JoVE   
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Biology

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Neuroscience

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Immunology and Infection

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Bioengineering

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Applied Physics

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Chemistry

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Behavior

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Environment

|   

JoVE Science Education

General Laboratory Techniques

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Basic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms I

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms II

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Essentials of
Neuroscience

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

 JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects

1, 1, 1, 1, 1

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    This article is a part of   JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.

    Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian

    Current Access Through Your IP Address

    You do not have access to any JoVE content through your current IP address.

    IP: 23.22.204.36, User IP: 23.22.204.36, User IP Hex: 387370020

    Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address

    You aren't signed into JoVE. If your institution subscribes to JoVE, please or create an account with your institutional email address to access this content.

     

    Summary

    This article describes a method for stabilizing long bone fractures that is based on the application of modified Ilizarov external fixators 1-3. After application of the fixators and creation of the bone injury, healing can be assessed, distraction osteogenesis can be performed, or non-union or critical sized defect can be created and used to study therapeutic interventions.

    Date Published: 4/11/2012, Issue 62; doi: 10.3791/3552

    Cite this Article

    Yu, Y. y., Bahney, C., Hu, D., Marcucio, R. S., Miclau, III, T. Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects. J. Vis. Exp. (62), e3552, doi:10.3791/3552 (2012).

    Abstract

    Assessing modes of skeletal repair is essential for developing therapies to be used clinically to treat fractures. Mechanical stability plays a large role in healing of bone injuries. In the worst-case scenario mechanical instability can lead to delayed or non-union in humans. However, motion can also stimulate the healing process. In fractures that have motion cartilage forms to stabilize the fracture bone ends, and this cartilage is gradually replaced by bone through recapitulation of the developmental process of endochondral ossification. In contrast, if a bone fracture is rigidly stabilized bone forms directly via intramembranous ossification. Clinically, both endochondral and intramembranous ossification occur simultaneously. To effectively replicate this process investigators insert a pin into the medullary canal of the fractured bone as described by Bonnarens4. This experimental method provides excellent lateral stability while allowing rotational instability to persist. However, our understanding of the mechanisms that regulate these two distinct processes can also be enhanced by experimentally isolating each of these processes. We have developed a stabilization protocol that provides rotational and lateral stabilization. In this model, intramembranous ossification is the only mode of healing that is observed, and healing parameters can be compared among different strains of genetically modified mice 5-7, after application of bioactive molecules 8,9, after altering physiological parameters of healing 10, after modifying the amount or time of stabilization 11, after distraction osteogenesis 12, after creation of a non-union 13, or after creation of a critical sized defect. Here, we illustrate how to apply the modified Ilizarov fixators for studying tibial fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis in mice.

    Protocol

    All Procedures were approved by the UCSF Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conform to national guidelines.

    1. Preparation of Fixators Prior to Surgery

    1. Before creating stabilized fracture, one needs to assemble the custom-design external fixation device. The custom-designed external fixation frames consisted of two aluminum rings stabilized by three stainless-steel #0/56 threaded rods, 8 #2/56 hexagonal nuts, and 17 matching bolts (Small Part Inc., Miami Lakes, FL3).
    2. Two aluminum rings are needed per fracture. To one ring assemble 4 #2/56 hexagonal nuts (small Part Inc., Miami Lakes, FL) and matching bolts into the appropriate holes, these should remain loose. This will be the proximal ring. To the distal ring assemble 3 nuts and bolts, again do not tighten fully.

    2. Anesthesia, Fracture Creation, and Fixator Application

    1. Mice (age, sex, and body weight are determined by the user) are anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 50mg/ml Ketamine, 0.5 mg/ml Medetomidine (0.03 ml/mouse).
    2. Apply eye lubricant to the eyes of the mice and place a piece of tape across their head to protect their eyes during the procedure.
    3. The animal is placed on a heating pad for the remainder of the procedure.
    4. Transfix the proximal and distal metaphyses of the left tibia using four 0.25 mm sterile insect pins (Anticorro: Fine Science Tool, Foster City, CA) by attaching the pins to a Dremel Tool and drilling them through the bone.
    5. Pins are oriented perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia, and 90 ° to each other. At least 10 mm between the proximal and distal pins.
    6. Position the first ring above the proximal pins with the nuts facing inward, toward the pins. Secure the pins to the ring keeping the tibia positioned centrally within the aluminum ring.
    7. Position the second ring below the distal pins and secure the pins to the ring using the hexagonal nuts as before. Add the fourth nut-bolt combination to the distal fixator.
    8. Create the transverse fracture by three-point bending with an appropriate device. We use the gravity system of Bonnarens and Einhorn 4. Rest the posterolateral surface of the tibia across the blocks, raise the weight to a predetermined height along the drop arm and drop the weight so that it contacts the anterolateral aspect of the tibia to produce the blunt fracture. The height the weight is dropped from needs to be determined for each strain of mouse to ensure a single fracture exclusively of the tibia.
    9. Fracture is confirmed by X-ray.
    10. After confirming the fracture, three stainless steel #0/56 threaded rods are attached to the rings. Starting from the distal end insert the rod and thread a nut onto the distal ring to secure the rod. Then put another nut onto the rod, the proximal ring will sit on top of this nut. Ensure that the two rings will be held at equal distances and are not straining the pins. Secure the proximal ring to the rods with a third nut.
    11. Subcutaneous injections of buprenorphine (1.0 mg/kg) for analgesia are given immediately after surgery and animals are monitored for pain and given buprenorphine as needed.
    12. Anesthesia is reversed by administering Atipamezole, and animals are monitored until they are responsive and ambulating.

