Visualizing Surface T-Cell Receptor Dynamics Four-Dimensionally Using Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy

JoVE Journal
Biochemistry

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Biochemistry section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:

 

Summary

The goal of this protocol is to show how to use Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy to four-dimensionally visualize surface receptor dynamics in live cells. Here T cell receptors on CD4+ primary T cells are shown.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations | Reprints and Permissions

Rosenberg, J., Huang, J. Visualizing Surface T-Cell Receptor Dynamics Four-Dimensionally Using Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (155), e59914, doi:10.3791/59914 (2020).

Abstract

The signaling and function of a cell are dictated by the dynamic structures and interactions of its surface receptors. To truly understand the structure-function relationship of these receptors in situ, we need to visualize and track them on the live cell surface with enough spatiotemporal resolution. Here we show how to use recently developed Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy (LLSM) to image T-cell receptors (TCRs) four-dimensionally (4D, space and time) at the live cell membrane. T cells are one of the main effector cells of the adaptive immune system, and here we used T cells as an example to show that the signaling and function of these cells are driven by the dynamics and interactions of the TCRs. LLSM allows for 4D imaging with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution. This microscopy technique therefore can be generally applied to a wide array of surface or intracellular molecules of different cells in biology.

Introduction

The precise dynamics of molecules trafficking and diffusing on the three-dimensional cell surface in real time have been an enigma to solve. Microscopy has always been a balance of speed, sensitivity, and resolution; if any one or two are maximized, the third is minimized. Therefore, due to the small size and immense speed with which surface receptors move, tracking their dynamics has remained a major technological challenge to the field of cell biology. For example, many studies have been conducted using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy1,2,3, which has high temporal resolution, but can only image a very thin slice of the T-cell membrane (~100 nm), and therefore misses events happening farther away in the cell. These TIRF images also only showing a two-dimensional section of the cell. By contrast, super-resolution techniques, such as stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM)4, photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)5, and stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED)6, can overcome the Abbe diffraction limit of light. These techniques have high spatial resolution (~20 nm resolution)4,5,6,7, but they often take many minutes to acquire a full two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) image, and therefore the temporal resolution is lost. In addition, techniques such as STORM and PALM that rely on blinking signals may have inaccuracies in counting8,9. Electron microscopy has by far the highest resolution (up to 50 pm resolution)10; it can even be conducted three-dimensionally with focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), resulting in up to 3 nm XY and 500 nm Z resolution11. However, any form of electron microscopy requires harsh sample preparation and can only be conducted with fixed cells or tissues, eliminating the possibility of imaging live samples over time.

Techniques to obtain the high spatiotemporal resolution required to identify the dynamics of surface and intracellular molecules in live cells in their true physiological 3D nature is only being recently developed. One of these techniques is Lattice Light-Sheet Microscopy (LLSM)12, which utilizes a structured light sheet to drastically lower photobleaching. Developed in 2014 by Nobel Laureate Eric Betzig, the high axial resolution, low photobleaching and background noise, and ability to simultaneously image hundreds of planes per field of view make LLS microscopes superior to widefield, TIRF and confocal microscopes12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. This four-dimensional (x, y, z and time) imaging technique, while still diffraction limited (~200 nm XYZ resolution), has incredible temporal resolution (we have achieved a frame rate of about 100 fps, resulting in a 3D reconstructed cell image with 0.85 seconds per frame) for 3D spatial acquisition.

