Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School
Yoshihara, M. Simultaneous Recording of Calcium Signals from Identified Neurons and Feeding Behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Vis. Exp. (62), e3625, doi:10.3791/3625 (2012).
To study neuronal networks in terms of their function in behavior, we must analyze how neurons operate when each behavioral pattern is generated. Thus, simultaneous recordings of neuronal activity and behavior are essential to correlate brain activity to behavior. For such behavioral analyses, the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, allows us to incorporate genetically encoded calcium indicators such as GCaMP1, to monitor neuronal activity, and to use sophisticated genetic manipulations for optogenetic or thermogenetic techniques to specifically activate identified neurons2-5. Use of a thermogenetic technique has led us to find critical neurons for feeding behavior (Flood et al., under revision). As a main part of feeding behavior, a Drosophila adult extends its proboscis for feeding6 (proboscis extension response; PER), responding to a sweet stimulus from sensory cells on its proboscis or tarsi. Combining the protocol for PER7 with a calcium imaging technique8 using GCaMP3.01, 9, I have established an experimental system, where we can monitor activity of neurons in the feeding center – the suboesophageal ganglion (SOG), simultaneously with behavioral observation of the proboscis. I have designed an apparatus ("Fly brain Live Imaging and Electrophysiology Stage": "FLIES") to accommodate a Drosophila adult, allowing its proboscis to freely move while its brain is exposed to the bath for Ca2+ imaging through a water immersion lens. The FLIES is also appropriate for many types of live experiments on fly brains such as electrophysiological recording or time lapse imaging of synaptic morphology. Because the results from live imaging can be directly correlated with the simultaneous PER behavior, this methodology can provide an excellent experimental system to study information processing of neuronal networks, and how this cellular activity is coupled to plastic processes and memory.
1. Constructing the FLIES
2. Preparing the Fly for Observation
3. Ca2+ Imaging of the Brain
4. Stimulating the Proboscis
5. Representative Results
Motor neurons of the rostrum protractor, a pair of major muscles responsible for lifting the rostrum for proboscis extension, have been reported to show robust responses to sweet stimuli13. Figure 9 shows Ca2+ signals through GCaMP3.01, 9 expressed by a Gal 4 driver, E4913, from a cell body of the motor neuron. As shown in the video, a robust PER was observed in synchrony with an increase in Ca2+ signal.
Figure 1. Schematic of the Fly brain Live Imaging and Electrophysiology Stage (FLIES). a, The FLIES is built such that the angle of the wall allows for the fly head to come out straight. Three segments of the fly proboscis are color-coded; the rostrum is magenta. The fly is inserted into the chamber with forceps, and a piece cut from the end of a Pipetman tip is plugged into the back of the chamber to block the fly from escaping. b, The hole is bored to conform to the fly's head. The remaining gaps are sealed with light-curing glue as indicated to ensure that there are no leaks. After the glue has cured, the Pipetman tip as a plug is removed. Saline is poured into the FLIES such that the surface of the brain is completely covered. It should be ensured that there is no saline leaking out onto the anterior end of the fly head. The shaded area surrounded by the dashed line in panel b shows the part to be dissected out.
Figure 2. Photograph of the FLIES. The crescent shaped wall of glue (from a glue gun) is made to control the flow of saline solution during perfusion, and to reduce the amount of saline used.
Figure 3. Frontal view of a fly mounted in the FLIES. This image shows how a fly is set in the FLIES, and how the light-curing glue is applied around the head of the fly (arrows) to create a saline-proof seal. If any saline leaks through to the proboscis of the fly, then the experiment will fail. The thread (arrowheads) tethered to the stage is to hold the proboscis in position, so that it is not completely retracted. Otherwise it would obstruct the more ventral portion of the SOG and cause movement artifacts.
Figure 4. Top-view of the FLIES with a dissected fly. This image shows the exposed SOG of a fly following cuticle removal. The esophagus, Muscle 16 and tracheae connected to the brain, as well as selected air-sacks have also been removed to prevent them from disturbing the brain, which can lead to artifacts in the calcium signals.