    3. Distraction Osteogenesis (see also: 12,13)

    To modify this procedure to accommodate distraction osteogenesis is straightforward. The rings are held in position by threaded rods, and by turning the nuts holding the rods in place the rings can be moved apart.

    1. Latency: For standard distraction osteogenesis using this model the fixators are placed onto the tibia and left alone for a latency period of 5 days.
    2. Distraction: Distraction osteogenesis can be performed by turning the nuts on the stabilizing rods ¼ turn (0.25 mm) every day 7 days.
    3. Maturation: Bony bridging is observed by 10 days and complete consolidation is observed by 27 days after the completion of distraction.

    4. Creation of a Critical Sized Defect

    To create a critical sized defect the external fixators are applied as previously described with the following modifications.

    1. Before beginning the procedure the skin is cleaned with 70 % ethanol.
    2. The fixators are applied completely prior to creating the defect.
    3. The mouse is then place under the dissecting microscope to visualize the medial tibia, and an incision (5-7 mm) is made with a #10 blade on a scalpel.
    4. The muscle is gently transected and separated to expose the mid-diaphysis of the tibia.
    5. A 3 mm segment of the bone is then removed from the mid-diaphysis using scissors. Using the point of the scissors, the bone is slowly snipped away and bone fragments are removed with forceps if necessary. Care should be taken with the tips of the scissors to avoid displacing the tibia with a large mechanical force.
    6. Examine the surgical site to ensure that there are no bone fragments, as these could promote healing.
    7. Replace the muscle around the blunted ends of the tibia.
    8. Close the incision on the skin with 2-3 sutures of 6-0 Polyamine Monofilament.
    9. Anesthesia is reversed and the animals are monitored for pain and given analgesics as previously described.

    5. Representative Results

    When properly applied, the external fixators provide more rigid stability of the closed tibial fracture with excellent reduction (Figs. 1, 2). However, in some cases inadequate reduction (an obvious and large gap between bone ends or multiple fractures occur (Fig. 3), and these mice are excluded from analyses. Fractures stabilized using this method heal primarily via intramembranous ossification (Fig. 4). In contrast, if the fracture is not stabilized a large cartilage callus is formed in the fracture gap (Fig. 5), and this is replaced by bone through the process of intramembranous ossification.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1. Radiographs illustrating an external fixation device used to stabilize tibial fracture. Radiograph taken after fracture showing a well-aligned bone segments (arrowhead).

    Figure 2
    Figure 2. Image of a mouse after the fixator has been applied.

    Figure 3
    Figure 3. Radiograph taken after fracture shows misaligned and fragmented bone segments (arrowhead).

    Figure 4
    Figure 4. Stabilized fracture heals via intramembranous ossification. Trichrome staining of stabilized fracture shows some new bone (b) at fracture site. Scale bar = 500 μm.

    Figure 5
    Figure 5. Non-stabilized fracture heals via endochondral ossification. Trichrome staining of non-stabilized fracture shows cartilage (c) and bone (b) at fracture site. Scale bar = 500 μm.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    Bones heal by two different modalities depending on mechanical stability (reviewed in: 14). When left unstable a large cartilage template forms in the fracture gap that is replaced by bone to bridge the two ends of broken bone. Proximally and distally to the break, bone forms directly by intramembranous ossification within the periosteum and endosteum. In contrast, in stable fractures healing occurs exclusively via intramembranous ossification 3. However, the specific mechanisms that regulate the switch between these two processes are unknown. There is evidence that stem cell fate in response to the mechanical environment is controlled genetically and can be altered. In mice that lack Mmp9 cartilage forms in the fracture site of stable fractures suggesting that Mmp9 is involved in stem cell fate decisions during fracture repair 5. Cartilage can also be induced to form in stable fractures if the Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway is activated during fracture repair 8,9. In order to draw these conclusions providing rigid stabilization during the early stages of healing is important, because these stem cell fate decisions are made during the first few days after injury11.