LLSM can be generally used to track real-time dynamics of any molecules within any cell at the single-molecule and single-cell level, particularly those in highly motile cells such as immune cells. For example, we show here how to use LLSM to visualize T-cell receptor (TCR) dynamics. T cells are the effector cells of the adaptive immune system. TCRs are responsible for recognizing peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligands displayed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APC), which determines the selection, development, differentiation, fate, and function of a T cell. This recognition occurs at the interface between T cells and APCs, resulting in localized receptor clustering to form what is called the immunological synapse. While it is known that TCRs at the immunological synapse are imperative for T-cell effector function, still unknown are the underlying mechanisms of real-time TCR trafficking to the synapse. LLSM has allowed us to visualize in real time the dynamics of TCRs before and after trafficking to the synapse with the resultant pMHC-TCR interaction (Figure 1). LLSM can therefore be used to solve current questions of the formative dynamics of TCRs and provide insights to understand how a cell distinguishes between self and foreign antigens.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

5C.C7 TCR-transgenic RAG2 knockout mice in B10.A background were used in this study according to a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Chicago.

1. Harvest and Activate T Cells

NOTE: This part of the protocol is based on previous protocols. See citations for further detail20,21.

  1. Euthanize a 10-12 week-old 5C.C7 transgenic mouse of either sex (~20-25 g) according to the approved IACUC protocol (i.e., CO2 chamber followed by cervical dislocation).
  2. Spray mouse carcass thoroughly with 70% ethanol to soak down the fur and bring into a BSL-2 safety cabinet.
  3. Turn mouse onto its right side and make a small incision in the body cavity with surgical scissors. Remove the spleen using surgical forceps. Cut away connective tissue as needed with surgical scissors.
  4. Place the spleen in a 70 µm-pore mesh cell strainer and mash with the back of a 1 mL syringe plunger. Wash through the strainer thoroughly with complete RPMI (RPMI with 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS], 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol).
  5. Centrifuge the single cell suspension of splenocytes at 300 x g for 5 min. Discard the supernatant.
    NOTE: The pellet at this point will be red.
  6. Resuspend the splenocytes in 5 mL RBC lysis buffer. Incubate for 5 min, then quench with 5 mL of complete RPMI.
  7. Centrifuge the single cell suspension of splenocytes at 300 x g for 5 min. Discard the supernatant.
    NOTE: The pellet at this point should be white, not red.
  8. Resuspend the pellet in 5 mL of complete RPMI.
  9. Transfer to a T-25 flask and add 10 µM moth cytochrome-C (MCC, sequence ANERADLIAYLKQATK). Put the cells in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C, 5% CO2 overnight.
  10. On the next day, add recombinant mouse IL-2 to a final concentration of 100 U/mL.
  11. Observe for the following days, adding fresh media as the current media turns yellow. T cells will die if left in yellow media unattended for over 48 h. Cells are ready to use 6-10 days after harvest.

2. Prepare Cells

  1. Incubate 5 mm round coverslips with 0.1% poly-L-lysine for 10 min. Aspirate off and let dry naturally.
  2. Use a density gradient reagent (see the Table of Materials) to separate out dead cells and to obtain 1 x 106 T cells and 1 x 106 APCs (CH27 cells21,22 transduced with cytosolic mCherry) separately.
    NOTE: Cells are counted using a hemocytometer.
    1. Add 3 mL of density gradient reagent to a 15 mL conical tube and add cells dropwise to the edge of the tube carefully. Do not mix. Centrifuge at 930 x g for 10 min at 4 °C; use acceleration/deceleration: SLOW/SLOW. Remove the thin middle layer of cells between the complete media and the density gradient reagent carefully, putting each cell type into separate conical tubes.
      NOTE: It is necessary to prepare more cells than needed for imaging, as we find that 50% is lost on average during the process. The more cells used for the process, the easier it is to harvest them from the density gradient. We use 4-8 mL of both cell types to ensure excess cells. If desired, cells can be counted before this step to ensure volume needed. Any extra cells are put back into their respective flasks.
    2. Wash both tubes of T cells and CH27 cells three times with 5 mL complete RPMI (300 x g for 5 min). Discard the supernatant each time during the wash. Resuspend each tube in 1 mL complete RPMI and count cells by a hemocytometer.
  3. Resuspend 1 x 106 APCs in 500 µL complete RPMI and add 10 µM MCC. Incubate for 3 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Wash cells three times with 500 µL complete RPMI (300 x g for 5 min). Discard the supernatants.
  4. Resuspend 1 x 106 T cells in 500 µL complete RPMI. Add 2 µg of anti-TCRβ Alexa488-labeled Fab (clone H57) to 500 µL of cells. Incubate for 30 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Wash cells three times with 500 µL of complete RPMI (300 x g for 5 min). Discard supernatant after each wash.
    NOTE: The divalent anti-TCR antibody was cut into monovalent Fab using a Fab preparation kit (see the Table of Materials) to avoid crosslinking the T cell receptors by the divalent antibody (this step is optional).
  5. Resuspend both cell types in 500 µL of imaging media (phenol red-free Leibovitz's L-15 medium with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine).

