Chloroform Fumigation
Chloroform Fumigation - Related Videos
09:04
Assessment of Labile Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sequential Fumigation Incubation Procedures
0 Views •
Cited by 4 •
2016
Labile organic carbon (LOC) and the potential carbon turnover rate are sensitive indicators of changes in soil nutrient cycling processes. Details are provided for a method based on fumigating and incubating soil in a series of cycles and using the CO2 accumulated during the incubation periods to estimate these parameters.
08:58
Procedures of Laboratory Fumigation for Pest Control with Nitric Oxide Gas
0 Views •
Cited by 12 •
2017
This paper describes nitric oxide (NO) fumigation protocols for postharvest pest control. Fumigation chambers are flushed with nitrogen (N2) to establish ultralow oxygen conditions before NO is injected. At the end, chambers are flushed with N2 to dilute NO before exposing products to ambient air to prevent exposure to NO2.
12:32
Colletotrichum fioriniae Development in Water and Chloroform-based Blueberry and Cranberry Floral Extracts
0 Views •
2019
Here, bioassays designed to monitor the development of a fungal pathogen, Colletotrichum fioriniae, in the presence of blueberry or cranberry floral extracts on glass coverslips are described. Water-, chloroform-, and field rainwater- based floral extraction techniques are detailed as well as insight into how this information can be applied.
07:11
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
0 Views •
Cited by 21 •
2019
The traditional soil-sampling procedure determines the number of soil samples arbitrarily. Here, we provide a simple yet efficient clustered soil-sampling design to demonstrate soil spatial heterogeneity and quantitatively determine the number of soil samples required and the associated sampling accuracy.
06:01
Testing the Physiological Barriers to Viral Transmission in Aphids Using Microinjection
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2008
Aphids are effective transmitters of plant viruses. Aphid microinjection of virus, the procedure we will show you today, is a technique allowing researchers to inject virus directly into the hemocoel of the aphid, bypassing the gut, one of the 2 major barriers for virus transmission in a circulative manner. The same technique is also used to inject dsRNA for RNAi.
FAQs
An unfumigated control provides the comparison needed to interpret material released after treatment. Researchers measure extractable carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus in both samples and examine the difference associated with fumigation. This comparison helps distinguish pools exposed by microbial-cell disruption from nutrients already extractable without treatment, strengthening estimates of microbial biomass and related nutrient pools.
Chloroform vapor penetrates the sample and disrupts microbial membranes, causing cells to lyse. That physical damage makes intracellular material accessible for subsequent extraction, rather than leaving it confined within intact cells. The released carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus can then be measured as indicators of microbial biomass and nutrient pools in the environmental sample.
Sealing the fumigation setup is important because the method depends on retaining chloroform vapor around the sample. A contained environment supports contact between the vapor and the material, while also limiting uncontrolled release of a volatile hazardous chemical. The quality of the resulting biomass or nutrient estimate therefore depends on both effective exposure and controlled laboratory conditions.
A basic workflow begins by exposing an environmental sample to chloroform vapor in sealed equipment. After fumigation, researchers extract the material released from disrupted microbial cells, measuring carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus. They perform the same extraction on an unfumigated sample and compare the results. This sequence links sample treatment to estimates of microbial biomass and nutrient pools.
The technique can provide estimates of microbial biomass alongside released carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus pools. Those measurements allow investigators to examine microbial communities in relation to decomposition and nutrient cycling, rather than treating soil chemistry as disconnected from living microbial material. Comparing treated and untreated samples also supports interpretation of changes across environmental conditions.
In environmental studies, chloroform fumigation helps connect microbial measurements with ecosystem processes. Researchers can use the resulting biomass and nutrient-pool estimates to investigate soil microbial communities, decomposition, and nutrient cycling, as well as ecosystem responses to environmental change. Its value lies in linking microbial cell contents with broader questions about how environmental systems process and redistribute nutrients.
Because chloroform is volatile and hazardous, fumigation requires more than the exposure step itself. Researchers should use sealed equipment, handle the chemical carefully, provide appropriate ventilation, and manage waste responsibly. These controls reduce uncontrolled vapor release and support safe sample processing, while preserving the contained conditions needed for a consistent comparison between fumigated and unfumigated samples.