Erratum: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

2023年3月17日

本文内容

摘要

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated.

摘要

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated from:

Delivery outcomes chart comparing cesarean, eutocic, instrumented births; data 2014-2018.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

to:

Delivery mode comparison chart: cesarean, eutocic, instrumented, ECV success 2014-2018 percentages.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

披露

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
No conflicts of interest declared.

重印与许可

申请许可以重复使用本 JoVE 文章的文本或图表

申请许可

标签

External Cephalic VersionECV ProcedureDelivery OutcomesChi squared TestFigure UpdateObstetric InterventionBreech PresentationMaternal Fetal MedicineClinical Trial CorrectionData Visualization