Light Touch Testing
Light Touch Testing - Related Videos
10:10
Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
0 Views •
2026
A protocol for simultaneous recording of visuomotor behavior and brain activity during standard paper-based cognitive tests using an MRI-compatible tablet and eye-tracking technology alongside functional MRI, towards improving the usage of such tests. Preliminary results are presented from a young healthy adult performing a Trail-Making test.
02:26
Responses to Gravity and Touch
0 Views •
2020
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity Higher plants sense gravity using statocytes, cells found near the vascular tissue in shoots, and in the root cap columella in roots. Statocytes contain starch-filled organelles called statoliths. The statoliths settle, or sediment, at the bottom of the statocyte in the direction of gravity. Statolith sedimentation triggers a signaling cascade, resulting in the asymmetrical distribution of the plant hormone auxin across root and shoot tips. This...
02:37
Touch Habituation Assay: A Method to Study Non-Associative Learning in C. elegans
0 Views •
2023
This video introduces the touch habituation assay, a C. elegans behavioral method of assessing mechanosensation and quantifying time to habituation.
09:40
Using Touch-evoked Response and Locomotion Assays to Assess Muscle Performance and Function in Zebrafish
0 Views •
Cited by 78 •
2016
Zebrafish are an excellent model to study muscle function and disease. During early embryogenesis zebrafish begin regular muscle contractions producing rhythmic swimming behavior, which is altered when the muscle is disrupted. Here we describe a touch-evoked response and locomotion assay to examine swimming performance as a measure of muscle function.
02:54
Escape Response Assay: A Method to Study the Response of Zebrafish Larva to Touch Stimuli
0 Views •
2023
This video describes the touch-evoke response assay, which measures the response of the zebrafish larva to touch stimuli.
FAQs
The distribution of reduced or altered detection can help indicate where sensory signaling may be disrupted. Reviewing responses across dermatomes and peripheral nerve territories gives the clinician two anatomical patterns for organizing findings. This approach can make sensory abnormalities more meaningful during neurological assessment and help relate an observed deficit to possible nerve, spinal, or broader neurological involvement.
Testing corresponding areas on both sides provides an internal comparison for the patient’s sensory responses. A difference between sides may reveal an abnormality that could be less apparent when one area is assessed alone. This comparison also helps clinicians describe the extent and distribution of sensory loss more precisely when interpreting the examination.
Reduced or abnormal detection may indicate disruption somewhere along the sensory pathway. The findings can be associated with nerve injury, spinal disorders, or neurological disease, but the pattern across body sides, dermatomes, and peripheral nerve territories supplies important context. Light touch findings therefore contribute to clinical localization and support, rather than replace, broader neurological assessment.
A clinician commonly uses cotton or a soft filament to apply gentle contact to corresponding body areas. The patient reports when contact is felt and identifies where it occurred. The clinician then compares responses across both sides and reviews relevant dermatomes and peripheral nerve territories, recording differences that may indicate altered sensation.
The examination can show whether gentle contact is detected consistently and whether responses differ by location or body side. Organizing these findings by dermatomes and peripheral nerve territories helps describe the distribution of sensory loss. That distribution can support diagnostic evaluation by suggesting whether an abnormality has a localized or broader pattern.
Repeated examinations allow clinicians to compare sensory responses over time rather than relying only on a single assessment. Changes in the areas or degree of detected contact may help monitor an abnormality and evaluate recovery. This longitudinal use is relevant when tracking sensory findings associated with nerve injury, spinal disorders, or neurological disease.