    Our method of external fixation, when applied correctly can be used to stabilize bone to assess intramembranous ossification during fracture healing. Our method creates a fracture along with other limb injuries that occur in a high velocity impact. In contrast, drill hole models that are used to assess intramembranous ossification may not reflect trauma in patients. Further, the method described here is closed, so complications associated with an open injury do not confound interpretation of the outcomes. Another common method for stabilization uses placement of an intramedullary pin prior to fracture (e.g.4). This technique is widely used, and placement of the pin is simple and efficient. While this approach produces lateral stabilization it does not provide for rotational stability. The resulting injury heals primarily via endochondral ossification which can be achieved without stabilization at all 3. Plated fixation has also been used to achieve fracture stabilization in mice 15. Here an open fracture is created and specially designed internal fixators are attached to the bone after an osteotomy is made. Similar to our approach the internal fixation method provides stability and healing occurs via intramembranous ossification. We do not observe significant complications, pin-tract infections, or other co-morbidities associated with this procedure, and the animals are able to move around their cages easily. The major drawbacks are in the length of time it takes to become proficient at this method, the time it takes to complete the procedure, and the requirement for teams of two individuals to perform the procedure. In combination with genetic or physiologic manipulations to the mice, comparing stabilized to non-stabilized fracture healing provides considerable insight into the mechanisms that regulate stem cell fate during fracture healing 5, and has allowed an investigation of distraction osteogenesis14 while also providing us with a model of non-union13.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    We have nothing to disclose.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was funded by R01-AR053645 from NIAMS.

    Materials

    Name Company Catalog Number Comments
    0.25mm insect pin Fine Science Tools 26000-25 Blacked Anodized Steel, 0.25mm rod diameter, 4cm length
    Stainless Steel Hex Nut Small Parts, Inc. #2-56 1/8" length, 56 threads per inch
    Stainless Steel Hex Nut Small Parts, Inc. #0-80 1/8" length, 80 threads per inch
    Stainless Steel Machine Screw Small Parts, Inc. #0-80 1/8" length, 80 threads per inch
    Stainless Steel Machine Cut Threaded Rod Small Parts, Inc. #0-80 6" length, 80 threads per inch
    18-8 Stainless Steel Head Machine Screw McMaster-Carr 2-56 Threads, 3/6" length
    External Fixation Device Machine shop Custom-designed

    References

    1. Ilizarov, G.A., Lediaev, V.I., & Shitin, V.P. The course of compact bone reparative regeneration in distraction osteosynthesis under different conditions of bone fragment fixation (experimental study). Eksperimentalnaia Khirurgiia i Anesteziologiia. 14, 3-12 (1969).
    2. Ilizarov, G.A. & Deviatov, A.A. Surgical elongation of the leg. Ortopediia Travmatologiia i Protezirovanie. 32, 20-25 (1971).
    3. Thompson, Z., Miclau, T., Hu, D., & Helms, J.A. A model for intramembranous ossification during fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 20, 1091-1098 (2002).
    4. Bonnarens, F. & Einhorn, T.A. Production of a standard closed fracture in laboratory animal bone. J. Orthop. Res. 2, 97-101 (1984).
    5. Colnot, C., Thompson, Z., Miclau, T., Werb, Z., & Helms, J.A. Altered fracture repair in the absence of MMP9. Development. 130, 4123-4133 (2003).
    6. Lange, J., et al. Action of IL-1beta during fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 28, 778-784, doi:10.1002/jor.21061 (2010).
    7. Xing, Z., et al. Multiple roles for CCR2 during fracture healing. Dis. Model Mech. 3, 451-458, doi:dmm.003186 [pii] 10.1242/dmm.003186 (2010).
    8. Lu, C., et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 enhances fracture healing in an ischemic environment. J. Orthop. Res., doi:10.1002/jor.21033 (2009).
    9. Yu, Y.Y., Lieu, S., Lu, C., & Colnot, C. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 stimulates endochondral ossification by regulating periosteal cell fate during bone repair. Bone. 47, 65-73, doi:S8756-3282(10)00526-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.012 (2010).
    10. Lu, C., Miclau, T., Hu, D., & Marcucio, R.S. Ischemia leads to delayed union during fracture healing: a mouse model. J. Orthop. Res. 25, 51-61 (2007).
    11. Miclau, T., et al. Effects of delayed stabilization on fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 25, 1552-1558, doi:10.1002/jor.20435 (2007).
    12. Tay, B.K., Le, A.X., Gould, S.E., & Helms, J.A. Histochemical and molecular analyses of distraction osteogenesis in a mouse model. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 16, 636-642 (1998).
    13. Choi, P., Ogilvie, C., Thompson, Z., Miclau, T., & Helms, J.A. Cellular and molecular characterization of a murine non-union model. J. Orthop. Res. 22, 1100-1107 (2004).
    14. Buckwalter, J.A., E.T., Marsh, L.J. In: Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults., Heckman, J.D. & Bucholz, R.W., ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins., 245-271 (2001).
    15. Garcia, P., et al. The LockingMouseNail-A New Implant for Standardized Stable Osteosynthesis in Mice. J. Surg. Res., doi:S0022-4804(09)01270-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.713 (2009).

    Comments

    0 Comments

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter