Flanker Task Paradigm
Flanker Task Paradigm - Related Videos
06:43
The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
0 Views •
Cited by 22 •
2013
We demonstrate how an objective measure can be employed in the widely employed rubber hand illusion paradigm. This measure is obtained by modifying the well-established crossmodal congruency task. This task allows the investigation of multisensory processes which are critical for modulations of body representations as in the rubber hand illusion.
06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
0 Views •
2017
This protocol was designed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals (e.g., an abstract thinking goal) using the task interruption and resumption paradigm. The protocol is suitable for cognitive goals that are automatically pursued once activated, as the distraction procedure prevents goal pursuit during the interruption period.
13:18
Conducting Concurrent Electroencephalography and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Recordings with a Flanker Task
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2020
The present protocol describes how to perform concurrent EEG and fNIRS recordings and how to inspect the relationship between the EEG and fNIRS...
09:15
Creating the Minimal Group Paradigm
0 Views •
2023
Source: Julian Wills & Jay Van Bavel—New York University The study of intergroup relations, such as prejudice, conflict, and discrimination, has always been a central topic in social psychology. Does discrimination stem from competition with other groups, a history of conflict, or derogatory stereotypes? Despite an abundance of real-world examples, the ingredients that lead to intergroup discrimination are often unclear. To help solve this problem, a group of psychologists created "minimal...
08:22
Decision-making and the Iowa Gambling Task
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratories of Jonas T. Kaplan and Sarah I. Gimbel—University of Southern California Decision-making is an important component of human executive function, in which a choice about a course of action or cognition is made from many possibilities. Damage to the inferior parts of the frontal lobes can affect a person's ability to make good decisions. However, while decision-making deficits can have a large impact on one's life, these deficits can be difficult to quantify in the laboratory.
FAQs
On incongruent trials, the target and surrounding flankers activate competing response information. Selecting the response associated with the target therefore requires resolving that conflict during action selection. The resulting increase in reaction time and possible accuracy reduction provides a behavioral indication of how strongly distracting information disrupts response control.
The congruency effect is obtained by comparing performance on congruent and incongruent trials. A larger difference in reaction time or accuracy indicates greater behavioral impact from conflicting flankers, whereas a smaller difference indicates less measured interference under the tested conditions. This comparison focuses analysis on distraction-related change rather than overall speed or accuracy alone.
Selective attention helps prioritize the central target, while response inhibition helps prevent surrounding, conflicting information from driving the response. Cognitive control coordinates these demands when target and flankers disagree. Examining performance under this conflict therefore links observable behavior with several interacting control processes rather than treating attention as a single ability.
A basic implementation presents a central target with surrounding flankers and varies whether the flankers are congruent or incongruent. Participants respond to the target while ignoring the surrounding items. Researchers then record reaction time and accuracy for the relevant trial types and compare them to quantify the behavioral cost associated with conflicting flankers.
Separate reaction-time and accuracy outcomes help distinguish different performance patterns. A participant may respond more slowly when flankers conflict, make more errors, or show both effects. Comparing these outcomes across congruency conditions gives researchers a profile of interference processing and response control, rather than a single undifferentiated measure of task success.
The paradigm provides clear, comparable performance measures for examining attention, executive function, decision-making, and cognitive control. Researchers can use congruency-related changes to study developmental or clinical differences in behavior, as well as general laboratory and applied questions. Its value comes from connecting a simple response task with measurable variation in how people handle distracting information.