Nadph Imaging
Nadph Imaging - Related Videos
10:42
Bioluminescence Imaging of NADPH Oxidase Activity in Different Animal Models
0 Views •
Cited by 16 •
2012
NADPH oxidase is the major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in phagocytes. Because of the ephemeral nature of ROS, it is difficult to measure and monitor ROS levels in living animals. A minimally invasive method for serial quantification of ROS in living mice is described.
13:45
Hybrid µCT-FMT imaging and image analysis
0 Views •
Cited by 34 •
2015
We describe a protocol for hybrid imaging, combining fluorescence-mediated tomography (FMT) with micro computed tomography (µCT). After fusion and reconstruction, we perform interactive organ segmentation to extract quantitative measurements of the fluorescence distribution.
12:42
Imaging the Neutrophil Phagosome and Cytoplasm Using a Ratiometric pH Indicator
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2017
This manuscript describes a simple method to measure the phagosomal pH and area as well as the cytoplasmic pH of human and mouse neutrophils using the ratiometric indicator seminaphthorhodafluor (SNARF)-1, or S-1. This is achieved using live-cell confocal fluorescence microscopy and image analysis.
09:08
Multiple-mouse Neuroanatomical Magnetic Resonance Imaging
0 Views •
Cited by 59 •
2011
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an increasingly popular tool for examining the phenotype of genetically altered mice. This article illustrates the methods necessary to achieve high-throughput phenotyping of genetically altered mice using multiple-mouse MRI.
06:46
Non-invasive In Vivo Fluorescence Optical Imaging of Inflammatory MMP Activity Using an Activatable Fluorescent Imaging Agent
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2017
This paper explains the application of fluorescent imaging using an activatable optical imaging probe to visualize the in vivo activity of key matrix metalloproteinases in two different experimental models of inflammation.
FAQs
The signal can be interpreted in relation to both NADPH abundance and its protein-binding state. Measuring fluorescence intensity provides a spatial and temporal readout, while fluorescence lifetime measurements add information that can help distinguish changes associated with binding. This distinction matters because bioengineers can examine not only where reduced cofactor is present, but also how its cellular state changes.
Intensity and lifetime measurements provide complementary views of the same endogenous signal. Intensity can be used to follow spatial distribution and changes over time, whereas lifetime measurements are particularly useful when the protein-binding state is relevant. Using both readouts can make interpretation more informative than relying on a single measurement, especially when comparing engineered cells or living tissues.
NADPH supports cellular biosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and redox regulation, so its imaging pattern can connect metabolic activity with cellular redox condition. In bioengineering, this makes the readout useful for examining whether cells maintain a favorable biochemical state, experience oxidative stress, or respond differently after engineering. These observations can guide interpretation of engineered-cell performance.
Because the method uses the cofactor’s intrinsic fluorescence, imaging can be carried out without introducing an external probe. Measurements are collected from living cultures or tissues, and the resulting fluorescence intensity, lifetime, or both can be analyzed to map distribution and dynamics. This approach supports observation of cellular states in their biological setting rather than requiring a separately labeled indicator.
Quantitative measurements can help assess metabolic activity, oxidative stress, and cell viability by tracking NADPH-related signal patterns. They can also reveal how engineered cells perform under a bioengineering design. These outcomes are valuable because the same imaging framework links intracellular redox-related information with practical questions about whether a construct, culture, or tissue is functioning as intended.
Bioengineers can use it to support biosensor development, evaluate tissue-engineering systems, and optimize metabolic or therapeutic designs. In each case, imaging supplies quantitative information about cofactor distribution and dynamics in living cultures or tissues. That information can help compare designs, monitor cell performance, and identify whether an engineered system achieves its intended metabolic or redox-related behavior.