHFR showed downregulation of several response-related signatures together with enrichment of Selenoamino Acid Metabolism (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S7C).
CIBERSORT
CIBERSORT estimated the relative abundance of 22 immune cell types in GSE75360. The immune cell composition of each sample is shown in Figure 5A. Correlations among immune cell types in hypertensive samples are displayed in Figure 5B. The strongest positive correlation was observed between macrophage M2 cells and activated dendritic cells (r = 0.450, p < 0.05), whereas the strongest negative correlation was observed between CD8+ T cells and monocytes (r = -0.582, p < 0.05). Gene-immune cell correlations with p < 0.05 are shown in Figure 5C. CST3 had the strongest positive correlation with monocytes (r = 0.609, p < 0.05), while FURIN had the strongest negative correlation with macrophage M2 cells (r = -0.445, p < 0.05).
PPI network
First, the STRING database was utilized to construct a PPI network for eight key genes. (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S8A). The results of the PPI network indicate that 7 key genes are related, namely: CST3, CTSD, LRP1, FCER1G, MTHFR, FURIN, and TBXAS1. Subsequently, a network comprising seven key interacting genes and their similar functional counterparts was predicted and built through the GeneMANIA website (Supplemental File 1—Supplemental Figure S8B). Lines of varying colors represent co-expression, sharing of protein domains, and other information. This network encompasses seven key genes and twenty similar functional proteins.
Construction of regulatory networks
Predicted regulatory networks were constructed for the hub genes. StarBase identified miRNAs associated with the hub genes, and these interactions were visualized as an mRNA-miRNA network in Cytoscape (Figure 6A). The network included three hub genes and 37 miRNAs, with details in Supplemental File 2. ChIPBase was used to identify transcription factors binding to hub genes, and the mRNA-TF network was visualized in Cytoscape (Figure 6B). This network contained seven hub genes and 47 TFs, with details in Supplemental File 2. CTD was then used to identify potential hub gene-associated drugs or compounds, and Cytoscape was used to display the resulting mRNA-drug network (Figure 6C), which included three hub genes and 18 drugs or compounds.
Experimental validation of candidate genes in Ang II-induced HUVECs
To extend the transcriptomic findings to an endothelial experimental model, HUVECs were stimulated with Ang II (100 nM) for 48 h to establish a hypertension-related endothelial injury model (Figure 7A). qRT-PCR was first performed to validate the expression of the eight candidate genes selected by machine learning. Compared with control cells, Ang II-treated HUVECs showed increased mRNA expression of LRP1, CTSD, MTHFR, FURIN, CST3, FCER1G, and TBXAS1., whereas AUTS2 showed a non-significant upward trend (Figure 7B). Among these genes, CST3 exhibited a marked increase after Ang II stimulation.
To further validate candidate genes at the protein level, western blotting was performed for CST3, FURIN, and TBXAS1. Consistent with the qRT-PCR results, Ang II treatment increased the protein expression levels of CST3, FURIN, and TBXAS1 in HUVECs (Figure 7C). Because CST3 is a secreted protein, ELISA analysis was additionally performed, and it was confirmed that Ang II increased CST3 secretion in the culture supernatant (Figure 7C). These results support the reliability of the transcriptomic screening results and indicate that CST3, FURIN, and TBXAS1 are responsive to Ang II-induced endothelial stimulation.
Because CST3 and FURIN were selected for subsequent functional experiments, their knockdown and overexpression efficiencies were verified before phenotype assays. qRT-PCR and western blotting showed that si-CST3 and si-FURIN markedly reduced CST3 and FURIN expression compared with si-NC, whereas oe-CST3 and oe-FURIN significantly increased CST3 and FURIN expression compared with oe-NC (Figure 7D). These results confirmed successful construction of CST3 and FURIN loss- and gain-of-function models in HUVECs.
Effects of CST3 and FURIN modulation on Ang II-induced endothelial phenotypes
Functional experiments were then performed to evaluate whether CST3 and FURIN participate in Ang II-induced endothelial changes. CCK-8 analysis showed that Ang II-treated si-NC cells displayed a progressive increase in OD450 over time. CST3 knockdown or FURIN knockdown reduced the Ang II-enhanced viability/proliferation signal at later time points, indicating that both genes participate in the proliferative/viability response of HUVECs under Ang II stimulation. FURIN overexpression also altered the CCK-8 time-course response, suggesting that FURIN may regulate Ang II-induced endothelial viability in a context-dependent manner (Figure 8A).
