Social memory is a core feature of mammalian social behavior and is particularly well developed in highly social species such as mice and humans. In rodents, recognition of others underlies behavioral dynamics critical for survival within family and conspecific units, including group cohesion, dominance hierarchies, mating behaviors, and parental care1,2. In addition to its evolutionarily advantageous role in animal survival, social memory disruption in humans is a pervasive hallmark across multiple neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease3,4,5,6. Because social recognition is fundamental to the daily functioning of social species and has clear clinical importance, developing behavioral assays that accurately capture its multidimensional nature and neural underpinnings is vital. While existing paradigms measure some aspects of social recognition in mice, most assays are designed to assess novelty preferences by comparing novel versus short-term relationships formed over minutes or hours, rather than quantifying recognition of long-term social relationships.
Existing approaches, such as the three-chamber paradigm or the habituation-dishabituation paradigms, assess novelty preference following only brief prior exposure, often limited to 5–15 minutes7,8,9,10,11. These methods have provided substantial insight into the neural mechanisms of these short-term social memories in mice12,13. However, naturalistic social memories and social function must incorporate the distinct mechanisms at play in long-term relationships, built via cohabitation, long-term social hierarchies, or mating partners. While some studies do use the three-chamber paradigm with littermates14 or familiar mice co-housed with the subject for up to 72 h15,16, the paradigm's primary use still focuses on the simple novel vs. familiar dichotomy. This limits comparisons across multiple different familiar mice. With established social recognition paradigms biased towards studying short-term relationships, we identify a clear gap in our knowledge of the neural mechanisms underlying social recognition of long-term relationships.
To address this limitation, we developed the four cups paradigm: a simple, flexible assay designed to differentiate recognition of multiple social familiarity levels within a single testing session. In this paradigm, a subject mouse explores four corners of an open arena, each containing a perforated cup holding a conspecific or a control empty cup. The cups contain a long-term familiar conspecific (cagemate), a short-term familiar conspecific with limited prior exposure (10 min), a novel mouse, and an empty control. Investigation time serves as a quantitative index of social recognition and social preference. This configuration allows simultaneous comparisons across familiarity levels while minimizing direct physical interaction and potential aggressive encounters.