In the ex vivo MI platform, two ischemic protocols were evaluated in the isolated mouse heart. Global ischemia, which has been widely used in ex vivo MI studies, resulted in heterogeneous ischemic injury throughout the heart. Using a reliable and high-resolution microscopic TTC-based detection approach12, it was demonstrated that the atrial myocardium and apical region were relatively resistant to ischemia and remained viable after 45 min of global no-flow ischemia (Figure 2A, upper panel). In contrast, regional MI induced localized ischemic injury in the myocardium distal to the LAD ligation site. Under these conditions, portions of the subepicardial myocardium remained TTC-positive, indicating preservation of viable tissue (Figure 2A, lower panel). These findings reveal distinct patterns of myocardial survival between the two ischemic protocols.
The minimal duration of ischemia and reperfusion required to reliably and reproducibly induce myocardial infarction was further investigated in the isolated mouse heart. Myocardial injury progressively increased as the duration of ischemia was extended from 30 min to 120 min (Figure 3A). Notably, the infarct size more than doubled between 30 min (n = 3) and 45 min (n = 5) of ischemia and seemingly reached a plateau as ischemic duration was extended to 60 min (n = 5), 90 min (n = 4), and 120 min (n = 3) (Figure 3B). These findings indicate that myocardial viability is highly sensitive to ischemic duration beyond 30 min. Compared with the in vivo MI (ivMI, n = 5) model, the ex vivo MI (evMI, n = 8) model produced nearly identical infarct sizes under comparable ischemic and reperfusion durations (36.88% ± 3.91% vs. 37.8% ± 2.17%, p = 0.27), suggesting that myocardial injury was not substantially affected by crystalloid perfusion. Nevertheless, evMI hearts exhibited thicker ventricular walls and a reduced ventricular lumen, likely due to myocardial edema associated with crystalloid perfusion (Figure 3C).
Taking advantage of the relatively controlled environment, free from extracardiac influences, the cardioprotective effects of intramyocardial IL-6 delivery were evaluated. In control hearts treated with PBS, scattered but measurable viable cardiomyocytes (viable CMs; deep red) remained detectable within the infarcted/necrotic region (beige), even after 45 min of ischemia (Figure 4; 1.05% ± 0.44%, SEM, n = 4). Notably, intramyocardial delivery of IL-6 (i.m.; arrows) significantly increased the amount of viable CMs, which were predominantly localized around the injection site within the region of interest (ROI; 4.08% ± 0.99%, SEM, n = 6; p = 0.005, Student’s t-test). These findings suggest that IL-6 may enhance cardiomyocyte survival following ischemic injury.
Finally, the current ex vivo MI model has several potential pitfalls that may affect the reproducibility of experimental outcomes. As demonstrated in Figure 5, ligature slip may result in inadequate LAD occlusion and extensive myocardial survival (4/168), and, in the meantime, incomplete reperfusion may occur when branches of the LAD are damaged (12/168). In addition, air embolization during the aortic cannulation can also cause myocardial injury (arrows, 7/168), making it difficult to distinguish ischemic injury from embolic injury for quantification. Finally, inadequate TTC staining may occur when the heart is excessively perfused (11/168), which substantially hampers the delineation of the infarct area.

Figure 1: Schematic of experimental setup. The non-recirculating, gravity-driven constant-pressure Langendorff system was designed to deliver nutrient-rich, oxygenated Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant hydrostatic pressure of 110 cmH₂O. KHB was first prewarmed to 37 °C in a reservoir and fed to a water-jacketed pressure column, where a constant hydrostatic pressure of 110 cmH2O was maintained via a pressure regulator. The perfused heart was immersed in a height-adjustable, water-jacketed organ bath to maintain a constant temperature of 37 °C throughout the experimental period (A). Myocardial infarction was induced by transient ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery following cardioplegic arrest on the cotton pad within a pre-chilled metal dish (B). The procedure was performed under a stereomicroscope. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Regional versus global myocardial infarction (MI) and infarct size determination. Global MI induces ischemic injury throughout the heart, as indicated by the yellow staining in microscopic TTC images. The atrial myocardium and the apical region appeared to be more resistant to ischemia and remained viable after 45 min of global no-flow ischemia (upper panel in A). Regional MI induces ischemic injury in the myocardium distal to the LAD ligation site. In this setting, portions of the subepicardial myocardium are stained red, suggesting preservation of viable tissue (lower panel in A). Infarct size was quantified using ImageJ, with the infarcted/necrotic area and viable myocardium delineated based on their distinct staining colors (B). Cardiomyocyte survival within the region of interest (ROI) was calculated by determining the percentage of the deep-red staining in the selected ROI (C). Scale bars: 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Impact of ischemic length on infarct size. Myocardial injury progressively aggravated as the duration of ischemia was extended from 30 min to 120 min (A). The infarct size more than doubled between 30 min (n = 3) and 45 min (n = 5) of ischemia and seemingly reached a plateau as ischemic duration was extended to 60 min (n = 5), 90 min (n = 4), and 120 min (n = 3) (B). Compared with the in vivo MI (ivMI, n = 5) model, the ex vivo MI (evMI, n = 8) produced nearly identical infarct sizes under comparable ischemic durations (36.88% ± 3.91% vs. 37.8% ± 2.17%, p = 0.27, Student’s t-Test). The evMI hearts exhibited a thicker ventricular wall and a reduced ventricular lumen, likely due to myocardial edema associated with crystalloid perfusion (C). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (SDM). Scale bars: 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: IL-6 enhanced cardiomyocyte survival following ischemic injury. Intramyocardial (i.m.) delivery of IL-6 in the evMI model yielded a measurable number of viable cardiomyocytes (viable CMs; deep red) within the infarcted/necrotic region (beige), predominantly localized around the IL-6 injection site (arrows, left panel). Quantification of viable CMs within the region of interest (ROI, indicated by dash lines) revealed that PBS injection resulted in only a small fraction of viable myocardium (1.05% ± 0.44%, SEM, n = 4), whereas injection of IL-6 significantly increased the amount of viable CMs within the ROI (4.08% ± 0.99%, SEM, n = 6; p = 0.005, Student’s t-test). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (SDM). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Unsatisfactory or unsuccessful outcomes caused by technical failure. As illustrated by the representative myocardial injury in the ex vivo MI model (left), viable and necrotic myocardium can generally be clearly distinguished in the typical TTC staining. However, several technical failures may result in unsatisfactory or uninterpretable outcomes. Inadequate LAD ligation caused by suture slippage may result in extensive myocardial survival despite prolonged ischemia. Incomplete reperfusion may occur when branches of the LAD are damaged during ligation and subsequently become poorly perfused, producing a pattern resembling the “no-reflow” phenomenon observed clinically. Such regions may exhibit a pinkish coloration (arrows). Microvascular embolization by air bubbles entering the coronary circulation during the cannulation procedure can also cause myocardial injury (arrows), making it difficult to distinguish ischemic injury from embolic injury for quantification. Finally, inadequate TTC staining may occur when the heart is excessively perfused, which may cause myocardial injury apart from ischemia. Scale bars: 1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| F-peak (n = 19) | F-steady (n = 19) | RF-peak (n = 19) | RF-steady (n = 19) |
| Means (mL/min) | 2.54 | 0.78 | 2 | 0.99 |
| SD | 0.59 | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.53 |
Table 1: Coronary flow at the maximal (F-peak) and steady-state (F-steady) levels during ischemia and reperfusion (RF-peak and RF-steady).