Transwell migration assays showed that Ang II markedly increased the number of migrated HUVECs compared with control cells. Knockdown of CST3 or FURIN significantly decreased Ang II-induced migration, whereas overexpression of CST3 or FURIN increased migration relative to the corresponding knockdown conditions (Figure 8B). These data indicate that CST3 and FURIN are involved in Ang II-induced endothelial migratory responses.
We next assessed inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial function markers. Ang II stimulation increased the expression of inflammatory and adhesion-related markers, including IL-6, TNF-α, VCAM1, and ICAM1, and enhanced ROS accumulation, while reducing eNOS expression and NO levels. Knockdown of CST3 or FURIN attenuated Ang II-induced increases in IL-6, TNF-α, VCAM1, ICAM1, and ROS and partially restored eNOS/NO-related endothelial functional readouts. In contrast, CST3 or FURIN overexpression generally enhanced migratory and inflammatory/oxidative phenotypes compared with the corresponding knockdown groups, although eNOS and NO readouts also increased in the overexpression conditions (Figure 8C). Together, these experiments suggest that CST3 and FURIN are functionally associated with Ang II-induced endothelial activation, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial functional changes, while the directionality of some endothelial function readouts requires further mechanistic clarification.
DATA AVAILABILITY:
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article and supplemental files.

Figure 1. Flowchart of comprehensive analysis. This flowchart summarizes the overall study design, including RAS-related gene curation, identification of RAS-related differentially expressed genes, functional enrichment analysis, immune infiltration analysis, protein-protein interaction and regulatory network construction, machine learning-based feature selection, and construction and external testing of the candidate diagnostic model for hypertension. Abbreviations: RASRGs = Renin-Angiotensin System-related genes; RASRDEGs = Renin-Angiotensin System-related differentially expressed genes; RF = random forest. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Differential gene expression analysis. (A) Volcanogram of DEGs between hypertensive and control samples in the GSE75360 dataset. (B) Venn diagram of DEGs and RASRGs in dataset GSE75360. (C) Heatmap of RASRDEGs in dataset GSE75360. (D) Chromosome localization map of RASRDEGs. These results show that a subset of hypertension-associated DEGs overlaps with RAS-related genes and that these genes display distinct expression patterns and chromosomal distribution. Orange represents hypertension samples, blue represents control samples. Within the thermal map, the red indicates high expression, while the blue denotes low expression. Abbreviations: DEGs = differentially expressed genes; RASRGs = Renin-Angiotensin System-related genes; RASRDEGs = Renin-Angiotensin System-related differentially expressed genes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Selection of key genes for hypertension through machine learning. (A) Forest plot of the 18 RASRDEGs included in the logistic regression model for hypertension diagnosis. (B) MeanDecreaseGini scatter plot in the RF algorithm. (C) Venn diagram of the intersection of genes selected by the two machine learning algorithms. These analyses support the selection of eight candidate genes for subsequent model construction. Abbreviations: RF = random forest. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. External validation of the candidate hypertension diagnostic model in GSE74144. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curve of the logistic regression model in the independent dataset GSE74144. (B) Calibration curve of the candidate diagnostic model in GSE74144. (C) Decision curve analysis of the candidate diagnostic model in GSE74144. (D) Nomogram of the candidate diagnostic model in GSE74144. These results show that the eight-gene candidate diagnostic model retained moderate discriminatory ability and acceptable calibration/net benefit in an independent external cohort. Abbreviations: DCA = decision curve analysis; ROC = receiver operating characteristic. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. Immune cell infiltration profiling of the GSE75360 dataset via the CIBERSORT algorithm. (A) Bar chart showing the proportion of immune cells in the GSE75360 dataset. (B) Correlation heatmap of immune cells in the GSE75360 dataset. (C) Correlation bubble chart of immune cell infiltration abundance and key genes in the GSE75360 dataset. These analyses show that the hypertension-associated transcriptomic signature is accompanied by variation in immune cell composition and gene–immune cell correlations. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. Hub gene regulatory network. (A) mRNA-miRNA regulatory network. (B) mRNA-TF regulatory network. (C) mRNA-drug regulatory network. These predicted networks are hypothesis-generating resources for possible upstream regulators and downstream drug associations of the hub genes. Orange indicates mRNA, purple indicates miRNA, blue indicates TF, and pink indicates drugs. Abbreviation: TF = transcription factor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7. Experimental validation of candidate genes and CST3/FURIN intervention efficiency in Ang II-induced HUVECs. (A) Schematic diagram of the Ang II-induced hypertension-related endothelial cell model and experimental intervention design. HUVECs were treated with Ang II (100 nM) and harvested after 48 h. si-NC, si-CST3, oe-NC, oe-CST3, si-FURIN, and oe-FURIN were used for gene intervention experiments. (B) qRT-PCR validation of eight candidate genes in control and Ang II-treated HUVECs. (C) Western blot validation of CST3, FURIN, and TBXAS1 protein expression and ELISA detection of secreted CST3. (D) qRT-PCR and western blot confirmation of CST3 and FURIN knockdown/overexpression efficiency. Data are presented as mean ± SD. ns, P > 0.05; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control or si-NC; &&&P < 0.001 vs oe-NC, as indicated. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8. Functional effects of CST3 and FURIN modulation in Ang II-induced HUVECs. (A) CCK-8 assay showing cell viability/proliferation at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after CST3 or FURIN knockdown/overexpression under Ang II stimulation. (B) Quantification of migrated cells per field using the Transwell assay. (C) Detection of inflammation-, oxidative stress-, and endothelial function-related markers, including IL-6, TNF-α, VCAM1, ICAM1, eNOS, NO, and ROS. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs Ang II + si-NC; &P < 0.05, &&P < 0.01, &&&P < 0.001 vs Ang II + si-CST3 or Ang II + si-FURIN, as indicated. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| GSE75360 | GSE74144 |
| Platform | GPL10588 | GPL13497 |
| Species | Homo sapiens | Homo sapiens |
| Tissue | Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell | white blood cells |
| Samples in Hypertension group | 10 | 14 |
| Samples in Control group | 11 | 8 |
| Reference | PMID: 27779208 | |
Table 1: GEO microarray chip information.
Supplemental File 1. Supplementary figures supporting transcriptomic analysis and candidate model evaluation. This file presents supplementary analyses for dataset normalization, RAS-related differentially expressed genes (RASRDEGs), enrichment results, gene set enrichment analysis, model evaluation, and hub-gene network assessment. Figure S1 shows expression distributions in GSE75360 and GSE74144 before and after normalization. Figure S2 summarizes group-level expression differences, ROC curves, and correlation patterns for the 18 RASRDEGs in GSE75360. Figure S3 presents GO and KEGG enrichment analyses of the 18 RASRDEGs. Figure S4 shows preranked GSEA results from the ranked GSE75360 transcriptome, highlighting immune- and inflammation-related signatures. Figure S5 presents internal evaluation of the eight-gene candidate diagnostic model in GSE75360, including ROC, calibration, decision curve analysis, and nomogram results. Figures S6 and S7 show single-gene GSEA results for the eight key genes, and Figure S8 presents STRING and GeneMANIA analyses of hub-gene protein-protein interaction and functional association networks.Please click here to download this file.
Supplemental File 2. Supplemental datasets supporting RAS gene curation and regulatory network construction. This file provides the curated renin-angiotensin system-related gene list used for intersection analysis and the predicted regulatory interaction datasets used to construct the mRNA-miRNA, mRNA-transcription factor, and mRNA-drug networks for the hub genes.Please click here to download this file.
Supplemental Table S1. GO and KEGG enrichment results for the 18 RASRDEGs. This table lists the significantly enriched GO biological process, cellular component, molecular function, and KEGG pathway terms identified from the 18 RASRDEGs. Enrichment significance was assessed using the hypergeometric test with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment. Abbreviations: GO = Gene Ontology; BP = Biological Process; CC = Cellular Component; KEGG = Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes。Please click here to download this file.
Supplemental Table S2. Results of GSEA for Datasets GSE75360. This table summarizes the significant gene sets identified by preranked GSEA of the ranked transcriptome in GSE75360, including set size, enrichment score, normalized enrichment score (NES), nominal P value, adjusted P value, and q value.Please click here to download this file.