3. Conducting LLSM Daily Alignment

NOTE: (Important) This alignment protocol is based on the LLSM instrument used (see the Table of Materials). Each LLSM may be different and require different alignment strategies, especially those that are home-built. Carry out the appropriate routine alignment and continue to section 4.

  1. Add 10 mL of water plus 30 µL fluorescein (1 mg/mL stock) to the LLSM bath (~10 mL volume), press Image (Home) to move the objective to image position, and look at a single Bessel laser beam pattern. Align the laser beam using the guides and pre-set region of interest (ROI) to make the beam a thin pattern balanced in all directions.
    1. The beam should also appear focused in the finder camera. Use two mirror tilt adjustors, top micrometer, focus, and emission objective collar to adjust. See Figure 2A,B for correctly aligned beam.
  2. Wash the bath and objectives with at least 200 mL of water to completely remove fluorescein.
  3. Image standard fluorescent beads in the imaging media (prepared by adhering beads to a 5 mm coverslip with poly-L-lysine, see the Table of Materials; this can be pre-prepared and re-used) for physical point spread function (PSF) in imaging media.
    NOTE: There can only be one bead in view for later processing, so try to find a bead that is by itself in the viewer or can easily be cropped to obtain a single bead.
    1. Turn on dither by setting to 3 in the 'X Galvo range' box. Press Live to view the current field. Move along the Z direction to find the cover slip and beads. Find the center of a bead by moving along Z, press Stop to pause the laser. Check 3D, press Center and then press Execute. This will collect the data.
    2. Manually adjust the tilt mirror, objective collar, and focus micrometer for highest gray values, then adjust as necessary to obtain proper patterns for objective scan, z galvo, z+objective (totPSF), and sample scan (samplePSF) capture modes. See Figure 2C-F for properly adjusted maximum intensity projections (MIPs).
      NOTE: The various captures modes (objective scan, z galvo, z+objective, and sample scan) change how the light-sheet moves through the sample. All scan modes should be used for alignment.
    3. The sample scan shows how data will be collected during the experiment. Collect the sample PSF by pressing Execute in sample scan mode for deskewing and deconvolution (see section 5). Change lasers to three color mode (488, 560, 647) and press Execute again.
      NOTE: Since the LLSM images at an angle (57.2°), images captured in the "sample scan" mode are collected at this angle, and are therefore "skewed". De-skewing is the process of correcting for this angle and "re-aligning" the image to a true z-stack. These data must be collected in imaging media and in all channels that will be imaged during the experiment. If this is not collected properly, the data will not be properly de-skewed. Similarly, make sure media has been warmed to 37 °C (or desired experimental temperature).