Figure 5. The monitoring apparatus. This apparatus is assembled from an Olympus BX51WI microscope attached to a spinning disk confocal microscope system (Improvision), and a side-mounted Nikon SMZ800 microscope. This setup allows for the live-imaging of brain activity during PER behavior.
Figure 6. Photographs to show the side-view of the FLIES. The thin layer of saline solution is sandwiched between the 40X water-immersion lens and the fly.
Figure 7. Schematic for making the Washi paper wick. Gampi-Washi paper is a traditional Japanese parchment that is extremely thin and smooth (Haibara, Japan). It is also very strong and can retain a large amount of liquid. The Washi paper must be cut into a trapezoid with very specific dimensions; 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm in width, and 4-5 mm in length (a). This trapezoid is then inserted from the 0.7 mm side into the tip of a 23 G hypodermic needle and can also be stabilized through the insertion of an insect pin, which is bent to a V-shape (b). c, The Washi paper becomes transparent following exposure to a liquid, making it ideal for this experiment.
Figure 8. Stimulation of the proboscis on the FLIES with the Washi-wick. The Washi paper wick at the tip of a hypodermic needle is applied for an instant using a Joystick manipulator with one hand. The needle is connected through a flexible tube to an injector manipulated with the other hand, for aspirating and discharging sucrose solution.
Figure 9. Representative results. a, PER behavior recorded through the CCD camera installed on the stereomicroscope. Frontal views of a starved fly with an extended proboscis (arrows) before the stimulation, at the stimulation, and after the stimulation with a wick containing 100 mM sucrose aqueous solution (arrowhead). Illumination is accomplished by a 491 nm laser used for GCaMP fluorescence. b, Sucrose-induced GCaMP 3.0 response in the motor neuron for the protractor of rostrum muscle in the starved state. The top panel, before the stimulation; the bottom panel, immediately after the stimulation. Scale bar, 10 μm. c, Quantification of the sucrose-induced GCaMP 3.0 response. The motor neuron responds to a sucrose stimulus by a sharp increase in fluorescence followed by a restoration phase of several seconds to the base line.
The FLIES allows for simultaneous recording of Ca2+ signals and PER behavior. Even with the brain exposed to saline normal PER behavior was observed. Using the Gampi-Washi wick instead of a Kimwipe wick used in the original capillary method7 facilitates a highly reproducible and stable PER behavior and avoids the need to become skilled in making and choosing a good Kimwipe wick. The experimental tips stated above allowed us to successfully avoid disturbances by movement of the proboscis, leading to a very stable recording of Ca2+ signals with low noise. Occasionally, tissue removal was not sufficient to expose cells or suppress movement adequately, leading to poor results. However, once we were skilled, more than 80 % of preparations produced good results. This methodology is not only for Ca2+ imaging, but can also be adapted to any live imaging while observing PER behavior. For example, we can access any cell through the use of an electrode to directly record activity. Combined with two-photon excitation microscopy, we are able to perform time lapse imaging of synaptic structure, which can be related to behavioral changes. Therefore, this method of brain imaging with behavioral observation is not only valuable for the functional dissection of the neuronal network, but could be used as a powerful tool to correlate synaptic plasticity14 to the mechanisms behind memory.
I have nothing to disclose.
I thank L Watanabe, M Gorczyca and other members of the Yoshihara lab for useful comments and discussion. I thank K. Scott and L. Looger for fly stocks, S Yokoyama for demonstrating experiments, Shinya Iguchi for technical help, and Nobuko Yoshihara for material information. This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grants MH85958, and the Worcester Foundation to M.Y.
|Tetric EvoFlow||Ivoclar vivadent||M04115||Light-curing glue|
|BX51WI Microscope||Olympus Corporation||BX51WI||With 40X (N.A. 0.8) water immersion objective lens|
|Spinning disk confocal microscope system||PerkinElmer, Inc.||With 491 nm laser|
|Stereomicroscope||Nikon Instruments||SMZ-800||Attached to a swing arm. Stereo view is still available with video recording|
|Gampi-Washi paper||Haibara, Japan||A special kind of traditional Japanese paper|
|CCD camera||Imaging Source||DFK41AU02||1/2" 1080 × 960 pixels SONY CCD|
|Joystick manipulator||Narishige International||MN-151|