$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
XTT inhibited NO and PGE₂ production in LPS- or TNF-α-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages
To determine whether the anti-inflammatory effects of XTT were independent of cytotoxicity, RAW264.7 cell viability was assessed following XTT treatment in the presence or absence of LPS. No appreciable reduction in cell viability was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 8 µM, indicating that the compound was well tolerated under the experimental conditions (Figure 1). Based on these findings, concentrations of 2–8 µM were selected for subsequent analyses.
Stimulation with LPS markedly increased the accumulation of NO and PGE₂ in the culture medium. Pretreatment with XTT attenuated both responses in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas it had little effect on unstimulated cells. A similar reduction in NO production was observed when RAW264.7 cells were challenged with TNF-α. In addition, morphological examination revealed a transition from the resting rounded phenotype to an activated morphology characterized by increased spreading and pseudopodia formation following LPS exposure15. These changes were noticeably reduced in cells treated with XTT (Figure 1), supporting its ability to suppress macrophage activation.

Figure 1: XTT suppressed NO and PGE₂ synthesis and attenuated morphological changes in LPS- or TNF-α-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. (A) Chemical structure of XTT. (B) RAW264.7 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of XTT for 24 h in the presence or absence of LPS (0.5 µg/mL), and cell viability was assessed using a CCK-8 assay. (C–E) RAW264.7 cells were pre-incubated with XTT (2, 4, and 8 µM) or BAY 11-7082 (10 µM) for 2 h prior to stimulation with LPS (0.5 µg/mL) or TNF-α (15 ng/mL) for 24 h. NO and PGE₂ levels in the culture medium were measured via the Griess assay and ELISA, respectively. (F) Morphological changes in RAW264.7 cells following incubation with XTT and LPS were visualized under an optical microscope. Scale bar = 40 µm. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versusthe LPS-treated group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
XTT suppressed the mRNA and protein expression of iNOS and COX2 in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells
To further explore the molecular mechanism underlying the anti-inflammatory properties of XTT, the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) was examined in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. XTT treatment at 2, 4, and 8 µM significantly reduced LPS-triggered mRNA expression of iNOS and COX2 (Figure 2).

Figure 2: XTT downregulated the transcript and protein levels of iNOS and COX2 in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were pre-incubated with the indicated concentrations of XTT or BAY 11-7082 (10 µM) for 2 h prior to LPS stimulation (0.5 µg/mL) for 24 h. (A, B) Transcript levels of iNOS and COX2 were assessed via qRT-PCR using GAPDH as the internal reference. (C, D) Protein levels of iNOS and COX2 were detected viaWestern blotting. GAPDH served as the loading control. Representative blots from three independent experiments are shown, and densitometric analyses of iNOS and COX2 normalized to GAPDH are presented. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the LPS-treated group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Treatment with XTT attenuated these increases in a concentration-dependent manner, with the strongest effect observed at 8 µM. The magnitude of inhibition was comparable to that produced by BAY 11-7082. These observations indicate that reduced NO and PGE₂ production is associated with suppression of iNOS and COX2 expression.
XTT decreased the mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells
To further characterize the anti-inflammatory profile of XTT, transcript levels of representative pro-inflammatory cytokines were evaluated. LPS stimulation strongly induced TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages. Pretreatment with XTT significantly attenuated the induction of all three cytokines in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3).
At the highest concentration tested, the inhibitory activity of XTT was comparable to or greater than that produced by BAY 11-7082. The broad reduction in cytokine expression further supports the ability of XTT to limit inflammatory activation in macrophages.

Figure 3: XTT downregulated the transcript levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Effects of XTT on TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA expression in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. (A–C) Transcript levels were determined by qRT-PCR. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus LPS alone. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
XTT did not alter MAPK signaling activation in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells
To clarify whether the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway contributes to the anti-inflammatory properties of XTT, the phosphorylation status of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p38 MAPK, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) was assessed via Western blotting.
LPS challenge markedly elevated the phosphorylation of ERK, p38 MAPK, and JNK in RAW264.7 cells. Specific inhibitors of these kinases effectively blunted their corresponding phosphorylation events. However, XTT treatment did not significantly alter LPS-triggered MAPK activation in RAW264.7 cells (Figure 4A–C), indicating that MAPK signaling is not a critical mediator of XTT’s anti-inflammatory actions.