4. Setting Up Cells with LLSM

  1. Add 100,000 APCs (50 µL) from step 2.5 to a 5 mm-diameter circular coverslip from step 2.1 and allow them to settle for 10 min.
  2. Grease the sample holder then add the coverslip cell-side-up to it. Add a drop of imaging media to the back of the coverslip to avoid bubbles before placing in the bath. Screw the sample holder onto the piezo, and press Image (Home).
  3. Find an APC to image to ensure that the LLSM and imaging software (see Table of Materials) are functioning properly.
    NOTE: We image at 0.4 µm step size with 60 z-steps and 10 ms exposure for two colors with dither set to 3, which results in 1.54 s per frame of 3D image with ~200 nm XY and 400 nm Z resolution. These settings may need to be adjusted based on cell size, desired z-resolution, and strength of signal from the fluorescent labeling technique used. Laser power usage will also vary based on fluorescent labeling technique used.
    1. Press Live to view the current image. Move along Z to find the cover slip and cells.
    2. Find the center of an APC by moving in the Z direction, then press Stop to pause the laser. Check 3D and input the desired settings (see step 4.3.1), press Center and then press Execute. This will collect the data.
  4. Lower the stage to load position and add 50 µL of T cells in imaging media (100,000 cells, from step 2.5) dropwise directly over the coverslip. It is best to let a drop form on the end of the pipette tip and then touch the tip to the bath liquid. Raise stage back by clicking "Image (Return)".
  5. Begin imaging. Be sure to set the desired stack size and time lapse length. For example, image 60 z-stacks at a 0.4 µm step size and input 500 time frames. (Typically) stop recording before 500 frames are reached to avoid photobleaching. Use Live mode to search for cell pairs, and when ready and desired settings have been entered, press Execute to collect data. See Movie 1 and Figure 1 for an example.

5. Track Surface Dynamics

  1. Export the data from the imaging software (see the Table of Materials). This will create z-stack TIF files for every time point in each color.
  2. First deskew and deconvolve the data.
    NOTE: We use the LLSpy pipeline under license by HHMI's Janelia Research Campus18, but deskewing and deconvolution are also available within multiple imaging softwares (see Table of Materials).
  3. Debleach the data.
    NOTE: We use Fiji's debleach feature with histogram matching (Fiji Pathway: Image | Adjust | Bleach Correction | Histogram Matching | OK).
  4. Import into the tracking software (see the Table of Materials). Track clusters according to software specifications. See Movie 2 for an example.
    NOTE: Tracking results will depend upon the tracking software used, algorithm chosen, desired output parameters selected, etc. For example, in the tracking software we utilized (see the Table of Materials), we chose to allow the software to track irregular shapes, rather than assigning each feature a single spot, since TCR clusters are not organized into perfect spheres. In addition, we chose to collect 35 parameters, including speed, direction, volume, intensity, area, location, and track duration information. However, different methods or parameters will be beneficial to answer different questions.
    1. If tracking is not desired, use the ClearVolume plugin for Fiji for visualizing and creating movies from hyperstack data.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Here, we describe the isolation, preparation, and imaging of primary mouse 5C.C7 T cells using a lattice light-sheet microscope. During section 3, it is imperative to align the microscope correctly, and to collect PSF daily with which to deconvolve the data after collection. In Figure 2, we show the correct alignment images that will be seen when aligning the microscope. Figure 2A and Figure 2B show the correct beam path and beam alignment, respectively, when imaged in fluorescein. The objective scan should show a large X shape in the XZ and YZ projections that is as symmetrical as possible; this should also be adjusted to be as small of an X as possible (Figure 2C). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the emission objective collar. The z galvo scan should show an oval in XZ and XY with a single dot on either side (above and below for XZ and to the left and right for YZ) (Figure 2D). This is mainly achieved by adjusting the galvo mirror tilt, either manually or with the motorized adjustment in the software. Finally, both the z+objective scan and the sample scan should show dots that look as round as possible (Figure 2E and Figure 2F, respectively). These may have a small X, but this should be as dimished as possible. These should be well aligned if the objective scan and z galvo were set well, but if adjustments are necessary, they will be mostly conducted with the galvo mirror. It is important to note that during this alignment, any time the collar and galvo are adjusted, the focus (micrometer above the emission objective) will need to be adjusted as well.

Using this protocol, we can see the four-dimensional dynamics of the TCRs on a T-cell surface (Figure 1, Movie 1). The main advantage of this microscope lies in the ability to track the visualized surface units of the TCRs, and to obtain quantified data from their size, motion, signal intensity, etc. (see Table of Materials). Movie 2 shows an example of the tracks obtained.

Figure 1
Figure 1: 4-dimensional imaging of T cell-APC Synapse. (A) A representative example 3D time-lapse LLSM images showing a T cell interacting with an APC. Shown are the TCR (green, labeled by anti-TCR-AF488) dynamics in recognizing antigens presented on the surface of an APC (red, cytosolic mCherry). Scale bar = 5 μm. Also see Movie 1. (B) Orthogonal XY slice of (A). Inset is a reference frame of a whole cell. Scale bar = 5 μm. (C) Orthogonal YZ slice of (A). Inset is a reference frame of a whole cell. Scale bar = 5 μm. (D) Dual orthogonal slice of (A). Inset is reference frame of whole cell. Scale bar = 5 μm. Also see Movie 3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: LLSM alignment. (A) Desired beam pattern for LLSM imaging experiment. (B) Screenshot of the beam alignment process; on the left is the focus window showing the narrowed, focused beam; at the top right is a graph showing that the beam is centered within the window; at the bottom right is the finder camera, which should also be a thin, focused beam. (C) Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of a bead by objective scan. (D) Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of a bead by z-galvo scan. (E) Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of a bead by z+objective scan. (F) Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of a bead by sample scan. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Movie 1
Movie 1: T cell synapse formation. Two-color volume rendering of the interaction of a T cell labeled with αTCR-AF488 (green) with a target APC expressing cytosolic mCherry (red) over 70 time points at 1.54 s interval. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Movie 2
Movie 2: Tracking TCR dynamic motion. Compare with Movie 1. Clusters corresponding to visible TCR structures were tracked in 3D over time with imaging software. Dragon tails showing cluster positions over the previous four frames are color-coded by displacement length. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Movie 3
Movie 3: Orthogonal slices of T cell synapse. Compare with Movie 1 and Figure 1B-D. Dual orthogonal slice of Movie 1, showing that αTCRβ-AF488 Fab is indeed labeling the cell surface TCRs. Inset is a reference frame of whole cell. Scale bar = 5 μm. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

The presented protocol was optimized for the usage of CD4+ T cells isolated from 5C.C7 transgenic mice on the LLSM instrument used, and therefore other cell systems and LLSMs may need to be optimized differently. However, this protocol shows the power of 4D imaging, as it can be used to quantify the dynamics of a surface receptor on an entire cell with the least distortion in physiological conditions. Therefore, there are many possible future applications of this technique.

A critical step is allowing the cells to settle at an appropriate concentration. If too many APCs settle on the coverslip and become too dense, it is hard to find a T cell that is interacting with only a single APC. When a T cell has multiple synapses, tracking and interpretation of data can become very complicated. Similarly, if too few APCs are present, finding a T cell forming a synapse is also difficult. In our hands, allowing 50,000 cells to settle for 10 min achieves an optimal density. However, this problem can be avoided if using a system with adherent cells. Cells can be grown in the incubator with the coverslips to a desired confluency.

Similarly, the number of T cells dropped into the system is dependent upon the size of the bath and the distance they can disperse. In the LLSM system used here, there is a 12 mL bath and a 2.5 mL bath, as opposed to the previous version of the system which only had a 10 mL bath available. We use the 12 mL bath for the original fluorescein imaging then switch to the 2.5 mL bath for imaging the cells. This allows for less thorough washing of the bath following the beam visualization step, and also lowers the number of T cells required for each imaging session. In turn, this would allow users to utilize fewer cells.

Finding cells at the correct point of interaction is also a challenge. In our hands, T cells take about 2 min to settle down to the APCs on the coverslip, so it is important to begin searching the coverslip for dynamic T cells close to APCs. A major improvement of this has been the recent addition of the LED light in the finder camera. If using a home-built system, we highly recommend including this feature in the design.

