Saturation Transfer Difference
Saturation Transfer Difference - Related Videos
11:44
Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR (SSTD NMR): A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2016
A detailed protocol describing the SSTD NMR method is presented here to help new users apply this new method to obtain the kinetic parameters of their own systems undergoing chemical exchange.
01:59
Solution Equilibrium and Saturation
0 Views •
2020
Imagine adding a small amount of sugar to a glass of water, stirring until all the sugar has dissolved, and then adding a bit more. You can repeat this process until the sugar concentration of the solution reaches its natural limit, a limit determined primarily by the relative strengths of the solute-solute, solute-solvent, and solvent-solvent attractive forces. You can be certain that you have reached this limit because, no matter how long you stir the solution, undissolved sugar remains. The...
07:30
Just-noticeable Differences
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University Psychophysics is a branch of psychology and neuroscience that tries to explain how physical quantities are translated into neural firing and mental representations of magnitude. One set of questions in this area pertains to just-noticeable differences (JND): How much does something need to change in order for the change to be perceivable? To pump intuitions about this, consider the fact that small children grow at an enormous...
08:19
Patterning via Optical Saturable Transitions - Fabrication and Characterization
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2014
We report that the diffraction limit of conventional optical lithography can be overcome by exploiting the transitions of organic photochromic derivatives induced by their photoisomerization at low light intensities.1-3 This paper outlines our fabrication technique and two locking mechanisms, namely: dissolution of one photoisomer and electrochemical oxidation.
09:34
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2013
Differential sperm competitive ability among Drosophila males with distinct genotypes can be ascertained through double-mating experiments. Each of these experiments involves one of the males of interest and a reference male. Readily identifiable markers in the progeny allow inference of the fraction of individuals fathered by each male.
FAQs
The key mechanistic step is selective radiofrequency irradiation of resonances belonging to the target biomolecule. Saturation spreads through that molecule and can cross the intermolecular contact to a ligand during its temporary bound state through nuclear Overhauser effects. The ligand then carries detectable changes, allowing interaction-related signals to emerge after spectral comparison.
Transient binding can still permit magnetization transfer before the ligand returns to solution. Because the ligand does not need to remain permanently associated with the biomolecule for affected resonances to appear, STD NMR can reveal interactions that may be difficult to observe with conventional assays. This makes the approach useful for examining weak protein–ligand recognition.
Proton mapping identifies which ligand protons receive the strongest observable transfer from the saturated biomolecule. These affected positions indicate parts of the ligand that contact or approach the binding site during recognition. The resulting pattern helps distinguish interaction-relevant regions within a molecule and can guide interpretation of how ligand structure relates to binding.
The on-resonance spectrum contains effects produced by selective saturation of the target biomolecule, whereas the off-resonance spectrum provides a comparison without that targeted irradiation. Subtracting the two spectra emphasizes ligand signals influenced by magnetization transfer and suppresses features unrelated to the interaction. This difference spectrum is therefore central to identifying binding-associated resonances.
A typical workflow selects resonances of the target biomolecule for radiofrequency saturation, records spectra under on-resonance and off-resonance conditions, and subtracts the resulting data. Signals appearing in the difference spectrum are then examined for ligand protons affected by transfer. The workflow links spectral changes to transient molecular recognition without requiring direct observation of a stable complex.
STD NMR is particularly valuable for fragment screening, ligand optimization, and structural studies of protein–ligand recognition. It can indicate whether small molecules interact with a larger biomolecule and identify ligand regions involved in contact. Researchers can use these results to prioritize fragments, compare ligand structures, and refine candidates whose binding features warrant further study.