Figure 4: XTT did not significantly affect LPS-induced MAPK activation in RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were pre-incubated with different concentrations of XTT or specific MAPK inhibitors for 4 h prior to LPS challenge for 30 min. (A–C) Phosphorylation status of ERK, p38 MAPK, and JNK was detected via Western blotting using specific antibodies. Total ERK, p38 MAPK, and JNK proteins served as internal references. Representative immunoblots and densitometric quantifications are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the LPS-treated group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
XTT blocked activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in activated macrophages
To explore the involvement of NF-κB signaling in the anti-inflammatory actions of XTT, the impacts of XTT on NF-κB pathway activation were examined in LPS-activated RAW264.7 cells and TNF-α-treated HeLa cells.
Western blot analysis showed that LPS challenge induced robust phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα in RAW264.7 cells. XTT treatment markedly mitigated these LPS-triggered changes in IκBα phosphorylation and degradation (Figure 5A and 5B).
Immunofluorescence analysis further confirmed that TNF-α stimulation evoked substantial nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 in HeLa cells, whereas exposure to 8 µM XTT significantly curtailed p65 nuclear accumulation (Figure 5C). These observations were further validated by cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation followed by Western blot analysis (Figure 5D). Collectively, these data indicate that NF-κB signaling suppression is a key mechanism underlying the anti-inflammatory properties of XTT.

Figure 5: XTT inhibited activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway. RAW264.7 cells were pre-incubated with XTT (2, 4, and 8 µM) or BAY 11-7082 (10 µM) for 4 h prior to LPS challenge (0.5 µg/mL) for 5 min (A) or 10 min (B). (A, B) Phosphorylated and total IκBα levels were detected via Western blotting. Tubulin served as the loading control. Densitometric quantifications of IκBα normalized to tubulin are shown. HeLa cells were pre-incubated with XTT for 4 h followed by TNF-α stimulation (15 ng/mL) for 30 min. (C) Nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 was examined by immunofluorescence staining. Scale bar = 10 µm. (D)Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation followed by Western blotting was conducted to assess p65 localization. GAPDH and PARP served as loading controls for cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, respectively. Densitometric quantifications of p65 normalized to GAPDH or PARP are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the LPS-treated group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
XTT interacted with IKKα/β and inhibited IKKα/β phosphorylation
To investigate whether XTT targets IKKα/β to suppress NF-κB signaling, cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA), molecular docking analysis, and phosphorylation studies were performed.
CETSA analysis demonstrated that XTT treatment reduced the thermal stability of IKKα/β proteins in HeLa cell lysates compared with the DMSO control, suggesting a direct interaction between XTT and IKKα/β (Figure 6A).
Molecular docking analysis was subsequently performed to evaluate the binding interactions between XTT and components of the IKK complex. XTT formed hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions with residues within the NEMO/IKK interaction domain, including Leu80, Ala722, and Asn721, with a calculated binding energy of −5.5 kcal/mol (Figure 6B and 6C). In addition, XTT formed hydrogen bonds with Asn225 and Gly218 within the ATP-binding pocket of IKKβ, with a calculated binding energy of −7.3 kcal/mol (Figure 6D and 6E). Additional hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions involving residues such as Leu18, Tyr115, Phe155, and Arg154 further stabilized the XTT–IKKβ complex.
Western blot analysis demonstrated that LPS stimulation markedly increased IKKα/β phosphorylation in RAW264.7 cells, whereas XTT treatment effectively suppressed LPS-induced IKKα/β phosphorylation (Figure 6F). Collectively, these findings suggest that XTT interacts with IKKα/β and suppresses NF-κB pathway activation by inhibiting IKKα/β-mediated signaling.

Figure 6: XTT interacted with IKKα/β and suppressed IKKα/β phosphorylation. (A) CETSA was conducted to assess the effect of XTT on the thermal stability of IKKα/β in HeLa cell lysates. Bcl2 served as the loading control. Densitometric quantifications of IKKα/β band intensities are shown. (B, C) Molecular docking analysis of XTT with the NEMO/IKK interaction domain was performed using AutoDock. (D, E) Molecular docking analysis of XTT with the ATP-binding pocket of IKKβ was performed using AutoDock. Calculated binding energies are indicated. (F) RAW264.7 cells were pre-incubated with XTT (2, 4, and 8 µM) or PS-1145 (10 µM) for 4 h prior to LPS challenge (0.5 µg/mL) for 10 min. Phosphorylated and total IKKα/β levels were detected via Western blotting. Densitometric quantifications of phospho-IKKα/β normalized to total IKKα/β are shown. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus the LPS-treated group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
DATA AVAILABILITY:
Supplementary File 1: Supporting data for 1β-hydroxyl-5α-chloro-8-epi-xanthatin (XTT), including structural characterization (HRESIMS, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectra), HPLC purity analysis, and original experimental data supporting the reported results. Please click here to download this file.