This study involved only established commercial cell lines and did not include human participants, clinical samples, or animal experiments. Therefore, institutional ethics approval and informed consent were not required. All experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional laboratory safety guidelines. Hazardous reagents were handled in designated fume hoods, with appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) used. Chemical and biological waste was disposed of in accordance with institutional regulations. The chemicals, kits, and reagents used in the protocol are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Cell culture
RAW264.7 murine macrophages, HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells and HEK293T human embryonic kidney cells were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The culture environment was set at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ and saturated humidity.
2. Cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed via a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. RAW264.7 cells (2.5 × 104 cells/well) were plated into 96-well plates and cultured overnight at 37 °C. Cells were then treated with varying concentrations of XTT for 24 h with or without LPS (0.5 µg/mL). The LPS concentration and treatment duration were optimized in preliminary experiments to induce moderate inflammatory responses without causing significant cytotoxicity. Subsequently, 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, and the plate was maintained at 37 °C for 2 h. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader.
3. Determination of NO and PGE₂ levels in cell culture medium
RAW264.7 cells were plated into 24-well plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells/well and cultured overnight at 37 °C. Cells were pre-treated with XTT for 2 h prior to LPS stimulation or TNF-α (15 ng/mL) for a further 24 h. The 2 h pre-treatment period was chosen to enable adequate interaction between XTT and cellular targets prior to inflammatory challenge. Levels of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) in the culture medium were quantified following the manufacturer’s protocols.
4. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
RAW264.7 cells (2 × 106 cells) were plated into 6-well plates overnight and pre-treated with various doses of XTT for 2 h before LPS challenge (0.5 µg/mL) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and purity were evaluated using a spectrophotometer, and samples with A260/A280 ratios >1.8 were used for downstream analyses.
Total RNA (2 µg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA in a final reaction volume of 20 µL using a cDNA synthesis kit. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green chemistry on a real-time PCR detection system. Primer sequences were as follows:
iNOS forward: 5′-GGA TCT TCC CAG GCA ACC A-3′
iNOS reverse: 5′-AAT CCA CAA CTC GCT CCA AGA TT-3′
COX2 forward: 5′-CAA CAC CTG AGC GGT TAC-3′
COX2 reverse: 5′-GTT CCA GGA GGA TGG AGT-3′
IL-1β forward: 5′-GCC TTG GGC CTC AAA GGA AAG AAT C-3′
IL-1β reverse: 5′-GGA AGA CAC AGA TTC CAT GGT GAA G-3′
IL-6 forward: 5′-TGG AGT CAC AGA AGG AGT GGC TAA G-3′
IL-6 reverse: 5′-TCT GAC CAC AGT GAG GAA TGT CCA C-3′
TNF-α forward: 5′-CAC CAC GCT CTT CTG TCT-3′
TNF-α reverse: 5′-GGC TAC AGG CTT GTC ACT C-3′
GAPDH forward: 5′-TGC ACC ACC AAC TGC TTA GC-3′
GAPDH reverse: 5′-GGC ATG GAC TGT GGT CAT GAG-3′
The PCR amplification procedure was carried out as: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 39 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with GAPDH as the internal control.
5. Western blotting
Following treatment, RAW264.7 cells were homogenized in RIPA buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. These inhibitors were prepared fresh immediately before use to prevent protein degradation and dephosphorylation. Total protein levels were quantified using a BCA assay kit. Equal amounts of protein were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. After transfer, membranes were incubated with 5% skim milk prepared in TBST containing Tween-20 (TBST) for blocking, and then probed with primary antibodies (1:1,000 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were next probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were detected using a chemiluminescence detection system, and band intensities were analyzed via densitometric quantification.
6. Immunofluorescence assay
HeLa cells were seeded into 6-well plates and pre-treated with XTT (8 µM) for 4 h prior to TNF-α stimulation (15 ng/mL) for 30 min. This 4 h pre-incubation period was chosen to maximize target engagement prior to NF-κB activation. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. After blocking with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 10% goat serum diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were incubated with an anti-p65 primary antibody (1:250 dilution) overnight at 4 °C, followed by probing with a TRITC-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (0.5 µg/mL) for 5 min in the dark. Fluorescence images were captured using a fluorescence microscope. HeLa cells were selected because their large cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio facilitates visualization of p65 nuclear translocation.
7. Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation
HeLa cells were pre-incubated with XTT for 4 h and then stimulated with TNF-α (15 ng/mL) for 30 min. Cells were collected, rinsed with cold PBS, and processed for cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extraction using a commercial nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kit per the manufacturer’s instructions. All procedures were performed on ice to preserve protein integrity.
8. Cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA)
CETSA was conducted as previously described14. Approximately 1 × 107 HeLa cells were collected and resuspended in 500 µL of cold PBS containing protease inhibitors, then lysed via three freeze-thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants were aliquoted equally into two groups and treated with either XTT (100 µM) or DMSO for 1 h at room temperature. XTT (100 µM) was applied to enhance detection sensitivity in CETSA experiments. Samples were then aliquoted into seven tubes and heated at the indicated temperatures for 3 min, followed by incubation at room temperature for another 3 min. Soluble protein fractions were collected for immunoblotting analysis.
9. Molecular docking
Molecular docking analysis was carried out as previously described14. Crystal structures of IKKβ (PDB IDs: 3BRT and 4KIK) were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Protein structures were preprocessed with PyMOL (version 2.3.4) to remove water molecules, original ligands, and impurities, followed by hydrogen atom addition. Gasteiger charges were computed, and active pockets were identified using AutoDock Tools (version 1.5.6). Protein structures were then stored in PDBQT format.
The XTT structure was generated in Chem3D (version 15.1) and optimized via energy minimization. Semi-flexible docking was performed using AutoDock Vina (version 1.1.2). Grid boxes were constructed to fully cover the active pockets, while all other parameters remained at default settings. Docking poses with the lowest binding energies and most stable conformations were selected for analysis. Binding energies below −5 kcal/mol were considered indicative of strong binding affinity according to published criteria. PyMOL was further employed to visualize binding modes and assess hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals interactions, and potential binding sites.
10. Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.