Finally, fluorescent labeling strategies are another important consideration. Each fluorescent protein or dye has a different quantum yield and rate of photobleaching. Fluorescent dyes are typically brighter, but if the cells have been stably transduced with a fluorescent protein labeled molecule, the label is replenished as the cell continues to produce the molecule. Therefore, labeling strategy is an important factor to consider when designing experiments.

We would like to conclude with a discussion on future directions for the technology. LLSM is also capable of structured illumination microscopy (SIM), which results in 150 nm XY resolution and 280 nm Z resolution, and is at least 10 times faster than widefield SIM12. Therefore, while LLSM provides unprecedented speed of 4D imaging, it cannot achieve the spatial resolution of current super-resolution techniques4,5,6. However, this resolution could be improved if a STED LLSM could be created. Light sheet STED and stimulated emission depletion with selective plane illumination microscopy (STED-SPIM) have been utilized, but lack the temporal resolution of LLSM21,22,23,24. If STED-SPIM were adapted to incorporate a lattice, we could potentially obtain 50 nm axial resolution with far less photobleaching, and image faster than currently available techniques. Nevertheless, with current available technologies, LLSM gives us the fastest temporal resolution with high axial resolution.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the advice and guidance from Dr. Vytas Bindokas at the University of Chicago. We thank the Integrated Light Microscopy Core Facility at the University of Chicago for supporting and maintaining the lattice light-sheet microscope. This work was supported by NIH New Innovator Award 1DP2AI144245 and NSF Career Award 1653782 (To J.H.). J.R. is supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowships Program.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
1 mL Syringe BD 309659 For T cell harvest
2-Mercaptoethanol Sigma-Aldrich M3148-25ML For T cell culture
5 mm round coverslips World Precision Instruments 502040 For Imaging
70um Sterile Cell Strainer Corning 7201431 For T cell harvest
Alexa Fluor 488 anti-mouse TCR β chain Antibody BioLegend 109215 For Imaging
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) X&Y Cell Culture FBS-500 For T cell culture
Ficoll GE Healthcare 17-1440-02 Denisty gradient reagent for T cell harvest
Fluorescein sodium salt Sigma-Aldrich F6377 For microscope alignment
FluoSpheres Carboxylate-Modified Microspheres Thermo Fisher Scientific F8810 For microscope alignment
Imaris Bitplane N/A Tracking Software; Other options for tracking software include Amira or Trackmate (Fiji).
Lattice Light-Sheet Microscope 3i N/A Microscope Used
Leibovitz's L-15 Medium, no phenol red Thermo Fisher Scientific 21083027 For Imaging
L-Glutamine Thermo Fisher Scientific 25030-081 For T cell culture
LLSpy Janelia Research Campus N/A LLSpy was used under license from Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus. Contact innovation@janelia.hhmi.org for access. Other deconvolution and deksewing methods are available in image processing softwares such as Fiji, Slidebook, Amira, and others. https://llspy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Moth Cytochrome C (MCC), sequence ANERADLIAYLKQATK Elimbio Custom Synthesis For T cell harvest
Penacillin/Streptamycin Life Technologies 15140122_3683884612 For T cell culture
Poly-L-Lysine Phenix Research Products P8920-100ML For Imaging
RBC Lysis Buffer eBioscience 00-4300-54 For T cell harvest
Recombinant mouse IL-2 Sigma-Aldrich I0523 For T cell culture
RPMI 1640 Medium Corning MT10040CV For T cell culture
Slidebook 3i N/A LLSM imaging software
Surgical Dissection Tools Nova-Tech International DSET10 For T cell harvest
T-25 Flasks Eppendorf 2231710126 For T cell culture
Thermo Scientific Pierce Fab Micro Preparation Kits Thermo Fisher Scientific 44685 For preparing Fab

