Degas Samples
Degas Samples - Related Videos
07:55
An All-in-one Sample Holder for Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography with Minimal Background Scattering
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2019
A novel sample holder for macromolecular X-ray crystallography along with a suitable handling protocol is presented. The system allows crystal growth, crystal soaking and in situ diffraction data collection at both, ambient and cryogenic temperature without the need of any crystal manipulation or mounting.
11:16
A Microfluidic Chip for ICPMS Sample Introduction
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2015
We present a discrete droplet sample introduction system for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS). It is based on a cheap and disposable microfluidic chip that generates highly monodisperse droplets in a size range of 40−60 µm at frequencies from 90 to 7,000 Hz.
01:18
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
0 Views •
2024
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas. Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
10:16
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
0 Views •
Cited by 186 •
2016
The protocol below describes the methodology for: microplastics sampling on the sea surface, separation of microplastic and chemical identification of particles. This protocol is in line with the recommendations for microplastics monitoring published by the MSFD Technical Subgroup on Marine Litter.
01:21
Sample Design
0 Views •
2024
Effective sampling is crucial for ensuring that research results are accurate and applicable. The process starts by identifying the target population, such as regular coffee shop visitors interested in trying new drinks. Clearly defining this group helps focus the study on gathering relevant data from the right people. The next step involves creating a sampling frame, which is a detailed and current list of everyone in the target group. An accurate sampling frame is essential to avoid missing...
FAQs
Reduced pressure encourages gases dissolved in the solution to leave the liquid phase, helping release oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide before analysis or experimental use. This approach is useful when gas content could create bubbles or change measurement conditions. Careful handling afterward remains important because the treated sample can reabsorb gases from its surroundings.
Sonication and inert-gas sparging provide alternatives to reduced pressure for releasing dissolved gases. Sonication uses acoustic treatment, whereas sparging passes an inert gas through the sample. The suitable choice depends on the biological solution and the risk of disturbing it, because degassing should reduce gas-related interference without compromising sample handling or experimental consistency.
Removing dissolved gases is only useful if the sample remains sufficiently degassed during subsequent handling. Exposure to surrounding air can allow gases to re-enter the solution, reducing the benefit of preparation. Limiting reabsorption helps preserve more consistent reaction conditions and supports reproducible pipetting, chromatography, and instrument measurements.
A basic workflow is to identify whether dissolved gases may affect the experiment, select reduced pressure, sonication, or inert-gas sparging, and treat the solution carefully. Afterward, minimize handling that could disturb the sample or promote reabsorption, then proceed with the intended analysis or experiment. The exact conditions should reflect the solution and measurement requirements.
Degassing is especially relevant when bubbles could interfere with fluidic operation or produce inconsistent liquid handling. Removing dissolved gases can reduce bubble formation in fluidic systems and improve the consistency of pipetting. It can also support more reliable chromatography, where gas-related disturbances may affect how samples move through the analytical workflow.
Degassed samples can benefit optical, electrochemical, and biochemical measurements when dissolved gases would interfere with the measurement or alter reaction conditions. The preparation step may also improve experimental reproducibility by making gas content more consistent between samples. Its value is greatest when bubbles, gas-sensitive reactions, or variable dissolved-gas levels could influence the outcome.