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Poulter, N. S., Pitkeathly, W. T. E., Smith, P. J., Rappoport, J. Z. The Physical Basis of Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy and Its Cellular Applications. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1251, Clifton, N.J. 1-23 (2015).
  2. Mattheyses, A. L., Simon, S. M., Rappoport, J. Z. Imaging with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the cell biologist. Journal of Cell Science. 123, Pt 21 3621-3628 (2010).
  3. Axelrod, D. Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology. 89, Chapter 7 169-221 (2008).
  4. Rust, M. J., Bates, M., Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nature Methods. 3, (10), 793-796 (2006).
  5. Betzig, E., et al. Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution. Science. 313, (5793), 1642-1645 (2006).
  6. Hell, S. W., Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics Letters. 19, (11), 780 (1994).
  7. Shroff, H., White, H., Betzig, E. Photoactivated Localization Microscopy (PALM) of Adhesion Complexes. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. 58, (1), 1-28 (2013).
  8. Liu, Z., Lavis, L. D., Betzig, E. Imaging Live-Cell Dynamics and Structure at the Single-Molecule Level. Molecular Cell. 58, (4), 644-659 (2015).
  9. Ji, N., Shroff, H., Zhong, H., Betzig, E. Advances in the speed and resolution of light microscopy. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 18, (6), 605-616 (2008).
  10. Erni, R., Rossell, M. D., Kisielowski, C., Dahmen, U. Atomic Resolution Imaging with a sub-50 pm Electron Probe. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3cs0m4vr (2019).
  11. Kizilyaprak, C., Daraspe, J., Humbel, B. M. Focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy in biology. Journal of Microscopy. 254, (3), 109-114 (2014).
  12. Chen, B. C., et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: Imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science. (2014).
  13. Ni, J., et al. Adoptively transferred natural killer cells maintain long-term antitumor activity by epigenetic imprinting and CD4+ T cell help. Oncoimmunology. 5, (9), 1219009 (2016).
  14. Chaudhri, A., Xiao, Y., Klee, A. N., Wang, X., Zhu, B., Freeman, G. J. PD-L1 Binds to B7-1 Only In Cis on the Same Cell Surface. Cancer Immunology Research. 6, (8), 921-929 (2018).
  15. Forbes, C. A., Scalzo, A. A., Degli-Esposti, M. A., Coudert, J. D. Ly49C-dependent control of MCMV Infection by NK cells is cis-regulated by MHC Class I molecules. PLoS pathogens. 10, (5), 1004161 (2014).
  16. Schöneberg, J., et al. 4D cell biology: big data image analytics and lattice light-sheet imaging reveal dynamics of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in stem cell-derived intestinal organoids. Molecular biology of the cell. 29, (24), 2959-2968 (2018).
  17. Gao, R., et al. Cortical column and whole-brain imaging with molecular contrast and nanoscale resolution. Science. 363, (6424), New York, N.Y. 8302 (2019).
  18. Cai, E., et al. Visualizing dynamic microvillar search and stabilization during ligand detection by T cells. Science. 356, (6338), New York, N.Y. 3118 (2017).
  19. Ritter, A. T., et al. Actin Depletion Initiates Events Leading to Granule Secretion at the Immunological Synapse. Immunity. (2015).
  20. Lim, J. F., Berger, H., Su, I. -H. Isolation and Activation of Murine Lymphocytes. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. (116), e54596 (2016).
  21. Huang, J., et al. A Single Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex Ligand Triggers Digital Cytokine Secretion in CD4+ T Cells. Immunity. 39, (5), 846-857 (2013).
  22. Irvine, D. J., Purbhoo, M. A., Krogsgaard, M., Davis, M. M. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature. 419, (6909), 845-849 (2002).
  23. Jansson, A. A mathematical framework for analyzing T cell receptor scanning of peptides. Biophysical journal. 99, (9), 2717-2725 (2010).
  24. Mickoleit, M., et al. High-resolution reconstruction of the beating zebrafish heart. Nature Methods. 11, (9), 919-922 (2014).

Comments

0 Comments


    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Usage Statistics